Sparrowhawk v Kayenta - correction
2007-02-01 by Richard Smallfield
Hi, apologies: I mistakenly printed the Kayenta print in QTR Grey Lab icc, not QTR Grey Matte Paper icc as I d done with the Sparrowhawk print. So. The result
Messages
Browse messages
Page 526 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
Sparrowhawk v Kayenta
2007-02-01 by Richard Smallfield
Hi, I got a box of A4 Hawkmountain Sparrowhawk and, as I do when I get a new paper, I printed a QTR calibration page. Without a Spectro, the 100% black looked
Re: Just Starting
2007-02-01 by Clayton Jones
Hello Jason, ... Ok, you ll need a 13 printer. My recommendation right now is to get an Epson. IMO they still offer the greatest versatility (can use a wide
test
2007-02-01 by Tom Baker
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: Just Starting
2007-01-31 by jason_copple
Clayton, In answer to your questions, I think at most 11x14 prints, that s as large as I blow up 35mm and they would be strictly B+W. As for glossy or matte
Re: Just Starting
2007-01-31 by Clayton Jones
Jason, Sorry, never mind question #5. I forgot you said your Photoshop skills are good. Regards, Clayton Info on black and white digital printing at
Re: Just Starting
2007-01-31 by Clayton Jones
Hello Jason, ... There are lots of good options, but it depends on what you want to do. Maybe if you could answer a few basic questions it would help us know
Re: Just Starting
2007-01-31 by jason_copple
Thanks Clayton, I ve read both of the articles you ve mentioned and they were very helpful. In answer to your note I haven t purchased any equipment for output
Re: Just Starting
2007-01-31 by Clayton Jones
Hello Jason, ... Welcome to the forum, you have come to the right place for BW printing. You haven t told us whether you have purchased a printer and inks
Re: [Digital BW] Epson R2400 Hardware failure: The bad and the good
2007-01-31 by Keith Zimmerman
My new printer was delivered today. 6 day turnaround from when the bad one was shipped to Epson. Amazing. Now, back to my paper testing. keith
RE: [Digital BW] Re: innova f-type glossy
2007-01-31 by Eric Neilsen
Sorry, should read, It may not be. Eric Neilsen Photography 4101 Commerce Street Suite 9 Dallas, TX 75226 http://e.neilsen.home.att.net
RE: [Digital BW] Re: innova f-type glossy
2007-01-31 by Eric Neilsen
I may not be a need but a preferred look. I d not rush to the GD or Bronzing as a factor unless they said so. Did I miss that? Eric Neilsen Photography 4101
Re: [Digital BW] Re: innova f-type glossy
2007-01-30 by Carl Schofield
I also see no objectionable GD or bronzing using MIS K4 inks in an Epson 4000 (CB X-Photo RIP). No need for spraying this paper.
Re: innova f-type glossy
2007-01-30 by David Keenan
... Maybe it s a difference in work flow, printer, or ink, but I see no need for any overcoat spray on the over 60 prints that I have made recently for a
Re: [Digital BW] Re: B/W Filters
2007-01-30 by Tom Baker
I ve heard most of their lines by now. Including reloading your operating system will solve the problem . Unfortunately, the output from the NEF coverter is
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Light source for evaluating prints?
2007-01-30 by Paul Roark
... See http://www.cgs.de/news/whitepapers/WP0511_OpticalBrighteners.pdf for an interesting article on optical brighteners. Paul www.PaulRoark.com
Re: Epson R340 with MIS UT-R2 Inkset Experiences
2007-01-30 by Seth
Try this (Photoshop again). Image Adjustments Shadow/Highlight. Now move all the shadow and highlight sliders to the left so they do not affect anything. Use
Re: B/W Filters
2007-01-30 by Seth
Boy, there s a shock!! You mean you spent more money to convert a NEF file after buying a $5000 camera and they don t have any tech that knows how to help?
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Light source for evaluating prints?
2007-01-30 by CDTobie@aol.com
... You may be a bit late, but please send your input to IPA Standards committee members David McDowell of Eastman Kodak , and Larry Warter
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Light source for evaluating prints?
2007-01-30 by CDTobie@aol.com
... OBAs (optical brightening agents) are sometimes called UV brighteners, but in fact they brighten even when no UV is present, as they react to blue visible
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Light source for evaluating prints?
2007-01-30 by Eric Neilsen
Perhaps, I didn t use enough language here, but some of us do get it. Eric Neilsen Photography 4101 Commerce Street Suite 9 Dallas, TX 75226
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Light source for evaluating prints?
2007-01-30 by Eric Vogel
Yes, and quite interesting in terms of interpreting color intent in historic paintings. -- Indeed. papers with artificial brighteners may look quite similar to
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Light source for evaluating prints?
2007-01-30 by Eric Neilsen
Maybe we need new standards. Eric Eric Neilsen Photography 4101 Commerce Street Suite 9 Dallas, TX 75226 http://e.neilsen.home.att.net
Re: [Digital BW] Re: innova f-type glossy
2007-01-30 by Douglas Meeuwsen
When I said cheap i was simply refering to the similarity of the surface to that of the old epson Cheap glossy photo paper. This is a diferent paper than
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Light source for evaluating prints?
2007-01-30 by CDTobie@aol.com
... Yes, and quite interesting in terms of interpreting color intent in historic paintings. It has a factor more directly related to this list as well: papers
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Light source for evaluating prints?
2007-01-30 by Eric Vogel
Thanks David. Wasn t really suggesting (cold) north light as a good source for these purposes, but it is significant historically. ... From: CDTobie@aol.com
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Light source for evaluating prints? (off topic)
2007-01-30 by CDTobie@aol.com
... The only misinformation (note my more polite choice of terms here) on this topic that I have noticed has been your statement that there is no lighting
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Light source for evaluating prints? (off topic)
2007-01-30 by Gary Brown
I must apologize for this off topic rant. I m getting tired of self promoting expertise. You missed the entire point of my post.
Re: MISPro ink with Epson 2200
2007-01-30 by Roger
I just got MISPRO inks for my R220 and am waiting for new profiles for it as they differ enough from the Epson inks to need custom profiles. No issues with
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Light source for evaluating prints?
2007-01-30 by CDTobie@aol.com
... Not regarding display lighting; but regarding proofing lighting, you will find that digital signage uses the same standards as graphic design and digital
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Light source for evaluating prints?
2007-01-30 by Gary Brown
Whoa! I can t speak with authority for Fine Art or Placemats, but I was an architectural signage designer for 15 years and can tell you there was no industry
Re: Light source for evaluating prints?
2007-01-30 by michael3442
David, while these preferred color temps are on the warm end, they do not appear to be a holdover as you suggest. The linked studies are very interesting in
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Light source for evaluating prints?
2007-01-30 by CDTobie@aol.com
... There are actually tools built into PrintFIX PRO for previewing and adjusting images to the light color and light quantity in the actual display location,
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Light source for evaluating prints?
2007-01-30 by CDTobie@aol.com
... North light, in low tech times, was a good source of broadspectrum, consistant light... but it is VERY cool, 9300k on average. So its a poor choice for
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Light source for evaluating prints?
2007-01-30 by CDTobie@aol.com
... All three, plus digital imaging in general, fall under the D50 standard, which is also the standard defined in ICC profiles. So it simplifies ICC profile
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Light source for evaluating prints?
2007-01-30 by Steve Clark
... I haven t read this whole thread so forgive me if this has been covered but color temp is just one component of the equation. As important, especially with
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Light source for evaluating prints?
2007-01-30 by Eric Vogel
Lots of good advice on lighting, but I want to add a comment on process. Painters have long favored northern light as it is considered cold and consistent
Re: innova f-type glossy
2007-01-30 by David Keenan
All my exhibition prints are on this paper. Love it. Even a $4 per sheet (for 13x19 ). Dave. -- Web Site: www.david-keenan.com 2007 PAW:
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Light source for evaluating prints?
2007-01-30 by Eric Neilsen
Yes, and what industry is that? Signage, Fine art, placemats? I think this list is a fine art dedicated list. There may be some that are general use but for
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Light source for evaluating prints?
2007-01-30 by CDTobie@aol.com
... This is a tiny range on the warm end of things. Graphic Arts (which now included digital photography) is standardized at 5000k; Textile at 6500k. The low
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Light source for evaluating prints?
2007-01-30 by CDTobie@aol.com
... Discussions of a viewing box don t relate to cross checking your prints under varying lightsources (which is certainly appropriate) they relate to using a
RE: [Digital BW] Re: MISPro ink with Epson 2200
2007-01-30 by Ian McLanaghan
Epson Archival Matte is available in UK. It appears names differ for same papers across the globe. Does anyone know of a deffinitve guide for Epson papers
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Light source for evaluating prints?
2007-01-30 by Ernst Dinkla
... Preferred color temperature for viewing art work isn t as fixed as suggested. But if musea prefer lower illumination levels to keep fading etc low then the
RE: [Digital BW] B/W Filters
2007-01-30 by Mike Johnston
Or http://tinyurl.com/23en42 Mike J. ... From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of
Piezography NK7 for BO on r800
2007-01-30 by lscaglio2002
Hello| is it possible to print BO on the r800 (with tha Japan driver) using the matte Piezography NK7? Thanks for sharing! Luca
Re: Light source for evaluating prints?
2007-01-30 by michael3442
After raising this issue with my first post, I ve been doing a little research. It appears there is a preferred color temperature for viewing color artwork and
RE: [Digital BW] B/W Filters
2007-01-30 by Eric Neilsen
If I need to adjust specific colors to a particular density, I do just that. It was shown to me 4 years or so back at a workshop that I set up for Dan
Re: [Digital BW] B/W Filters
2007-01-30 by craig
Basically, in the end, all of the colour to B&W conversion applications are more or less the same; they use variations in the colour channels to shift
Re: +++ 3 spaces in current exchange open ++++
2007-01-30 by Philip Schwartz
Tom: What constitutes a set ? Is that 14 copies of *one* print, or 14 copies of multiple prints?
Just Starting
2007-01-30 by jason_copple
Hi Everyone, After years of wet darkroom work I ve just made the jump to digital. Where should I begin in terms of output. My photoshop skills are good, I ve