Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Messages

Browse messages

Page 555 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched

Re: [Digital BW] Anti-static devices

2006-12-08 by Earl Olsen

Paul, ... I have been using Brillianize anti-static cleaner on both glass and acrylic galazing (cleaning both sides) before framing my prints for the past

Thread view Attachments: 0

[Digital BW] Re: Profile Confusion

2006-12-08 by Roy Harrington

... The problem with your (1) and (2) is that they both CONVERT from GG2.2 to DD20. This changes all the numbers in the image. What you want is to just

Thread view Attachments: 0

R800 with MIS B&W ink

2006-12-08 by Philip Schwartz

Does anyone have any experience using MIS B&W inks in an Epson R800? I have some UT-R2, UT-FSN, and some other odds and ends that I can play with. Any

Thread view Attachments: 0

[Digital BW] Re: Profile Confusion

2006-12-08 by rgoldman2

First off, I have to tell you all that I really appreciate the explanation and advice this post has generate. Roy, you are correct that the description of my

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Do ICC's work together with ABW?

2006-12-08 by Manuel Toledo Quinones

Dave, I imagine that your profile is based on a test print. If, (1) to produce the test print, you selected the same type of paper that you are using now to

Thread view Attachments: 0

Hahnemühle PhotoRag 188 & 308

2006-12-08 by Jose Usoz

Hello, I am beginning to test with the paper Hahnemühle PhotoRag. I use 188gr. for the tests and 308gr for the final copy. Reading the characteristics of

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Do ICC's work together with ABW?

2006-12-08 by David Keenan

... This all gets complicated in a hurry... I am printing using ABW using ICC profiles I created for the papers I use (albeit color profiles) using PrintFix

Thread view Attachments: 0

[Digital BW] Re: Profile Confusion

2006-12-08 by Roy Harrington

... I think this missing part of this whole discussion is that there are two modes in soft-proofing and they have different results. From you first post I

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Profile Confusion

2006-12-08 by jim kitchen

Your modified image will appear correctly, as it did previously with a gamma 2.2 rendering, by changing your image while working in the Dot Gain 20% profile.

Thread view Attachments: 0

FS: MIS UT-2 ink for 1280/1290

2006-12-07 by Richard

I bought a used 2200 to replace the aging 1280 for B&W work so now I have a couple UT-2 Eboni Black ink cartridges left. I will sell them at 50% off

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Informal Fade Test

2006-12-07 by robert49brake

... while - ... makes a ... The real problem is the leaking shaft seal in the Charger s air conditioning compressor that s been spewing CFCs into the ozone

Thread view Attachments: 0

fool your printer?

2006-12-07 by linsch2

I have some wood veneer samples (from the furniture-making trade), and I d like to try printing on them. They re very small (5.5x8 and 3.5x6 in.), apparently

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Profile Confusion

2006-12-07 by CDTobie@aol.com

... A softproof of one profile to another profile, is a way of saying I haven t converted to this space, but if I did, what would I get? This offers some

Thread view Attachments: 0

[Digital BW] Re: Profile Confusion

2006-12-07 by rgoldman2

But this file, which now has been converted to the DD 20 profile, does not look on screen they way it did when I was soft proofing in DD 20. If I soft proof

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Profile Confusion

2006-12-07 by CDTobie@aol.com

... There should indeed be no change, just as reassigning an sRGB image to AdobeRGB will show no change. It has been accurately recalculated to give the same

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Profile Confusion

2006-12-07 by rgoldman2

-Well, I thought I understood, but i seem to be running in place. I re set my PS color space back to GG 2.2 and opened a new image file. On screen it looks as

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Profile Confusion

2006-12-07 by CDTobie@aol.com

... Yes, that would be fine... as long as your files are tagged (and not incorrectly retagged!). C. David Tobie Product Technology Manager ColorVision Business

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Profile Confusion

2006-12-07 by rgoldman2

-OK, I think I understand what to do now to get the tiff or jpg files into the shape they require. Thanks.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Profile Confusion

2006-12-07 by Clayton Jones

... wrote: CDavid is corect, no need to change your color settings. Just use the Image/Mode/Convert Profile to convert (not assign) the image

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Profile Confusion

2006-12-07 by rgoldman2

Thanks for the guidance and the very good analogy. I gather from your suggestion that it is OK to go back into my PS settings and reset to GG2.2 (?) It seems

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Profile Confusion

2006-12-07 by CDTobie@aol.com

... You are assigning Dot Gain 20%, not converting to it, so the images are (quite appropriately) incorrect. Instead, go to the Edit Convert to Profile

Thread view Attachments: 0

Profile Confusion

2006-12-07 by rgoldman2

I m preparing a web submission of monochrome images, and the submission guidelines require tiff or jpg files with grayscale images saved with an ICC profile of

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Canon iPF 5000 Printer

2006-12-07 by CDTobie@aol.com

... I d heard that as well, but the effect of it I was most concerned about was metameric shift under differing light sources, and I don t find a significant

Thread view Attachments: 0

Do ICC's work together with ABW?

2006-12-07 by Manuel Toledo Quinones

or the epson driver will bypass the ICC when ABW is used? I know the question is basic, but couldn t find an answer in the archives. I tried using an icc

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] Informal Fade Test

2006-12-07 by Ken Carney

OK, I guess it s time for us to park the hole somewhere else for a while - just so long as I can keep my 350hp Charger that goes real fast and makes a cool

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Canon iPF 5000 Printer

2006-12-06 by Roy Harrington

Not really. It s the same basic thing -- as long as we re talking grayscale input and RGB output workflow that you ve used for a long time. An RGB to RGB

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Canon iPF 5000 Printer

2006-12-06 by CDTobie@aol.com

... Well, lets see. There s the media settings, and all other stuff that have to somehow be accounted for. And the fact that 3d LookUp Tables can t possibly be

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Informal Fade Test

2006-12-06 by Greg

... If testing at this time of the year the Earth is closest to the sun, and the Earth is tilted towards the Southern Hemishpere, so the sunlight is more

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] UV in NZ

2006-12-06 by petegorsky@external.umass.edu

Paul - Airborne particles in pollution can block some UV radiation, so it may be that if there is significantly less pollution there than here, the amount of

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] Informal Fade Test

2006-12-06 by Paul Roark

A factor that is hard to track is indoor air quality issues. These can affect the fade tests, I believe. Indoor air pollution has browned wet process RC

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] Informal Fade Test

2006-12-06 by David Whistance

I may be out of date but I think it is because they have a hole in the ozone layer above them. The ozone layer is supposed to filter out much of the UV light.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.