Re: [Digital BW] Anti-static devices
2006-12-08 by Earl Olsen
Paul, ... I have been using Brillianize anti-static cleaner on both glass and acrylic galazing (cleaning both sides) before framing my prints for the past
Yahoo Groups archive
Messages
Page 555 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
2006-12-08 by Earl Olsen
Paul, ... I have been using Brillianize anti-static cleaner on both glass and acrylic galazing (cleaning both sides) before framing my prints for the past
2006-12-08 by Roy Harrington
... The problem with your (1) and (2) is that they both CONVERT from GG2.2 to DD20. This changes all the numbers in the image. What you want is to just
2006-12-08 by Philip Schwartz
Does anyone have any experience using MIS B&W inks in an Epson R800? I have some UT-R2, UT-FSN, and some other odds and ends that I can play with. Any
2006-12-08 by rgoldman2
First off, I have to tell you all that I really appreciate the explanation and advice this post has generate. Roy, you are correct that the description of my
2006-12-08 by Manuel Toledo Quinones
Dave, I imagine that your profile is based on a test print. If, (1) to produce the test print, you selected the same type of paper that you are using now to
2006-12-08 by Jose Usoz
Hello, I am beginning to test with the paper Hahnemühle PhotoRag. I use 188gr. for the tests and 308gr for the final copy. Reading the characteristics of
2006-12-08 by Ernst Dinkla
... I think it works like this: If the profiles were made on targets printed in RGB mode there could be a difference between the use of more color inks in the
2006-12-08 by l33ry
That sounds right. I think the slides were rediscovered around 1978. And yes, it is hard to believe, but, then again, this is the Library of Congress we re
2006-12-08 by David Keenan
... This all gets complicated in a hurry... I am printing using ABW using ICC profiles I created for the papers I use (albeit color profiles) using PrintFix
2006-12-08 by Roy Harrington
... I think this missing part of this whole discussion is that there are two modes in soft-proofing and they have different results. From you first post I
2006-12-08 by l33ry
Yes, in both the color and digital collections, selected images are available in up to archival TIFFs, some exceeding 100mb. These are stunning jobs. Maybe
2006-12-08 by jim kitchen
Your modified image will appear correctly, as it did previously with a gamma 2.2 rendering, by changing your image while working in the Dot Gain 20% profile.
2006-12-07 by Richard
I bought a used 2200 to replace the aging 1280 for B&W work so now I have a couple UT-2 Eboni Black ink cartridges left. I will sell them at 50% off
2006-12-07 by Alan Zimmerman
OK. Thanks for the heads up. What are the odds of having the tests run on Monday? Alan Zimmerman ph 316-722-4802 cell 316-208-4802 fax 316-260-5446
2006-12-07 by Joost Horsten
... Stick them on a piece of larger paper? Joost
2006-12-07 by robert49brake
... while - ... makes a ... The real problem is the leaking shaft seal in the Charger s air conditioning compressor that s been spewing CFCs into the ozone
2006-12-07 by Barrett Benton
Somewhere in my disheveled archives is a copy of Modern Photography, dating from the early/mid-1980s, which first presented some of these images to the public,
2006-12-07 by linsch2
I have some wood veneer samples (from the furniture-making trade), and I d like to try printing on them. They re very small (5.5x8 and 3.5x6 in.), apparently
2006-12-07 by CDTobie@aol.com
... A softproof of one profile to another profile, is a way of saying I haven t converted to this space, but if I did, what would I get? This offers some
2006-12-07 by rgoldman2
But this file, which now has been converted to the DD 20 profile, does not look on screen they way it did when I was soft proofing in DD 20. If I soft proof
2006-12-07 by CDTobie@aol.com
... There should indeed be no change, just as reassigning an sRGB image to AdobeRGB will show no change. It has been accurately recalculated to give the same
2006-12-07 by rgoldman2
-Well, I thought I understood, but i seem to be running in place. I re set my PS color space back to GG 2.2 and opened a new image file. On screen it looks as
2006-12-07 by CDTobie@aol.com
... Yes, that would be fine... as long as your files are tagged (and not incorrectly retagged!). C. David Tobie Product Technology Manager ColorVision Business
2006-12-07 by rgoldman2
-OK, I think I understand what to do now to get the tiff or jpg files into the shape they require. Thanks.
2006-12-07 by Clayton Jones
... wrote: CDavid is corect, no need to change your color settings. Just use the Image/Mode/Convert Profile to convert (not assign) the image
2006-12-07 by rgoldman2
Thanks for the guidance and the very good analogy. I gather from your suggestion that it is OK to go back into my PS settings and reset to GG2.2 (?) It seems
2006-12-07 by Ernst Dinkla
... Correct, if your eyes have the same perceptual standard the QTR profile is based on there shouldn t be a difference. Met vriendelijke groeten,Ernst
2006-12-07 by Manuel Toledo Quinones
Yes, that s what I was expecting. However, after my initial results I reconsidered. I think that, when using ABW, the epson driver will still apply whatever
2006-12-07 by CDTobie@aol.com
... You are assigning Dot Gain 20%, not converting to it, so the images are (quite appropriately) incorrect. Instead, go to the Edit Convert to Profile
2006-12-07 by CDTobie@aol.com
... You can print through an ICC profile to AWB if you configure things that way, but the only effect it will have is on the linearity (what areas print what
2006-12-07 by rgoldman2
I m preparing a web submission of monochrome images, and the submission guidelines require tiff or jpg files with grayscale images saved with an ICC profile of
2006-12-07 by CDTobie@aol.com
... I d heard that as well, but the effect of it I was most concerned about was metameric shift under differing light sources, and I don t find a significant
2006-12-07 by Manuel Toledo Quinones
Thanks! I imagine that the advantage of using a QTR-created icc is the soft-proofing, since (I think) you can achieve similar results with a PS curve. Right?
2006-12-07 by Ernst Dinkla
... No ICC to my knowledge. The paper settings should have their influence though. And you can use a created QTR semi-ICC profile in a P2P conversion in PS to
2006-12-07 by Manuel Toledo Quinones
or the epson driver will bypass the ICC when ABW is used? I know the question is basic, but couldn t find an answer in the archives. I tried using an icc
2006-12-07 by Peter Marshall
I think you can see all 1600 of the images on line at the LoC, though I only looked at a few hundred of them. You can also download some big scans from the
2006-12-07 by l33ry
... seems to ... I think we have to allow that those black and white images have been with us for a lifetime as, in fact, the authoritative visual record. On
2006-12-07 by Ken Carney
OK, I guess it s time for us to park the hole somewhere else for a while - just so long as I can keep my 350hp Charger that goes real fast and makes a cool
2006-12-07 by Paul Roark
Roy, That sounds reasonable. So, basically, as David says, .its all a matter of sending RGB values to the printer,. But in addition to this the software
2006-12-07 by Richard Smallfield
... That is correct - apparently there is a hole (or a thinning?) in the ozone layer above us. Richard -- http://smallfield.vze.com
2006-12-06 by Peter Marshall
I saw some of it on the wall at the Photographers gallery yesterday, but they were still putting it up. I think the private view is tomorrow and it opens
2006-12-06 by Roy Harrington
Not really. It s the same basic thing -- as long as we re talking grayscale input and RGB output workflow that you ve used for a long time. An RGB to RGB
2006-12-06 by CDTobie@aol.com
... Well, lets see. There s the media settings, and all other stuff that have to somehow be accounted for. And the fact that 3d LookUp Tables can t possibly be
2006-12-06 by Greg
... If testing at this time of the year the Earth is closest to the sun, and the Earth is tilted towards the Southern Hemishpere, so the sunlight is more
2006-12-06 by Steve Kale
Yup we¹ve been paying for all those US emissions for some time. Great place to go get a tan... From: David Whistance
2006-12-06 by petegorsky@external.umass.edu
Paul - Airborne particles in pollution can block some UV radiation, so it may be that if there is significantly less pollution there than here, the amount of
2006-12-06 by Paul Roark
A factor that is hard to track is indoor air quality issues. These can affect the fade tests, I believe. Indoor air pollution has browned wet process RC
2006-12-06 by David Whistance
I may be out of date but I think it is because they have a hole in the ozone layer above them. The ozone layer is supposed to filter out much of the UV light.
2006-12-06 by Paul Roark
Is there any difference in the Photoshop-to-driver connection or interface that gives profiling software like PFP any more or less control than what I can
2006-12-06 by Paul Roark
... Why would there be more UV in NZ? Would this be latitude controlled? Paul www.PaulRoark.com