Yahoo Groups archive
Messages
Page 325 of 564 · 28179 messages matched
2006-12-15 by hardware@doepfer.de
Thank you for the poll. I assumed something like that ... We already have two prototypes available (very simple) and we will start the production in January. But we are not sure which front panel version we should manufacture: 1. Without front panel printing. This would allow bot
2006-12-15 by sfrules
Thanks, Ingo. Insight appreciated! sfrules
2006-12-15 by amnesia
hi all just put up a new photo of my euro banana. its a mix of plan b , livewire and doepfer :-) all work was done by Ken Stone, a clever chap :-) http://www.flickr.com/photos/45395793@N00/
2006-12-15 by Anton Coops
> Oh very John Cage :-) no, just practical, the damped reverb can sound very good. you can even combine damped reverb and 'undamped' reverb or damp individual springs. the other secrets you'll have to find out yourself :-P > > > > You can lay something on the springs, which chang
2006-12-15 by Florian Anwander
Hi amnesia > >>You can lay something on the springs, which changes the sound >>[...] > Oh very John Cage :-) Thats not John Cage, thats - as far as I rember - Dynacord or Echolette or some similar german company: I have seen a spring based reverb box in a studio in Frankfurt in t
2006-12-15 by amnesia
Oh very John Cage :-) > > You can lay something on the springs, which changes the sound > of the reverb: Eg. aluminium foil, nails across the springs for > resonating effects, or a kleenex or fabric for damping. >
2006-12-15 by Florian Anwander
Hi > I have the Spring reverb ...should the box with the springs inside be > faced down so the springs are not showing and therefore no dust, or face up? Dust does not make any influence to the springs themselves, because the electrical sound stimulation cause vibrations of the s
2006-12-15 by amnesia
Hi all I have the Spring reverb ...should the box with the springs inside be faced down so the springs are not showing and therefore no dust, or face up? Rossamni > >
2006-12-15 by Florian Anwander
Hi James > http://www.elby-designs.com really looks like someone is interested in promising synth gear. Florian
2006-12-15 by Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
The following Doepfer_a100 poll is now closed. Here are the final results: POLL QUESTION: Would you like Doepfer to release a "Mixing Expander" module that would be used to add 5 more inputs to A-138a/b? [It will be about 20-30% cheaper than an A-138a/b, as no integrated circuits
2006-12-15 by James Elliott
On Friday the 8th, Laurie Biddulph with elby-designs offered up his services to be a doepfer distributor. He has a great reputation with the modular DIY community.... Laurie Biddulph Phone: +61 (0)2 4340 0938 Mobile: 0400 257 645 Elby Designs ABN: 70 022 727 605 http://www.elby-
2006-12-14 by zanalogheaven
Hello, I have the Doepfer Vocoder modules, A129 1/2, 3 and 4, they are approximately $650 from Analog Haven, I'll take $450 obo. I also have an Analogue Solutions SY02 MS20 filter. Analog Haven price is $199, I'll take $150 obo. I will accept trades for other Eurorack modules. Sp
2006-12-14 by hardware@doepfer.de
> Hi, > > I've also had the same problem with the Aussie distributor (and hence > feel the need to register my discontent). > > I get all my modules from Shawn at Analogue Haven in the US and would > recommend them wholeheartedly as the best source of Doepfer for > Australians (i
2006-12-14 by hardware@doepfer.de
> Hi all, > > My tapped bbd module suddenly has a limited range, it can now only > do short delaytimes, probably 25-40% of the range it should have. In > other words: it can't produce the aliasing sound anymore. The first > time I fired it up it was ok, second time it had this pr
2006-12-14 by beakanddune
Hi, I've also had the same problem with the Aussie distributor (and hence feel the need to register my discontent). I get all my modules from Shawn at Analogue Haven in the US and would recommend them wholeheartedly as the best source of Doepfer for Australians (in fact I'd recom
2006-12-13 by denis goekdag
lol.....actually 1970 i wasn't around to do *anything* (including writing not-yet-invented emails)....i guess i should put a new buffer battery in my laptop :-) i fully agree to the notion of one quad vca with common voltage control for all outputs, that's what i meant in the fir
2006-12-13 by Anton Coops
Hi all, My tapped bbd module suddenly has a limited range, it can now only do short delaytimes, probably 25-40% of the range it should have. In other words: it can't produce the aliasing sound anymore. The first time I fired it up it was ok, second time it had this problem. Any i
2006-12-13 by John
Your email is set to the year 1970. On 6/25/70 8:22 PM, "denis goekdag" wrote: > > > > > Dieter, > > i see your point, but in this particular case a common attenuator, > voltage controlled if possible, acting on all outputs simultaneously > would be great; there are a lot of poss
2006-12-13 by Richard
yeah man, that is really taking the back to analogue thing too far! Richard ----- Original Message ----- From: John To: Doepfer a100 Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 6:11 PM Subject: Re: AW: [Doepfer_a100] suggestion on the new A-143-9 (Re: News) Your email is set to the year 1
2006-12-13 by hardware@doepfer.de
> > of course it would be possible to add four VCAs. > I thought the LFO is computed in the uP (or do I mismatch with the > 143-4?). If I am right: Why dont't we use a CV-in for the waveform > level, A/D-convert it, and include the level in the waveform calculation? The A-143-9 i
2006-12-13 by Florian Anwander
hi > of course it would be possible to add four VCAs. I thought the LFO is computed in the uP (or do I mismatch with the 143-4?). If I am right: Why dont't we use a CV-in for the waveform level, A/D-convert it, and include the level in the waveform calculation? Florian
2006-12-13 by Bakis Sirros
right... exactly! best regards, Bakis. --- selfoscillate wrote: > > Hello Denis, > > > > of course it would be possible to add four VCAs. > But this would at > least double the price of the module. I think one or > two dual VCAs A- > 132 would be a good solution for this applicat
2006-12-13 by selfoscillate
> Hello Denis, > > of course it would be possible to add four VCAs. But this would at least double the price of the module. I think one or two dual VCAs A- 132 would be a good solution for this application. But of course we could add the VCAs to the module if the user prefer this
2006-12-13 by Bakis Sirros
hello dieter, ok, poll is on the way... best regards, Bakis. --- hardware@doepfer.de wrote: > > Dieter, > > > > i see your point, but in this particular case a > common attenuator, > > voltage controlled if possible, acting on all > outputs simultaneously > > would be great; ther
2006-12-13 by hardware@doepfer.de
> Dieter, > > i see your point, but in this particular case a common attenuator, > voltage controlled if possible, acting on all outputs simultaneously > would be great; there are a lot of possible applications i can imagine > where one would want to have identical modulation int
2006-12-13 by hardware@doepfer.de
> Hi, > > I just got a 101-1 Steiner filter, and it doesn't seem > to be acting right. The lowpass and bandpass inputs > doesn't pass anything, the highpass passes everything, > the frequency knob does nothing, and the emphasis knob > does nothing but make a thump-thump-thump noi
2006-12-13 by Bakis Sirros
hello, i agree with denis on this. best regards, Bakis. --- denis goekdag wrote: > Dieter, > > i see your point, but in this particular case a > common attenuator, > voltage controlled if possible, acting on all > outputs simultaneously > would be great; there are a lot of possib
2006-12-12 by djsoysos
Sounds broken to me. Give the nice folks at Analogue Haven a call. They will take care of it. That filter is very useful, I'm sure you'll enjoy it when it's working propery. Soy Sos
2006-12-12 by neil jendon
Hi, I just got a 101-1 Steiner filter, and it doesn't seem to be acting right. The lowpass and bandpass inputs doesn't pass anything, the highpass passes everything, the frequency knob does nothing, and the emphasis knob does nothing but make a thump-thump-thump noise when it's a
2006-12-12 by ilanode
Hello sfrules, no idea wether the JAG will run on +/-12V. Grant will know. Frac Rack and Euro Rack differ in both FP-size and the position of the mounting holes. Thus the JAG won't fit into the "Beauty Case" either of them has to be modified. If I'm not mistaken the Buerklin case
2006-12-12 by amnesia
HI Yes I also buy from Analog Haven as I live in Australia. The Aussie distributer was crap and expensive. ELby Design would do a way better job as I deal with them for building a modular system Ross > >
2006-12-11 by Anton Coops
impressive reverb, thanks ingo! On 11 Dec 2006, at 6:48, selfoscillate wrote: > > hello all, > > here are some stereo examples for the a188/2. > in the first example a sawtooth wave from an a110 > is used as audio input. in the other two examples > a roland tr808 pattern is used
2006-12-11 by grove@zeta.org.au
Dieter wrote: > > Please contact our sales department (sales@...). Maybe we can > sell > > directly to you. I don't know the current state of our Australian > > representative. > > > > Best wishes > > Dieter Doepfer > > > > Thanks for your response Dieter. Last time I checked you
2006-12-11 by hardware@doepfer.de
> > A-143-9 Voltage Controlled Quadrature LFO: www.doepfer.de/a1439.htm > > This module looks quite nice to me, but IMHO, one ore more built-in > (passive) attentuator(s) would make it even more versatile. > > Either a single attn. for all four outputs simultaneously or four > at
2006-12-11 by selfoscillate
hello all, here are some stereo examples for the a188/2. in the first example a sawtooth wave from an a110 is used as audio input. in the other two examples a roland tr808 pattern is used as audio input. the remaining patch is the same on all examples: the 3328 stages output is p
2006-12-10 by Adam-V
--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, wrote: > > Please contact our sales department (sales@...). Maybe we can sell > directly to you. I don't know the current state of our Australian > representative. > > Best wishes > Dieter Doepfer > Thanks for your response Dieter. Last time I
2006-12-10 by sfrules
People? "A collection of controllers (wheels, joystick, buttons) is planned for the control box (expansion box for the planned CV/gate keyboard). I believe that a horizontal mounting of the controllers is more useful than a vertical mounting in a module. An additional controlbox
2006-12-09 by hardware@doepfer.de
> Hello, > > I responding to your email on the basis that I assume that your current > Australian distributor(s) are not performing well. I would be interested in > been considered for this position and would ask you outline your > requirements. > > Best Regards > > (Mr) Laurie B
2006-12-09 by levka0
> A-143-9 Voltage Controlled Quadrature LFO: www.doepfer.de/a1439.htm This module looks quite nice to me, but IMHO, one ore more built-in (passive) attentuator(s) would make it even more versatile. Either a single attn. for all four outputs simultaneously or four attns, one for e
2006-12-09 by bellenger_a
Hello Phil Then I guess you read the answers under here from Dieter and Ingo... CV i knob is equipped with POLARIZER.... Best Alexandre --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "doctorvague" wrote: > > I'm having the exact same problem as you describe Alexandre. Anything I plug into
2006-12-08 by Laurie Biddulph
Hello, I responding to your email on the basis that I assume that your current Australian distributor(s) are not performing well. I would be interested in been considered for this position and would ask you outline your requirements. Best Regards (Mr) Laurie Biddulph Phone: +61 (
2006-12-08 by doctorvague
I'm having the exact same problem as you describe Alexandre. Anything I plug into the CV input of the 163 seems to bypass the CV attenuator like it is not even there. I just received this system about 2 weeks ago and am not experiencing any other oddities except this. It seems br
2006-12-08 by bellenger_a
GREAT Sorry I didnt know at all ... thank you... MERCI BEAUCOUP... + A --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "ilanode" wrote: > > Hello Alexandre, IIRC the CV pot works the other way round => CW = > fully attentuated => CCW = CV left unattentuated. Regards, Ingo > > --- In Doepfer
2006-12-08 by ilanode
Hello Alexandre, IIRC the CV pot works the other way round => CW = fully attentuated => CCW = CV left unattentuated. Regards, Ingo --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "bellenger_a" wrote: > > HELLO > > I just recieve A163... Something bizarre : when I put in cable to CV In (LFO
2006-12-08 by hardware@doepfer.de
> HELLO > > I just recieve A163... Something bizarre : when I put in cable to CV In (LFO sine for ex.), > with both knobs totally ccw to 0 position.... the CV DOES AFFECT the coming in signal (PLL > rect. for ex.) Please look at the user's manual (page 2): "For the first producti
2006-12-08 by bellenger_a
HELLO I just recieve A163... Something bizarre : when I put in cable to CV In (LFO sine for ex.), with both knobs totally ccw to 0 position.... the CV DOES AFFECT the coming in signal (PLL rect. for ex.) Is that BIZARRE OR NOT? and then if I turn on the knobs they do work... OTHE
2006-12-07 by hardware@doepfer.de
> Hmm, why do you try to generate it completely with digital means? I'd > create a rough waveform and send it through a VC-slewlimiter, where the > slew rate is depending on the frequency of the intended waveform. The CV > for the slewlimiter would be created by the uP itself. A
2006-12-07 by jason kahn
hi i've done a good deal of flying around with my a-100. the only problem i ever really had was in beirut when i was leaving the country. they wanted to me to unmount all the modules! (i could talk them out of this after a long while, though...). in europe some planes are too sma
2006-12-07 by Florian Anwander
HI redsawcloud > Maybe this has already been discussed, but wouldn't a cv input to sweep crossfading be a > big plus? In fact: it has been discussed ;-) And the answer is: the A134 is what you are looking for. The forthcoming crossfader module is not intended for a different appr
2006-12-07 by Florian Anwander
Hi Dieter > more processor power than expected. E.g. if you want to generate a 100Hz > sawtooth with 256 steps of resolution you need a update rate of about 25 kHz > from the processor - not only for one but for all waveform outputs. Hmm, why do you try to generate it completely