Yahoo Groups archive

Doepfer

Index last updated: 2026-04-29 00:15 UTC

Messages

Browse messages

Page 38 of 564 · 28179 messages matched

Re: [Doepfer_a100] New poll for Doepfer_a100

2015-06-01 by achtung_999

--cough--- http://www.doepfer.de/a138u.htm On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 7:29 PM, james.husted@mac.com [Doepfer_a100] Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com > wrote: Dieter - I would think about also make the opposite of a buffered multiple - a unity summer. Dual three inputs and one output secti

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] New poll for Doepfer_a100

2015-06-01 by james.husted@mac.com

Dieter - I would think about also make the opposite of a buffered multiple - a unity summer. Dual three inputs and one output sections normalized to each other. It is often needed when transposing sequencers or other sources to destinations that don’t have multiple 1V/oct inputs.

Thread view Attachments: 0

AW: AW: [Doepfer_a100] New poll for Doepfer_a100

2015-06-01 by yahoo@doepfer.de

> I am no designer, but instead of designing a new panel, why not do a A-180-3? Same design as the 180-1 but active? In the A-180-1 all sockets are equal because they are simply connected (a passive module). In a buffered multiple you have to distinguish between the input and the

Thread view Attachments: 0

AW: AW: [Doepfer_a100] New poll for Doepfer_a100

2015-06-01 by yahoo@doepfer.de

> Would this be exactly the same as the Intellijel buffered multiple in 2 HP but from Doepfer instead? > > /Janne I don't know the circuit of the Intellijel module but I think there not many options for such a circuit. Our buffered multiple would be nothing but a master buffer fo

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: AW: [Doepfer_a100] New poll for Doepfer_a100

2015-06-01 by Janne Gson Berg

Would this be exactly the same as the Intellijel buffered multiple in 2 HP but from Doepfer instead? /Janne > To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com > From: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com > Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 10:26:35 +0200 > Subject: AW: [Doepfer_a100] New poll for Doepfer_a100 > > >

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Software for Sound Sampler System

2015-06-01 by Zoë Blade

> Of course we would do this. But I have no idea how to copy the data of a C64 disk so that it can be published on our website (and > the other way round too for the user: i.e. how to copy the data on a C64 disk). I'm sure there are such tools but I'm not familiar > with them. I

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Software for Sound Sampler System

2015-06-01 by Florian Anwander

And a short addon: you are not done with the adapter. You still have a ton of software to install and to handle on your windows computer or Linux machine (keywords: OpenCBM, Vice). Am 01.06.2015 um 10:59 schrieb Florian Anwander fanwander@mnet-online.de [Doepfer_a100]: > The only

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Software for Sound Sampler System

2015-06-01 by Florian Anwander

Hello First of all: I will get a diskette. A kind guy from the german sequencer.de forum will send me a copy. The exchange between a PC and a C64 is not really possible on the diskette level (the PC 5.1/4 Disks have a completely different format from the C64). The only remaining

Thread view Attachments: 0

AW: [Doepfer_a100] New poll for Doepfer_a100

2015-06-01 by yahoo@doepfer.de

> Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the Doepfer_a100 group: > Should Doepfer start to make a simple buffered multiple with either 2hp width or 4hp widht? A dual 1in 3 out with the > ability to use the lower unit outputs with the upper units input. > Created b

Thread view Attachments: 0

AW: [Doepfer_a100] Software for Sound Sampler System

2015-06-01 by yahoo@doepfer.de

> > Hello, > > > > this is a long shot, but worth trying: > > > > I bought a 8-voice Doepfer Sound Sampler System (not the A-112, but the > > one from 1984). Since I owned already a one voice system, I thought that > > I would have the C64 diskettes too. But unfortunately it seem

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Software for Sound Sampler System

2015-05-31 by Zoë Blade

> Hello, > > this is a long shot, but worth trying: > > I bought a 8-voice Doepfer Sound Sampler System (not the A-112, but the > one from 1984). Since I owned already a one voice system, I thought that > I would have the C64 diskettes too. But unfortunately it seems, that I > ha

Thread view Attachments: 0

[Doepfer_a100] An existing poll has been modified, check it out.

2015-05-30 by Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com

Enter your vote now! Should Doepfer start to make a simple buffered multiple with either 2hp width or 4hp widht? A dual 1in 3 out with the ability to use the lower unit outputs with the upper units input. Created by: marco.heimburger 4hp quad - 4 in, 12 out (added by: blinkenlich

Thread view Attachments: 0

[Doepfer_a100] New poll for Doepfer_a100

2015-05-29 by Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com

Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the Doepfer_a100 group: Should Doepfer start to make a simple buffered multiple with either 2hp width or 4hp widht? A dual 1in 3 out with the ability to use the lower unit outputs with the upper units input. Created by: marco

Thread view Attachments: 0

Software for Sound Sampler System

2015-05-29 by florian anwander

Hello, this is a long shot, but worth trying: I bought a 8-voice Doepfer Sound Sampler System (not the A-112, but the one from 1984). Since I owned already a one voice system, I thought that I would have the C64 diskettes too. But unfortunately it seems, that I have given them aw

Thread view Attachments: 0

AW: [Doepfer_a100] Update A160-2 / A-160-5

2015-05-26 by yahoo@doepfer.de

The modules are currently in production and we expect the first batch next week (as well as A-110-4 and A-139-2). It depends upon the orders of your distributor when they will be available locally. Please contact your distributor directly. Best wishes Dieter Doepfer > Hi Dieter..

Thread view Attachments: 0

Update A160-2 / A-160-5

2015-05-25 by sj230962@gmail.com

Hi Dieter...any update on specific timing (no pun intended) as to when distributors will have the new A160 modules in stock ? Cheers Steve

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] A106-6 XP filter

2015-05-12 by Jase

Thanks for your help, Neal, Scott and Fitz.. I'll look at that A107 and have a read. Cheers Jase Sent from my iPhone > On 12 May 2015, at 04:50, fitz fytz_72@yahoo.fr [Doepfer_a100] wrote: > > just watch the A107 PDF because that's the same filters individualy . > the aim to get

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] A106-6 XP filter

2015-05-12 by fitz

just watch the A107 PDF because that's the same filters individualy .the aim to get several output is to mix or crossing the diferents outut , for example with a A 134-2 or a A 144 and a A 135 .Fitz De : "Scott Rogers scott@scottfromcanada.com [Doepfer_a100]" À : Doepfer_a100@yah

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] A106-6 XP filter

2015-05-11 by Scott Rogers

The manual I got with the Basis System 2 also did not have a page for that filter. There is not much to know though. Plug something into the audio input (and turn the level up) and then take the output from one of the jacks on the right side. A is All Pass H is High Pass B is Ban

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] A106-6 XP filter

2015-05-11 by Neil Kagan

Oh right, umm I don't know.. I just tried different outputs and resonance settings. It's based on the Oberheim Xpander filter so maybe the manual for that? Neil Sent from my iPhone > On 11 May 2015, at 18:20, Jase sachavaughan@yahoo.com [Doepfer_a100] wrote: > > I have the a100 M

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] A106-6 XP filter

2015-05-11 by Jase

I have the a100 Manuel and noticed the a106-6 didn't have a pdf.. New to this so just wanted a few patch ideas to get me going like most of the other doepfer PDFs have.. Is there a pdf for another filter which you can recommend looking at at ? Cheers jase Sent from my iPhone > On

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] A106-6 XP filter

2015-05-11 by Neil Kagan

It doesn't work any differently to the others, the manual lists the filter types if that's what you need? Neil Sent from my iPhone > On 11 May 2015, at 09:47, sachavaughan@yahoo.com [Doepfer_a100] wrote: > > Hi, don't suppose anyone has any patch examples or ideas on how to use t

Thread view Attachments: 0

A106-6 XP filter

2015-05-11 by sachavaughan@yahoo.com

Hi, don't suppose anyone has any patch examples or ideas on how to use the titled filter do they? Cheers Jase

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: A-101-6 Opto Fet Demo

2015-05-08 by a11@live.nl

Hi forum members, Now I have part 3 in Highpass Mode. Here I'm also introducing my diy StiGhetti. That's a stick (Doepfer format ) to eat up all of your spaghetti. So there is no more spaghetti irritation. Watch it here: Doepfer A-101-6 DEMO Part 3 Doepfer A-101-6 DEMO Part 3 A d

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] CV Bus question

2015-05-08 by achtung_999

On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 7:09 AM, james.husted@mac.com [Doepfer_a100] Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com > wrote: The usage of the bus in no way stops from using the front panel jacks. The connections all go to the normalization on the input side and only one module can send to it so it

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: CV Bus question

2015-05-08 by Mark Koehler

I guess I don’t understand why it’s so useful when you have only ONE bus and would have little control over which modules are sources for the bus. I used to use it when I was mostly using MIDI for Gate and Pitch. When I started using all sorts of other sources and multiple cases,

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] CV Bus question

2015-05-08 by Neil Kagan

I know James, it's crazy as its so useful! Neil Sent from my iPhone > On 7 May 2015, at 19:44, james.husted@mac.com [Doepfer_a100] wrote: > > Still to this day, I just don’t understand why more modules don’t connect to the CV and Gate bus. It doesn’t add that much to put a 16-pin

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] CV Bus question

2015-05-08 by james.husted@mac.com

The usage of the bus in no way stops from using the front panel jacks. The connections all go to the normalization on the input side and only one module can send to it so it doesn’t get in the way, it is just there if you want to use it. It is VERY useful in the standard voice co

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] CV Bus question

2015-05-08 by achtung_999

I totally disagree on the use of the busses. I never use them, I find the idea not fitting in a modular system. My thought behind this: It's a modular, every signal should be visible and easily re-patchable on the front. /my 2 kroner On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 9:59 PM, christian ienn

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] CV Bus question

2015-05-07 by christian ienni

and a quick footnote on this particular bit - often i see on mods they DO have the 16-pin headers, but they only use an 8 or 10-lead ribbon cable (whatever minimum was necessary for the mod to work), so a lot of the time it's not even a space issue, just a laziness or "it never o

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] CV Bus question

2015-05-07 by christian ienni

just my irrelevant 2 cents, but yes, i absolutely agree, and have thought so since the first time years ago i got a third-party euro mod & was disappointed that it didn't do that. having cv & gate on the bus is one of those little touches, something so obvious most people probabl

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] CV Bus question

2015-05-07 by james.husted@mac.com

Still to this day, I just don’t understand why more modules don’t connect to the CV and Gate bus. It doesn’t add that much to put a 16-pin header on the PCB (space is the only problem for some) and a header to enable the function. Almost every Synthwerks product we make that prod

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: AW: AW: [Doepfer_a100] CV Bus question

2015-05-07 by Neil Kagan

Dieter, you absolute genius!!! Thank you so much, that's one less patch cable! Neil Sent from my iPhone > On 7 May 2015, at 14:49, yahoo@doepfer.de [Doepfer_a100] wrote: > > Hello Neil, > > just wanted to mention that it was possible to add this feature (additional jumper for CV

Thread view Attachments: 0

AW: AW: [Doepfer_a100] CV Bus question

2015-05-07 by yahoo@doepfer.de

Hello Neil, just wanted to mention that it was possible to add this feature (additional jumper for CV from bus). Currently the A-110-4 are in production and should be available end of May. Best wishes Dieter Doepfer > Any chance it could be added before the 110-4 is released? > >

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: AW: [Doepfer_a100] A-111-2

2015-05-06 by Nathan Cearley

ha, I wouldn't lump complex oscillators in with the current fad for multi purpose modules that are feature fat to the point of confusion or overkill. a well designed complex oscillator has a particular personality that differentiates it from other complex oscillators and even use

Thread view Attachments: 0

AW: [Doepfer_a100] fried my A-138 (linear)

2015-05-05 by yahoo@doepfer.de

> I guess it was my time to fry a module. I lost an A-138V2 (linear) mixer by misconnecting it. If it’s likely to be the > opamp, I’d be glad to give it a try, maybe replacing it with the OP470AY for kicks. I'm quite sure replacing the quad OpAmp (LM324/TL084/TL074 compatible) wi

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: AW: [Doepfer_a100] A-111-2

2015-05-05 by soup

I'll say one of the reasons I choose Doepfer modules is they haven't dived into the hp race to the bottom with smaller and more densely packed combination modules. When they do it, it's typically novel and still with a mind to usability. Take care, soup On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 11:

Thread view Attachments: 0

fried my A-138 (linear)

2015-05-05 by Kazys Varnelis

I guess it was my time to fry a module. I lost an A-138V2 (linear) mixer by misconnecting it. If it’s likely to be the opamp, I’d be glad to give it a try, maybe replacing it with the OP470AY for kicks.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: AW: AW: [Doepfer_a100] A-111-2

2015-05-05 by Neil Kagan

Hey no worries, I'm glad you're making stuff at all Dieter! I think a lot of my more esoteric VCO wants are going to be sorted with the TZ range anyway. I must admit the most exciting sounds to be the Triangle core based one so far... Neil Sent from my iPhone On 5 May 2015, at 16

Thread view Attachments: 0

AW: AW: [Doepfer_a100] A-111-2

2015-05-05 by yahoo@doepfer.de

> Would there be a possibility for a VCO with built in wave shaping? > > > Neil Of course this would be possible. But here comes the next question: which type of VCO (triangle, sawtooth, trapezoid or sine/cosine core) and which kind of wave shaper. There is not only ONE type of V

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: AW: [Doepfer_a100] A-111-2

2015-05-05 by Neil Kagan

Actually they're very old; Buchla had them in the 1960s :) Sent from my iPhone > On 5 May 2015, at 14:11, Tonko Sekulo oknot24@gmail.com [Doepfer_a100] wrote: > > I also don't see no need for "complex" dual oscillators or built in > waveshapers. The flexibility of separate module

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: AW: [Doepfer_a100] A-111-2

2015-05-05 by Tonko Sekulo

I also don't see no need for "complex" dual oscillators or built in waveshapers. The flexibility of separate modules is one of the strongest points of having and working with a modular synth. Many new and exciting combinations of modules are possible this way much more than with

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: AW: [Doepfer_a100] A-111-2

2015-05-05 by Neil Kagan

Would there be a possibility for a VCO with built in wave shaping? Neil Sent from my iPhone > On 5 May 2015, at 13:08, yahoo@doepfer.de [Doepfer_a100] wrote: > > > Hi to you all, > > > > I wasn't a member of this group when this module was being planned. Dieter, would you conside

Thread view Attachments: 0

AW: [Doepfer_a100] A-111-2

2015-05-05 by yahoo@doepfer.de

> Hi to you all, > > I wasn't a member of this group when this module was being planned. Dieter, would you consider revisiting if there was > now more interest? A lot of us are into the buchla sound and would love a complex oscillator like this! > > Neil I'm sorry but this projec

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] A-111-2

2015-05-05 by achtung_999

I admit, that I do not understand the need for the A-111-2 as it was planned. Such modules invalidate the basic idea of an modular system. All functions of the A-111-2 can be achieved by the combination of existing modules. I think a follower for the A-111 would be great. But it

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] A-111-2

2015-05-05 by Florian Anwander

Hello, I admit, that I do not understand the need for the A-111-2 as it was planned. Such modules invalidate the basic idea of an modular system. All functions of the A-111-2 can be achieved by the combination of existing modules. I think a follower for the A-111 would be great.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.