Yahoo Groups archive

Analogue-sequencer

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:15 UTC

Messages

Browse messages

Page 110 of 168 · 8362 messages matched

Re: [analogue-sequencer] muting Auxes

2004-12-08 by bleep

On Wed, 8 Dec 2004, arp1618 wrote: > I don't know if this has been brought up in the past as i have only had > my P3 for a few weeks now, but has there been any suggestion for muting > auxes. Sometimes i have all sixteen steps or even just a pattern in the > aux that i want to mu

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Re: muting Auxes

2004-12-08 by Paul Nagle

On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 13:05:04 -0000, "arp1618" wrote: >That sounds great Paul but i can't see how it could be implemented into the main play >screen. 4 auxes per track and eight tracks. It could be done ofcourse but can it be done in >a way that wont confuse the hell out of a newc

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: muting Auxes

2004-12-08 by arp1618

--- In analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com, Paul Nagle wrote: > On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 11:35:39 -0000, "arp1618" > wrote: > > >I don't know if this has been brought up in the past as i have only had my P3 for a few > >weeks now, but has there been any suggestion for muting auxes. Som

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Re: Wouldn't it be great if the P3 ...

2004-12-08 by Oakley Sound

> the way i sample single sequences from the P3 is to hit play and then immediately hit the key that switches to an empty or fully muted part ... An excellent idea. Thank you. This is what I'll do. Glad to hear I'm not the only one doing this sampling loops bit. > Or record and e

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [analogue-sequencer] muting Auxes

2004-12-08 by Paul Nagle

On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 11:35:39 -0000, "arp1618" wrote: >I don't know if this has been brought up in the past as i have only had my P3 for a few >weeks now, but has there been any suggestion for muting auxes. Sometimes i have all >sixteen steps or even just a pattern in the aux that

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Re: Wouldn't it be great if the P3 ...

2004-12-08 by Paul Nagle

On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 11:28:37 -0000, ch.³l wrote: >the way i sample single sequences from the P3 is to hit play and then >immediately hit the key that switches to an empty or fully muted part >at the end of the currently playing one. works okay for me... Would be cool to have a "o

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Re: Wouldn't it be great if the P3 ...

2004-12-08 by Gert van Santen

ch.³l wrote: > hi Tony, > >> Why? Well, I'd like to be able to sample a single or double sequence >> into a sampler for looping and stopping it at the end of the >> sixteenth note is quite tricky at 140bpm... > > the way i sample single sequences from the P3 is to hit play and th

Thread view Attachments: 0

muting Auxes

2004-12-08 by arp1618

I don't know if this has been brought up in the past as i have only had my P3 for a few weeks now, but has there been any suggestion for muting auxes. Sometimes i have all sixteen steps or even just a pattern in the aux that i want to mute out the auxes on the fly. This would be

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Wouldn't it be great if the P3 ...

2004-12-08 by ch.³l

hi Tony, > Why? Well, I'd like to be able to sample a single or double sequence > into a sampler for looping and stopping it at the end of the > sixteenth note is quite tricky at 140bpm... the way i sample single sequences from the P3 is to hit play and then immediately hit the k

Thread view Attachments: 0

Wouldn't it be great if the P3 ...

2004-12-08 by Oakley Sound

... stopped automatically at the end of the sequence length. By this I mean in a new mode, one would hit RUN and it plays away, but if you then hit STOP the P3 will continue until the defined end step and then stops. Currently, of course, it stops the moment you hit STOP. Why? We

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [analogue-sequencer] P3 v3.983

2004-12-07 by Paul Nagle

On Tue, 7 Dec 2004 22:24:22 -0000, "Colin f" wrote: > >> Colin, will mr. Nagle be sober enough during concerts to >> actually push >> TWO buttons to stop the P3?? I don't stop, I fade. Although I do have some new features in mind to make stopping cooler.... 8) >I suspect his futu

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [analogue-sequencer] P3 v3.983

2004-12-07 by Boele Gerkes

Oh boy! I just can hear mr. Nagle thinking about new features... :-))) Colin, will mr. Nagle be sober enough during concerts to actually push TWO buttons to stop the P3?? Boele Op 7-dec-04 om 22:53 heeft Paul Nagle het volgende geschreven: > > On Tue, 07 Dec 2004 21:46:07 -0000,

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [analogue-sequencer] P3 v3.983

2004-12-07 by Paul Nagle

On Tue, 07 Dec 2004 21:46:07 -0000, "colinfraser_com" wrote: >If you're paying very close attention, you may also notice that >despite these new features, this build is smaller than the last one. >I've had my optimising hat on... Smaller eh? Paul --- Paul Nagle / Soft Room Music

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [analogue-sequencer] P3 v3.983

2004-12-07 by Colin f

> Colin, will mr. Nagle be sober enough during concerts to > actually push > TWO buttons to stop the P3?? I suspect his future gigs may be somewhat longer... Cheers, Colin f

Thread view Attachments: 0

P3 v3.983

2004-12-07 by colinfraser_com

Folks, There's a new firmware build in Yahoo files, with a fix for an obscure little bug brought to light by a sysex dump Roel sent me. The bug itself amounted to a single 'B' that should have been a 'D' in a variable name, but the effects of it are rather unpredictable and poten

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [analogue-sequencer] P3 with a mind of it's own

2004-12-07 by Tom Adam

> Did you initialise the memory when you first powered your P3 up ? Yes. > One point worth noting if it does turn out to be a hardware problem - > the P3 > pattern data amounts to 48k of RAM. My dump is 82k > Was the underlying note data OK after your incident, with just the auxe

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Re: Production P3 Pricing

2004-12-07 by Colin f

> When would you likely be accepting orders for one of these bad > boys. I see a kit type c in my future as soon as you can take my > order. I have ordered the production cases, to be delivered as a single sample for approval, followed by a bulk order that should keep me going fo

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Production P3 Pricing

2004-12-07 by wny_synth

When would you likely be accepting orders for one of these bad boys. I see a kit type c in my future as soon as you can take my order. --- In analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com, pelo reads lists wrote: > hello Colin and list, > > > Those of you waiting for kits, I'd be interested

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [analogue-sequencer] P3 with a mind of it's own

2004-12-06 by Tom Adam

Colin f wrote: > That sounds more like a hardware problem to me - something causing the > memory to get corrupted. > Was only the one bank affected, or did others go weird too ? > > Cheers, > Colin f > No... Playing with them now.... Tom

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [analogue-sequencer] P3 with a mind of it's own

2004-12-06 by Colin f

> > That sounds more like a hardware problem to me - something > causing the > > memory to get corrupted. > > Was only the one bank affected, or did others go weird too ? > > > No... Playing with them now.... Did you initialise the memory when you first powered your P3 up ? Just

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [analogue-sequencer] P3 with a mind of it's own

2004-12-06 by Paul Nagle

On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 20:40:36 +0100, Tom Adam wrote: >Did I mention that I'm a new P3 user and that I still got to read the >part of the aux events. A big, fun adventure is ahead.... One thing you might look at is whether your User Config switches on events as you turn the knobs.

Thread view Attachments: 0

P3 with a mind of it's own

2004-12-06 by Tom Adam

Yesterday something strange happened..... We were jamming along and all went fine. We programmed some tracks, few playlists and one cc but that's about it. After a five minute brake we pressed play and... All hell broke loose. A track playing my JD-800 changed pitch all the time,

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [analogue-sequencer] P3 with a mind of it's own

2004-12-06 by Colin f

> Yesterday something strange happened..... > We were jamming along and all went fine. We programmed some > tracks, few > playlists and one cc but that's about it. > After a five minute brake we pressed play and... > All hell broke loose. A track playing my JD-800 changed pitch a

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: P3 reset

2004-12-04 by Magnetize

Sorted, Thx Colin :) > From: "Colin f" > Subject: Re: P3 reset > > > My p3 has 'D715' in the bank indicator area of the screen (top left) > > since today for some bizzare reason. > > Dunno how that happened but is there a keysequence to reset it back to > > its initial settiings?

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: auxD sending program changes?

2004-12-03 by colinfraser_com

Roel, Sorry it's take me so long to check this out... I've set up a pattern to do this on my P3 and can't see anything untoward. Can you send me a sysex dump of the patterns, if you're still having this problem ? Cheers, Colin f > > I use track 1&2 for controlling the bassdrum of

Thread view Attachments: 0

P3 reset

2004-12-03 by Magnetize

My p3 has 'D715' in the bank indicator area of the screen (top left) since today for some bizzare reason. Dunno how that happened but is there a keysequence to reset it back to its initial settiings? Thx. /s [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [analogue-sequencer] P3 reset

2004-12-03 by Colin f

> My p3 has 'D715' in the bank indicator area of the screen (top left) > since today for some bizzare reason. > Dunno how that happened but is there a keysequence to reset it back to > its initial settiings? You have managed to select a debug option. If you hold step key 14 while

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Potential playlist edit changes

2004-12-02 by Paul Nagle

On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 23:27:13 -0000, "Colin f" wrote: >I think I see where you're coming from Paul. I had misgivings later about mentioning it because it would be quite a change from the current method. >OK, how about we think of playlist steps as 'pattern selections', and the >cur

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Potential playlist edit changes

2004-12-02 by Boele Gerkes

Boele bows deeeeeeep for Paul and Colin! Op 2-dec-04 om 0:27 heeft Colin f het volgende geschreven: > >> You'll probably hate me for this but... supposing playlists worked >> like parts do? I mean, you can play parts in series starting at the >> first you hold down and ending at

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [analogue-sequencer] Potential playlist edit changes

2004-12-02 by Hans Greuber

Hi; Sorry to say,but I hate playlist as my tracks are minimal-same half bar pattern based. Hans > > > You'll probably hate me for this but... supposing playlists worked > > like parts do? I mean, you can play parts in series starting at the > > first you hold down and ending at t

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Potential playlist edit changes

2004-12-01 by Gert van Santen

Paul Nagle wrote: > You'll probably hate me for this but... supposing playlists worked > like parts do? I mean, you can play parts in series starting at the > first you hold down and ending at the last you hold down. > > If playlists worked the same way you could have the same fl

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Potential playlist edit changes

2004-12-01 by Paul Nagle

You'll probably hate me for this but... supposing playlists worked like parts do? I mean, you can play parts in series starting at the first you hold down and ending at the last you hold down. If playlists worked the same way you could have the same flexible interaction that woul

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [analogue-sequencer] Potential playlist edit changes

2004-12-01 by Colin f

> You'll probably hate me for this but... supposing playlists worked > like parts do? I mean, you can play parts in series starting at the > first you hold down and ending at the last you hold down. > If playlists worked the same way you could have the same flexible > interaction

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Potential playlist edit changes

2004-12-01 by niall munnelly

On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 10:12:05PM +0000, Paul Nagle wrote: > Well, I feel sorta bad for bringing all this up - it's not actually a > priority of mine even (my priorities are always knob-related, ask my > wife). with the advent of sampling technology, rimshots are but a note-on a

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Potential playlist edit changes

2004-12-01 by Paul Nagle

On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 20:56:23 -0000, "colinfraser_com" wrote: >Modifying Paul's idea slightly, what if the first 8 keys are for >selecting patterns, and keys 9 - 16 represent playlist steps. >The labelling for PART could become PART/PLAYLIST STEP to make this >clear. Certainly the

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Potential playlist edit changes

2004-12-01 by bleep

On Wed, 1 Dec 2004, colinfraser_com wrote: > One LED above the playlist step keys would be green to indicate the > current playlist position, the rest would be red to indicate the > length of the playlist if it were longer than one step. > The playlist will always start on step 1

Thread view Attachments: 0

Feature request

2004-12-01 by Jesper

I was just about to beg and plead to have the P3 play chords, but decided to download the latest manual and have a look. And there it is, on page 50, Aux notes! Absolutely fantastic! I haven't even tried it yet, but wow, that's very very cool. Something else I was thinking about.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Potential playlist edit changes

2004-12-01 by colinfraser_com

Folks, Paul said... > I was thinking that a way of making Playlist Edit more intuitive to a > newcomer would be to have the first 8 keys represent playlist position > and the second 8 act as selectors for patterns. It occurs to me that a big part of the problem is the overlap of

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Richie Hawtin at fabric

2004-12-01 by colinfraser_com

--- In analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com, "arp1618" wrote: > > Just wondering if anybody happened to see Richie Hawtin play at Fabric > at the weekend. Do you know if he used the P3 or was it just a DJ set? > I almost jumped on the train on saturday to go and see but London's a

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Playlist Revamp

2004-12-01 by darkstr1746@comcast.net

I for one would like to see the inclusion of the playlist edit, memory space permitting of course. If not, maybe a addition for P4? That would certainly give me a little more incentive to get another one..... not that i need any!! LOL If it could be done in an intuitive way it wo

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Re: Playlist Revamp

2004-12-01 by Paul Nagle

On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 14:52:26 -0000, "arp1618" wrote: > I think the playlist idea is a good one, and to be honest if it was >done in the way you describe then i'd probably use the playlists alot >more. Same for me. >If it means taking up valuable code space however i'm not up for

Thread view Attachments: 0

Richie Hawtin at fabric

2004-12-01 by arp1618

Just wondering if anybody happened to see Richie Hawtin play at Fabric at the weekend. Do you know if he used the P3 or was it just a DJ set? I almost jumped on the train on saturday to go and see but London's a long way from Fife.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Playlist Revamp

2004-12-01 by bleep

On Wed, 1 Dec 2004, Paul Nagle wrote: > So, I take it nobody minds at all if Colin revamps playlist edit as > per my suggestion yesterday? it sounds like a good idea to me. bleep. out. --- http://leichenfeld.iuma.com http://thirdwavecollective.com

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Playlist Revamp

2004-12-01 by arp1618

--- In analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com, Paul Nagle > > I sit and idly think of this stuff all day cos that's the kind of guy > I am. I should get out more... > > No no Paul. Why should you get out more, what's it got to offer that your P3 and synths don't. No! i say stay in an

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Playlist Revamp

2004-12-01 by arp1618

--- In analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com, bleep wrote: > On Wed, 1 Dec 2004, Paul Nagle wrote: > > > So, I take it nobody minds at all if Colin revamps playlist edit as > > per my suggestion yesterday? > > I think the playlist idea is a good one, and to be honest if it was done

Thread view Attachments: 0

Playlist Revamp

2004-12-01 by Paul Nagle

So, I take it nobody minds at all if Colin revamps playlist edit as per my suggestion yesterday? 8-) I mean, it's not for me personally as I don't use playlists extensively - but with my reviewer's hat on, I *am* conscious of the learning curve and the way many reviewers might pr

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Playlist Revamp

2004-12-01 by scd

on 01-12-2004 12:48, Paul Nagle at softroom@btinternet.com wrote: > > > So, I take it nobody minds at all if Colin revamps playlist edit as > per my suggestion yesterday? I certainly don't. I think it is a good idea! Boele > > 8-) > > I mean, it's not for me personally as I don't

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Re: Production P3 Pricing

2004-12-01 by scd

on 01-12-2004 08:48, Colin f at colin@colinfraser.com wrote: > >> Hey! I'm a "PC-loving Cubase fiend" and I'm just waiting to >> purchase a kit >> for one of these... > > You 'get it', so you're excused ;-) LOL!! > > Cheers, > Colin f > > > > _____________________________________

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [analogue-sequencer] Re: Production P3 Pricing

2004-12-01 by Colin f

> Hey! I'm a "PC-loving Cubase fiend" and I'm just waiting to > purchase a kit > for one of these... You 'get it', so you're excused ;-) Cheers, Colin f ________________________________________________ Message sent using UebiMiau 2.7.2

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Production P3 Pricing

2004-12-01 by pelo reads lists

hello Colin and list, > Those of you waiting for kits, I'd be interested to hear whether > you'd prefer: > > a) a PCB/CPU kit only > b) a PCB/CPU kit plus a full set of keys > c) a PCB/CPU kit, full set of keys and pro case i'm a lot handier with a soldering iron than any other k

Thread view Attachments: 0

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.