Yahoo Groups archive

The Logic Off Topic list

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:27 UTC

Messages

Browse messages

Page 56 of 140 · 6965 messages matched

Re: [L-OT] nice future!

2002-07-26 by Colin Miller

... I agree the mac processors are way behind on the speed issue. But I think that will change soon and there will probably be much faster stuff around the

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [L-OT] Re: Nice Future!

2002-07-25 by Murray McDowall

... Exactly -- performance/up to date features -- they are everything. If performanc didn t matter Mac users would still be running their Mac Plus or LCs. ...

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Nice Future!

2002-07-25 by Garth Hemphill

... Rumours are many times based in truth. Apple isn t stupid. I think if they feel they aren t going anywhere with the G series processors, why wouldn t

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [L-OT] nice future!

2002-07-25 by Murray McDowall

... Snort indeed. Here is what you posted originally. ... You said that you think that Mac s being behind in speed will change soon. This would involve a

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [L-OT] nice future!

2002-07-25 by Murray McDowall

... Rumour sites suggest a modest speed bump for G4 is coming next month. While it is _possible_ that Macs could get a_big_ speed bump in the future why would

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [L-OT] nice future!

2002-07-25 by erkdemon

... The problem is, that if someone has a cheapy 2000+ Athlon machine with a DDR motherboard, and it s being suggested that they upgrade to a superior

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: nice future!

2002-07-25 by erkdemon

... [ http://www.digitalvideoediting.com/2002/07_jul/features/cw_macvspc2.ht m ] ... Interesting to see that adding a second processor does not seem to give

Thread view Attachments: 0

nice future!

2002-07-24 by mike_harper98

http://www.digitalvideoediting.com/cgi- bin/getframeletter.cgi?/2002/07_jul/features/cw_macvspc2.htm says it all

Thread view Attachments: 0

Hector

2002-07-24 by Paul Wheeler&Kerry Ritson

Send us your addy will you . I ve lost it in the trash. Paul [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [L-OT] Hector

2002-07-24 by Hector

... The MPX1 editor is a 3rd party application, freeware. It is not an adaptation for sounddiver as some people have misunderstood. It is a pc only app. If

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [L-OT] Applemagic interface???

2002-07-24 by David Eager

... There is a VST plugins folder, and suitably fixed VST plugins do work [try Spark ME] There are two ways to go, some VST plugins will be ported over to

Thread view Attachments: 0

Emagic Unitor 8 MkII

2002-07-22 by Clayton L. Workman

I m selling my Emagic Unitor 8 MkII midi interface on ebay. If anyone is interested, the url is: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=895025416

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [L-OT] Applemagic interface???

2002-07-22 by Dennis Gunn

... I think you are wrong. I do not have first hand knowledge so I can t real off specifics but I am in direct contact with people working on that stuff.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [L-OT] Applemagic interface???

2002-07-21 by TazmnianDv@aol.com

... But Digi provide specific hard disks that they recommend. There is a Protools keyboard for mac. They don t seem to have any shortage of plug-ins, despite

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [L-OT] Applemagic interface???

2002-07-21 by Dennis Gunn

... Don t worry. VST is not going anywhere. My understanding is that it is already a part of OSX. The only thing that kind of bugs me is that there is not

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [L-OT] Applemagic interface???

2002-07-21 by ewald_kegel

Yes, but companies like Steinberg and Emagic provided over the past years affordable, comparable and workable solutions for musicians at a lower price level.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [L-OT] Applemagic interface???

2002-07-21 by Dennis Gunn

... Well, OK, look at digidesign. In terms of audio quality the HD system is pretty much the undisputed master of the universe right now.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Sorry once more..

2002-07-20 by Klangwerke

apologies! Last attempt - I swear! Thanks for your patience -------------------------------- Tim Dylla Klangwerke Engineer/Music&more

Thread view Attachments: 0

Sorry once more..

2002-07-20 by tim_dylla@yahoo.de

apologies! Last attempt - I swear! Thanks for your patience ... Tim Dylla Klangwerke Engineer/Music&more

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [L-OT] Applemagic interface???

2002-07-20 by ewald_kegel

Don t be too sure about this. What you may win on stability/reliability you may lose on improvement and business competition + higher prizes. Look at eg.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [L-OT] OSX and M$

2002-07-20 by Colin Miller

... computers. ... The fact tat OSX has been slow to start (supposedly) is completely normal. It s going to take a long time for users to migrate over. Most

Thread view Attachments: 0

OT: .mac services overpriced concerns

2002-07-20 by L. Gustavo Petri

Dear Friends, I have just read and signed the online petition: .Mac Services Overpriced Concerns hosted on the web by PetitionOnline.com, the free online

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [L-OT] important question to me

2002-07-20 by Dennis Gunn

... No I am seriously considering getting a DSP card to use on the native tracks I run alongside the TDM tracks. The problem for me is PCI slots. With three

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [L-OT] apple supports windows

2002-07-20 by John Matthews

Does it have something to do with Apple developing software in order to sell hardware (this was always the model with Digi/Avid)? who knows? but I bet it has

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [L-OT] OSX and M$

2002-07-20 by John Matthews

Thanks Taz, more useful info for those of us who are thinking of going Mac. In fact I d like to hear from PC users who have bought Mac s to run Logic- how they

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [L-OT] OSX and M$

2002-07-19 by TazmnianDv@aol.com

I have been using OSX on one my macs, and its a beautiful OS - but it works a little different that OS 9.2. Its finicky (changing the name of the applications

Thread view Attachments: 0

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.