Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Messages

Browse messages

Page 1319 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched

Genuine Fractals question

2004-04-07 by Roger Smith

DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.comRBSmih4/7/04 6:32 AM1/03/2004DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.comrbsmith252@comcast.ne t ... Joe, I ve been

Thread view Attachments: 0

Update on Jerry Olson Memorial Exchange

2004-04-07 by Tom OConnell

Hi all- Just thought that those of you who participated in the Jerry Olson Memorial exchange would like an update on the disposition of the extra set of prints

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Streaks on PhotoRag using BO

2004-04-07 by David Styffe

... I ran across some streaks very similar to what you describe a few months back with my 2200 while printing 80 calendars on InkJetArt s DuoBrite Matte in

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Genuine Fractals

2004-04-07 by John Vitollo

... Yes... actually with PS CS it s recommended to up sample in 50% steps as it has better algorithms than past Photoshops. With older Photoshop apps

Thread view Attachments: 0

Imageprint - no tint from 0 to 50 %

2004-04-07 by Vicsmole

Using ImagePrint 5.6 - I am getting no tint in lighter areas of prints - printed a step wedge with 98,98 - tone from 60% t0 100% match my earlier test

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Genuine Fractals

2004-04-07 by Val Brunell

John...Interesting post. I know little about up-sampling, but I take it from your post that if I stair-step with PS CS I should get results comparable to

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: 4000 Ultrachrome vs UT2

2004-04-07 by scrber

... oops, forgot to mention. Under a loupe, the yellow is clearly used a lot, there seems to have been no change in the profiles of the 4000 to reduced the

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: 4000 Ultrachrome vs UT2

2004-04-07 by scrber

So, I had my sample prints back today from Epson. They had replicated each of the prints I sent them on the Premium semigloss and Ultra smooth papers. Each in

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] Genuine Fractals

2004-04-07 by Joe Dempsey

I have used Genuine Fractals just about since it was first introduced ... even before Lizard Tech was the distributor. It works beautifully and has saved my

Thread view Attachments: 0

Consumer Reports article

2004-04-07 by sanfo2003

May issue of Consumer Reports hammers third party inks -- MIS and Piezotone inks not reviewed although their description of maintenance headaches using third

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] Genuine Fractals

2004-04-07 by Frank J Mares

I have also used GF for 2-3 years. Works fine and in my system stable. As an aside I did go to their web site recently for any updates and they are possibly

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Genuine Fractals

2004-04-07 by Tom Baker

I ve used GF for a couple of years. It works great, but: unless it has changed recently, it doesn t support 16 bit files. Also, it is lossless . That

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Genuine Fractals

2004-04-07 by orbancc

I use GF also. I usually enlarge in 1 steps up to the final size - going from 11x14 up to 24x30. I d like to do 1% steps, but my workstation is way too

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Genuine Fractals

2004-04-07 by John Vitollo

... Genuine Fractals uses a proprietary file format and just has strange work flow. Who knows in five years if the GF file format will be around. Anyway your

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Genuine Fractals

2004-04-07 by lea

I ve used it for several years now...mostly with my images used for licensing on large objects. It works and it is a wonderful program. I m not aware of any

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Genuine Fractals

2004-04-06 by Andre

But, before springing for $300.00, I d appreciate imput from ... this ... Get Irfanview at www.irfanview.com. It resamples with a Lanczos filter which is as

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Genuine Fractals

2004-04-06 by jnhugo

... wrote: and frankly it ... appreciate imput from ... this ... actually you stumbled on to the secret of art- if it looks good to you-that s

Thread view Attachments: 0

Genuine Fractals

2004-04-06 by Joe Davajon

I m wondering if any of you are using Genuine Fractals. On the face of it, the program sounds good. Lizard asserts that one can take a small file and enlarge

Thread view Attachments: 0

MIS UT-FSN and Piezography ICC Profiles

2004-04-06 by londuck

No luck with a response to my original question (below) so I thought I would break it into parts so hopefully someone can help. Can the MIS UT-FSN inkset (with

Thread view Attachments: 0

Streaks on PhotoRag using BO

2004-04-06 by wifflebomb

I have developed a BO workflow that looks great on EEM. I use an Epson 2200 and the standard inks (hate the Eboni). I find PhotoRag significantly more

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Good Cottom papers

2004-04-06 by Clayton Jones

Hello Roger, ... Thanks, they are really pretty papers. ... Yes, very similar (they have swatches available). ... Well, that s not exactly what I said. What I

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] New in group

2004-04-06 by Mariano Molinari

Thanks, I Go to dan´s site! ... here in ... for ... wish ... visiting ... messages to ... from ... digital ... and ... group ... the ... THE ... THE OWNER

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Good Cotton papers

2004-04-06 by Diana York

Roger, We have several 100% cotton papers from 15 mil thickness/250 GSM (Osprey/Merlin) to 40 mil thickness/500 GSM (Nighthawk) and in several textures. I d be

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Just looking for a direction

2004-04-06 by Andre

... wrote: I m using a ... Piezography Museum Bright White is no longer available in sizes other than 8.5x11 and when that lot is sold people

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Just looking for a direction

2004-04-06 by Antonis

Alan, I can tell you for sure that neither the 1280 nor the inks are to blame for your disapointments. It s either the software/profiles you are using or

Thread view Attachments: 0

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.