Re: [Digital BW] Run PS6 & 7?
2003-01-10 by Bill Agee
... Smart man...I do the same thing...7 has great editing tools, but the I haven t figured how to get it to match the adobe rgb output of 6. Identical files
Yahoo Groups archive
Messages
Page 1689 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
2003-01-10 by Bill Agee
... Smart man...I do the same thing...7 has great editing tools, but the I haven t figured how to get it to match the adobe rgb output of 6. Identical files
2003-01-10 by Bill Agee
... Where would one begin to look for such a service? Tom, Try painting it on with a good brush to get a textured look, alternatively use a lintless roller..if
2003-01-10 by Paul Roark
Norm, ... Basically, a split-tone uses cool/neutral ink in one area and warm ink in another area. I have a sample of a split tone at:
2003-01-10 by danielstaver <daniel@petraflux.com>
I did have a similar problem with my 2100. The light gray ink would suddenly report out of ink in the middle of a print and stop, even though the cartridge was
2003-01-10 by jim hayes <jimhayes@frii.com>
I ve run both version 7 and 6 on Win2000 SP3 AND 7, 6 and ver 5.5 on Win 98SE. You just can t run more than one version at the same time, you have to close
2003-01-10 by Charles Bandes <byronbulb@yahoo.com>
Are you allocating enough RAM? PS7 on my OSX mac (G4 Dual 500, 1.2 gigs RAM) runs way faster than ps6 does under classic.
2003-01-10 by Bob Whitmore
Hi folks ... I was so happy with my new 2200 until ... I have been printing birth announcements (small 5x7 cards) and I had been following the ink level
2003-01-10 by Greg Phelps
I currently have PS 6 & 7 loaded. Version 6 is loaded on system 9.2.2 and version 7 is loaded on system 10.2.3 this is because I still have printer software
2003-01-10 by phireworks <ron@proformasystems.com>
I ve been late to jump on the OS X - Photoshop 7 bandwagon, but did so a few days ago. Now I m trying to figure out why. Photoshop 7 is running what seems to
2003-01-10 by Roger L Sopher
Look in edit/preferences/plugins etc. Roger ... From: William Cobb [mailto:bcphoto@bellsouth.net] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 4:27 PM To:
2003-01-10 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
... EDIT Preferences Plug-Ins & Scratch Disks Additional Plug-Ins Directory (gets set to the old directory) AND Legacy Photoshop Serial Number
2003-01-09 by Ken Carney
... I guess a motor drive would help there. Mission Keyhole 6 (c. 1963) resolved 160 lp/mm on film, or something less than two meters at around 100km orbital
2003-01-09 by Stan McQueen
... I had exactly the same thing happen to me this weekend and I ve been wondering what caused it. I was photographing dental appliances on a plaster model of
2003-01-09 by Wayne J. Cosshall
Yes, I m running both 6 and 7 on my Mac. What should work if you are having trouble is install the upgrade to 7, then re-install 6. I would think this would
2003-01-09 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
I use both on the same machine in WinXP Pro// Just make sure you don t install them to the same directory. Oh, and you can t open one if the other is already
2003-01-09 by William Cobb
Looks like I missed something! Where s the setting in v7.0 that allows access to v6.0 plugins? I ve already moved everything to v7.0, but it d be good to know
2003-01-09 by Roger L Sopher
Hi Clevus, I am running both 6 & 7 on my WinTel machine. Operating system WINXP Pro. In fact there is a setting in 7 that allows it to address the plugins that
2003-01-09 by Stuart Phillips
I had 6 and 7 running on the same Wintel machine. They run as separate applications7 is definitely worth the upgrade. Just to name two improvements: 1. The
2003-01-09 by Truman Prevatt
When I was with Fairchild Weston some years back I heard one of the guys from the our sister division Fairchild Camera and Instrument (the people who developed
2003-01-09 by William Cobb
As I said ... WinTel machine, it did disable 6.0, just as going to 6.0 made 5.0 innoperative on my system. ... From: Jerry Olson To:
2003-01-09 by Shilesh Jani <shilesh.jani@smith-nephew.
To keep the trasitions fairly gentle, you may want to feather the selections before applying the curves. Regards. Shilesh ... warm, ... warm, ... curve. ...
2003-01-09 by Jerry Olson
Assuming you are using Paul Roarks curves, (He has 5, from cool to warm, with the MIS VM Inkset), you would select the area you want to be warm, and with a
2003-01-09 by Jerry Olson
No it won t disable it. I had both on my hard drives for months and used both. Of course I use a Macintosh.... Jerry
2003-01-09 by Jerry Olson
Cleavis, photoshop 7 is well worth the upgrade price. I d Never go back to 6. There s hundreds of little improvements and 4 or 5 huge ones. Jerry
2003-01-09 by Moreno Polloni
... an ... Not only that, some of the rolls of film were over a mile long. That works out to approx 8,000 exposures per roll.
2003-01-09 by Cleavis <lyonscox@cableone.net>
Sorry about that trippple post...server bounced it back...didn t realize it had gone through. Apologetically, Cleavis
2003-01-09 by Cleavis <lyonscox@cableone.net>
Subject: Run PS6 & 7? I was wondering if anyone is running BOTH, Photoshop 6 & 7 on their machine. I m not sure I want/need 7 as I m pretty comfortable with 6.
2003-01-09 by Jerry Olson
If you have a very sharp slide, you can easily get a 13x19 inch print from this scanner, of excellent quality. Jerry
2003-01-09 by Jerry Olson
Jawa, I started in digital printing about 7 years ago. Todays papers and inks are light years better. I have seen no fading at all with the MIS VM inkset, and
2003-01-09 by Jerry Olson
Ah so! just tape over the ones you remove with scotch tape, and put them in a baggie. Be sure you wipe all the ink off the cartridges before taping. Jerry
2003-01-09 by Lyonscox
Subject: Run PS6 & 7? I was wondering if anyone is running BOTH, Photoshop 6 & 7 on their machine. I m not sure I want/need 7 as I m pretty comfortable with 6.
2003-01-09 by Jeffrey Fass
On a Mac you can, even after you upgrade. They ll coexist. I use 6 to print with MIS-VM, 7 to retouch and edit. Jeffrey http://www.happyeyeball.com ... From:
2003-01-09 by normsams
Can someone please give me a definition/explanation of split tone effects. Thanks in advance. Norm
2003-01-09 by William Cobb
Unless I missed a trick somewhere, using the v7.0 upgrade will disable v6.0. I also followed the 4.0 - 5.0 - 6.0 - 7.0 upgrade path, the only usable options
2003-01-09 by Lyonscox
I was wondering if anyone is running BOTH, Photoshop 6 & 7 on their machine. I m not sure I want/need 7 as I m pretty comfortable with 6. Not real
2003-01-09 by Paul Roark
... I actually have an 8x10 head for my enlarger. However, I used 8x10 mostly for internegatives, including digital ones. I ve always thought it would be fun
2003-01-09 by Paul Roark
... wrote: SNIP ... SNIP ... The Epson driver looks at the three RGB curves and starts the black when the three of them together add up to some
2003-01-09 by timatherton@theedge.ca
... You just need a bigger negative Paul - you need to start at 8x10 :-) Tim
2003-01-09 by nsams2002 <normsams@worldnet.att.net>
Could I get a definition/explanation, please, of split tone effects. Thanks in advance. Norm
2003-01-09 by Paul Roark
I have not followed all of the posts in this thread, so I apologize for a late and perhaps redundant post. ... I have found that my old system that was
2003-01-09 by Ken Carney
I think I see your point. I have not followed all the messages in this thread, but basically it is that the scanner is capable of resolving more detail and
2003-01-09 by Jeff Randall <jrandall@ch2m.com>
... wrote: SNIP ... SNIP Loris: Yes, the black kicks in soon after the cyan position ink (dark gray) starts. This is driven by the reflective
2003-01-09 by Kevin Gulstene
... If I understand you correctly then I agree. I am saying that there is a much larger range of what is discernible/printable/not-lost when using a scanner
2003-01-09 by Austin Franklin
Hi Kevin, ... Agreed. ... Agreed. ... Hum. I m not clear on that. The discernability is what is at issue. If they aren t discernable, they don t do anyone
2003-01-09 by Kevin Gulstene
Hi Shilesh, Thanks for your response. ... Yes that is true. Mostly. (1) If the scene brightness can t be captured on the film (like EV 500 or something silly
2003-01-09 by Kevin Gulstene
Ken, It seemed counterintuitive to me as well. But here is a more traditional way to look at it. when you make the exposure the image is on the film. There
2003-01-09 by Austin Franklin
Hi Kevin, ... And...for the record, before reviewing your experiment ;-) I disagree with that. Here is my take on it: For N+ exposure/development, with N+
2003-01-09 by Shilesh Jani <shilesh.jani@smith-nephew.
Kevin, You are absolutely right - but only for conditions you tested, i.e., (1) the scene density range can be fully caputured on your film, and (2) the
2003-01-09 by vicente_calzado <vicente_calzado@ieci.es>
I know must of you are using more appropriate printers (usually EPSON models) for B&W printing, but I am trying to get the best from my HP- 930C. Has anyone
2003-01-09 by Ken Carney
Kevin: I can very quickly run out of knowledge about scanning (or exactly how electricity works, for that matter). I may well be missing the point, but here