RE: [Digital BW] Re: EAM or Enhanced EAM?
2002-12-16 by Tim Atherton
... which, as there is no accepted definition of archival (truly or otherwise) other than for storage conditions and handling, was pretty pointless.
Yahoo Groups archive
Messages
Page 1707 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
2002-12-16 by Tim Atherton
... which, as there is no accepted definition of archival (truly or otherwise) other than for storage conditions and handling, was pretty pointless.
2002-12-16 by Jerry Olson
Hi Jo, I ve been told that the two papers are identical, only the name changed because the paper wasn t all that archival. However, depending on which epson
2002-12-16 by Loris Medici
Krebs point (stated in a later message) was that; EPSON renamed the product because it was not truely archival - as its name implied...
2002-12-16 by glewis4457@aol.com
In a message dated 12/16/2002 2:18:37 AM Central Standard Time, ... I am not really trying to be flippant...OK maybe a little, but there is alot of crap in the
2002-12-16 by Duncan Staples <gdstaples@yahoo.com>
Can someone point me to an educational website to learn more about the CIS and MIS inks, advantages, dissadvantages, tips&tricks etc.? Thanks in advance,
2002-12-16 by Jason DeFontes
Here s what I do to flatten watercolors and other stuff on paper that has a tendency to buckle: Get a fine mist spray bottle and fill it with water. Lightly
2002-12-16 by winddancing
appropriate speed, ink choice, ink (lay-on) quantity
2002-12-16 by Austin Franklin
But Robert... ... It s not a problem...really ;-)
2002-12-16 by Jon Adams
Hello All- Let me thank you in advance for putting up with a new guy question. I just purchased an Epson 2200 and have been experimenting with different
2002-12-16 by Thomas Fors
... I thought of that, but the writing instrument itself is also part of the problem. Many of the pens I tried got clogged from the coating on the prints in
2002-12-16 by Wendel White
Light Impressions sells Pigment Ink pens for about $2 each from .2mm to .65mm Wendel
2002-12-16 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
... Hmmm.. I wonder.. Do you think that s why we re bringing out product in conjunction with MIS and Lyson? Keith Just some guy, and founder of the
2002-12-16 by dw_carter <davec52@attglobal.net>
I agree with you Jon. I tried Sharpie on plant labels in my greenhouse. Even those that did not get wet faded in sunlight in less then one year. Instead of
2002-12-16 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
... OK, let s leave the logo out of it... The fact remains it is STILL the same paper... Chris Bair (InkJetArt.com) knows/says that, and the product manager
2002-12-16 by Keith Krebs <editor@p-o-v-image.com>
... I don t doubt that... and I never implied the entire world consisted of the US. (In fact, I m probably the least likely American to have that kind of
2002-12-16 by Loris Medici
The world does not consist of the US... The original poster of the question is from The Netherlands...
2002-12-16 by Keith Krebs <editor@p-o-v-image.com>
... It IS in the US market.. Keith
2002-12-16 by Bruce
on 12/16/2002 12:17 AM, DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com at ... I can agree with this. -Bruce
2002-12-16 by Bruce
on 12/16/2002 12:17 AM, DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com at ... I assumed a properly readied file. And I stand by my opinion. I ve discovered that
2002-12-16 by Loris Medici
... I have 3 packs of european size EAM (1 x A3+, 2 x A4) and all are without logo on the back. So, being logoless is not a specific property of the so named
2002-12-16 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
BTW: It s EPSON Archival Matte the old stuff and EPSON Enhanced Matte (notice, no Archival in that name) the new stuff Keith Just some guy, and
2002-12-16 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
... That rep was either NUTS or plain STUPID... It s the same paper, simply renamed and without a logo on the back. That rep is probably the same idiot who was
2002-12-16 by Jo Brunenberg
Hi EAM users, At the Epson booth at Seybold San Francisco last autumn an Epson representative told me that the new Epson Enhanced Archival Matte was superior
2002-12-16 by Robert Morrison
On 12/15/02 6:53 AM, Austin Franklin wrote: The wrinkling and ink saturation problems that you are having...and also the fact that
2002-12-16 by Mark Tucker <mark@marktucker.com>
... It s my ... Trust me, you won t be judged on your choice of pencil lead that you sign the prints with. If that s where you re putting your concern, I m
2002-12-16 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
... searched the ... We ve got a complete simple and tailorable solution coming that we are working on in conjunction with Lyson and MIS Associates. Expect to
2002-12-16 by Thomas Fors
Thanks! I m going to have a print in an exhibit next month in Chicago. It s my first time, and I want to look like I know what I m doing! --Tom ... From:
2002-12-16 by Jerry Olson
You should always sign the original print itself in your own handwriting. Otherwise it will have much less value. jerry
2002-12-16 by Jerry Olson
# 1 pencil or an HB pencil is still the best. Jerry
2002-12-16 by Austin Franklin
Hi Jerry, ... It is a good question...when I bought my large batch of EHWM, EAM did not exist. Regards, Austin
2002-12-16 by Jerry Olson
Austin, I ve not had buckles or air pockets, but I ve seen a lot of old dry mounted photos that had them. Why use EHWM instead of EAM? Just curious. Jerrry
2002-12-16 by Mark Tucker <mark@marktucker.com>
I received this week a thick needle from Campbell Hausfield for my sprayer. It s a needle that s designed for thicker viscosity liquids. The all-purpose is
2002-12-16 by Mark Tucker <mark@marktucker.com>
Go to the art supply store and buy several soft lead pencils. Brand name is Staedtler Mars Lumograph 100. I have them in HB , 2B , 4B , and 6B . Each one
2002-12-16 by Ken Carney
I just sign mine with a sharpened #2 pencil. The signature is there, somewhat light, which suits me OK since it doesn t detract from the print. That s on
2002-12-16 by sdmey4@aol.com
Oh! Thats different. I use a # 6 pencil, works on every coated paper I ve used. Steve M. In a message dated 12/15/2002 6:39:31 PM Pacific Standard Time,
2002-12-16 by Thomas Fors
I remembered reading that sharpies aren t very lightfast, and I ve avoided them in favor of india ink. The coating is not something I m applying. It s the
2002-12-16 by Carolyn Frayn
... ps... sorry if that sounded grumpy. What I was trying to say was that on the matte paper surface you can achieve good contrast with a good file. You won t
2002-12-16 by John Vitollo <johnnyv@comcast.net>
... Yep...Sharpies fade rather quickly. Maybe some kind of India Ink Pen? Don t know if India Ink fades! Hey Steve...A little birdy told me you bought a
2002-12-16 by frankg_photo <fh.gross@sympatico.ca>
Thanks to all for the guidance on getting more snap out of my prints. It will take a while to learn and try out these new techniques on a few images. Will
2002-12-16 by sdmey4@aol.com
Interesting! When I did south window tests on my ink paper combos,I would mark them with a sharpie sunny side up. The sharpie ink was the first to go. Why
2002-12-16 by Jon Dubovsky
Technically, Sharpie markers are not archival-grade. The Stanford web site (Sharpie FAQ) makes that statement. I had several labels in black Sharpie on
2002-12-16 by Carolyn Frayn
... no problem, no discussion necessary... what you say is misleading to those who haven t printed a properly readied file. I have very kicky prints, mine
2002-12-16 by Bruce
on 12/15/2002 4:35 PM, DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com at ... I feel the same way. I don t get kick in my prints either. Then I started
2002-12-16 by Richard Coda <rcoda@yahoo.com>
Hi Frank: You didn t say whether you were working in RGB or Grayscale mode. You can make an adjustment layer using any technique you want. If you are working
2002-12-16 by Carolyn Frayn
... scarey, that s exactly how I read it... C
2002-12-16 by Walter Scott Martin <waltersmartin@sbcgl
Carl we in the industry use a pen that goes by the name of Sharpee. A photographers best tool it will easily remain permanent on the surface of any coating,
2002-12-16 by Tyler Boley <tyler@tylerboley.com>
... wrote: ... sorry, should read Photo Quality Glossy Paper media setting ...
2002-12-16 by Carl Schofield
I just use a scan of my signature and and add the signature file to the image I want to print as a layer in Photoshop. You could also have a custom font made
2002-12-16 by Tyler Boley <tyler@tylerboley.com>
Some thoughts on the GimpPrint drivers, another bothersome cross post. There is a quad ink option built into the driver, it does in fact partition the inks
2002-12-16 by Tyler Boley <tyler@tylerboley.com>
Excuse the cross post, apparently it s political incorrect, but expedient. A first look at the new Cone Sepia inks is very impressive. A very rich warm