Re: [Digital BW] Re: Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-05 by Ernst Dinkla
A Sinar back that fits the 6x4.5 MF cameras is announced at DPreview, 22 million pixels, 1.5 x 2 inch CCD:
Messages
Browse messages
Page 1802 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
Re: [Digital BW] Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-05 by Robert Morrison
... Particularly when it comes with an onboard nuclear reactor to power it, has dual 100gb microdrives to store the images, takes my tiny M-mount lenses and
RE: Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-05 by mike rott
... Austin, there is a straight B&W digital body from Kodak, called the DCS 760M. 6 megapixel, 12 bit, single channel monochrome data capture. Claimed to
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-05 by Tim Spragens
... Other than the look of scanned film, I heartily agree with this argument. Film is an extremely dense storage medium, though not without its particular
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-05 by Austin Franklin
Hi Helene, I know they ve pretty much always had a B&W version, it s the 16M pixels that I was questioning...as the 760M is a 6M pixel camera. The ISO is
RE: [Digital BW] digital b&w show in Boston gallery
2002-09-05 by Richard Wolfson
... Yes. That s what Norm says to use. Richard Wolfson
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-05 by Robert Morrison
One thing I forgot to mention on my original post is the big reason that I m still using film...portability. I shoot prime lenses. My Voigtlander Bessa R2
Re: [Digital BW] digital b&w show in Boston gallery
2002-09-05 by CDTobie@aol.com
... That was certainly the theory, and the Wolfson print on my livingroom wall supports that theory nicely. C. David Tobie Design Cooperative
Re: Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-05 by grdglass@aol.com
Kodak has always had a B+W version. Current model is the 760M (M=monochrome). Quite nice. $11,000. Helene ... [Non-text portions of this message have been
Re: [Digital BW] digital b&w show in Boston gallery
2002-09-05 by Martin Wesley
Richard, If you would be willing to put your workflow down on paper, so to speak, ink dilutions and blends, brand of RIP, separation curves, etc. I would be
Re: [Digital BW] digital b&w show in Boston gallery
2002-09-05 by CDTobie@aol.com
... Converting in the other direction, of course, is a dogarithmic function... C. David Tobie Design Cooperative CDTobie@designcoop.com
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Clogging CFS Line
2002-09-05 by josh smith
... I had the same problem, it happened twice in within a month. Trouble is I didn t realise it was the tube that was clogged. I blew out the clog with a
RE: [Digital BW] digital b&w show in Boston gallery
2002-09-05 by Austin Franklin
... Ah, hell no! I just stuff them under the arm of my X-Rite 810, and press...yeah, I wear gloves, and there s a LITTLE screaming (from both the cat and my
RE: [Digital BW] Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-05 by Austin Franklin
... Hi Moreno, It wasn t 16M pixel if I remember correctly. The ones I know of are real BEASTS though... What model number are you talking about? Regards,
Re: [Digital BW] Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-05 by Moreno Polloni
... every ... market. Kodak has (or recently had) exactly that; a B&W version of one of their 35mm bodied digital cameras.
RE: [Digital BW] digital b&w show in Boston gallery
2002-09-05 by Richard Wolfson
Wrong units are no problem: you can convert in Photoshop, by applying a catenary curve.
Re: [Digital BW] Gen 4 Black was Ink decisions
2002-09-05 by Martin Wesley
Jerry, I really like the Selenium-PiezoTones but from Paul s tests the black doesn t hold up as well as the Generations black. So I was thinking of replacing
Re: [Digital BW] digital b&w show in Boston gallery
2002-09-05 by CDTobie@aol.com
... Doing this accurately requires the use of a caterimeter, or ideally a spectrocaterimeter; a dogatometer is not calibrated properly, and will read out in
[Digital BW] Adjustment Curve for PTone printing from Piezo Driver
2002-09-05 by Carolyn Frayn
I just posted this on the Piezo list for Tyler, thought some of you may be interested. In this lists files section Tyler s original preview tutorial can be
Re: [Digital BW] Gen 4 Black was Ink decisions
2002-09-05 by Martin Wesley
... From: Tony Terlecki To: Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 11:24 AM Subject: Re:
RE: [Digital BW] digital b&w show in Boston gallery
2002-09-05 by Richard Wolfson
Jerry, I can t help with cat questions, but I can tell you about my workflow for b&w printmaking. The paper I m using is Media Street s Generations ProPhoto
RE: [Digital BW] Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-05 by Austin Franklin
Hi Jerry, ... I KNOW you are simply delighted with your D60! ... Take the same picture with 35mm film camera vs a 35mm digicam, and you will see that there is
Re: [Digital BW] Gen 4 Black was Ink decisions
2002-09-05 by Tony Terlecki
... Jerry, What about warming/fading of the Generations black? It may be great right out of the printer but I ve heard it fades more than any of the other
Re: [Digital BW] Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-05 by Jerry Olson
Austin, I don t want to restart THIS war again. I m simply delighted with the quality of my D60, and lets just leave it there. I use Fred Miranda s stair step
Re: Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-05 by shileshcjani
For now, and perhaps long-term, we will just have to accept differences between digital capture and scanned film. In my experience as a first time digital
Re: [Digital BW] Gen 4 Black was Ink decisions
2002-09-05 by Jerry Olson
Martin, I have mixed Generations with VM inks, no problem. I use the enhanced black with the MIS VM quads now. (I m patiently waiting for another pint of
Re: [Digital BW] digital b&w show in Boston gallery
2002-09-05 by Jerry Olson
Austin, Once had a Black cat with a density D Max of 4.8. That was in a coal bin and the lights were off. Well, Of COURSE I m a cat person. Aren t we all?
Re: [Digital BW] Dmax Ink was digital b&w show in Boston gallery
2002-09-05 by Jerry Olson
Martin, You re right. I forgot about the paper. I am satisfied with the enhanced generations black, so I guess I should just be satisfied, and not keep
Re: [Digital BW] Dmax Ink was digital b&w show in Boston gallery
2002-09-05 by Jerry Olson
Re: Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-05 by charles_bandes
Yeah, it s all a question of your standards and expectations. I must say though that the relative lack of noise and grain from the digital cameras goes a long
Gen 4 Black was Ink decisions
2002-09-05 by Martin Wesley
Paul, Do you know if the Generations 4 is compatible with the MIS-K and the MIS tinting inks? I am wondering if you could mix them say 50/50 to hit a
RE: [Digital BW] digital b&w show in Boston gallery
2002-09-05 by Austin Franklin
Hi Jerry, Hum, a cat person...well, that explains a lot ;-) (just kidding, Jerry, I know how serious some cat people take their cats...I ve had many cats...and
Dmax Ink was digital b&w show in Boston gallery
2002-09-05 by Martin Wesley
... From: Jerry Olson To: Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 9:32 AM Subject: Re:
RE: [Digital BW] Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-05 by Austin Franklin
Jerry, ... I agree with very sharp, any image can be made to be very sharp, film or digital, but I question highly detailed at 13x19. Quite detailed,
Re: [Digital BW] digital b&w show in Boston gallery
2002-09-05 by Jerry Olson
Have 3 now, a fourth would eat us out of house and home. Hope to see a 2.5 D Max black ink soon. I d have to reprint everything! Jerry
Re: [Digital BW] Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-05 by Jerry Olson
Hi Andy, I have a D60, and you can print very sharp, highly detailed 13x19 inch prints from that camera. I imagine the other cameras are about equal to this
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Ink decisions
2002-09-05 by Jerry Olson
Jamie, I use the Epson Driver. Too many problems with the early piezo system. Ink was brown, faded browner, lots of software bugs, etc. Haven t yet had any
[Digital BW] Re: Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-05 by andrevallejo
I personaly think that when a D120 is out,shooting 35mm won´t make sense anymore.Maybe we re 2 years away from it. Then it will be digital for anything up to
RE: [Digital BW] digital b&w show in Boston gallery
2002-09-05 by Austin Franklin
... Jerry, I think you simply need a darker cat to take pictures of ;-) Austin
Re: [Digital BW] digital b&w show in Boston gallery
2002-09-05 by Martin Wesley
Richard, Congratulations on the show. Very nice shot! Would you share the details of your inks, papers and workflow? Thanks, Martin Wesley
Re: [Digital BW] digital b&w show in Boston gallery
2002-09-05 by Jerry Olson
Richard, How did you get that deep black ink? Details !! I ve been looking for a deeper black ink since I began digital printing 6 years ago. Jerry
Re: [Digital BW] your favorite film
2002-09-05 by andrevallejo
I think it goes in the same direction;if the light is low,but uniform,you can do with slide.But that s not the usual,so myself I d use Delta 400,which has
Re: [Digital BW] Refilling carts
2002-09-05 by Martin Wesley
Tony, The procedures differ depending upon the model printer you have. Since you have and Epson I don t believe any glue guns are required for any model and I
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-05 by Martin Wesley
Charles, I have seen some astounding prints on 13x19 paper in a couple of print exchanges and I would agree with you. It is not so much a matter of quality but
RE: [Digital BW] Refilling carts
2002-09-05 by Alessandro Pardi
Hi Tony, if what you re after is just experimenting a bit, I d suggest you use only virgin carts (i.e. throw away carts once empty): it s just a bit more
Re: Negativ film vs Diafilm?
2002-09-05 by andrevallejo
I do.And I find exactly the same results as you do.As I stated in a previuos post,I ve extensively tested and compared many films;and the bottom line is that I
[Digital BW] Re: Clogging CFS Line
2002-09-05 by jrandall1149
The plastic (tygon?) tubes are not impermeable to water. They allow water (the major component of ink) to evaporate. This process is accelerated in hot and
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-05 by Austin Franklin
... Not quibbling , there, Bob...I was unaware that the new Fuji used a 6M sensor, and output interpolated 12M pixel images. ... Well...remember, the digicams
Re: BW densities ?? The Rest of the MIS FS Story
2002-09-05 by jrandall1149
Alex: My working knowledge of the Epson driver (others please step in and help/correct me because I am beyond my detailed technical knowledge of drivers) is
[Digital BW] Ink decisions
2002-09-05 by Paul Roark
Stephen, ... A test of the Indelible black that included the Gen K is in the Files section. The Gen k is not as lightfast as the MIS FS/VM K, but it s much