Re: [Digital BW] Canon D60 Question
2002-07-25 by Jerry Olson
... Of course it has!! So what? That s tonality, not image detail, and ... ???? HUH? Who cares what it is? The pictures look great !!! ... But they DO up to
Yahoo Groups archive
Messages
Page 1848 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
2002-07-25 by Jerry Olson
... Of course it has!! So what? That s tonality, not image detail, and ... ???? HUH? Who cares what it is? The pictures look great !!! ... But they DO up to
2002-07-24 by Stephen Petegorsky
... If we are concerned with the perceived quality of an image, and not just with technical theory and numbers, aren t we missing an essential point here? When
2002-07-24 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
... Welll... Hmmm... I haven t run into the problem... BUT, I have seen higher metamerism with certain papers... The polymer coated papers did better than
2002-07-24 by Austin Franklin
Jim, ... I skimmed over the link you provided, and I don t see anything I ve said that is in conflict with what that article says...it only talks about
2002-07-24 by hsitz
In the Austin/Jerry interchange on digital vs. film, Jerry said the ... That statement really surprised me. I figure that when you re printing out digital
2002-07-24 by Austin Franklin
Hi Jerry, ... Please explain why you believe that. ... Not true. ... Well, it may be taken for granted, but it s not universally true. ... Yes, and that looses
2002-07-24 by Austin Franklin
... Here are the facts that have been relayed to me: There were three of these lenses for 6000 series cameras, 50/4, 80/2.8, and 150/4. They were called
2002-07-24 by Austin Franklin
Jerry, ... Now we re getting somewhere. BTW, you CAN absolutely sharpen chemical images. The sharpening techniques used in PS CAME from the wet darkroom
2002-07-24 by Austin Franklin
Jerry, ... And I have never disputed that, no one CARES about the sharpness. A TWO pixel sensor is equally as sharp! It s simply not relevant. ... That s a
2002-07-24 by azshtr
I just returned from Ireland, this time I changed my method a bit... I brought Portra B/W and asked for hand inspections. Our departure was hand inspected but
2002-07-24 by Lawrence Smith
... I have a 9600 and have been testing B&W prints for the big M . I don t think there is a universal standard for what is acceptable. For instance I found
2002-07-24 by Richard Sintchak
Wednesday, July 24, 2002, 7:32:06 AM, culturalvisions wrote: c Thought people would be interested in seeing this link c
2002-07-24 by Neil Bellefeuille
... Thanks all for the advice.
2002-07-24 by Mij Sirron
Actually you re both wrong, see: http://www.normankoren.com/Tutorials/MTF.html Quoting: The D60 has 72% the total resolution of full frame 35mm Provia scanned
2002-07-24 by Jeff Magidson
Hey everyone; I had heard some good reports on Lyson Small Gamut inks on here. I have been on a quest for a long time to find a way to make inkjet pints that
2002-07-24 by pbard2002
Looking to sell some MIS FS ink. It s a hex set, bulk 1 pint bottles, now all are 60% full, except the Y position, which is 50% full. Please contact me off
2002-07-24 by Jerry Olson
Austin, if you don t sharpen your images at all, they CANNOT be as sharp as they can get. ALL images with scanned with scanners need at leas a little
2002-07-24 by Jerry Olson
I read an article on the mentioning that Tokina makes the Rolleinar lenses. I believe it was about a year ago in Shutterbug. Jerry ... What? you don t like to
2002-07-24 by Jerry Olson
Simple Austin. You can t sharpen a provia slide before you print it in the darkroom on let say, a cibachrome type paper. You get it as sharp as your enlarging
2002-07-24 by Jerry Olson
Austin, as I have said so many times, My digital images are VERY sharp, and full of shadow and highlight detail. The D60 is better than the D30 at both. The
2002-07-24 by rmcooke
Hi Folks, Does anybody know where I can get (buy) a resolution test file? Something like the PIMA/ISO 12233 chart or even the 1951 USAF chart but in a digital
2002-07-24 by Austin Franklin
Jerry, I believe you are comparing sharpened images with unsharpened images, and, rightly so, claiming they sharpened images are sharper. I simply don t
2002-07-24 by Austin Franklin
Jerry, ... Sharpness is only one of many characteristics of a lense. The Summilux (both the 75 and the 50) are kings of 35mm bokeh (rendering of the out of
2002-07-24 by Austin Franklin
Hi Jerry, ... As I ve said a hundred times, if not a thousand...why on earth are you comparing sharpened images with unsharpened images and saying the
2002-07-24 by Austin Franklin
Jerry, ... As you can well imagine, I dispute that... ... And I d say most any MF camera will provide higher quality images, not simply 4x5. ... Does that
2002-07-24 by culturalvisions
Thought people would be interested in seeing this link http://www.inkjetart.com/pro/7600_9600/black_mode.html Frank http://www.culturalvisions.com
2002-07-24 by Kip Babington
Helene - I do indeed use the Canon 9000 to print black and white prints. They are sent to the printer as RGB files that have been Desaturated in Photoshop. I
2002-07-24 by scho_2000
... You can get Enhanced matte in A3+ and A4 sheet sizes here: http://www.inkjetart.com/pro/enhanced_matte.html
2002-07-24 by jrandall1149
In addition to the MIS web site mentioned by Richard, you might want to checkout the Files section of this forum under Image Processing and Ink Sets for very
2002-07-24 by ake_vinberg
As a follow-up to my own post, Paul Roark was kind enough to send me instructions on how to get started with the adaption. Inks and empty cartridges have been
2002-07-24 by Richard Sintchak
Tuesday, July 23, 2002, 4:29:53 PM, neilbell66 wrote: n Hello all. I m new to the list and looking for some help locating n some workflow options. I have an
2002-07-24 by Andrew Eschbacher
I ve been to Europe twice in the last five years, the last time for a month in Ireland starting on Sept. 20, 2001. Both times my film was sent through the
2002-07-24 by Doug Fisher
... Archival enhanced matte: 190 gsms Small, but different. Whats different?
2002-07-24 by Bruce
on 7/23/2002 11:28 AM, DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com at ... doug, the negative prescan options are not in the prefs, but in the controls. Look
2002-07-24 by jimpatrainbow
WOW, thanks for all the responses! The idea of throwing a 3200 role in there is a great idea! Thanks again for all the information, hope I have a lot of
2002-07-23 by grdglass@aol.com
Kip, Did you use the Canon 9000 to print a black-and-white, and if so, how was the metamerism? Helene ... [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2002-07-23 by neilbell66
Hello all. I m new to the list and looking for some help locating some workflow options. I have an 1160, Peizo system and have tested MIS, old Piezo and new
2002-07-23 by Ricardo Lagos
i found a very easy workaround to the x-ray machine problem.. (and did this post 9/11) hand carry your film -- (in your carryon) -- remove it from your carry
2002-07-23 by gschern
According to the latest Epson distributor price book dated 6/2002 that I have as a reference, the Enhanced Matte is only available in the large format rolls.
2002-07-23 by Tim Spragens
I d worry more about going back into the US than anywhere else, if even that would be a problem. I m often flying within Europe, film in hand luggage, not a
2002-07-23 by Julian Thomas
Yeah Jerry, but they won t let you on the plane! You have no right to have a hand inspection - although you can ask, and I do every time - so you have a
2002-07-23 by Jerry Olson
Yes, SOME machines at SOME airports are perfectly safe. The one down the hall may not be. Kodak itself said NOT to let any film be xrayed in Europe, their Xray
2002-07-23 by Jerry Olson
I imagine it s the same paper, but am wondering what epson did to it to get the 2 gsm difference between the papers. SOMEthing changed. Was it just weight?
2002-07-23 by Stan McQueen
... See http://www.kodak.com/global/en/service/tib/tib5201.shtml for more definitive information. My experience has been that the lead bags are not worth the
2002-07-23 by Jerry Olson
If you put them in film sheild bags, they will surely flag them and ask you to remove whatever is in them. No longer do they let anything through that can t be
2002-07-23 by Jerry Olson
We do. And side by side comparisons confirm I am right about this. Jerry
2002-07-23 by Jean-Michel Paris
... I would not do any of that. With the new considerably more powerful x-ray machines at some airports, they will fry your film in an atempt to see through
2002-07-23 by Julian Thomas
I travel fairly often in Europe (Italy/Spain/UK) and I ve never been able to get a handcheck. The films are safe to 1600 iso so they always scan it . But the
2002-07-23 by Jerry Olson
Do NOT let the airport Xray your film overseas. Chances are it will be toast. No matter what they tell you, DON T do it. Especially don t check it in your
2002-07-23 by Jerry Olson
enhanced matte weight: 192 gsms Archival enhanced matte: 190 gsms Small, but different. Whats different? Jerry