Re: [Digital BW] Image theft
2002-05-06 by David Dyer-Bennet
... It is not, in fact, technically illegal. Fair use is the concept that allows this, and it s explicitly written into the law. (Not explicitly *enough*,
Yahoo Groups archive
Messages
Page 1904 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
2002-05-06 by David Dyer-Bennet
... It is not, in fact, technically illegal. Fair use is the concept that allows this, and it s explicitly written into the law. (Not explicitly *enough*,
2002-05-06 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
... Actually he never SAID that, for illustrative purposes (which may or may NOT indicate he actually own it) he said: It s no different than if I took my
2002-05-06 by Austin Franklin
Pufmeister, ... That doesn t have anything to do with it being legal or not though... You have NEVER made a cassette from an album or CD etc., or recorded a
2002-05-06 by Austin Franklin
Steve, I don t mean to be crass, but you don t know what you re talking about here. There CLEARLY are circumstances that are entirely and completely legal to
2002-05-06 by bluzdoctor
Hello: I posted several weeks ago that I had purchased a new Epson 1160 online (at Staples.com) auction site. After six+ weeks waiting and numerous unreturned
2002-05-06 by Thom McGraw
... Epson driver with Paul Roark curve. For the ... I agree, I think it s a great paper. After reading your reply, I gave the 300 weight another go and it
2002-05-06 by Thom McGraw
... Yes. I think I just got one of those bad 1160 s. Never really noticed it until the warranty was over. Thom
2002-05-06 by Thom McGraw
Doesn t surprise me given my flat prints with Peregrine. Thank you. Thom
2002-05-06 by Kevin Gulstene
No doubt some will agree and some will not. You ve staked out your position and I ve staked out mine. I don t make copies of an artist s work for any use.
2002-05-06 by stevenr@mindspring.com
I know nothing about music copy rights. All I know is that it is a copy right violation to copy a photo unless you own the copy rights of that image. So if
2002-05-06 by Austin Franklin
Steve, And you base that on what? As I said, it is EXACTLY the same as owning a CD and making a tape from some of the songs on the CD. Are you claiming that
2002-05-06 by stevenr@mindspring.com
This is not correct. If you own a photo you can hang any were you like, but you can not copy it unless you own the copy right. Steve I don t believe size or
2002-05-06 by stevenr@mindspring.com
With a Photo it is 50 years pulse the life of the Photographer before the image goes in to public domain . a play, etc., enters "public domain"
2002-05-06 by toomagenta@aol.com
In a message dated 5/6/2002 1:35:24 PM Eastern Daylight Time, ... How do they know? They don t know if the printer properly washed and fixed the image. They
2002-05-06 by Austin Franklin
Kevin, ... Well, for me too...but when it is warranted. ... Actually, they are VERY clear here. If you own a CD and make a cassette of it (or a compilation),
2002-05-06 by toomagenta@aol.com
In a message dated 5/6/2002 1:11:31 PM Eastern Daylight Time, ... Even if the image sucks? My favorite print to stare at just for the sake of enjoying the
2002-05-06 by stevenr@mindspring.com
Kevin,You are not over the top. You are right on the money. (no pun intended). Any one who make their living selling photos should feel this way. Keep up the
2002-05-06 by Kevin Gulstene
... Perhaps image use would be more appropriate. As I said in another post it is a hot button for me. ... Agreed, this is arguably fair use. ... This is
2002-05-06 by Don Eby
... I don t think that whether the artist is selling any images or not is the real issue. If an image is posted on a website, it can be enjoyed by all, on the
2002-05-06 by Robert G. Morrison
... Right...and this comment is perhaps circular...but if Weston...or Weston s estate decided to edition one of his prints using Iris or Inkjet
2002-05-06 by Jason DeFontes
An interesting book on this topic is The Worth of Art: Pricing the Priceless by Judith Benhamou-Huet. http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/2843232848
2002-05-06 by Kevin Gulstene
You make some good points, and reproducing a web image for your kitchen is a small transgression but: 1. Presumably you would not want someone to attribute the
2002-05-06 by iwasnvrhere
... wrote: I have been curious about that also. Some other experts claim that the Epson 100% black is just that. However, my suspicious are
2002-05-06 by rikeller
It seems to me that an important piece to this discussion that has been ignored is that the rarity, or whatever you want to call it, that exists in the
2002-05-06 by Doug Fisher
Garry - Maybe someone can jump in here who knows for sure, but I have heard the NoMoreCarts system (which is what I believe the Niagra system really is) may
2002-05-06 by Steadman Uhlich
Mark Tucker, Your humor gets laughs again. Nekkidness is one of those thangs that just seems to sell. (wINK) I think I know the very shot you mentioned in
2002-05-06 by marktuckerdotcom
... You guys are completely missing the point here -- it s about MONEY. Like it or not, to many people who are buying these multi-thousand dollar prints, it s
2002-05-06 by Gregory Popovitch
What you say is true. But then I can find a great print in books. Michael Kenna s books are well printed, and a page from them would look great under glass. So
2002-05-06 by Austin Franklin
Kevin, ... Now hold on, Kevin. This is hardly a serious violation (if really at all) that you need to get all puffed up about here, and ESPECIALLY for you
2002-05-06 by ruhrfoto
A great print (silver/inkjet or whatever) - depends on the capabiliy to produce a great negative (file) - depends on the capabilty to pre-visualize a great
2002-05-06 by Gregory Popovitch
Hi David, I respect your opinion, but I don t think it is usually shared by collectors (and it is collectors who buy expensive prints). You may well enjoy the
2002-05-06 by Ricardo Lagos
hmm .. i think that if someone takes a 640x480 image from the web -- manipulates it, and prints it .. (to hang on their refrigerator) -- they willl get a print
2002-05-06 by Carolyn Frayn
... Copyright or not, it is certainly theft. How can you not recognize that. ... Those people paid for the calendars. No comparison. Carolyn
2002-05-06 by Truman Prevatt
Copywrite laws are complex at best, some say convoluted. While it is technically illegal to even copy a page out of a book, it is recognized that it is not in
2002-05-06 by Kevin Gulstene
I can t believe you really believe this. ... This is wrong. It is illegal to use a copyright image for _any_ purpose without the copyright owner s permission.
2002-05-06 by David Dyer-Bennet
... I *strongly* suggest you consult a lawyer before doing anything important based on your current understanding of copyright. Or at least look at
2002-05-06 by Paul Roark
... wrote: ... ... I activate the sliders in most of the variable-tone curves to give more control of tone. (If I had known
2002-05-06 by Alan Zinn
... Della, Yours is another example, if I correctly understand you, of size matters arrogance. Nobody who understands photography believes that small format
2002-05-06 by Jean-Michel Paris
Gregory Popovitch is raising some very interesting and valid points, particularly regarding the difficulty of mastering certain elements of the darkroom part
2002-05-06 by royvharrington
... same light, then ... I haven t any inside knowledge of Piezo or Epson so I can only read the claims that they both make. No doubt there s marketing hype
2002-05-06 by David Dyer-Bennet
... Why would anybody want to spend a significant amount of money to buy a rare object? The only reason I can understand is they can t get something the looks
2002-05-06 by rcoda
Hi Todd: I don t believe it s illegal unless I try to sell them or even give them away. I m just putting them up in my kitchen. It s no different than if I
2002-05-06 by Rick Schiller
Inkjet printers, whether BW or color, are simply amazing in how far they have come the last few years. And the amount of manipulation and control Photoshop
2002-05-06 by jrandall1149
... wrote: ... Paul: When you say *with the right settings*, I assume you primarily mean checking the *no color correction box*
2002-05-06 by Gregory Popovitch
Hi Mark, I agree with your previsions, but I m not sure I really made up my point about the lack of acceptance for inkjet prints in galleries. A buyer of
2002-05-06 by Paul Roark
Vinny, ... If you already have a Piezo driver, the easiest thing is to just go with the MIS FS inks -- the standard FS if you want the warm tones like the
2002-05-06 by Robert Morrison
... Response mainly to Gregory, This is yet another example of the person who walks into an art gallery and says that my 3 year old could have done that.
2002-05-06 by Paul Roark
David, ... Sad but true. Although, in the partitioned workflows and with the right settings, it appears we are able to get sufficient control of the inks to,
2002-05-06 by Jerry Olson
Jon Cone has told us that his system prints at 2160 dpi. That is the only place I have ever heard this number mentioned. I doubt if the printer really prints
2002-05-06 by Robert Morrison
... Have you actually seen sample prints with the new technology (7600/9600)? I was just speaking with someone this weekend that has been using the new