Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Messages

Browse messages

Page 427 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched

RE: [Digital BW] Epson's court victory

2007-11-03 by Paul Roark

... C A N A D A ? Europe and Canada are not covered by the US ITC. I can just see those guards I met this summer searching hundreds of trunks for ... inkjet

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] Epson 1800 chips

2007-11-03 by Paul Roark

I think since I ve been using resetters I ve had maybe 2 chips that died as opposed to getting reset. It s not something that I expect. Note that I have had

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Epson's court victory

2007-11-03 by Rick Colson

Charlie Thomson wrote: I ll just say this.. You can vote every 4 years in this country, if you don t like that MOVE!!! Now there s a really intelligent,

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Epson/Cone .... Now What?

2007-11-03 by wkm@kauaiphotos.biz

$340 at MIS. Probably cheaper on ebay. I d get the carts NOW. I think the ink will be around for awhile yet. I m stocking up on extra cart sets for my printers

Thread view Attachments: 0

Epson 1800 chips

2007-11-03 by Myron Gochnauer

I have a relatively new Epson 1800, which I bought for pure-carbon black printing (3 Eboni black cartridges). Twice now I have had the printer reject (or fail

Thread view Attachments: 0

Epson/Cone .... Now What?

2007-11-03 by flyflightdeck

Well less than a year ago I bought a new Epson 4800 over the 3800 and Canon IPF5000 for its ability to use Piezography inks.I still have not got around to

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] Epson's loss leader

2007-11-03 by Paul Roark

... An Epson rep told me they lose money on every 220 sold. Of course, that might not have been the truth. ... I m not sure where the line is. I was hoping

Thread view Attachments: 0

for Jon Cone re:Epson's court victory

2007-11-02 by Frank Jay

Jon, when I go target shooting and use wadcutters, I get a discount on my pack of 50 when I return a pack of 50 spent shells. the shells can be used I believe

Thread view Attachments: 0

Epson's loss leader

2007-11-02 by Andre Moreau

... of Epson ... Hello Paul, This has been the general consensus amongst Epson desktop users, that Epson is selling printers at below cost so it can make money

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Epson's court victory

2007-11-02 by Steven Karafyllakis

... Paul, the biggest hindrance is resetting the chips-do you have any idea if the auto-reset chips are universal, or printer- specific? If we can get past

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Epson's court victory

2007-11-02 by john dean

Yea and I ll bet their attorneys just got a big raise this week. ... Actually I do clean out and refill my Epson 10K carts with Jon s ink on occasion and in

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Epson's court victory

2007-11-02 by Dana H. Myers

... It s what patent law is all about; you craft an invention and spend the time and money to patent it, you get protection in return. Further, if a patent

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Epson's court victory

2007-11-02 by Tom Baker

Sounds like there needs to be some serious effort made on refilling the Epson carts. Don t know what that might be, but it certainly would be useful to have

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Epson's court victory

2007-11-02 by john dean

So that includes refillable bottle carts too, of all sorts, like MIS is selling now for the big ones? Man, that sounds like a tough nut to crack unles someone

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Epson's court victory

2007-11-02 by Mark Savoia

People using third party inks and carts in Epson large format printers has got to be such a small percentage considering the (10) thousands of printers they

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Epson's court victory

2007-11-02 by Jon Cone

CIS systems are not exempt which use a container with or without a chip attached but that can be read if it is used (the chip is not the issue, simply its

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] Epson's court victory

2007-11-02 by E Neilsen

Then a clear winner will be the first company that markets a chip free printer. One that accepts whatever inks one wants to load and perhaps bundled with a

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Epson's court victory

2007-11-02 by Frank Jay

Would not the sudden unavailabilty of carts, lead to more people buying in bulk, chip setters and CIS systems so the revenue lost from cart sales will be made

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Epson's court victory

2007-11-02 by Tyler Boley

My intention with the initial post was to get the information out there, this is huge for some of us, and I hoped that would result in others interested in

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] Epson's court victory

2007-11-02 by Tom Maugham

I m sorry to admit that I came into this thread late but here s my particular situation: I have an Epson 1280 using a CIS from MIS Associates. Assuming that

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] Epson's court victory

2007-11-02 by Paul Roark

By the way, Epson has filed a second lawsuit going after the large format cartridges. And has anyone figured out how to refill 3800 carts yet? They really are

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Epson's court victory

2007-11-02 by john dean

I ll tell you what will be a political, professional, and personal jab is if he signs it. Don t think they are going to stop with little carts, they will use

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Epson's court victory

2007-11-02 by Richard Cooke

John, How about in the future keeping your political jabs to yourself? Some on this list find this kind of cheap shot juvenile. This list is for the

Thread view Attachments: 0

Filling R220 empties with Windex

2007-11-02 by p5198

I d like to try this on a stubborn Cyan clog. I have a bottom filler, syringe and a blunt needle, and a couple of exhausted, presumably sponge-filled carts.

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] Epson's court victory

2007-11-02 by Paul Roark

(Legal thoughts - slightly OT) The law in this matter states, in relevant part: Section 19 U.S.C. 1337. Unfair practices in import trade . (d) Exclusion of

Thread view Attachments: 0

MIS r260 -- cartridge not recognized

2007-11-02 by Mitch Greenwald

I just purchased a set of MIS carts, refillable, for an r260. I loaded one (eboni) and put it in. I couldn t print, and the utility showed all carts (not

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Epson's court victory

2007-11-02 by john dean

Write your senator and congressman. At the very least they should be aware that the issue even exists, because I m sure most of them don t.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Epson's court victory

2007-11-01 by JensGerbitz

Thanks for the reply Jon. As much as I would like to write the President, I m on the other side of the 49th parallel. In any case, I wish you much luck with

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Epson's court victory

2007-11-01 by Jon Cone

Jens, The ruling only affects printers with on-carriage cartridges and these are 13 and smaller. The 3800 uses remote ink carts, but I do not think anyone has

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Epson's court victory

2007-11-01 by JensGerbitz

Can someone clarify whether the 3800, or any 17 printer, would be considered desk-top, i.e. affected by this law? I guess this means that people should stock

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Epson's court victory

2007-11-01 by john dean

There has also recently been a successful lawsuit against makers of carts cloned from HP and HP won. I m not sure about Canon. It seems to me, though I know

Thread view Attachments: 0

Epson's court victory

2007-11-01 by Tyler Boley

It turns out there is a very good chance this will effect any of us using alternative inks for prints far superior to OEM solutions, or any other reason.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Epson R220; moving the heads ...

2007-11-01 by p5198

...out of the way so that I can apply Windex to the parking pad. It was easy enough for the 1160 and 1280, but I can t figure out how to do it with this little

Thread view Attachments: 0

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.