Yahoo Groups archive

Analogue-sequencer

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:15 UTC

Messages

Browse messages

Page 77 of 168 · 8362 messages matched

Re: [analogue-sequencer] "Drum" Operating System.

2006-02-20 by Richard

did I hear just my vermona drm1 whimper with excitement....? what I would personally like is to be able to dedicate just one track for drum use, with limited polyphony (I never need to hear more than four drum sounds on the same step) maybe using the auxes in a different way... c

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [analogue-sequencer] "Drum" Operating System.

2006-02-20 by Colin f

> I had read previously that the P3 has a specific OS from drum use. I have the beginnings of an OS build for drum-specific use, but I haven't found the time to work it into a releasable form. It's still on my personal wish-list. Best regards, Colin Fraser Sequentix Music Systems

Thread view Attachments: 0

Ableton live sync (was: Top Speed - ergonomics part II)

2006-02-20 by Julian

> P3 normally sends a MIDI START when you hit RUN. > If you use FUNC+RUN from stopped on P3, it will send a MIDI CONTINUE, which > shouldn't reset slaved devices. > The slave will need to be at the start of a bar to continue from. Now im trying this with ableton live... From the

Thread view Attachments: 0

"Drum" Operating System.

2006-02-20 by DJ Paris Lee

I had read previously that the P3 has a specific OS from drum use. Could someone lay out the difference b/t that operation mode and the normal P3 OS? Thanks. -Paris

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Top Speed - ergonomics part II

2006-02-17 by Jim Combs

--- In analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com, "circuitsea" wrote: > Are people finding it nice and successful to use the P3 with their > computer sequencers I'm tending to compose on the P3 and once something is shaped up, I'll then sync to Digital Performer, but only to record audi

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Top Speed - ergonomics part II

2006-02-17 by david

Oakley Sound ha scritto: > > Are people finding it nice and successful to use the P3 with their > computer sequencers... > > I use my P3 with Ableton Live and sometimes Reason. > > With Reason its less useful because Reason has to act as a midiclock > slave. Even with the FUNC+RU

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Top Speed - ergonomics part II

2006-02-17 by Oakley Sound

> Are people finding it nice and successful to use the P3 with their computer sequencers... I use my P3 with Ableton Live and sometimes Reason. With Reason its less useful because Reason has to act as a midiclock slave. Even with the FUNC+RUN mode on the P3 its no good since Reas

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [analogue-sequencer] Top Speed - ergonomics part II

2006-02-17 by Colin f

> Id much rather be using ableton too, but when i tried it some > time back, > with the p3 running as a master, every time i hit run, > ableton would reset > to bar 1 beat 1, which was 100% useless for me. P3 normally sends a MIDI START when you hit RUN. If you use FUNC+RUN from

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Top Speed - ergonomics part II

2006-02-17 by Julian

>... but now i've switched to ableton live. Hi David, Id much rather be using ableton too, but when i tried it some time back, with the p3 running as a master, every time i hit run, ableton would reset to bar 1 beat 1, which was 100% useless for me. I wish i could find a nice sim

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Top Speed - ergonomics part II

2006-02-16 by david

circuitsea ha scritto: > Thanks for all the discussion of the interface. Very much > appreciated. > > My next question has to do with using the P3 along with a > computer sequencer. My plan would be to send midi from the p3 > to Logic, then make a switch in the environment that w

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Top Speed - ergonomics part II

2006-02-16 by Gary Chang

"circuitsea" wrote: > > > Are people finding it nice and successful to use the P3 with their > computer sequencers, ie do most tend to have some special > sequences coming from the P3 and others from the computer, > or do some use the P3 simply a midi data generator to the > "sam

Thread view Attachments: 0

Top Speed - ergonomics part II

2006-02-16 by circuitsea

Thanks for all the discussion of the interface. Very much appreciated. My next question has to do with using the P3 along with a computer sequencer. My plan would be to send midi from the p3 to Logic, then make a switch in the environment that would switch the midi data from bein

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Keytops for the Maplin Switches....searching

2006-02-15 by philsmillie

Oooops, that's me knackered too... I knew I should've bought some sooner! Guess I'll have to splash out on those sexy Cherry keyswitch and keycap sets eh Colin? Do you have any/many sets left? Phil www.jointintelligencecommittee.com

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Keytops for the Maplin Switches....searching

2006-02-14 by legozone23

Aaarrrggh.. i hoped really you can help me out Colin, nut thanks for the fast answer (as usual!). That´s really excellent stupid now, i so much wished to have my two baby´s in the same outfit, one was planned as rack-, the other is an old desktop-version. Maybe somebody else has

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [analogue-sequencer] Keytops for the Maplin Switches....searching

2006-02-14 by Colin f

> I´m searching for anybody who can supply me with keytops for > the Maplin > Switches (DM76H) for the P3-Kit i just bought used.. On the > Maplin Site > they say it´s discontinued :((( I only have a few of these left, so I can't help. I wasn't aware they were discontinued, typic

Thread view Attachments: 0

Keytops for the Maplin Switches....searching

2006-02-14 by legozone23

Hi, I´m searching for anybody who can supply me with keytops for the Maplin Switches (DM76H) for the P3-Kit i just bought used.. On the Maplin Site they say it´s discontinued :((( I really want to use these retro-look switches, so if somebody has some of these (i would need 25 of

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [analogue-sequencer] Something else...

2006-02-14 by Andrew Scheidler

How about an VGA output on the back of the P3? For optional use to "see" how things are set... OK, I'll shut up before I get a chair thrown at me =0 Andrew (current SEQ-303 owner, future P3 owner) >>> colin@colinfraser.com 02/14/06 4:54 AM >>> > How about displaying the actual, c

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Something else...

2006-02-14 by Paul Nagle

On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:35:04 +0000, Martin Naef wrote: >I recently tried to add a set of AUX rel notes one octave below the main >note. The track was running at timebase 4 (global Tempo 66), so rather >slow. I only knew where my knob was at the start of each step, so it >took mor

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Something else...

2006-02-14 by Martin Naef

Hi Paul Paul Nagle wrote: >> I recently tried to add a set of AUX rel notes one octave below the main >> note. The track was running at timebase 4 (global Tempo 66), so rather >> slow. I only knew where my knob was at the start of each step, so it >> took more than one full track

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Something else...

2006-02-14 by Martin Naef

Hi Colin Colin f wrote: >> Sculpt: Why don't I see the sculpt value immediately? Especially for >> slow patterns it's hit and miss when I try to set a specified value >> (e.g., I only see the current data value once I hit the next step) > > Sculpting is captured at the start of e

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [analogue-sequencer] Something else...

2006-02-14 by Colin f

> How about displaying the actual, continuously updated data value in > brackets somewhere on the screen? I had planned to do this at one point, but put it off because it's more complex to do than it might seem. The display would need to show the value that would be sculpted for

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Something else...

2006-02-14 by Richard Scott

"How about displaying the actual, continuously updated data value in brackets somewhere on the screen?" I agree with Martin that something like that would be very helfpul - its often impossible to get back to where you were on the P3 Richard ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ma

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [analogue-sequencer] Something else...

2006-02-13 by Colin f

> Additional issues independent from the above: > > Sculpt: Why don't I see the sculpt value immediately? Especially for > slow patterns it's hit and miss when I try to set a specified value > (e.g., I only see the current data value once I hit the next step) Sculpting is capture

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Something else...

2006-02-13 by Martin Naef

Hi Colin Colin f wrote: >> I wouldn't be surprised >> if some people therefore still prefer the old method. > > Nor would I. > The PAGE key should become sticky if that option is enabled, along with > FUNC, PLAY/EDIT and REC. > That would need to break the original functionality.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Something else...

2006-02-13 by Martin Naef

Hi Colin Colin f wrote: >> Yup - they could also select the CC mode. EG, step 1 means CC, the >> others select the group. > > That's neater still, so I did it that way. > Test beta 41 is in Yahoo files now. Very neat - works beautifully here. Having a small overlay printed helps

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [analogue-sequencer] Something else...

2006-02-13 by Colin f

> > One oddity with this is that step key 4 gives you the same > page as step 1, > > and 8 gives you the same page as 5. > > I understand the implementation side of it, but it feels > rather strange. > The little math required to fix this should be simple enough. Yeah, I'm just l

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Something else...

2006-02-13 by Paul Nagle

On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 23:14:58 -0000, "Colin f" wrote: >I'm tempted to drop the incremental PAGE only action altogether. >I'm find the direct access much quicker, and I'll probably stop using the >old method myself. >Comments welcome. Woooo - now I'm faster than *ever*. Superb chan

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [analogue-sequencer] Something else...

2006-02-13 by Colin f

> Add a shiny > "groove-box-style" printed panel (sticky transfers anyone?), and I > think this will utterly rock! I could print that on the silver laser film I use for the serial numbers... > There's something rather wonderful about watching evolution in action. I think this is

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Something else...

2006-02-13 by Gary Chang

"Colin f" wrote: > > > I'm tempted to drop the incremental PAGE only action altogether. > I'm find the direct access much quicker, and I'll probably stop using the > old method myself. > Comments welcome. > Colin, What you are doing is revolutionizing the P3's work flow, and I mu

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Something else...

2006-02-12 by Martin Naef

Hi Colin Colin f wrote: >> ... while I'm at it: How about using the same selection mechanism for >> the AUX events? Page+StepXX select the category, data then >> chooses the >> event within the category. > > Since the step keys are not active during aux config, it doesn't even ne

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [analogue-sequencer] Something else...

2006-02-12 by Colin f

> Yup - they could also select the CC mode. EG, step 1 means CC, the > others select the group. That's neater still, so I did it that way. Test beta 41 is in Yahoo files now. In aux config, you can still press PAGE to toggle between events and CCs. But FUNC is no longer. To selec

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [analogue-sequencer] Something else...

2006-02-12 by Colin f

> ... while I'm at it: How about using the same selection mechanism for > the AUX events? Page+StepXX select the category, data then > chooses the > event within the category. Since the step keys are not active during aux config, it doesn't even need PAGE+step. Step keys could se

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [analogue-sequencer] Re: top speed - interface questions

2006-02-12 by darkstr1746@comcast.net

If had more keys, I would be able to have dedicated PLAY MODE, EDIT MODE and PLAYLIST EDIT keys. ok. the above mentioned functions are what i would need to see before i got into this again. But that's just me and my needs for how i work. Simple? yes. Simplistic? yes. And not at a

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Something else...

2006-02-12 by Martin Naef

Hi Colin > BTW: The direct selection of the menus is *very* nice. As I'm writing > this e-mail, I'm preparing a small paper template so I know always what > key goes to what menu. I think once the feature set is more stable, it > might be a good idea to print something like that

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Something else...

2006-02-12 by Martin Naef

Hi Colin colinfraser_com wrote: > I forgot to mention, the new beta adds another record option. > nDub has been replaced with a 'Dub' option, with settings > of 'off', 'note' and 'gaps'. > Note is the same as nDub, gaps is like normal record but new notes > will only be added int

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Re: top speed - interface questions

2006-02-12 by Richard Scott

Hi Colin, I am frequently amazed not just by the P3 but by your reponsiveness to people's individuals comments and needs - and i think it takes some balls to admit the unfinished nature of the P3 and it takes respect to listen the way you do. I really appreciate it, and it is soo

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [analogue-sequencer] Re: top speed - interface questions

2006-02-12 by Colin f

> SO, now, by changing the Function, Play Edit, and Page > Buttons to Pattern Edit, Play Mode, and Playlist Edit buttons, you can > directly enter an actual page with a single keystroke! Now any page > can be immediately accessed by holding down the MODE key and hitting > the pag

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: top speed - interface questions

2006-02-12 by Gary Chang

"Colin f" wrote: > > A label along the front of the step keys, with > "EDIT PAGE: tbase / direction / cut&paste / shift / rnd note / rnd upper / > sculpt / config" > would probably help the unfamiliar find their way around too. > Let me know what you think... > Great, Colin! SO,

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: top speed - interface questions

2006-02-12 by Jim Combs

--- In analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com, "tmoravan" wrote: > Use it every day and you'll be comfortable. Getting there slowly. Not everyday, but everytime I fire up the beast, a new song pops out like magic. The sign of a good interface is one that allows beginners to be functi

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [analogue-sequencer] Din sync problem with Tr-909

2006-02-11 by a

if i remember correctly, there's a mode on the 909 that tells it to start always back from step 1, or to continue. Either that, or you need to wack "stop" before hitting start from the master sequencer (your P3) I remember having this slight problem when I was a 909 user. It was

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [analogue-sequencer] Re: top speed - interface questions

2006-02-11 by darkstr1746@comcast.net

Whilst i might prefer Garys solution to the step/page/access dilemma, this two button solution might just work for even a block head such as myself. I must say however that i would gladly cough up with the extra cash for a machine that had a much more serious UI which would mean

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [analogue-sequencer] top speed - interface questions

2006-02-11 by darkstr1746@comcast.net

So it's come to this. I feel sooooo pathetic. A man so totaly stoned out of his gourd that he makes the Cheshire cat seem omnipotent, can whiz around the P3 with the ease of a brilliant mathematician doing basic addition while I, totally straight, not being able to handle anythin

Thread view Attachments: 0

Something else...

2006-02-11 by colinfraser_com

I forgot to mention, the new beta adds another record option. nDub has been replaced with a 'Dub' option, with settings of 'off', 'note' and 'gaps'. Note is the same as nDub, gaps is like normal record but new notes will only be added into gaps in the existing pattern. Best regar

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [analogue-sequencer] Re: top speed - interface questions

2006-02-11 by Colin f

> What added to this with the XT was the exponential curve effect of the > encoders, where the faster you turned them the further their effect > would be - so a quick quarter turn would move you very very far and a > slow quarter turn would not move you far in adjusting a paramet

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: top speed - interface questions

2006-02-11 by circuitsea

I totally understand that with design there are trade-offs, and I also don't mind a learning curve - even a very steep one. But what I find is that some designs (and I did feel this way about the XT which I had for years) are just incapable of giving you `traction' so-to-speak. W

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [analogue-sequencer] Re: top speed - interface questions

2006-02-11 by Colin f

> It is just that when, in order to master the device for performance, > the majority of "chops" necessary are navigational skills - > remembering where you are, knowing how to exit to the main page and > access the next mode to get to the next needed page. The structure is > a t

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Re: top speed - interface questions

2006-02-11 by Nick Rothwell

On 11 Feb 2006, at 11:18, Paul Nagle wrote: > As for more remote control, yeah, I think this is > something Nick Rothwell was pushing for too Not necessarily. It really depends on whether the P3 is a performance interface or a box for generating information (audio or otherwise).

Thread view Attachments: 0

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.