Yahoo Groups archive
Messages
Page 78 of 168 · 8362 messages matched
2006-02-11 by tmoravan
Couple points: I'm also one of those people that has bought (and sold) gear because of the interface. Still have the Matrix 12, Wave, JP-8, etc. (although I still kept the Cyclone despite the interface. What is does is just too cool to pass up, and the P3 is a lot like that in so
2006-02-11 by Paul Nagle
Gary Chang wrote: >Of course, I submit this opinion with all due respect - this is >already a tremendous leap forward. I am just trying to "nudge" the P3 >into the next universe, where I can use it as a really time keyboard >alternative.... > > Wouldn't argue with any of your poi
2006-02-11 by Gary Chang
Paul, Your explanation is a valid argument that I agree with - the P3 is an amazing device that is worth learning and mastering and it has opened new and interesting avenues for creative sequencing in live circumstances. It is just that when, in order to master the device for per
2006-02-11 by Paul Nagle
circuitsea wrote: >How does the P3 with all its many parameters and capabilities rate in >this category? Do people find they get really fast moving around in >it or is it always a very conscious step by step process to add and >adjust tracks. > > It's a good question and my answe
2006-02-11 by Gary Chang
"circuitsea" wrote: > > I own and Oberheim Xpander, and am stunned when I read accounts of it > being a tough synth to program, or that it is really awesome but the > interface is awkward. > On the flip side I used to own a Waldorf Microwave XT and no matter > how long you used i
2006-02-11 by circuitsea
I own and Oberheim Xpander, and am stunned when I read accounts of it being a tough synth to program, or that it is really awesome but the interface is awkward. The interface on the Oberheim Xpander is absolutely wonderful - it has a huge amount of parameters and almost all of th
2006-02-09 by Paul Nagle
Jack Deckard wrote: >I GOT MY P3 yesterday, from Analog Haven. I spent most of yesterday >rearranging my rack, and have not >used it yet, other than to power up and see the LEDs blink. I'll be going >thru Paul's Users manual for the next couple of hours. > > Smoke a fat one - mig
2006-02-09 by Jack Deckard
You might want to look at this also http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B0002P1B4M/104-4353060-4691917?v=glance This looks pretty much the same as what is in the picture. I've got one of the below rack mounted above my P3 http://www.furmansound.com/products/pro/accessor
2006-02-09 by acidmitch
I've been using lights made by the Mighty Bright company.You can check them out here http://www.bill-lewington.com/mighty.htm They are cheap and work well. I have the extra flex model which can run for about 30 hours on rechargable batteries and it can take a bit of a battering.
2006-02-08 by vliesgaard
Yeaha it works again. I made the din sync output to sync only and that solved the problem. Thanks everyone for the fast reply's By Juur --- In analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com, "Colin f" wrote: > > > I have my 909 permanently hooked to the P3 via DIN sync, and never have any >
2006-02-08 by Andrew Scheidler
Although I don't yet have a P3, I've had an XT for quite a long time and can assure you that it would be a great partner for the P3. Full parameter access via CCs, and there's a lot of parameters :) Knobs are endless rotaries and there's lots of them. Built-in effects are very us
2006-02-08 by Colin f
> > I wonder if colin could be persuaded to add > one to the > > p3..? > > I had the idea of adding one of those "mixer lights" to my > p3. I asked Colin > about the posibilities, but he was not very enthusiastic. USB can provide up to 5v @ 500mA power to each socket, for the pur
2006-02-08 by Gert van Santen
Jez Creek wrote: > Thanks, > For those who don't know, at RMI's recnt gigs there have been little > gooseneck lamps attached to their gear. > (see http://www.modulator-esp.co.uk/images/photos/misc/HJ4/rmi/02.jpg > for an example) > I thought it looked like they were connected to
2006-02-08 by Jez Creek
Thanks, For those who don't know, at RMI's recnt gigs there have been little gooseneck lamps attached to their gear. (see http://www.modulator-esp.co.uk/images/photos/misc/HJ4/rmi/02.jpg for an example) I thought it looked like they were connected to the midi outs of the equipmen
2006-02-08 by ferrograph632
>>If you can afford to have both, and have the ARP triggered externally so it syncs to the rest of your gear, I'd say have/keep both. Paul did. I did. Many others have as well.
2006-02-08 by sad1robot@aol.com
HMMM why dont you just send midi clock out of the P3 to the 909? that works like a charm :) ill try and test my 909 . din in see if i have the same behaviour. i vaguely remember having the 606 /808's din out into the 909s din in. . then using the 909's midi clock to drive the p3.
2006-02-08 by Colin f
I have my 909 permanently hooked to the P3 via DIN sync, and never have any trouble. I do also have an 808 hooked up to, so maybe that makes a differnce... In later P3s that have the SYNC socket wired for both MIDI and DIN sync at the same time, it's possible that the MIDI data s
2006-02-08 by henry
Hi juur, same happens here (using din sync) with a 909 (haven't tested with my 303 so far), but this is somehow similar when 909 is synced via midiclock to logic. - so this might be due to the sync behaviour of the 909 and not a p3 fault. I guess colin could tweak the Din sync be
2006-02-08 by vliesgaard
I have the P3 as master din synced to my Tr-909. The problem is that when I restart, the P3 starts at the start (as it should) but the 909 sometimes continues where it stoped and sometimes starts at the begining. I want it always to start at the begining. I have the 909 in patern
2006-02-03 by bleep
On Thu, 2 Feb 2006, peter wrote: > my dream sampler would be one that could have loop-point as modulation. > i had a ensoniq eps16 when i was a kid, and had really fun when > assigning loop-point to datawheel, it could reach pithches high-silly, > and with a drop with the datawhe
2006-02-03 by tmoravan
--- In analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com, Paul Nagle wrote: > > Vrx wrote: > > >Hi > > > > can anyone here outline the Arp sequencers model 1623 etc and whether the P3 can emulate them well? any differences in Arp sequencer models and any good ?:) would a P3 replace one ? > > >
2006-02-03 by Paul Nagle
Vrx wrote: >Hi > > can anyone here outline the Arp sequencers model 1623 etc and whether the P3 can emualte them well? any differneces in Arp sequencer models and any good ?:) would a P3 replace one ? > > The P3 certainly replaced one of mine (I kept the other as it is rather uni
2006-02-03 by Jez Creek
Colin wrote >It is possible to compensate for post-FTS PXPos by transposing the FTS root >note in the opposite direction such that PXPos brings it back to where it >should be. But I took the easier option of changing the implementation >rather than trying to explain that one... P
2006-02-02 by Vrx
Hi can anyone here outline the Arp sequencers model 1623 etc and whether the P3 can emualte them well? any differneces in Arp sequencer models and any good ?:) would a P3 replace one ? cheers for any advice. matt Ps my votes for Variphrase electribe .I guess thats unlikely to hap
2006-02-02 by Colin f
> Aha, thanks Colin, I thought I was either going mad or my P3 was not > functioning correctly. > It turns out it's neither, just that the manual doesn't > explain this at all, > maybe something to add in the next update (under FTS and part > transpose). The manual doesn't explai
2006-02-02 by Paul Nagle
Another thought on this topic (transposing). In the transposed part, I tend to change the root and sometimes the scale itself. So if I'm in C aeo and I transpose up 5 semitones, I would always change the root to F so it's truly F aeo. Or indeed FMaj. Of course this can be odd whe
2006-02-02 by Paul Nagle
Jez Creek wrote: >Paul, >I had thought FTS was global, but it doesn't seem to be on my P3 (v3.1.005). >I'm not using playlists, just transposing a part using 'PXPos' and it >definitely isn't forcing to scale. > > Ah, sorry, I'm easily confused.. :) Paul --- Paul Nagle / Soft Room
2006-02-02 by Jez Creek
Aha, thanks Colin, I thought I was either going mad or my P3 was not functioning correctly. It turns out it's neither, just that the manual doesn't explain this at all, maybe something to add in the next update (under FTS and part transpose). Being able to choose will be good Che
2006-02-02 by Paul Nagle
Jez Creek wrote: >Probably a silly question, but is there anyway to have FTS on transposed >patterns? >At the moment when I transpose a pattern it changes key, I may be missing >something obvious, but I can't find anywhere to this could be set. > > FTS is global and forces all (n
2006-02-02 by Colin f
> I had thought FTS was global, but it doesn't seem to be on my > P3 (v3.1.005). > I'm not using playlists, just transposing a part using 'PXPos' and it > definitely isn't forcing to scale. The FTS behaviour around PXPos was not what you might expect... But this has been made sel
2006-02-02 by Jez Creek
Paul, I had thought FTS was global, but it doesn't seem to be on my P3 (v3.1.005). I'm not using playlists, just transposing a part using 'PXPos' and it definitely isn't forcing to scale. Cheers Jez Paul wrote >FTS is global and forces all (non protected) notes to the scale you >
2006-02-02 by Jez Creek
Probably a silly question, but is there anyway to have FTS on transposed patterns? At the moment when I transpose a pattern it changes key, I may be missing something obvious, but I can't find anywhere to this could be set. Cheers Jez
2006-02-02 by Tommy
Hello all, I haven't used my P3 for nearly six weeks, mainly due to my work load at the moment and i don't see my time freeing up anytime soon as i've got a baby on the way. It is a travesty that i have to sell this wonder of a machine but I'm really needing the money and it woul
2006-02-02 by peter
nice one! and those little tribes are cheap nowdays huh? my dream sampler would be one that could have loop-point as modulation. i had a ensoniq eps16 when i was a kid, and had really fun when assigning loop-point to datawheel, it could reach pithches high-silly, and with a drop
2006-02-02 by Paul Nagle
On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 01:01:34 -0000, "peter" wrote: >does anyone know if there is a hardware sampler with parametercontrol >- CC#, on loop position? I don't know any that can dynamically change loop position. My little ESX-1 electribe can change the sample start and end via CC - s
2006-02-02 by henry
Am 02.02.2006 um 09:05 schrieb Colin f: > > > any posibility for a copy all defined 'aux events' from one track to > > others ? > > You can use copy/paste to do this - if you copy any steps of a > pattern, the > aux config also gets copied to the copy buffer. > When you come to p
2006-02-02 by Colin f
> any posibility for a copy all defined 'aux events' from one track to > others ? You can use copy/paste to do this - if you copy any steps of a pattern, the aux config also gets copied to the copy buffer. When you come to paste it, press 'paste', then press the 'select' softkey
2006-02-02 by David Bate
peter wrote: > does anyone know if there is a hardware sampler with parametercontrol > - CC#, on loop position? The Akai Z4/Z8/MPC4000 series can control sample start via the Program Modulation Matrix, as well as assign a CC# to that... but it can't change loop position, other th
2006-02-02 by peter
does anyone know if there is a hardware sampler with parametercontrol - CC#, on loop position? peace peter
2006-02-01 by henry
Hi colin, any posibility for a copy all defined 'aux events' from one track to others ? I recently discovered the playlist feature and lately use with 4bar long sequences (chained tracks) then I copy 1st part to other parts and let them run chained as well - but when i start to c
2006-01-31 by implode7@comcast.net
-------------- Original message ---------------------- From: Nick Rothwell > > On 31 Jan 2006, at 17:12, peter sedin wrote: > > > ps..anyone been working with this sequenser?? > > http://www.signalarts.ca/satspecs.html > > I see it has infinite encoders... > > -- N. I have one. I
2006-01-31 by Paul Nagle
Nick Rothwell wrote: >On 31 Jan 2006, at 17:12, peter sedin wrote: > > > >> ps..anyone been working with this sequenser?? >> http://www.signalarts.ca/satspecs.html >> >> > >I see it has infinite encoders... > > Isn't it a little early to tell? :) I see a useful list of scales for
2006-01-31 by Nick Rothwell
On 31 Jan 2006, at 17:12, peter sedin wrote: > ps..anyone been working with this sequenser?? > http://www.signalarts.ca/satspecs.html I see it has infinite encoders... -- N. nick rothwell -- composition, systems, performance -- http:// www.cassiel.com
2006-01-31 by Colin f
> 1:can one sequensers clock res. be controlled by another sequenser? One track can dynamically control the timebase of another track. Is that what you meant ? > 2:can induvidual events be moved tiny bits to make more > lively/groovy pattern(for drums etc)? Yes. Each step has a g
2006-01-31 by peter sedin
hello guys and girls! 1:can one sequensers clock res. be controlled by another sequenser? 2:can induvidual events be moved tiny bits to make more lively/groovy pattern(for drums etc)? i had a couple of doepfer mac16-3 sequensers, but got tired of them becurse there were now butto
2006-01-29 by Paul Nagle
Martin Naef wrote: > >Ok, I think I get it now. I was missing the crucial distinction between >*pattern* and part. Until now, I used them interchangeably. > > Yeah, a pattern is the 16-step "sequence" of conventional step sequencers and you string them together in playlists.Parts
2006-01-29 by Martin Naef
Hi Paul Paul Nagle wrote: >> Now I'm trying to edit a track in part 3 - I want to create a variation >> of what is in part 2. Now whatever I edit is applied to both part 2 and >> part 3 -> in other words, it seems as if part copy doesn't actually copy >> the tracks, but simply se
2006-01-29 by Paul Nagle
Martin Naef wrote: >Now I'm trying to edit a track in part 3 - I want to create a variation >of what is in part 2. Now whatever I edit is applied to both part 2 and >part 3 -> in other words, it seems as if part copy doesn't actually copy >the tracks, but simply sets a pointer to
2006-01-29 by Colin f
> Ok, I think I get it now. I was missing the crucial > distinction between > *pattern* and part. Until now, I used them interchangeably. An initialised bank has each part holding a single step playlist for each track, with the same pattern number as the part number. That's just
2006-01-29 by Martin Naef
I'm currently wondering whether I've stumbled across a bug (I'm on Beta 39) or a misunderstanding on my part. Can anybody enlighten me? Here's what I want to do: I've created a part 2 that I want to duplicate to part 3. I'm in play mode. I use part-copy all from play mode -> hold