Re: Re: [L-OT] Atomic Bomb/Japan
2001-09-24 by KONDO Tatsuo
... Japan at that time had no such abilities of any kind. What they could do was to fly balloons reinforced with saccharide taken from a kind of potato and
Messages
Browse messages
Page 112 of 140 · 6965 messages matched
OT: Ireland and its terrorists
2001-09-24 by Mark Lennox
Just as an aside... here in Ireland most generally consider that acts perpetrated by those involved in the 1916 rising were patriotic and justified as we now
Re: [L-OT] ]Goodbye/Arafat
2001-09-24 by LogicBaby
Hey, Its because the current Israeli government consisting of Sharon and his followers has NO peace or political Agenda AT ALL, every time there is a chance
Re: [L-OT] OT Goodbye / Hussein
2001-09-24 by Mark Lennox
... the ... Jr., ... never ... He did make a speech to the graduating class of MIT where instead of urging them to wear sunblock he told them to brush their
Re: [L-OT] Re: Goodbye Apologies
2001-09-24 by Hendrik Jan Veenstra
... Thanks. You needn t have done this in public -- all the more kudo s to you. No-one needs to agree with anyone, but we re all entitled to our opinions, as
Re: [L-OT] Re: OT Goodbye
2001-09-24 by Hendrik Jan Veenstra
... I think you completely miss the point. Someone wrote that the US has only killed recently in war-acts. The problem is one of the old chicken & egg. A
Re: [L-OT] Re: OT Goodbye
2001-09-24 by Mike Cover
To see what we re up against, with the growing home-grown infection of Islam s fundamentalist-terrorist, whose sole.. taking over the humankind s collective
Re: [L-OT] Atomic Bomb/Japan
2001-09-24 by Wilson Zorn
... From: John Matthews To: Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2001 11:32 PM Subject: Re: [L-OT] Atomic Bomb/Japan ...
Re: Re: [L-OT] Atomic Bomb/Japan
2001-09-24 by Wilson Zorn
GAmoore - I think you re misunderstanding something here. I m making neither argument. I am indicating what some people have said on both sides of the fence
Re: [L-OT] Atomic Bomb/Japan
2001-09-24 by John Matthews
... that might be true but; 1. with millions more of dead on both sides. 2. The US didnt beat Nazi Germany, Russia did, the Russains and Japanese agreed not to
Re: Re: [L-OT] Atomic Bomb/Japan
2001-09-24 by GAmoore@aol.com
... If they weren t willing to surrender even AFTER two atomic bomb attacks an the firebombing of Tokyo, do you really think they would just surrender on their
CLimate Treaty
2001-09-24 by GAmoore@aol.com
I saw one of the Japanese ministers on TV a few months ago saying that they didn t like the treaty because it doesn t count the affect of the forests of Japan.
China threat
2001-09-24 by GAmoore@aol.com
A few examples In 1996, during PResidential elections in Taiwan, the chinese started firing missiles 25 miles off the coast of Taiwan as a message. The US
Re: Re: [L-OT] Perspective
2001-09-24 by GAmoore@aol.com
Pupkid wrote ... Go in the bathroom and vomit then. You are ASSUMING you know what will happen, when in reality, nothing has happened yet. Please at least wait
Apologies/World Opinion
2001-09-24 by GAmoore@aol.com
After reading spectro@ozemail.com.au (Spectro) s mail, it made me really depressed. I freely admit that the US blunders at time - Vietnam was questionable, and
Re: [L-OT] Re: Atomic Bomb/Japan
2001-09-24 by GAmoore@aol.com
... The US military expected to lose more in the invasion of Japan than in the entire European theatre. Japan would have lost 3 to 10 times as many. The atomic
Re: [L-OT] Re: OT Goodbye (longish)
2001-09-24 by GAmoore@aol.com
Hendrik wrote ... Its so easy to consider America so war like and primitive. However, in 1915 and 1940, the view in America was we want to stay out of yet
]Goodbye/Arafat
2001-09-24 by GAmoore@aol.com
Why is it the Israeli s blame Arafat for any disturbance that is caused by any of the millions of Palestinians? They assume he has absolute control every
Re: [L-OT] Re: OT Goodbye
2001-09-24 by Wilson Zorn
PS - all of which to say is that it s not a ridiculous claim that many dislike the leader of Saudi Arabia. It may even be an incorrect claim, when all s
Re: [L-OT] Re: OT Goodbye
2001-09-24 by Wilson Zorn
I do not state that Saudi Arabia faces imminent revolt. Far from it. Some of these links don t seem terribly independent, particularly ain-al-yaqeem - take a
Re: [L-OT] Re: Goodbye Apologies
2001-09-24 by Dennis Gunn
In a personal mail Joeri pointed out what he regarded as some offensive remarks I made with regard to the ideas of Hendrik Jan Veestra. I strongly disagree
Re: [L-OT] Anti-American rant
2001-09-24 by KONDO Tatsuo
... Not true. Japan has chosen the way to convince the US instead of simply blaming it, because without participation of the country that produces 22% of CO2
Re: Atomic Bomb/Japan
2001-09-24 by Lee Blaske
... It s a little late to second guess that decision, considering that the people who made it have been dead themselves for quite some time. Dropping the two
Re: [L-OT] Re: OT Goodbye
2001-09-24 by marc lindahl
... Yes it is, and a prime example of how media can subtly slant a story. ... Under what you or I might take as accompanying circumstances. But this thought
Re: [L-OT] Atomic Bomb/Japan
2001-09-24 by Wilson Zorn
... From: To: Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2001 12:52 PM Subject: Re: [L-OT] Atomic Bomb/Japan ... would have
Re: [L-OT] Re: OT Goodbye
2001-09-24 by marc lindahl
... ... and I can see that your definition is, anything the US has even remote involvment in, regarless of context, where lives were lost; tally them up as
Re: [L-OT] Re: OT Goodbye
2001-09-24 by Wilson Zorn
The article indicates, In the current Arab climate of hostility to Israel and its US backers, many Saudis resent their government s friendship with the West.
Re: [L-OT] Re: OT Goodbye
2001-09-24 by marc lindahl
... It s a simple yes or no question... in some countries, you know you re represented by your goverment because of your social status, caste, or political
[L-OT] Re: OT Goodbye
2001-09-24 by Dennis Gunn
... Impressive post. Thank you for supporting your statements so articulately. Some of them strike me as somewhat slanted but I lack the knowledge to refute
Re: [L-OT] Re: OT Goodbye
2001-09-23 by Teddy Kumpel
... are you going to say something aggressive after I answer?
Re: [L-OT] Re: Adrian Gills post
2001-09-23 by The Pupkid
... I agree. An astonishing and sobering post. pk
Re: [L-OT] Perspective
2001-09-23 by The Pupkid
... While you pat yourselves on the back, lots of us are sick to the stomach at the thought of what is about to be done in our names. And highly dubious about
Re: [L-OT] Re: OT Goodbye
2001-09-23 by marc lindahl
... Did you vote in the last election?
Re: [L-OT] Re: OT Goodbye
2001-09-23 by Teddy Kumpel
that is a supremely wise thing to say. thank you. I am American... but I am not represented by my own government in the least.
Re: [L-OT] Re: OT Goodbye / Hussein
2001-09-23 by marc lindahl
... True - the hoax was the attribution.
Re: [L-OT] Re: OT Goodbye
2001-09-23 by Mike Cover
Raising yo kids to become sand terrorists?? Best you construct more tents, Omarr...you ll be goin back to the desert where you ve been for ages! Proud to be
Re: Adrian Gills post
2001-09-23 by ythan@btinternet.com
thank you. one of the very few worthwhile posts anywhere on the net. andy
Re: OT Goodbye / Hussein
2001-09-23 by marzzz@aol.com
... Well, that speech wasn t a hoax, it was a column written several years ago for the Chicago Tribune by Mary Schmich (who writes regularly for the Trib),
Re: [L-OT] Atomic Bomb/Japan
2001-09-23 by dchapsk@aol.com
In a message dated 9/23/01 12:49:12 PM, marc@bowery.com writes: I was using the broader, inclusive we. OK, but it s a different we than the we that
Re: OT Goodbye
2001-09-23 by Adrian Gill
... Propaganda? I ve no interest in evangelizing for any anti-American stance. America is undoubtedly the most open, democratic country on the planet. I look
Re: [L-OT] Atomic Bomb/Japan
2001-09-23 by dchapsk@aol.com
In a message dated 9/23/01 12:42:24 PM, wilson.zorn@asterick.com writes:
Re: [L-OT] Atomic Bomb/Japan
2001-09-23 by marc lindahl
... OK, but it s a different we than the we that bombed Japan.
Re: [L-OT] Re: OT Goodbye
2001-09-23 by marc lindahl
... Reading that article, it doesn t claim that the kind is generally disliked by a large part of the population... the closest it comes is that it is thought
Re: [L-OT] Atomic Bomb/Japan
2001-09-23 by Wilson Zorn
... There is zero doubt that we could have beaten Japan without dropping the A-bomb. The debate centers around at what cost that would have been. Some
Re: [L-OT] Atomic Bomb/Japan
2001-09-23 by dchapsk@aol.com
In a message dated 9/23/01 12:14:15 PM, marc@bowery.com writes:
Re: [L-OT] Anti-American rant
2001-09-23 by Wilson Zorn
... Hi, I am not debating this but could you please cite a source, particularly re the regularly part? I couldn t find it but am very interested to read up
Re: [L-OT] Re: OT Goodbye
2001-09-23 by Joeri Vankeirsbilck
... When reading many of these statements, I really feel like replying, but I ve done that on another forum and I don t feel like going through all that again.
Re: [L-OT] IRA
2001-09-23 by Wilson Zorn
... From: To: Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2001 11:26 AM Subject: [L-OT] IRA ... the ... Having lived in Boston
Re: [L-OT] Re: OT Goodbye (longish)
2001-09-23 by Wilson Zorn
... For religious populations http://www.noharmm.org/religiouspop.htm seems to be in the ballpark.
Re: [L-OT] Re: OT Goodbye
2001-09-23 by Wilson Zorn
... From: marc lindahl To: Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2001 10:34 AM Subject: Re: [L-OT] Re: OT Goodbye ...