RE: [Digital BW] Best 35mm BW scanner thinking
2002-08-31 by Tim Spragens
... FireWire connection, other than that I really don t know. I used to have the 4000t before I got my Minolta, it did a very good job. When the tf came out, I
Yahoo Groups archive
Messages
Page 1809 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
2002-08-31 by Tim Spragens
... FireWire connection, other than that I really don t know. I used to have the 4000t before I got my Minolta, it did a very good job. When the tf came out, I
2002-08-31 by bgs
I spelled my own name wrong. Giant yow! Barry SCHAFFER [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2002-08-31 by bgs
And I agree to that. Sloppy work is not acceptable. It is disrespect to your own work and the art. Barry Schafer ... From: Jerry Olson
2002-08-31 by rsc236
oh, okay, that s probably it. what s the difference between the t and the tf? is it software? ... From: Tim Spragens [mailto:t.spragens@cityweb.de] Sent:
2002-08-31 by Tim Spragens
Odd, the B&H site shows two 4000 s, the 4000t and the 4000tf, with the tf costing about twice as much. Tim ... -- Tim Spragens http://www.borderless-photos.de
2002-08-31 by rsc236
whoh. i was at b&h last week, and the salesrep strongly recommended a microtek 4000dpi scanner for around $1200. now i look on the website and it shows the
2002-08-31 by tomoc
Hi- I ve been making some low ball bids for a densiotmeter on ebay...not enough to win (or if I do it will be a real bargain). What x-rite models do you
2002-08-31 by daintreeriver2002
Jerry, I followed your steps for cleaning the print heads of my Epson 1280. The cartridges that I d removed were about 20% full (color) and maybe 40% full for
2002-08-31 by Larry Roohr
B&H has the Microtek 4000T for $599 right now, I think that scanner is the same as the polaroid. Larry ... From: Jerry Olson [mailto:jerryolson@rrv.net] Sent:
2002-08-31 by Jerry Olson
Check into the Canon 4000. Great scanner, and great price. Jerry
2002-08-31 by Jerry Olson
Agreed. Then the Artist in you comes out. But if you have a half inch hair in the middle of an otherwise great image, I m sorry, but it just does not belong
2002-08-31 by Richard Sintchak
Saturday, August 31, 2002, 3:46:51 AM, grdglass@aol.com wrote: gac Richard, gac For the 1160 with 5.1.3e, simply install paper profiles 6.0.3. If you have
2002-08-31 by bgs
That might be true but why not use your imagination and put, maybe, an apple in the sky or anything you want if you think the sky needs a change. Man Ray put
2002-08-31 by grdglass@aol.com
For all the ICQ paper profiles listed in my system s color subdirectory, I have a set of Q46 s and Q4 s. Does anyone know to what the Q numbers refer? Most
2002-08-31 by grdglass@aol.com
Richard, For the 1160 with 5.1.3e, simply install paper profiles 6.0.3. If you have not installed profiles 6.0.0, you must install those before 6.0.3. Museo
2002-08-31 by Paul Roark
Shilesh, The yellowness you measured in the new EAM is more than I d think would be an acceptable manufacturing variance. I got worried and checked a new roll
2002-08-31 by Martin Wesley
Mitch, This is not meant to discourage your thread and please continue, but you might want to pose your questions on the Scan Hi-End list:
2002-08-31 by Martin Wesley
... From: Karl Wolz To: Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 5:05 PM Subject: RE:
2002-08-31 by bggilliand2001
All, If you have the PERFECT print, I m assuming it is art, according to your s or the viewer s interpretation. Obvious defects may sometimes be a way to focus
2002-08-31 by Rick Schiller
What s the best 35mm scanner at a reasonable price for primarily BW negatives. There some to be some issues about the Nikons, they they are otherwise
2002-08-31 by Richard Sintchak
Friday, August 30, 2002, 6:17:27 PM, janishilesh wrote: j Hello All, j I just noticed sometime new with EAM, and I am not sure what to make j of it. I
2002-08-31 by Mitch Alland
For: C. David Tobie ... Thanks, but I am not sure that I understand. On the Imacon, scanning into Grayscale does not permit attaching a profile, so, in fact, a
2002-08-31 by Mitch Alland
To: Greg Phelps ... No. Select Histogram in the Window menu do display the Histogram window; then, move the Highlight and Shadow slider
2002-08-31 by Jerry Olson
But what do you do when you see a beautiful pictorial image with a very obvious rule that was broken? Suppose you had a very smooth gray sky, but the right
2002-08-31 by Jerry Olson
Oh I know that! that would be very obvious what he is trying to do. But if I see an image, say of a lake or an ocean and the horizon is off by say 1/4th of an
2002-08-31 by Jerry Olson
Thanks Tom, You can break many of the rules and still have an image with terrific impact. If one knows the rules on how to make a technically great print and
2002-08-31 by janishilesh
I just scanned the papers on a flat-bed, with lowered exposure setting, used levels to accentuate the differences. Here is what I found: New paper: R/G/B =
2002-08-31 by janishilesh
Hello All, I just noticed sometime new with EAM, and I am not sure what to make of it. I opened a new box of 8-1/2 x 11 paper, and printed a photograph I
2002-08-31 by Karl Wolz
But you DO work with a set of rules (some try to avoid being pigeonhole into rule-following by calling them guidelines , etc.). They may be rather
2002-08-31 by Karl Wolz
Jerry, One of the things I ve observed over the years is that if you re going to break rules - say, for instance the horizon thing, don t just dent it, but
2002-08-30 by J Greer
Richard, I m running version 6.x of the Piezo plug-in with the latest paper profiles downloaded from Cone s Web site. There is a profile for Crane Museo in
2002-08-30 by tomoc
... followed ... Jerry- Those sound like pretty good rules to me, too...adding that you can only break them if you know them and understand them and then
2002-08-30 by Jerry Olson
Thanks Bruce. THink I ll leave well enough alone... Jerry
2002-08-30 by tomoc
My issue with EEM/EAM is that it should be available in it s present weight and price, but they should also produce a 300 or 310 gsm version... If Epson did
2002-08-30 by Bruce
on 8/30/2002 12:10 PM, DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com at ... I keep my monitor set to 2.2 for two reasons: 1. when editing video, it displays an
2002-08-30 by rich8155
Hello all, I have a few sheets of Crane s Museo I want to try out in my Epson 1160 which I have loaded with MIS FS-N inks. I am using the PiezoBW driver ver.
2002-08-30 by CDTobie@aol.com
... Photoshop adjusts your gamma as needed; images look and print identically despite what gamma your monitor is set to. C. David Tobie Design Cooperative
2002-08-30 by Moreno Polloni
... You re right Jerry. My apologies; I didn t read the post you were responding to.
2002-08-30 by Julian Thomas
When I first starting doing this stuff I d heard Macs were the best for imaging so I set everything (on a PC) to 1.8 gamma - boy did a feel a fool later...
2002-08-30 by Julian Thomas
No, leave it alone Jerry! You have a system that works! The only problem maybe sending your files to a colourlab for printing. Julian ... From: Jerry Olson
2002-08-30 by Jerry Olson
Good Advice! I ll follow it. Jerry
2002-08-30 by Jerry Olson
Bill, If I set photoshop for a 1.8 and the monitor for a 2.2, would I have to make changes to all my images when printing? Both are currently 1.8. Jerry
2002-08-30 by Jerry Olson
Moreno, he asked what makes a good print, and technically if he followed these rules, he d have a pretty nice print. You can always break the rules if you
2002-08-30 by Bill Morse
Hi Jerry and Julian- Jerry, AFAIK, you would only have to profile your monitor to a 2.2 workspace. In my system, I use Optical to profile my monitor (also a
2002-08-30 by workmantx@aol.com
Martin, Thanks for the clarification. I think my workspaces are set up correctly for using Paul s VM curves. I ve got PS& and I m using a PC. Under RGB the
2002-08-30 by Moreno Polloni
... Oops! My apologies. I should have read the original post.
2002-08-30 by Shire,Stanley
I m scanning on an 848 - 16bit RGB , gamma 2.2 and checking the black and white points in the levels dialog to make sure that I m not clipping anything at the
2002-08-30 by Martin Wesley
Paul, Nice post. I just want to ad that from the research I did that un-buffered, lignin free, acid free papers have a natural pH of about 6.0 which will test
2002-08-30 by Barbara White
Oh, come on. The person asked for a set of rules and Jerry was kind enough to give him some. They were basically the same rules of printing I was taught when I
2002-08-30 by Martin Wesley
... From: scho_2000 To: Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 6:08 AM Subject: Re: [Digital BW] What s