Re: [Digital BW] The perfect print
2002-09-01 by Renan Lopes
Hi Martin, I don t have this book. I ll try it at Amazon, I could see on the cover He burns in white skies. Am I wrong? Would you know a site where a I can
Messages
Browse messages
Page 1808 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
Re: I'll try...
2002-09-01 by Bruce
on 9/1/2002 7:31 AM, DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com at ... Treadwinkle, I m thinking that your problem has to do with how to set up photoshop to
Curing bad 1280 MIS chips
2002-09-01 by jimhayes361
I haven t been following the threads on bad MIS carts too much, but I guess another problem is getting the chips to register when inserting a MIS-filled cart
Re: I'll try...
2002-09-01 by bggilliand2001
TheImagefactory convert to BW filter has worked well for me also. Free download for trial at their web site. Mimics different wet darkroom looks. Barry
Re: Super Computer systems worth it?
2002-09-01 by charles_bandes
IMHO it s all about RAM. I ve got a pretty nice system - was top of the line about two years ago. Needless to say, Apple s current crop of G4s blow mine out of
Re: [Digital BW] I'll try...
2002-09-01 by J Greer
If you are doing a straight conversion to b/w in Photoshop, that is likely your first problem. Better options are to use the Channel Mixer, the Russell Brown
Re: Is anyone REALLY thrilled? Honestly?
2002-09-01 by bggilliand2001
Treadwinkle, Have you printed a 21 step wedge greyscale file yet? This should be the first things you do with any new ink or ink change. You can get the file
Re: [Digital BW] Thanks a ton!!!
2002-09-01 by Robert Damon
The Russell Brown tutorial is a good one. There is another method which is described here: http://www.computer-darkroom.co.uk/ Look at the tutorial entitled
Re: midtones!
2002-09-01 by johnvphoto
... Have you tried printing a grayscale to see how the tones render? John V.
Thanks a ton!!!
2002-09-01 by treadwinkle
I really appreciate that link AND let me do some research on my histograms, you may be pointing me in the right direction. Many many thanks, Richard!
Re: [Digital BW] Is anyone REALLY thrilled? Honestly?
2002-09-01 by Truman Prevatt
I think film is and a good scanner is the key. Expose for the shadows and develop for the highlights. There is no counterpart for this with a digital camera.
Re: Is anyone REALLY thrilled? Honestly?
2002-09-01 by photographyworks
... Hi Treadwinkle, Hahnemühle Photo rag 308 is the best paper you can get. I only have experiences with piezographyBW and the old inks with 1280 epson.
[Digital BW] Re: Clogged? Epson 1280 and sick of BAD MIS cartridges!
2002-09-01 by Sam A. McCandless
... dmeriwether16 could do more than assume and hope if he or she had done his or her homework. ... Not to me; I ve gotten good products - their VM
Re: [Digital BW] midtones!
2002-09-01 by Julian Thomas
EAM To:
Re: I'll try...
2002-09-01 by a_pettit_jr
Your experience sounds like my first futile attempt at BW printing with MS VM and Lysonic Quad inks a year ago ( I gave up ). I have a currently unstalled MIS
Re: [Digital BW] I'll try...
2002-09-01 by Richard Sintchak
Saturday, August 31, 2002, 10:56:38 PM, treadwinkle wrote: t As far as my workflow, well... thusfar all I do is convert to t greyscale and export to Piezo
I'll try...
2002-09-01 by treadwinkle
As far as my workflow, well... thusfar all I do is convert to greyscale and export to Piezo where I select the paper and dpi. I m already feeling stupid
Re: [Digital BW] Is anyone REALLY thrilled? Honestly?
2002-09-01 by Richard Sintchak
Saturday, August 31, 2002, 10:12:44 PM, treadwinkle wrote: t I m shooting actor headshots. I ve got a Canon d60, Epson 1280, t piezotone warm neutrals
midtones!
2002-09-01 by treadwinkle
It s mostly coming up short in the transition from highlight to shadow. The gradation (hoping that s the right term) is VERY harsh on almost all of my shots.
Re: [Digital BW] Is anyone REALLY thrilled? Honestly?
2002-09-01 by bgs
film ... From: treadwinkle To: Sent: Sunday, September 01, 2002 1:12 AM Subject:
RE: [Digital BW] Is anyone REALLY thrilled? Honestly?
2002-09-01 by Larry Roohr
Treadwinkle, A few specifics might help. Hows it coming up short? Larry ... From: treadwinkle [mailto:VOLveeta@bellsouth.net] Sent: Saturday, August 31, 2002
Is anyone REALLY thrilled? Honestly?
2002-09-01 by treadwinkle
I m shooting actor headshots. I ve got a Canon d60, Epson 1280, piezotone warm neutrals and... eh! I m waiting for the paper to arrive because thusfar,
RE: [Digital BW] Densitometer- For Paul, Austin, any others....
2002-09-01 by Paul Roark
Tom, I use the X-Rite Color Digital Swatchbook, model DTP22. It gets the job done. It is limited to 0.01 density resolution, but that s fine with me. (It
Re: Clogged? Epson 1280 and sick of BAD MIS cartridges!
2002-09-01 by dmeriwether16
... As a system, MIS has good results and great potential. Roark, et.al., are very solid in their knowledge and most helpful (though I assume they are not
Re: [Digital BW] The perfect print
2002-09-01 by Martin Wesley
... From: Renan Lopes To: Sent: Saturday, August 31, 2002 7:14 PM Subject: Re:
Re: BW 35mm scanner: Canon 4000 or Microtek 4000
2002-09-01 by Bruce
on 8/31/2002 4:03 PM, DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com at ... Jerry, Just to stir the pot , from my experience, B&W silver films have a unique
Re: [Digital BW] The perfect print
2002-09-01 by Renan Lopes
Excellent Jerry, I would add: 11. No to white skys Renan Lopes
RE: Best 35mm BW scanner thinking
2002-09-01 by Bruce
on 8/31/2002 11:41 AM, DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com at ... Confused, To confuse you more, I ve been using my LS-2000 for B&W silver and C-41
Re: [Digital BW] Super Computer systems worth it?
2002-09-01 by Robert C Wittig
... Try saving a scan with a really high dpi resolution, and you will discover the value of having a lot of RAM. Try saving a few thousand heavily layered
Super Computer systems worth it?
2002-09-01 by lyonscox
Just wondering about those, lucky, people who may have multi Gig this, that and the other top-o-line current model computers feel it s worth it? Does the
Re: [Digital BW] Clogged? Epson 1280 and sick of BAD MIS cartridges!
2002-09-01 by Sam A. McCandless
... Actually, I d keep the Epson carts, if you still have them, around, plugged with the very inexpensive rivets MIS sells, in case they help someday with
Re: [Digital BW] Re:Canoscan 4000US
2002-08-31 by Renan Lopes
All my photo gear is Nikon and bought CanosScan because of the price. I m not happy. I scan basically B&W (TMY) and most of my pictures are too grainy. Renan
Re: Re[2]: [Digital BW] Re:Canoscan 4000US
2002-08-31 by Tim Spragens
... OTOH, I was poisoned against Canon by their first entry into the scanner world, the 2700 was, at best, suitable only for learning, and for web photos. Tim
Re[2]: [Digital BW] Re:Canoscan 4000US
2002-08-31 by Richard Sintchak
Saturday, August 31, 2002, 3:00:43 PM, Jerry Olson wrote: JO 3 different reviews said the JO canon was sharper than the nikon 4000 or any other scanner under
Re: [Digital BW] Re:Canoscan 4000US
2002-08-31 by Jerry Olson
So Which reviewers to believe? I guess you d just have to test them yourself first. There were a lot of complaints on the scanner list that the nikon 4000
Re: [Digital BW] Re:Canoscan 4000US
2002-08-31 by Jerry Olson
No, but I bet you had a faulty scanner. 3 different reviews said the canon was sharper than the nikon 4000 or any other scanner under $1500. My 2720 film
Re: [Digital BW] Clogged? Epson 1280 and sick of BAD MIS cartridges!
2002-08-31 by Jerry Olson
Bob, you should have experienced the last month when I was trying to get my new 1280 up and running. 3 defective cartridges in a row. No Vacuum. You might have
Re: [Digital BW] BW 35mm scanner: Canon 4000 or Microtek 4000
2002-08-31 by Jerry Olson
Ah, but I use color film and convert to black and white. That way you can use fare, ice, etc. Once the image is in the computer, you d have a very hard time
Re: [Digital BW] BW 35mm scanner: Canon 4000 or Microtek 4000
2002-08-31 by Jerry Olson
Ah, but I use color film and convert to black and white. That way you can use fare, ice, etc. Once the image is in the computer, you d have a very hard time
Re: [Digital BW] Re:Canoscan 4000US
2002-08-31 by Richard Sintchak
Saturday, August 31, 2002, 1:18:16 PM, André Vallejo wrote: AV I ve made a direct comparison between the Canon and the Nikon 4000. The AV Canon ate dust.By
Re:Canoscan 4000US
2002-08-31 by André Vallejo
I ve made a direct comparison between the Canon and the Nikon 4000. The Canon ate dust.By far. Scanning BW the Nikon was a light year ahead. I bought the
BW 35mm scanner: Canon 4000 or Microtek 4000
2002-08-31 by Rick Schiller
I appreciate the head s up from all on the Microtek as they do make the hardware for the Polaroid. I ve done some test scans with the Nikon 4000 & Nikon
RE: [Digital BW] Best 35mm BW scanner thinking
2002-08-31 by rsc236
first off, thanks to all who are helping out on this scanner issue. this is a topic i ve been agonizing about for some time, and i am looking to make a
Re: The perfect print
2002-08-31 by Bobbie Blazy
Greetings, There is a group photographersforum on yahoo that would love to respond to your discussion.....not to mean to stop your thread, its just that the
Re: [Digital BW] Clogged? Epson 1280 and sick of BAD MIS cartridges!
2002-08-31 by workmantx@aol.com
Jerry, I did the cleaning both from above and below. It s just that the cartridges didn t seem to work at all then (after replacing). The next set I opened
Re: [Digital BW] Best 35mm BW scanner thinking
2002-08-31 by Tim Spragens
... Jerry, we re going to buy you a razor hone for your birthday. Tim -- Tim Spragens http://www.borderless-photos.de http://www.borderless-photos.com
Re: [Digital BW] Clogged? Epson 1280 and sick of BAD MIS cartridges!
2002-08-31 by Jerry Olson
Dan, if you had epson color cartridges in your 1280 you can take them out and put them back as many times as you want with no problems. Did you try squirting
MIS FS N-E first prints
2002-08-31 by copal01
Hi all, I would like to know if someone in the list use the MIS FS N with the epson drivers with a epson 890. I going to start to work and I should be very
Re: [Digital BW] Best 35mm BW scanner thinking
2002-08-31 by Jerry Olson
It isn t much better than the canon. The canon has the sharpest lens available, thus making an image the sharpest you can get in an under $1000 scanner. I ve
RE: [Digital BW] Best 35mm BW scanner thinking
2002-08-31 by Larry Roohr
The Tf is an upgrade to the T. Scans in 42 bits instead of 36, and claims Dmax of 4.3, heh heh ya right, that just means they improved the shadow response over