Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Messages

Browse messages

Page 2112 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched

Re: The Name Issue and Other Ramblings

2001-10-07 by Tyler Boley

... wrote: snip... ... Yes, and also Tim s point about easily flooding the world with identical prints, lowering the scarcity value (which is kinda BS). One

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: The Name Issue and Other Ramblings

2001-10-07 by grdglass@aol.com

Yes, and that the guy down the street is able to make injet prints too. It s a technology that is available to the masses and, thereby, loses its mystique.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: The Name Issue and Other Ramblings

2001-10-07 by Mark Tucker

... remember ... their ... Martin, I m with Harvey here; a level-headed thorough post. Thank you. Given, I am so out of my area about all these gallery issues.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: The Lenswork Issue

2001-10-07 by grdglass@aol.com

Speaking of Lenswork, the current Sept.-Oct. issue has images for sale and beside each, in bold text says: Hand-pulled photogravure (not inkjet!). Note the

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Argh!

2001-10-07 by Tim Spragens

Maybe the next print exchange ought to have a theme - images restricted to those of your creative mess . For a further restriction, a diptych or other

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: gallery results (RANT)

2001-10-07 by ncm

Julian, There must be a European conspiracy. When I talked to an art gallery owner here in Paris some time ago (mainly for advice) she quoted about 2500FF as a

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re:Gallery Rules

2001-10-07 by ncm

Mark, Snort. Guffaw. Oh man don t *do* that...at least not while I am sipping my morning coffee. Anybody got a quick remedy for coffee in keyboard syndrome?

Thread view Attachments: 0

The Name Issue and Other Ramblings

2001-10-07 by Martin Wesley

Some random thoughts. One thing that occurs to me about naming this new medium is that the artists probably will not be a big part of the decision process. I

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Hand Pulled Prints

2001-10-07 by Martin Wesley

Well I guess I will have to concede then since it would be impossible to count them all. Besides I only have two dogs and they seem to have no interest in my

Thread view Attachments: 0

Lenswork Special Editions

2001-10-07 by Martin Wesley

Just a note on Lenswork Special Edition prints. First off I have to say that if you are a B&W photographer Lenswork is a magazine you should be subscribing to

Thread view Attachments: 0

homage to Eugene Smith

2001-10-07 by ternahan

what good would it do in the box?...the best part is my dog LOVES to shred it every chance she gets. I changed the subject, Brian. Belatedly

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Lenswork Issue (Our New Slogan)

2001-10-07 by Tyler Boley

... snip ... You re stuck. Say you make these beautiful objects with the only currently available materials that will make them this beautiful! Nothing less

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Hand Pulled Prints

2001-10-07 by Steadman Uhlich

Mark I agree with all you wrote below and feel the same way about rolls versus sheets. I like to print them one at a time and look over every single print

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Hand Pulled Prints

2001-10-07 by Mark Tucker

... have hand pulled digital prints? Steadman, I know you re kidding, but honestly, I *do* feel differently when I m printing on single sheets than when I m

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Lenswork Issue (Our New Slogan)

2001-10-07 by Mark Tucker

... Fine to use anything I write. But since I write with dyes instead of pigments, you d better cut n paste pretty fast. By tomorrow, that post will probably

Thread view Attachments: 0

Hand Pulled Prints

2001-10-07 by Steadman Uhlich

OK, in the same vein as hand pulled gravure prints why not have hand pulled digital prints? Those thicker papers sometimes need a little hand pulling and

Thread view Attachments: 0

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.