Yahoo Groups archive
Messages
Page 489 of 564 · 28179 messages matched
2003-04-01 by David Salter
I make a few modules, usually from PCB's supplied by Oakley Sound, EFM etc. On the panel side I strongly suggest members investigate a company that Oakley use (as do a lot of MOTM format users). http://www.schaeffer-apparatebau.de/ Schaeffer provide an excellent service. They sup
2003-04-01 by Bakis Sirros
hi andreas, message already forwarded to dieter... bakis. --- Andreas Lindholm wrote: > I too think that a "simple" dual attenuator should > be made too. I would like > to have one of my latest LCD control module and also > one or two simple dual > attenuators to complement it. I
2003-04-01 by Andreas Lindholm
I too think that a "simple" dual attenuator should be made too. I would like to have one of my latest LCD control module and also one or two simple dual attenuators to complement it. I suspekt that there is a group of people like me and Kevin out there. The advanced single line m
2003-04-01 by Andreas Lindholm
I don't see why Doepfer shouldn't be able to sell pre drilled plates and kits if they wanted to. They have all the components and all they have to do is NOT mount them ;) That would be very useful. /Andreas ----- Original Message ----- From: "p. hendricks" To: Sent: Tuesday, Apri
2003-04-01 by selfoscillate
i use a simple voltmeter and it does the trick, it is cheap and versatile. but it looks damn miserable ;-) best wishes self oscillate --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "Joe Buechler" wrote: > I think there should be a general-purpose voltmeter module instead. > Come to think o
2003-04-01 by selfoscillate
--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "Tim Stinchcombe" wrote: > Hi Self oscillate, > > > i'm looking forward to your investigations ;-) > > Well Dieter is clearly on the case now anyway, but it looks to me > that it will actually require removing *2* capacitors for each > section
2003-04-01 by p. hendricks
On 3/31/03 3:02 PM, "code_pig" wrote: > Is there any chance that Doepfer would sell pre-punched (even > printed maybe?) front panels, jack sockets, PCB mounted pots, and > knobs? That would allow any DIY'er to match a project's look and > feel with their existing Doepfer modules?
2003-03-31 by Bakis Sirros
DIETER SAY: "at first we will change to A-107 electronics to have additional soldering points available where the additional jack sockets are connected to (they will have to be wired manually as they are not soldered directly to the pc board). After that we will change the front
2003-03-31 by code_pig
I very much like the module Andreas put in the files section, but it still would be nice to have a simple dual attenuator/offset module. It'd be cheap to produce, and I know I'd get at least 4 of them. As for the DIY section, I really like the DIY approach, and have built a wide
2003-03-31 by Bakis Sirros
hi andreas, a LCD or a LED display will be good,but it will surrely add to the price,though... bakis. --- Andreas Lindholm wrote: > I was fiddling around with tuning my vcos and > thinking about how good it > would be to have a great attenuator and suddenly it > struck me that wh
2003-03-31 by Andreas Lindholm
I was fiddling around with tuning my vcos and thinking about how good it would be to have a great attenuator and suddenly it struck me that what I really want is an attenuator that DISPLAYs what I am doing. So I changed the attenuator sketch I had and put in a simple LCD(or what
2003-03-31 by Joe Buechler
I think there should be a general-purpose voltmeter module instead. Come to think of it, that's another DIY module, isn't it? Joe --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "Andreas Lindholm" wrote: > I was fiddling around with tuning my vcos and thinking about how good it > would be t
2003-03-31 by Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
Hello, This email message is a notification to let you know that a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the Doepfer_a100 group. File : /a137v2.gif Uploaded by : mr_krz Description : Very advanced attenuator module You can access this file at the URL http://groups.yahoo.com
2003-03-31 by Tim Stinchcombe
Hi Self oscillate, > i'm looking forward to your investigations ;-) Well Dieter is clearly on the case now anyway, but it looks to me that it will actually require removing *2* capacitors for each section (as well as C1,3,5,7,9 as Dieter mentions, C2,4,6,8,10 need to go too: i.e.
2003-03-31 by Bakis Sirros
very good idea andreas,i agree! bakis. --- Andreas Lindholm wrote: > Very nice news indeed. Not that I would dare to mess > around with a solder > that much myself, but I think a wast number of mods > like suggested here > would indeed give Doepfer as a brand great goodwill. > Pe
2003-03-31 by Andreas Lindholm
Very nice news indeed. Not that I would dare to mess around with a solder that much myself, but I think a wast number of mods like suggested here would indeed give Doepfer as a brand great goodwill. Personally I wonder if if would be possible to add modified versions to the choic
2003-03-31 by Bakis Sirros
--- Dieter Doepfer wrote: > From: "Dieter Doepfer" > To: "Bakis Sirros" > Subject: AW: [Doepfer_a100] Re: Sort of OT: > Inverting Attenuator - New Cynthia module > Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 16:47:30 +0200 > > > hello bakis, > > > > yes but the a129/3 can't handle audio signals and >
2003-03-31 by selfoscillate
hello tim, thank you very much. i'm looking forward to your investigations ;-) an a129/3 which can handle audio frequencies would be fantastic for my purposes. best wishes self oscillate --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "Tim Stinchcombe" wrote: > Hi self oscillate, > > > or m
2003-03-31 by Tim Stinchcombe
Hi self oscillate, > or maybe we can modify an a129/3 and switch out the > slew limiter component? anybody who can check this? I've had a quick look at this on a couple of occasions, and I think it is do-able - should just require disabling/replacing a couple of capacitors. I'll
2003-03-31 by Bakis Sirros
hi self-osc, ok,you're right... bakis. --- selfoscillate wrote: > > hello bakis, > > yes but the a129/3 can't handle audio signals and > a dedicated offset module would. > > or maybe we can modify an a129/3 and switch out the > slew limiter component? anybody who can check this?
2003-03-31 by selfoscillate
hello bakis, yes but the a129/3 can't handle audio signals and a dedicated offset module would. or maybe we can modify an a129/3 and switch out the slew limiter component? anybody who can check this? best wishes self oscillate --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Bakis Sirros wro
2003-03-30 by code_pig
I must agree with Andreas here. Anything I put together will look second rate compared to Doepfer modules. This may not matter to everyone here, but I take my stuff to sessions, and my clients like a good look. Regards, Kevin --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "Andreas Lindholm
2003-03-30 by ilanode
Hi John, Got my A166 yesterday and it's already one of my favorite modules. Based on Boolean logic it's great in conjunction with the A160 and A161 to create rhythmical pattern from a simple clock signal. Using the different outputs and the inverter will enable you to get differe
2003-03-30 by James Husted
Well times are changing and I've reluctantly decided to part with my Doepfer/AS rig along with a bunch of other stuff. Here is the list: 2 Doepfer portable racks (very cool and sleek looking) full of modules: Rack one- (make yourself a sequencer) TOP ROW - A145 LFO,RS-90 VCO, RS-
2003-03-30 by Andreas Lindholm
That's why we better vote about it when all versions are up and Doepfer can make one. I'd rather have a Doepfer than my own cause mine will look like something a cat dragged in ;) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joe Buechler" To: Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 12:54 AM Subject:
2003-03-29 by Joe Buechler
I think Dieter had the right idea, putting a circuit for a mixer/offset on the new DIY page. An attenuator is an obvious DIY module. There's been so many different variations suggested that there's now way Doepfer could please everyone. Joe --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "c
2003-03-29 by code_pig
Bakis, The point was an attenuator module, and not specifically not 8 attenuators. That said, I see your point. As for your suggestion, I agree you can do a great dal with the A129 collection of modules, but at a cost. The solution you outlined will cost me over $325 (not even ta
2003-03-29 by Bakis Sirros
hi andreas, if you compare this modcan module with the module combi i mentioned,they take about the same space...(modcan modules are 5U...) but,of course,if you just want a doepfer dual attn./offset module,there is a big difference in space requirements. bakis. --- Andreas Lindho
2003-03-29 by Andreas Lindholm
Wouldn't that take up like twice the space? Well as you all know I like the a 129/3 a lot, but I think it is a bit bulky and doesn't really boost signals. So I think we need a more flexible module and I just sketched a a137 that is as small as possible but with all the features.
2003-03-29 by Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
Hello, This email message is a notification to let you know that a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the Doepfer_a100 group. File : /a137.gif Uploaded by : mr_krz Description : VC-Attenuator 6width You can access this file at the URL http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Doepfe
2003-03-29 by Bakis Sirros
hi kevin, ok,but you can do this with an a129/3 and three a175's!!!and you get 5 offset controls and 6 minimultiples and optional slew(a129/4)in the package.... bakis. --- code_pig wrote: > This is a hint... mostly. We need one as well. > > http://www.cyndustries.com/ > > > Regar
2003-03-29 by studio1dk
No, haven´t seen anything new about the key/seq in a long time. -so I´m just as curius as you Keld > regarding the upcoming touch kybd / seq, i was wondering if anyone knew about > its final packaging ? i`ve seen the pic of the "all-in-one" unit on the > website but wondered if t
2003-03-29 by Andreas Lindholm
No we don't, "we" have now come up with something better in your sketches =) ----- Original Message ----- From: "code_pig" To: Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 11:41 PM Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Sort of OT: Inverting Attenuator - New Cynthia module > This is a hint... mostly. We need o
2003-03-28 by davevosh@aol.com
> Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com hello to all ! regarding the upcoming touch kybd / seq, i was wondering if anyone knew about its final packaging ? i`ve seen the pic of the "all-in-one" unit on the website but wondered if there was any merit in a version that mounts the pots and ot
2003-03-28 by code_pig
This is a hint... mostly. We need one as well. http://www.cyndustries.com/ Regards, Kevin
2003-03-28 by synchro1
This is most welcome! An excellent start and we should encourage Doepfer to pursue this as much as possible. Very good, thank you! I will proofread more closely this weekend... -- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Bakis Sirros wrote: > > --- Dieter Doepfer wrote: > > From: "Dieter
2003-03-28 by Bakis Sirros
--- Dieter Doepfer wrote: > From: "Dieter Doepfer" > To: "Bakis Sirros" > Subject: A-100 DIY page > Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 18:50:19 +0100 > > Dear Bakis, > > we have put the first draft of the A-100 DIY page on > our web site today. The > link is www.doepfer.de/diy/a100_diy.htm.
2003-03-28 by Tim Stinchcombe
Hi list, Quite by chance I noticed that the '5V' LED was lit on one of my busbars, and which I knew did not have a source of 5V connected to it (i.e. no AD5). Measured the voltage on the 5V rail, was 12V, not 5! Traced it back to one of the ribbon connectors with a 10-way ribbon
2003-03-28 by Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
The following Doepfer_a100 poll is now closed. Here are the final results: POLL QUESTION: Would you like to have additional control inputs without attenuators for the A107 morphing filter? CHOICES AND RESULTS - no, but add solder points where the user could connect jack sockets i
2003-03-27 by Joe Buechler
Hey John The best application I've thought of for the logic module would be to use it to combine outputs of the Clock Divider to create gate durationss that aren't divisible by two. For example, suppose you want the A150 to switch between the top and bottom rows of the A155 seque
2003-03-27 by jmaddocks1975
Hi all, What's this dual logic module all about? I've read about it on the doepfer website but could do with a better explanation, anyone got one? :-D Any example patches I could use it for? Thanks John.
2003-03-27 by code_pig
Got it it one, S.O. It's a bit of a low cost, Swiss army knife module. In the past I've always had a number of these types of modules (i.e. non-Doepfer systems), as they come in very handy as an attenuated mult. Regards, Kevin --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "selfoscillate"
2003-03-27 by selfoscillate
maybe because a mixer has only one output and you would need two a138, one a176, one a180 and maybe one a175 for the same task. the suggested module is something like a space- and moneysaver. best wishes self oscillate --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Florian Anwander wrote:
2003-03-27 by Florian Anwander
Hi Kevin > (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Doepfer_a100/files/offset_module_2.jpg) I still do not understand what for you need such a module, if you have mixers. Florian
2003-03-27 by Florian Anwander
Hi moved this discussion to private mail with Franz Holzer in German. Florian
2003-03-27 by Andreas Lindholm
I agree with you on that not every module has to have everything and that is exactly why it is good that we can have many proposed modules and vote about it. And as I wrote earlier perhaps one day we can have both a high end and a standard attenuator so we can all choose what sui
2003-03-26 by Bakis Sirros
hi hans and florian, let's calm down a little,ok???we're all musicians after all.we should colaborate with each other, not fight each other,right??? by the way:i have the sh101 and the AS adsr's and many doepfer adsr's.they all sound wonderful ,when connected in the right way.han
2003-03-26 by Andreas Lindholm
Not a bad idea. Can you also manage to squeeze in an input for voltage controlled attenuation on the lower "channel" on the advanced version? or perhaps make the advaced module a bit wider and cram in all features on both? The alterantive to that is to have the advanced version l
2003-03-26 by code_pig
Sorry, but the correct link is http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Doepfer_a100/files/offset_module_3.jpg Regards, Kevin --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "code_pig" wrote: > Right. I've done one last image > (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Doepfer_a100/files/offset_module_2.jpg) > ,
2003-03-26 by code_pig
Right. I've done one last image (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Doepfer_a100/files/offset_module_2.jpg) , that incorporates a CV function in the lower channel. I'm not convinced that using a rotary selector knob (ala the Range selector on the VCO's), as it would probably drive the