Yahoo Groups archive

Doepfer

Index last updated: 2026-04-29 00:15 UTC

Messages

Browse messages

Page 490 of 564 · 28179 messages matched

Revote

2003-03-26 by Andreas Lindholm

I edited the poll to go after Kevins excellent sketches so please vote again now for more clarity. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Doepfer_a100/surveys?id=11076862 ----- Original Message ----- From: "code_pig" To: Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 8:28 PM Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Re:

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: The definition of a new attenuator

2003-03-26 by Andreas Lindholm

Not bad. You are fast Kevin :) That seems like a good module, but I'd rather have + 12 or + 15 than 2.5 or is it 25? Cause some other brands of modulars and old synths use higher gatevalues and it is good to have a module that gaps that span I think. I like to mix my gear as much

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: The definition of a new attenuator

2003-03-26 by code_pig

How about leaving the Range feature labelled simply "L/M/H", and then have jumpers inside to select the range? Regards, Kevin --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "Andreas Lindholm" wrote: > Not bad. You are fast Kevin :) That seems like a good module, but I'd rather > have + 12

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] not other OSC and worst modules

2003-03-26 by hans greuber

Dear Florian : . So if you were so stupid (sorry that I am getting that rigid) to >buy a module, that was known to you as not being usable, no one will be >able to help you. Would you buy wintertyres for a Volvo if you own a Saab - >only because both are funny northern european c

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: The definition of a new attenuator

2003-03-26 by code_pig

Andreas, Thanks very much for the vote of confidence. I've taken what you said and tried to incorporate it into the propossed module. You'll find the results here: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Doepfer_a100/files/offset_module_2.jpg Regards, Kevin --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: not other OSC and worst modules

2003-03-26 by code_pig

Hans, I was serious in my offer. If you don't want your A112 any more, email me. Regards, Kevin --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "hans greuber" wrote: > Dear Florian : > > . So if you were so stupid (sorry that I am getting that rigid) to > >buy a module, that was known to yo

Thread view Attachments: 0

Punchy ADSRs

2003-03-26 by Andreas Lindholm

As for punch in ENVs I think it can be called punch. I personally define a punch ENV as a fast one that can make you filter sweep fast enough to make a snap or click. That is punchy for me. Filters that can't go that fast like the VCADSR is what I call sloppy and punchless ;) I t

Thread view Attachments: 0

The definition of a new attenuator

2003-03-26 by Andreas Lindholm

David Salter asked for a definition of the advanced attenutator in the poll. Since it is a vast majority that is pro an attenuator it is perhaps time to start diskussion of the features. As I see it this sketch from Kevin is a very good suggestion that falls somewhere between wha

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] the A-100 and the korg MS-20

2003-03-26 by Bakis Sirros

hi jed, you will needthe a119 ext.in module to patch the output of the ms20 to the a100.but of course you can cross-patch between the two as far as cv's(and the ms20 noise outs) are concerned.watch the voltages,though... bakis. --- exacta_one wrote: > hi all, > > just curious if

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: not other OSC and worst modules

2003-03-26 by jmaddocks1975

Hi, I agree! I think the a100 envelopes are very nice, perhaps Hans hasn't noticed they have a range switch :-D Trying to make a 'punchy' sound using the wrong range??..oh well. The multimode filter is a nice filter, but really depends what sound you are after, that is why we hav

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: the A-100 and the korg MS-20

2003-03-26 by jmaddocks1975

Hi Jed, I wouldn't say you need it as you can feed the audio out from MS20 to the doepfer VCF fine, the level isn't very loud but not too quiet, close to the noise barrier though. If you're planning on doing it alot then I'd recomend the a119 as it makes the sound very loud and c

Thread view Attachments: 0

the A-100 and the korg MS-20

2003-03-26 by exacta_one

hi all, just curious if anyone knows if i need that external input module to patch from my MS-20 into the A-100 (audio signals and CV), i havent tryed it yet as i dont have any TS to mini cables on hand. i know they operate differently as far as the scaling; i have a kenton midi

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: New poll for Doepfer_a100

2003-03-26 by Joe Buechler

Good idea for the indicator LEDs! I'd still rather have two attenuated inputs on the top half, as in my .gif file. I think it would be more useful than the multi outputs. (I'm thinking two random LFOs plus offset voltage to the A156, for example.) Joe --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogro

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: New poll for Doepfer_a100

2003-03-26 by code_pig

I've put a JPG in the files section (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Doepfer_a100/files/offset_module_1.jpg) of what I'd be quite happy with. Regards, Kevin --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, David Salter wrote: > Define advanced. > > regards > > > > David Salter > Reuters Consul

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Doepfer_a100] New poll for Doepfer_a100

2003-03-26 by David Salter

Define advanced. regards David Salter Reuters Consulting Tel: +44 20 7542 2402 Mob: +44 7990562402 Fax: +44 20 7542 2699 -----Original Message----- From: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com] Sent: 25 March 2003 18:42 To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] not other OSC and worst modules

2003-03-26 by Florian Anwander

Hi Hans > What Doepfer should do now is to do a MAC editor for their A-112 sampler > that I have unused and disconnected, There is no editor for th A112. There is only a sample dump loader. You may assumingly do the same job with every other sample dump loader or simply any seque

Thread view Attachments: 0

doepfer clock

2003-03-26 by jmaddocks1975

Hi all, I've just posted a pic of my doepfer clock on my studio wall. These were available for a limited time in UK (maybe some left, not sure). It has pic of a100 in background :-D It's the last pic in photos section. john.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Regarding the attenutator poll

2003-03-26 by selfoscillate

true, but it would be fine, if we can do this with the attenuator-module too. best wishes self oscillate --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "pstnotpd" wrote: > I might be wrong, but isn't this like a 130 without the CV component > and a voltage source patched to one of the inpu

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Regarding the attenutator poll

2003-03-26 by pstnotpd

I might be wrong, but isn't this like a 130 without the CV component and a voltage source patched to one of the inputs? --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "selfoscillate" wrote: > > hello, > > a new attenuator/offset-module should be able to handle > audio signals. the a129/3 i

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Regarding the attenutator poll

2003-03-26 by selfoscillate

hello, a new attenuator/offset-module should be able to handle audio signals. the a129/3 isn't capable of this, i think because of the slewlimiter-component. best wishes self oscillate --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "Andreas Lindholm" wrote: > I just added a vote about the

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: not other OSC and worst modules

2003-03-25 by Bakis Sirros

as far as i know, the designer of the wasp filter collaborated with doepfer for the design of the a124. bakis. --- Tim Stinchcombe wrote: > > >Others more modern are very good ,(maybe because > are designed by > other > > >people or cloned from better machines) : WASP > filter >

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: Regarding the attenutator poll

2003-03-25 by Bakis Sirros

no....you need at least 6HP,i think. bakis. --- Joe Buechler wrote: > Sounds good, but can you put an attenuator knob on a > 4U module? > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "code_pig" > wrote: > > Also what Andreas SAID... > > > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "code_pi

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: not other OSC and worst modules

2003-03-25 by Tim Stinchcombe

> >Others more modern are very good ,(maybe because are designed by other > >people or cloned from better machines) : WASP filter > The WASP filter clone was originally designed by Jürgen Haible and > "borrowed" by Doepfer. Check Mr. Haible´s website, he´s a real > synth-DIY-frea

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Regarding the attenutator poll

2003-03-25 by Joe Buechler

Sounds good, but can you put an attenuator knob on a 4U module? --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "code_pig" wrote: > Also what Andreas SAID... > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "code_pig" wrote: > > > > Yeah, what Andreas sadi, and do it for $8... okay? > > > > Regards

Thread view Attachments: 0

Regarding the attenutator poll

2003-03-25 by Andreas Lindholm

I just added a vote about the need for an attenuator. As I thought it, alternative 1 is something like what I proposed earlier with switches for maximum output levels 5/10/12/15 volts, pos and negative attenutation and two or more "channels". The second something more like a stri

Thread view Attachments: 0

quality of modules and so on...

2003-03-25 by Andreas Lindholm

That is true, but mine also seems very sensite to room temperature. It tune very differently at 19 celsius than at 23 celsius and that is just plain crazy too me. The A111doesn't do that neither the AS95s. So I will never buy another A110 unless very cheap and as LFO ;) As for th

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Regarding the attenutator poll

2003-03-25 by code_pig

Also what Andreas SAID... --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "code_pig" wrote: > > Yeah, what Andreas sadi, and do it for $8... okay? > > Regards, > Kevin > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "Andreas Lindholm" > wrote: > > I just added a vote about the need for an attenuat

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Regarding the attenutator poll

2003-03-25 by code_pig

Yeah, what Andreas sadi, and do it for $8... okay? Regards, Kevin --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "Andreas Lindholm" wrote: > I just added a vote about the need for an attenuator. As I thought it, > alternative 1 is something like what I proposed earlier with switches for >

Thread view Attachments: 0

New poll for Doepfer_a100

2003-03-25 by Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com

Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the Doepfer_a100 group: Would you like Doepfer to make an attenutator module? Regarding more detailed layout we will conduct a later survey about that. o Yes, an advanced one o Yes, but only a basic dual attenuator o Yes, but

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: not other OSC and worst modules

2003-03-25 by code_pig

I like the A112. You need the Waird "Wave 256" application to create wavetables, and Doepfer's A112 application to load the module. Unfortunately, both applications are PC based. Also, and as long as I'm at it, the proposed wavetable oscillator should also not require a gate like

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: not other OSC and worst modules

2003-03-25 by ps_minor

me too..but w provision for loading/editing wavetables via mac (as well as pc). also, i would have bought an a112 (maybe 2) a long time ago if it had a mac editor. -psm > > or something like the blacet/wiard miniwave module, > which seems to be quite nice. > > best wishes > > sel

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: not other OSC and worst modules

2003-03-25 by selfoscillate

> Personally, I'd like to see a new dedicated wavetable oscillator > (i.e. no sampling option) with better and more visual control over > waveform selection than the A112 offers. For example, the old > Digisound VCDO, although inexpensive and slightly less than elegant, > used 4

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: not other OSC and worst modules

2003-03-25 by Bakis Sirros

hi ethan, same for me,too...i didn't realize from the start that, with a modular system ,you have the option of distorting the input in various stages of the signal path. bakis. --- ethanzer0 wrote: > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "code_pig" > wrote: > >> and the 121 multi

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] new filter module on the way???

2003-03-25 by Paul Schulz

Hi self osc. if you don´t believe then go this link: http://www.synthtech.com/motm480.html best, P. selfoscillate wrote: > > hello paul, > > really, motm is doing a yamaha clone? i didn't know that. > i'll take a closer look at it, but i don't want to > raise another modular ;-)

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] not other OSC and worst modules

2003-03-25 by Paul Schulz

Hi folks, well, I can´t agree with Hans´ worst-module-opinion in every point. A-110 VCO (I don´t really like it, too.) pros: nice sound; cheap; octave switch cons: tune range isn´t large enough; no fine tune, no lin FM input (although it is possible to add this function (and soft

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: not other OSC and worst modules

2003-03-25 by code_pig

Although I prefer the A111, the A110 isn't really that bad. And I like the A121 (especially the band pass filter), but not for everything. I mean, I like mustard, but not in my coffee.. mostly (if you catch my drift). As for the A126 Frequency Shifter, I can't agree on that it's

Thread view Attachments: 0

New poll for Doepfer_a100

2003-03-25 by Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com

Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the Doepfer_a100 group: what features would you like to be included in the A101 MS20 STYLE FILTER??? o individual inputs,outputs for the HPF and the LPF sections. o cv inputs for F-CUTOFF and Q for both the HPF and the LPF. o

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Doepfer_a100] Re: not other OSC and worst modules

2003-03-25 by David Salter

I love the 121, I have two of them, warm and creamy. Ethan, you absolutely right about levels, it is very easy to distort the signal in a patch (although it can be good to do so). regards David Salter Reuters Consulting Tel: +44 20 7542 2402 Mob: +44 7990562402 Fax: +44 20 7542 2

Thread view Attachments: 0

New poll for Doepfer_a100

2003-03-25 by Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com

Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the Doepfer_a100 group: would you like doepfer to manufacture the A101 MS20 STYLE FILTER??? o yes! o maybe... o no. To vote, please visit the following web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Doepfer_a100/surveys?id=11076653

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: new filter module on the way???

2003-03-25 by selfoscillate

hello paul, i surfed to that page right after i've read you posting :-) it's a cs-80 filterclone, yum yum. best wishes self oscillate --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Paul Schulz wrote: > Hi self osc. > > if you don´t believe then go this link: > http://www.synthtech.com/motm

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: not other OSC and worst modules

2003-03-25 by ethanzer0

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "selfoscillate" > i'd like to see another doepfer vco, because there is > a good change of improval amongst the old doepfer vco's. I agree that Doepfer could add another VCO to the catalog. Personally, my favorite VCO of all time is the Progra

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: not other OSC and worst modules

2003-03-25 by ethanzer0

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "code_pig" wrote: >> and the 121 multimode filter is >> simply the WORST sounding filter >> I have ever heard,and can´t be >> compared to other brand ones. >> I´m not bashing Doepfer as I have >> 6 panels if their modules but some >> of them a

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Doepfer_a100] another filter

2003-03-25 by David Salter

John, I too own the Sy02 and love it, I used to own an MS20 and this filter is so close it's scary. If Doepfer produce their own clone I will not buy it (why when I have it already). I agree also with your statement regarding different modules. The A100 range is fantastic in it's

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: not other OSC and worst modules

2003-03-25 by Bakis Sirros

hi list, well,i also have many doepfer envelopes(a140,141,142)and i like them very much!in fact i can't see anything wrong on them!they have very fast envelope times!!not like the ms20 ones...as for the a121 to me sounds like the filter in my yamaha cs15(sold now...).i like it's

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: another filter

2003-03-25 by selfoscillate

i agree too. best wishes self oscillate --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Bakis Sirros wrote: > hi john, > i definitely agree about the chaos module!!!(where is > it???) > and the new vco! > bakis. > > > > > --- jmaddocks1975 wrote: > > Hi, > > The Korg MS20 filter is easily o

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: not other OSC and worst modules

2003-03-25 by selfoscillate

hello hans, well i don't agree with you about several things like the a121 and the doepfer envelopes. but that is all a matter of taste. i'd like to see another doepfer vco, because there is a good change of improval amongst the old doepfer vco's. best wishes self oscillate --- I

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Fwd: Fw: new filter module on the way???

2003-03-25 by selfoscillate

hello paul, really, motm is doing a yamaha clone? i didn't know that. i'll take a closer look at it, but i don't want to raise another modular ;-) aaaarrrggghhh where is all the money gone? best wishes self oscillate --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Paul Schulz wrote: > Hell

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: tuning and scale

2003-03-25 by selfoscillate

the a110 vco needs approxímately 45 minutes time for warming up. maybe this is why it gets out of tune? best wishes self oscillate --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "Andreas Lindholm" wrote: > I have had theese kind of problems myself with my A110 and that is why I > hate it.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.