Yahoo Groups archive
Messages
Page 131 of 168 · 8362 messages matched
2004-06-26 by turbotron69
Hi Colin and folks; I finally did this,but the results were far from the 202 instant random suc= cess. I couldn´t get any usable pattern or rhythm using this way. The only thing that I like form that mode was that whatever you do " is quantized or limited" to one exact bar,the MA
2004-06-25 by Colin f
> ...why would you need two of these interfaces to control > 16 tracks. Why not a much smaller little box to link to the p3, and > could be stuffed anywhere, even a small body cavity, and then a menu > option on the p3 where you would, say, choose p3 # 2...and then the all > of t
2004-06-24 by implode7@comcast.net
I was trying to reconcile the fact that I am already thinking that I will probably want another p3 at some point with rapidly diminishing space in my apartment, when I started to wonder - the reason that it takes up as much space as it does is because of the buttons and knobs, th
2004-06-24 by Colin f
> >Also remember if you set repeats on a playlist step with chg=B, the pattern > >will only be reset on the next global bar after the number of reps set. > There are occasions when I would wish this behaviour optional > actually. And also for accumulators to sometimes continue ac
2004-06-24 by Paul Nagle
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 14:33:22 +0100, "Colin f" wrote: >Also remember if you set repeats on a playlist step with chg=B, the pattern >will only be reset on the next global bar after the number of reps set. >At least it used to do that, I haven't tested it for a while, so I may have
2004-06-24 by Colin f
> > Bear in mind all patterns are in playlists, even if the playlist is > > just one step. If chg is set to B it will synchronise to the global > > bar. If set to P it will loop at its own length. > > > > yeah - I was thinking about it last night in bed, and that makes perfect >
2004-06-24 by Paul Nagle
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 14:13:05 +0100, "Colin f" wrote: >Seems like we have a concensus. >I'll modify the behaviour of bank init and power-on wipe in the next build. And modify the spelling of "tape" back to "tap" ?? 8-) Paul --- Paul Nagle - SoftRoom Music - www.softroom.co.uk Bogu
2004-06-24 by Gene Schwartz
> From: Paul Nagle > Organization: The Soft Room > Reply-To: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com > Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 08:16:03 +0100 > To: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com > Subject: Re: [analogue-sequencer] stupid (probably) question > > On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 22:21:51 -0700,
2004-06-24 by Gene Schwartz
> From: "Colin f" > Reply-To: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com > Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 9:15:21 +0100 > To: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com > Subject: Re: [analogue-sequencer] stupid (probably) question > >> Bear in mind all patterns are in playlists, even if the playlist is
2004-06-24 by blip
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Colin f wrote: > > Bear in mind all patterns are in playlists, even if the playlist is > > just one step. If chg is set to B it will synchronise to the global > > bar. If set to P it will loop at its own length. > > Indeed. When initialising a bank, all playl
2004-06-24 by Colin f
> > > > I'll have a 'P' please bob > > > Agree. > > and me.. > And FWIW me too. Seems to be more intuitive that way :->) Seems like we have a concensus. I'll modify the behaviour of bank init and power-on wipe in the next build. Cheers, Colin f ___________________________________
2004-06-24 by ch.³l
--- In analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com, "Colin f" wrote: > > >Also remember if you set repeats on a playlist step with chg=B, the > pattern > > >will only be reset on the next global bar after the number of reps set. > > > There are occasions when I would wish this behaviour o
2004-06-24 by Andy Wilson
> > >I'll have a 'P' please bob > > > > Agree. > > and me.. And FWIW me too. Seems to be more intuitive that way :->) Andy --- Andy Wilson http://www.techman.synth.net andy@techman.synth.net
2004-06-24 by Paul Nagle
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 09:21:25 +0100 (BST), wrote: >I'll have a 'P' please bob Agree. Plus it would help when doing tutorials as you can avoid that whole gbar thing until later when you're ready. Otherwise you have to explain why your 7 note pattern is not just looping in chunks of
2004-06-24 by Paul.Maddox.Mail-list@Synth.net
Colin, > Indeed. When initialising a bank, all playlist steps have chg set to B, > though it has been suggested that maybe P should be the default. Any > comments ? I'll have a 'P' please bob Paul
2004-06-24 by ch.³l
> >I'll have a 'P' please bob > > Agree. and me..
2004-06-24 by Colin f
> Bear in mind all patterns are in playlists, even if the playlist is > just one step. If chg is set to B it will synchronise to the global > bar. If set to P it will loop at its own length. Indeed. When initialising a bank, all playlist steps have chg set to B, though it has bee
2004-06-24 by Paul Nagle
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 22:21:51 -0700, Gene Schwartz wrote: >ah - glad to help...looks like you have to set the pattern in a playlist and >set chg to p? I didn't see a way simply within a pattern outside of a >playlist. Bear in mind all patterns are in playlists, even if the playlis
2004-06-24 by Gene Schwartz
ah - glad to help...looks like you have to set the pattern in a playlist and set chg to p? I didn't see a way simply within a pattern outside of a playlist. > From: Gene Schwartz > Reply-To: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com > Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 20:17:40 -0700 > To: > Subjec
2004-06-24 by Gene Schwartz
I interrupt this wish list for what probably has a very simple answer... I just got my main and display boards back from Colin, so I've really had only a few hours on my P3. What I'm trying to do is set one of the tracks to play 16th notes, but only 11 of them - the last step bei
2004-06-23 by Paul Maddox (Mail Lists)
Colin, > Didn't it always do that ? I don't remember it not doing so, but maybe > I'm getting old... ermm, not in my version, perhaps my version is old Colin, not you. Can you mail me a copy (off list, please nicely) Paul
2004-06-23 by Colin f
> whilst we're on the subject of wishes, can we send a MIDI CC > without sending > a note on yet? > I really need to put the latest version of the OS in my P3, > at some point.. Didn't it always do that ? I don't remember it not doing so, but maybe I'm getting old... Cheers, Coli
2004-06-23 by Paul Maddox (Mail Lists)
Hi, whilst we're on the subject of wishes, can we send a MIDI CC without sending a note on yet? I really need to put the latest version of the OS in my P3, at some point.. Paul
2004-06-23 by Colin f
> i've got something new i'd like to see if possible; in pattern-edit, > i'd like to be able to shift the aux-tracks independantly from the > main track, i.e. without shifting the actual notes themselves. and > continuing from that, AUX-events to shift the aux(d) track > independ
2004-06-23 by ch.³l
> whilst we're on the subject of wishes, can we send a MIDI CC > without sending a note on yet? > I really need to put the latest version of the OS in my P3, at some > point.. hi Paul, in the version i'm running, v3.959, we can. and we like it. :-)
2004-06-23 by ch.³l
hi Colin, i've got something new i'd like to see if possible; in pattern-edit, i'd like to be able to shift the aux-tracks independantly from the main track, i.e. without shifting the actual notes themselves. and continuing from that, AUX-events to shift the aux(d) track independ
2004-06-21 by Colin f
> i was just setting midi-channels on a P3, and when i accidentally > hit "midi chan"+9 the display showed "Select channel../(pgm) > cancel" did i miss something or are you hiding something from us? ;-) It's hidden in the manual Chiel ;-) pgm channel is the midi channel that BPgm
2004-06-21 by ch.³l
> It's hidden in the manual Chiel ;-) bugger..my excuse was going to be that the last version of the manual i had a look at was v3.82, but that's also got this in. i must have skipped it as 'not important'..i'll have a look in the manual first next time i discover something new..
2004-06-21 by ch.³l
hi Colin, i was just setting midi-channels on a P3, and when i accidentally hit "midi chan"+9 the display showed "Select channel../(pgm) cancel" did i miss something or are you hiding something from us? ;-) grtz Chiel
2004-06-21 by roelp23
> The basic design of R3 is that each pattern will have 16 steps for 16 > instruments, each step with a velocity value, on/off status, and > possibly some other bits like flam. > The 16 instruments in a pattern will map to 16 midi channels and note > numbers defined in a kit. > S
2004-06-20 by philsmillie@yahoo.com
> I am a bit stoned, but the video is in the bag. Innit Phil? The video is err.. yes! still in the bag! Lol.. I'd forgotten i've not got the capture card fitted in PC at moment, it'll get sorted in next day or so.. just been distracted a little by playing a Moog Taurus Bass layer
2004-06-19 by Colin f
> No no, sorry. I was thinking about an *optional* extra key > for this. You would still have to support a key-chord for > the standard machine, but you could also accept the new > single-key event for the same thing. That's a possibility, but without the extra key, there still i
2004-06-18 by Robert van der Kamp
On Saturday 19 June 2004 01:15, Colin f wrote: > In theory it's easy to add one - there are 5 'spaces' in > the key scanning matrix that could be used. > But it might not go down well with existing P3 owners if > they had to retro-fit a new key. No no, sorry. I was thinking about
2004-06-18 by Colin f
> for me, one of the good things about the P3 is that once you've got > the hang of the basics the way stuff's organised is pretty logical. > well, to me at least. Well that's what I try to achieve, so I'm glad you think so ;-) Cheers, Colin f
2004-06-18 by Colin f
> so... by what i think i understand of P3's way of handling patterns & > playlists, saving a playlist to a different track on the current part > would only change the sequence in which the patterns are played, but > not the patterns for the track that's 'saved-to' themselves, ri
2004-06-18 by Colin f
> I'm reading all these suggestions about playlist editing and > it's getting deeper and deeper by the week. At what point are > we gonna lose control or to put it another way at what point > are we going to get lost in code and forget what level we're > on?? Who is going to be a
2004-06-18 by Colin f
> > I rather wish I'd thought of the playlists sooner, so I > > could have put a dedicated 'list edit' key on there. > > Would it be possible to add one? In theory it's easy to add one - there are 5 'spaces' in the key scanning matrix that could be used. But it might not go down
2004-06-18 by ch.³l
> Unfortunately it's not available if you're memory layout is set up > for 3 banks of 16 patterns - PLAY/EDIT + 9 to 16 are used to enter > pattern edit for those patterns. oh that's right there's different memory layouts..maybe i should give them a try someday..;-) then how abou
2004-06-18 by ch.³l
--- In analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com, darkstr1746@c... wrote: > I'm reading all these suggestions about playlist editing and it's getting deeper and deeper by the week. At what point are we gonna lose control or to put it another way at what point are we going to get lost in
2004-06-18 by ch.³l
> I suppose when you hit FUNC in playlist edit to get the > save/back/lose options, the step keys 1 to 8 could let you save the > playlist to a different track on the current part, and 9 to 16 > could let you save the playlist to the same track but on a > different part. so... by
2004-06-18 by darkstr1746@comcast.net
I'm reading all these suggestions about playlist editing and it's getting deeper and deeper by the week. At what point are we gonna lose control or to put it another way at what point are we going to get lost in code and forget what level we're on?? Who is going to be able to rem
2004-06-18 by Robert van der Kamp
On Friday 18 June 2004 19:29, colinfraser_com wrote: > I rather wish I'd thought of the playlists sooner, so I > could have put a dedicated 'list edit' key on there. Would it be possible to add one? - Robert
2004-06-18 by Paul Nagle
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 17:29:20 -0000, "colinfraser_com" wrote: >It would seem to have a certain logic to it. >I suppose when you hit FUNC in playlist edit to get the >save/back/lose options, the step keys 1 to 8 could let you save the >playlist to a different track on the current p
2004-06-18 by colinfraser_com
> > Well, when you edit a pattern, you can choose to save the results > > to a different pattern before you exit. Perhaps if there were an > > equivalent for playlists it would be logical - you could then save > > a playlist to a different part when you exit playlist edit - even
2004-06-17 by Paul Nagle
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 17:13:28 +0100, "Colin f" wrote: >It is entirely possible - I'd just need to set up a separate pointer to >capture what the current part was at the time you enter playlist edit. >The reason I didn't do this is because I thought it would probably be >hellishly
2004-06-17 by blip
> > it also gave me the idea that i'd like to be able to edit playlists > > for other parts than the one playing, and that i'd also like to be > > able to switch to playlists for other tracks directly from playlist- > > edit...probably not really in the realm of the possible thou
2004-06-17 by Colin f
> i've just noticed something about the playlist-edit mode and part > selection: in play mode, say part# 9 is playing and global bar is set > to 32. if i hit the key for another part, this key's LED lights up > orange, indicating the part that will be switched to when the end of
2004-06-17 by ch.³l
> Well, when you edit a pattern, you can choose to save the results > to a different pattern before you exit. Perhaps if there were an > equivalent for playlists it would be logical - you could then save > a playlist to a different part when you exit playlist edit - even > if tha
2004-06-17 by MAG
This is for the folded panel. Aluminum would be a bit cheaper. The whole case, e.g. folded panel, side plates, bottom, screws, pot mount board. costs approx. 260.-- Euro for one single piece. actually I'm waiting for an offer for the laser text on it. anyway......... grz mag p.s.
2004-06-16 by Colin f
> for one single case without gravured text, only they main > case (panel), no rack mounts, > no side panels, made from 1.4301 grinded stainless steel > I have to pay Euro 135.-- > i'll get the cnc programm for Euro 10.-- Is that for a panel folded along the front and rear edges,