Re: [L-OT] Re: Hard Drive Installation-Help!!
2002-02-23 by Sean McCoy
... Right, and the second drive will need to be jumpered as a slave drive.
Messages
Browse messages
Page 79 of 140 · 6965 messages matched
Re: [L-OT] Hard Drive Installation-Help!!
2002-02-23 by Paul Wheeler&Kerry Ritson
You have to set the jumpers on the drive correctly and that relates to which ide channel you put the drive on . I think seagate reccomend putting a second hard
Re: Hard Drive Installation-Help!!
2002-02-23 by monsdrum
... You may have to make some jumper settings on the back of your first harddrive. Some drives can be configured to be either master, slave or only drive via
Hard Drive Installation-Help!!
2002-02-23 by litepipe
Hello everyone!! First let me apologize for this possibly to OT for the OT list post. I m trying to install a second hard drive in my internet computer
Re: [L-OT]Should you always Normalize?
2002-02-22 by monsdrum
... audio ... The ... OK, I stand corrected. Sorry for spewing out wrong info. At least it serves to my defense, that I actually felt pretty convinced I was
Re: [L-OT] Re: OT: acoustic treatment for monitor room
2002-02-22 by Mark Lennox
You need a mix of absorption: http://www.ethanwiner.com/basstrap.html and diffusion http://physchem.kfunigraz.ac.at/listeningroom/diffusors.html
Re: [L-OT] Re: OT: acoustic treatment for monitor room
2002-02-22 by Sean McCoy
I just completed a new surround mixing room which I m currently moving into. It was designed by Chips Davis, and although I don t have it full of recording
Re: OT: acoustic treatment for monitor room
2002-02-22 by Joeri Vankeirsbilck
[redirected from LUG to Logic-OT:] From: Vincent Kenis Date: Thu Feb 21, 2002 9:04pm Subject: Re: [LUG] OT: acoustic treatment for
Re: [L-OT]Should you always Normalize?
2002-02-22 by Hendrik Jan Veenstra
... Huh? So you say that if you have e.g. (silly example) 2 samples with values 1 and 2, and normalise them to the full 65536-scale (16 bit), you would get
Audio Energiser
2002-02-22 by Tony Thompson
... I ve not used this very much myself, but it was an interesting experiment to try using it on some single-cycle waveforms - sawtooth and sine if I remember
Re: [L-OT]Should you always Normalize?
2002-02-22 by Spectro
... No, They *are* multiplied. Adding a value will offset the waveform. S. --
Re: [L-OT]Should you always Normalize?
2002-02-22 by monsdrum
... have ... Afaik this isn t right. To my understanding, the numbers are not multiplied by a factor, but rather added to a number high enough to make the peak
Re: [L-OT]Should you always Normalize?
2002-02-22 by Joeri Vankeirsbilck
... That s true in a digital context, but not when working with (older) hardware samplers. Imagine an old hardware sampler. I love some of the old Emu s
RE: [L-OT]Should you always Normalize?
2002-02-22 by Richmond, James (James) ** CTR **
Hiya, ... I rarely normalise mainly for the fact that if you double the volume you double the noise too. Better to use a quality mic pre and gate. jr
Re: [L-OT]Should you always Normalize?
2002-02-22 by Hendrik Jan Veenstra
... About the level being too low: that can hardly be true. When I play a recording through another audio program, and through the same card, it sounds just
[L-OT] Re: Upgrade (sorry) q for emagic on LAWG4 to LAWP5
2002-02-22 by Hendrik Jan Veenstra
... Oh well... I don t mind that much, personally, if it takes a bit longer before v5 arrives. I probably won t have much time to do anything sensible
Transmit track function
2002-02-22 by kgheysen
I own a yamaha psr 630 keyboard. There s this MIDI function on it that don t quit get: transmit track function. I entered all the psr 630 presets in logic s
Be sues M$
2002-02-21 by yoonchinet
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news? tmpl=story&u=/nm/20020219/tc_nm/tech_be_microsoft_dc_3 Yoonchi.
Re: [L-OT]Should you always Normalize?
2002-02-21 by Joeri Vankeirsbilck
... Strange. For me, normalizing depends on the use of the recording. If it s a simple sample which I ll use later on, then I normalize it. If it s a
[L-OT]Should you always Normalize?
2002-02-21 by blue alien
I find that when I make a recording in Logic, to my knowledge, I minimize headroom by setting the level as high as possible without bumping the red clip
Re: [L-OT] Re: Upgrade (sorry) q for emagic on LAWG4 to LAWP5
2002-02-21 by Joeri Vankeirsbilck
... I d say you have a bigger chance at info@emagic.de Markus and Michael 1) are developers and 2) are extremely busy. It s the job of info@emagic.de to look
[L-OT] Re: Upgrade (sorry) q for emagic on LAWG4 to LAWP5
2002-02-21 by monsdrum
... new ... content (in the ... 5 ... water ... & ... It s nice to see that someone other than me have the same difficulty understanding this. I would like to
Re: [L-OT] Re: mastering tips
2002-02-21 by Murray McDowall
... http://www.tcelectronic.com/files/Finalizer.pdf Last few pages are an Appendix. Regards, M
[L-OT] Re: mastering tips
2002-02-21 by Hendrik Jan Veenstra
... Appendum? :-) Oh, you mean addendum . Or was it appendix ? Sorry... ;) -- Hendrik Jan Veenstra Omega Art:
[L-OT] Re: Upgrade (sorry) q for emagic on LAWG4 to LAWP5
2002-02-21 by Hendrik Jan Veenstra
... This is a bit weird imo. I too ordered the Gold to Platinum, 4 to 5 upgrade, and my dealer s guess was that it should arrive in a few weeks (not months).
[L-OT] Re: Upgrade (sorry) q for emagic on LAWG4 to LAWP5
2002-02-21 by mikaeladle
... new ... If you get any clarity on the subject, please inform the list. I have asked the same question to the same distributor. Best, Mikael Adle
Re: Pricing of upgrades
2002-02-21 by Jonathan Christensen
...
Re: [LUG] GEN - Upgrade & Manual
2002-02-21 by Wilson Zorn
... manual, ... While I agree, talking to E-magic seems useless. They clearly care about trees and internal technology decisions more than customers. May as
Re: OT: acoustic treatment for monitor room
2002-02-21 by Joeri Vankeirsbilck
[redirected from LUG to Logic-OT:] From: maakbow Date: Wed Feb 20, 2002 7:25pm Subject: Re: OT: acoustic treatment for monitor room
Re: OT: acoustic treatment for monitor room
2002-02-21 by Joeri Vankeirsbilck
[redirected from LUG to Logic-OT:] From: kickindaspeaker Date: Wed Feb 20, 2002 10:31pm Subject: Re: OT: acoustic treatment for
RE: OT: acoustic treatment for monitor room
2002-02-21 by Joeri Vankeirsbilck
[redirected from LUG to Logic-OT:] From: Keller, Steve Date: Wed Feb 20, 2002 10:42pm Subject: RE: OT: acoustic treatment for monitor room Check this
Re: OT: Mac - updating OS
2002-02-21 by Joeri Vankeirsbilck
[redirected from LUG to Logic-OT:] From: Gareth Henderson Date: Tue Feb 19, 2002 10:04pm Subject: Re: [LUG] OT: Mac - updating
Re: mastering tips
2002-02-21 by Joeri Vankeirsbilck
[redirected from LUG to Logic-OT:] From: Ren=?ISO-8859-1?B?6Q==?= Kornfeld Date: Wed Feb 20, 2002 10:41pm Subject: Re: [LUG] [GEN]
Re: mastering tips
2002-02-21 by Joeri Vankeirsbilck
[redirected from LUG to Logic-OT:] From: Matt McKenzie-Smith Date: Thu Feb 21, 2002 0:28am Subject: Re:[GEN] [OT] Waveburner Pro and
Re: Re: Pricing of upgrades
2002-02-21 by Alexis Aiosa
... ... Oh hey, that makes real sense. Wow, why didn t I think of that! Now I see. Yah, right...NOT! Real silly,
Re: Any Liverpool fans out there?
2002-02-21 by yavuzj
... No. GS stands for Galatasaray. It was actually a goalles draw but we are playing Liverpool again next week. This time it will at home (in Istanbul).
Re: [L-OT] Re: Upgrade (sorry) q for emagic on LAWG4 to LAWP5
2002-02-20 by Mark Lennox
... errr... doesnt seem to clarify the situation for you monsdrum! I dont see why you have to wait for the LAWG4- LAWP5 upgrade when you can get LAWP5 up and
Re: Upgrade (sorry) q for emagic on LAWG4 to LAWP5
2002-02-20 by monsdrum
Joeri suggested that I pointed my question directly at emagic, since apparently none of the emagic guys subscribe to the list. Here is the reply that I got:
RE: (OT) PORTABLE MiniDisc Recorder
2002-02-20 by DbbBrook@aol.com
Does any company make a PORTABLE MiniDisc Recorder with an optical (digital) out. It seems like every portable MD only has an audio out, and only the decks
Re: [L-OT] RE: (OT) Microphone positioning - NOT HOMEWORK
2002-02-20 by Dennis Gunn
... Yes thats what I mean. The absolute most important mics you can put on the set would be the overheads. Two mikes arranged as a stereo pair fairly high
Re: [L-OT] re: (OT) Bad News in Music INdustry
2002-02-20 by Doug Slick
... Thanks Bjorn. I ll check it out. -- Doug [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [L-OT] RE: (OT) Microphone positioning - NOT HOMEWORK
2002-02-20 by DbbBrook@aol.com
In a message dated 20/02/2002 01:02:59 GMT Standard Time, ... HE HE I have no overhead. I guessed you meant microphones above the drummer. ?? Am I right.
Re: [L-OT] re: (OT) Bad News in Music INdustry
2002-02-20 by DbbBrook@aol.com
I differently agree with you Dennis.
Re: Any Liverpool fans out there?
2002-02-20 by yoonchinet
... Are you talking Giga Studio, or what? :-). Yoonchi.
Re: Any Liverpool fans out there?
2002-02-20 by ronniewibbley
... Me? Go to Anfield? I would feel like Martin Sheen in Apocalypse Now, sailing into the black heart of darkness, entering a land of horror. Or Van Helsing,
Logic on Win2k/XP Cluster
2002-02-20 by Gerrit "Gerry" Straub
Anyone on this list also toyed with the idea of running Logic on a Windows cluster ? Would be a lot of extra power to bring up my girlfriend s machine to the
Re: [L-OT] Re: OT: Mac - updating OS
2002-02-20 by John Matthews
I thought OSX was the latest Mac OS?? Cheers John Groovey Band website mail to : chickenjohn@grooveyband.co.uk http://www.grooveyband.co.uk/ East
Re: [L-OT] RE: (OT) Microphone positioning - NOT HOMEWORK
2002-02-20 by John Matthews
You re very lucky to be able to have that many mikes at your disposal!!! ... Cheers John Groovey Band website mail to :
Re: Any Liverpool fans out there?
2002-02-20 by yavuzj
Hi Ron, ... Why don t you go support GS at Anfield? ... Yavuz
Re: OT: Mac - updating OS
2002-02-20 by Joeri Vankeirsbilck
[redirected from LUG to Logic-OT:] From: lotusmajordomo Date: Tue Feb 19, 2002 9:46pm Subject: Re: OT: Mac - updating OS ... snip I