Re: [lpc2000] LPC2138 and GCC
2005-09-30 by Rob Jansen
... Those files are not part of the GCC environment but chip specific. If you d like to run code from RAM (as I do) to test some simple things, the lpc21isp
Messages
Browse messages
Page 148 of 329 · 16407 messages matched
Re: [lpc2000] JTAG RTCK question
2005-09-30 by Rob Jansen
Alas, it is just the other way around. The RTCK line is not used by a lot of the JTAG pods around, the ARM7 TDMI-S does use the RTCK. Look at page 5-3 (105) in
Re: [lpc2000] Re: New poll for lpc2000
2005-09-30 by Earl Bollinger
www.newmicros.com has the nifty little Tini2106, Tini2136 and Tini2138 Arm(tm) units with a Phillips ARM MCU on a 24 pin .100 board which is about 1 square
Re: JTAG RTCK question
2005-09-29 by philips_apps
Not really. While using the JTAG debugger this pin is controlled by the JTAG interface. Also in the LPC2103 which was the device in discussion, the RTCK is not
Re: LPC2101/02/03 Datasheet
2005-09-29 by philips_apps
Hi, the answer is YES, all of the above. The pins are connected to the APB bus by default for compatibility reasons but can be connected to the Local Bus
JTAG RTCK question
2005-09-29 by seangra
I see that people are saying that the RTCK line for JTAG debugging isn t used. Does this mean that I can use this as a GPIO even when using the JTAG debugger?
Re: LPC2101/02/03 Datasheet
2005-09-29 by radoslaw_mitura
The block diagram in the pdf shows GENERAL PURPOSE GPIO mapped to P0[31:0] as well as HIGH SPEED GENERAL PURPOSE GPIO mapped to the same P0[31:0] . Does
LPC2138 and GCC
2005-09-29 by Alexander Shabarshin
Hello I try to run simple circuit with LPC2138 chip. I plan to use lpc21isp utility to flash it under Linux. Yesterday I installed GCC-4.0.1 from gnuarm.com,
Re: New poll for lpc2000
2005-09-29 by seangra
There s also another company that makes really cheap DIP prototype boards: http://www.embeddedartists.com/products/boards/lpc213x.php LPC2132 ( 64/16) -
Re: New poll for lpc2000
2005-09-29 by radim100
... boards ... of ... on ... Hi , You may have to check these guys they migth have what you are looking for : http://www.maramil.com/maramilcom_main
Detecting when LPC2000 is in debug mode
2005-09-29 by davebryan1
Hi, Does anyone have any ideas how to detect when a LPC2000 device has been halted by a JTAG debugger ? I need a fast acting signal (within a few microseconds)
Re: [lpc2000] Slow OCD Remote/Insight debugging
2005-09-29 by sig5534@hotmail.com
That is the JTAG link speed setting. Actual the probe goes to 10M but the LPC would not take that. Chris. ... From: Matthias Hertel To:
Re: [lpc2000] Re: New poll for lpc2000
2005-09-29 by Pont, Dr M.J.
... For those of us who spend some of our time teaching in universities, etc, this would be perfect. Price isn t too critial ($5?). If you want to inspire
Re: [lpc2000] Re: LPC2148 - Vbat current with Vdd = 0?
2005-09-29 by Joel Winarske
... Thanks Bob!
Re: [lpc2000] LPC + Profibus
2005-09-29 by Joel Winarske
For required interconnect signals see page 42 of the data sheet: www.profibuscenter.nl/page-downloads/_spc3_hardware_V1.2.pdf You would need to bit bang an
Re: New poll for lpc2000
2005-09-29 by Bob_xyz
There are a number of companies that make SMD-to-DIP adapter boards for prototyping. IIRC, one of the trade names used is Surf-Board . Regards, Bob
Re: New poll for lpc2000
2005-09-29 by Gus
I could be the only one asking for this but I am really dreaming of an ARM DIP package that can be prototyped very easilyon a bread board. Or maybe someone out
Re: [lpc2000] Slow OCD Remote/Insight debugging
2005-09-29 by Blagoj Kupev
Here is my opinion using other MCUs (MPC565, PIC16F, PIC18F) and i think for LPC the situation is the same regarding programming speeds. There are two
LPC + Profibus
2005-09-29 by gfaurie1
Hello, I d like to link a LPC and a SPC3. The SPC3 protocol ASIC is totally dedicated for the use as PROFIBUS DP slave. It manages layer 1 and 2 of PROFIBUS.
Re: New poll for lpc2000
2005-09-29 by philips_apps
A little additional info why the focus on the PLCC44 package. It is cost and cost. The resale price of a PLCC52 device would be more than 30 cent higher than
Re: [lpc2000] Re: New poll for lpc2000
2005-09-28 by Xtian Xultz
Ok, its clear to me now (I develop few boards in SMT so please understand...)
New poll for lpc2000
2005-09-28 by lpc2000@yahoogroups.com
Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the lpc2000 group: What package yould you prefer for the new LPC2000 family devices? Note: I have no
Re: New poll for lpc2000
2005-09-28 by Karl Olsen
... I d say that removing pin 44 (P0.14) is no option either. With this pin floating at reset, you don t know whether the chip enters the bootloader or not.
Re: [lpc2000] Re: New poll for lpc2000 - use PLCC-52!
2005-09-28 by Sebastien Jacquemard
A PLCC52 will be a great solution, it s effectively difficult to remove one pin on each side, AIN7 and AIN2 no problem, but for the 2 other sides... SSEL1 (3)
Re: [lpc2000] Re: New poll for lpc2000 - use PLCC-52!
2005-09-28 by haare_in_der_dusche@yahoo.de
lpc2100_fan wrote: A PLCC-48 does not exist, neither do sockets for a package that does not exist. That is true. But why insist on using PLCC-44, when
Re: New poll for lpc2000
2005-09-28 by lpc2100_fan
A PLCC-48 does not exist, neither do sockets for a package that does not exist. The whole purpose of a PLCC package is easy handling availability of low cost
Re: [lpc2000] Slow OCD Remote/Insight debugging
2005-09-28 by Matthias Hertel
You do flash programming at 1MB/s on an LPC2xxx controller?
Re: LPC2101/02/03 - OTHER VERSIONS PLANNED WITH MORE FLASH ?
2005-09-28 by lp2000c
... Plus USB, larger footprint, and more $. ... While I am certainly in favor of fixing all bugs, I wonder about the viability of LPC2114 and LPC2124. Why
RE: [lpc2000] Slow OCD Remote/Insight debugging
2005-09-28 by Paul Curtis
Chris, ... Well, let s work through it shall we. ... Sure. I understand that. ... I m sorry if I m a little thick here. You ll need to help me with the
Re: [lpc2000] Slow OCD Remote/Insight debugging
2005-09-28 by sig5534@hotmail.com
I guess you missed the point. The programming time is limited by the internal operation of the LPC CPU. Erasing sectors is time controlled by the CPU. The
Re: [lpc2000] Re: New poll for lpc2000
2005-09-28 by Xtian Xultz
I understand, my question is, why not have a PLCC48 instead a PLCC44? Is it impossible to not have a PLC44 but only a PLCC48?
Re: [lpc2000] Slow OCD Remote/Insight debugging
2005-09-28 by Blagoj Kupev
As i understand regarding your comments it is much cost effective that i buy CrossConnect with CrossWorks than to by Seggers JTAGjet?! What about support from
Re: TFT LCD display (Nokia6600 type) driver
2005-09-28 by gokbektas
According to Nokia 6600 service manual schematics, LCD interface has six data pins (LCDDa0-LCDDa5), clock signal (LCDDISPClk), LCDLLClk, LCDFPS, LCDCamClk1,
RE: [lpc2000] Slow OCD Remote/Insight debugging
2005-09-28 by Paul Curtis
Hi, ... Ok, so 48K in 6 seconds is 8K per second to download and flash. Gee. That s way slower than CrossWorks wiggler implementation which will erase,
Re: [lpc2000] Slow OCD Remote/Insight debugging
2005-09-28 by sig5534@hotmail.com
The time is all due to the erase I think. As I recall it takes about 0.3 Sec per sector and there are about 16 sectors, so that is about 5 seconds right
Re: LPC family member with Ethernet?
2005-09-28 by Alan Hutton
It would be really cool if you could provide a development board with the option to power it up from the ethernet. The LM5070 from National Semiconductor will
Re: [lpc2000] Re: New poll for lpc2000
2005-09-28 by Michael Johnson
Hi, ... Do you use/need JTAG-TRST? Given that these parts don t come out of reset under debug control I can t see that this pin is of much use. Michael
Re: [lpc2000] Slow OCD Remote/Insight debugging
2005-09-28 by Michael Johnson
... What is the size of your program that takes 6 seconds to download to flash? Michael
Re: [lpc2000] Slow OCD Remote/Insight debugging
2005-09-28 by sig5534@hotmail.com
I mean 1 MegaByte per second. That is my JTAG link speed. I have 2 designs right now I am working with, a LPC2106 and an LPC2124. The download to the
Re: New poll for lpc2000
2005-09-28 by philips_apps
Hi, some more information: 1. There might be a chance of taking away 2 pins on one side if they are 2 corner pins. 2. JTAG pins are also used and needed for
Re: [lpc2000] LPC2101/02/03 Datasheet
2005-09-27 by Richard
Hi Philips Marketing, For the benefits of the 3rd party tool vendors (which ultimately benefits Philips), how about releasing some sort of standard header file
Re: New poll for lpc2000
2005-09-27 by radim100
I understand that die layout dictates one pin from each side , but it is really limiting !!! Probably best 4 pin to take out would be GPIO/ANx pin since this
Re: New poll for lpc2000
2005-09-27 by seangra
To go to a 44-pin chip from a 48-pin chip you have to remove one pin from each side (the 44-pin package has only 11 pins per side, wherease the 48 pin package
Re: [lpc2000] New poll for lpc2000
2005-09-27 by daedalworks@comcast.net
The question I have is why the restriction of removing one pin from each side? That really limits the possibilities... ... Enter your vote today! A new poll
Re: New poll for lpc2000 - compatibility
2005-09-27 by aeiderman
Why JTAG pins are not an option? You can easily remove TRST pin (pin 8, P0.27) with no damage to JTAG functionality (pin 8). RTCK pin (pin 26) also have no
Re: New poll for lpc2000
2005-09-27 by lpc2100_fan
Hi, there is a 48-pin LQFP package and that is just fine as is, the story is about the PLCC package, which is easier to handle but afaik does not exist as
RE: [lpc2000] New poll for lpc2000
2005-09-27 by David Kay
To get the part in a PLCC44 package is my guess - same die just with 4 pads not connected? Cheers, Dave Kay ... From: lpc2000@yahoogroups.com
Re: [lpc2000] New poll for lpc2000
2005-09-27 by Xtian Xultz
Sorry if my question is stupid, but is it impossible to have a 48 pin footprint? Why only 44 pins?
Poll is about which pins to omit in the PLCC44 version, please act right away
2005-09-27 by philips_apps
Hi, while most of the rules are described in the Poll itself, I will do my best to generate the optimal pinout and share with you a little how a decision like
New poll for lpc2000
2005-09-27 by lpc2000@yahoogroups.com
Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the lpc2000 group: Rules: need to take off one pin from each side of the LQFP48. JTAG pins, Vdd, Vss