Dfine grain & noise reduction
2004-01-05 by Paul Roark
Has anyone used Dfine grain and noise reduction program? It s made by http://www.nikmultimedia.com/dfine/usa/entry.php, and there is a free demo that can be
Messages
Browse messages
Page 1390 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
Marshall Image Guard
2004-01-05 by Paul Roark
I saw a can of Marshall Image Guard in a photo store yesterday. Just judging from the can and label, it is the same as PremierArt Print Shield and Lyson Print
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Epson Papers?
2004-01-05 by Paul Roark
John, ... What printer and ink are you using to get this dmax? Paul www.PaulRoark.com
Noise (was Re: 16 Bit vs. 8 Bit for BO)
2004-01-05 by Glenn Mitchell
... often ... an ... have so ... out of its ... it, taking ... trying the ... but never ... I hear ya! I bought a DiMage 7i for a small camera to carry around
Great Customer Support (was FocalBlade)
2004-01-05 by Glenn Mitchell
... new ... I ... separately, ... book, for ... Harold is great at customer support. It cannot be stressed enough! Another who deserves accolades is Vlad at
[Digital BW] FocalBlade (was Re: Miranda Actions)
2004-01-05 by Glenn Mitchell
... before going with PhotoKit Sharpener. I went with PhotoKit because ... pass. ... received a discount. ... FocalBlade. ... find a couple of his tools very
Re: [Digital BW] FocalBlade (was Re: Miranda Actions)
2004-01-05 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
... and Harald Heim is up there with Ed Hamrick of VueScan, in my book, for consistent support, updates, and personal accessibility.. Keith Krebs Just some
Re: [Digital BW] FocalBlade (was Re: Miranda Actions)
2004-01-05 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
... Agreed. Which is why I stopped buying Fred s products as well, AND have NEVER posted on the forums there.. Keith Krebs Just some guy, caretaker of the
Re: [Digital BW] FocalBlade (was Re: Miranda Actions)
2004-01-05 by Alan.Huntley@cox.net
Mitch, I agree. FocalBlade is a very nice product which I evaluated before going with PhotoKit Sharpener. I went with PhotoKit because 1. I happen to agree
Re: 1160/FS-N curves for Quadtone Rip
2004-01-05 by bjornaagedk
... Hmm. Have already done that. The output is looking strange... almost like a negative!! What could be wrong? I have also made a print without any curves...
Re: Re: [Digital BW]
2004-01-05 by Alan.Huntley@cox.net
Marzenna, Conversion of color to B&W has already been discussed on this forum. Do a search and you should get quite a few hits. There are many ways to convert
Re: 1160/FS-N curves for Quadtone Rip
2004-01-05 by John Vitollo
... Go into the ExampleInks folder and use the 1160-fs profile.
1160/FS-N curves for Quadtone Rip
2004-01-05 by bjornaagedk
I am experimenting with the Harrington QuadTone Rip and my Epson 1160 printer with MIS FS-N inks. Do someone have curves for this ink/printer combination?
[Digital BW] Re: 16 Bit vs. 8 Bit for BO
2004-01-05 by Clayton Jones
Aside from the other points of view expressed here, IMO the BO part of this thread is irrelevent. It s the image that is either posterized or not as a result
RE: [Digital BW] Re: 16 Bit vs. 8 Bit for BO
2004-01-05 by Paul D. DeRocco
... ... other than the fact that my old Minolta DiMage 7 does in fact have so much noise that I can t manage to coax any visible posterization out of its
RE: [Digital BW] scanning and image size
2004-01-05 by Paul D. DeRocco
... Before you try any resampling, just specify the inches and let the driver do the resampling automatically . That almost always works fine. Explicit
Vs: Vs: [Digital BW] Septone Ink Fade Test
2004-01-05 by Ukko Heikkinen
Thank you, Clayton. Ukko Heikkinen , I live in south Florida. Right now the daylight is about 10.5 hours (sun rises at 7:10 am, sets at 5:41 pm). My front
Re: Vs: [Digital BW] Septone Ink Fade Test
2004-01-05 by Clayton Jones
Hello Ukko, ... long the days are over there. I live in south Florida. Right now the daylight is about 10.5 hours (sun rises at 7:10 am, sets at 5:41 pm). My
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Epson Papers?
2004-01-05 by john eckenrode
clayton i get a 1.68 pretty consistently with Hot Press, the 1.59 seems low to me. i really like this paper so far after playing with a few boxes. it is worth
Good camera for B&W
2004-01-05 by degan00115061
Greetings This is my first post to the group. Most of the discussions seems to be about printers and paper. Does anyone have any advice on which camera to
[Digital BW] Re: Epson Papers?
2004-01-05 by Clayton Jones
Hello Carl, ... Thanks very much, this is what I was looking for. Regards, Clayton Info on black and white digital printing at
Re: 16 Bit vs. 8 Bit for BO
2004-01-05 by Glenn Mitchell
... Mitchell
Re: 16 Bit vs. 8 Bit for BO
2004-01-05 by Tyler Boley
... gmitchel850@y... wrote: snip... ... Mitch! Buddy! I m agreeeing with you man! ... Uh... Hello?! Is this not the B&W list? I d say most of the people here
Re: 16 Bit vs. 8 Bit for BO
2004-01-05 by Tyler Boley
... Whopdeedoo for you. I have none of those things. bragging rights (which you quickly fell into) for those who, by right of better equipment and the
Re: [Digital BW] Re: 16 Bit vs. 8 Bit for BO
2004-01-05 by Anthony G. Atkielski
... And not everyone is manipulating color images. A 16-bit image in black and white requires 33% less memory and disk than a color image in 8-bit; so anyone
Re[2]: [Digital BW] 16 bit vs 8 bit difference, Re Glen Mitchell´s posting
2004-01-05 by Anthony G. Atkielski
... Graphics cards are largely digital devices so they can easily be any number of bits; how good they are at actually generating 65,536 different voltage
FocalBlade (was Re: Miranda Actions)
2004-01-05 by Glenn Mitchell
I avoid FredMiranda.com and Fred s actions. I own several. He makes a fine product. The problem is his site masquerades as an open site, and it s censored.
Re: 16 Bit vs. 8 Bit for BO
2004-01-05 by Glenn Mitchell
... have limited ... assertion of bragging ... better equipment and ... I don t understand any of this at all. Why all of this ad hominem? I offered nothing of
Re: 16 Bit vs. 8 Bit for BO
2004-01-05 by Glenn Mitchell
... very ... theory) ... Who has said some editing cannot be done in 8-bits without deterioration?! That s not the point of contention at all. The question is,
Re: 16 Bit vs. 8 Bit for BO
2004-01-05 by J Michael Sullivan
What you are advocating is a wasteful workflow for those who may have limited resources. It certainly is an EXPENSIVE workflow -- hence my assertion of
RE: [Digital BW] Re: 16 Bit vs. 8 Bit for BO
2004-01-05 by Austin Franklin
Michael, ... The new Nikon in fact does have a 16 bit A/D, but the sensor/AFE (Analog Front End) simply won t provide 16 *clean* bits...so yes, it does scan at
[Digital BW] Re: 16 Bit vs. 8 Bit for BO
2004-01-05 by Glenn Mitchell
... posterization ... loaded, ... after ... adjustments ... and ... That s not necessarily true at all. Noise comes in varying degrees. It s effects on an
Re: 16 Bit vs. 8 Bit for BO
2004-01-05 by Tyler Boley
... Sullivan wrote: big snip... I m sorry Michael, but I take issue with almost every point you make. But it seems everyone is sick of this
Re: 1160/Roark-bad gradient-contact prints...
2004-01-05 by Mark Hahn
They work very well with the VM inkset. The best thing I ve found is that when one doesn t work you can try the other. The zones of badness are different for
Re: [Digital BW] 1160/Roark-bad gradient-contact prints...
2004-01-05 by Mark Hahn
thanks Paul, I ll play aorund with the 1160 just to see what I can get, maybe I just need a better printer for this... yes, for many prints I think I can
RE: [Digital BW] Clog from hell
2004-01-05 by Seth Rossman
Windex with ammonia contains ammonia. There are other variations available. But, many folks have solved clogs with Windex. Not in the heads, though; under
Re: 16 Bit vs. 8 Bit for BO
2004-01-05 by J Michael Sullivan
Wow. What a firestorm. Even a claim of gratuitous name dropping !! hmph. I will stand by the following facts (verified by me and others -- yes, my amigo Bruce
Re: [Digital BW]
2004-01-05 by mgolczewska
Hello Alan, thank You very much for replying! If you have found a better way to convert color to B&W please do share it with us! I have found a way myself
RE: [Digital BW] leaving eboni black when printing color
2004-01-05 by Seth Rossman
Nothing -- if you profile it. Seth = yes I am using a 2200 epson with the epson inks, except with MIS =Eboni in the photo black slot because I do mostly black
Re: [Digital BW] 16 bits vs 8 bits' Thanks to Glen Mitchell
2004-01-05 by Cort Anderson
... If all you are doing is B&W then that is okay but if you are doing color for separations and offset printing then you are making a big mistake in my
Re: Miranda Actions (was unknown)
2004-01-05 by Tom Husband
... recently, a ... Photokit ... CSpro ... found other, ... find Fred s ... I agree with Alan. The Miranda actions are pretty good but I think there are
RE: [Digital BW] 16 bits vs 8 bits' Thanks to Glen Mitchell
2004-01-05 by Austin Franklin
Hi Julio, ... For %99.99999 of all COLOR images, Dan is in fact correct. This topic has in fact been beaten to death. The challenge to people who think Dan
RE: [Digital BW] 1160/Roark-bad gradient-contact prints...
2004-01-05 by Paul Roark
Mark, ... RC-compatible UT inks on Pictorico transparency is a better bet. Still, my 1160 just is not up to the job of making a good internegative. 1280 and
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Black Ink Problem Using MIS GP Ink
2004-01-05 by Paul Roark
Alan, ... No, but I don t trust any dye. My bottles of MIS black dyes and Media Street s hybrid black collapse onto themselves in my darkroom storage as the
Re: scanning and image size
2004-01-04 by sceptre12345
... Set the print size to the desired width and height in Photoshop. Unless you want to scale the image with unconstrained proportions, you do not have to
Re: [Digital BW] scanning and image size
2004-01-04 by Joseph Robinson
Thanks to everyone for the advice. I will scan at the original negative size at 4000 ppi. It sounds like I should be able to change the image size in
Re: [Digital BW] (unknown)
2004-01-04 by A. Huntley
Hi Marzenna, Over the years I ve owned several of Fred s actions and, more recently, a few of his new plugins. Until the Pixel Genuis folks developed Photokit
16 bits vs 8 bits' Thanks to Glen Mitchell
2004-01-04 by Julio Fernandez
Glen: What a great reply and exposition of the issues. That is a keeper, appreciate your taking the time to explain. Soon after I had posted I noticed your
Re: [Digital BW] Clog from hell
2004-01-04 by flyfishingusa2002
Windex contains ammonia, which is highly corrosive, if you use it in your print head, as I did, you will find that it is likely to damage the circuit board
RE: [Digital BW] Re: 16 Bit vs. 8 Bit for BO
2004-01-04 by Austin Franklin
... I hope there was a HUGE caveat on that, that he was SPECIFICALLY talking about color, NOT B&W. You really *need* do tonal corrections to high bit data for