Re: [Digital BW] Re: 7000 banding problem
2002-07-31 by Robert Morrison
I m with Antonis...sounds like a paper thickness issue to me...at least if the Photorag was the 308gm. I run the 188gm PR and EAM with the same paper setting
Messages
Browse messages
Page 1841 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
RE: [Digital BW] what magazines do you read?
2002-07-31 by David J. Bookbinder
I read LensWork, Popular Photography, Camera Arts, and American Photo. LensWork and Camera Arts are by far the most useful, from an esthetics viewpoint. More
weird problem printing 15 identical pictures`
2002-07-31 by Jerry Olson
Has anyone experienced this problem, and if you have can you offer any explanation at all? I m printing 15 prints for a large pix exchange, and the first 13
what magazines do you read?
2002-07-31 by rmcooke
Hello All, I ve looked in the archives without much luck concerning which photography magazines are read by members of this knowledgeable and august group. So,
Re: [Digital BW] Storage of digital images
2002-07-31 by Bob Frost
... From: Anthony Atkielski ... pixel ... or ... Anthony, If the color information is significantly interpolated and the luminance is
Re:Luminous Landscape 2200 Review
2002-07-31 by Doug I.
While I stand by my original point that there is too often a rush to condemn anything Epson on this list, I apologize if in the way I said it I have in any way
Re: [Digital BW] Storage of digital images
2002-07-31 by Truman Prevatt
It s a bit more subtle that that. It has to do with the information content in the image. Here the term information is used in it s mathematical sense. For
RE: [Digital BW] digital images
2002-07-31 by Austin Franklin
Anthony, ... I believe you are misusing the term pixel here. Printers, at least the inkjet ones we use here, print dots, they do not print pixels. There is a
Re: [Digital BW] digital images
2002-07-31 by Anthony Atkielski
... I ll using printing for an analogy, since that seems appropriate here. When you print something (for example), each pixel printed is constructed from an
RE: [Digital BW] Storage of digital images
2002-07-31 by Steadman Uhlich
Shilesh, Welcome to the Digital Revolution Part 3. First was the Printer. Second was the Scanner. Now...the camera. Steadman [Non-text portions of this message
digital images
2002-07-31 by Stephen Petegorsky
Anthony - can you explain depth of modulation to me? Stephen Petegorsky petegorsky@external.umass.edu web site - www.spphoto.com
Re: [Digital BW] Storage of digital images
2002-07-31 by Anthony Atkielski
... No. Normally each pixel in the output image corresponds to a physical pixel in the CCD. The only interpolation that occurs is for color, since each pixel
Re: [Digital BW] Storage of digital images
2002-07-31 by Bob Frost
Anthony, Surely every pixel on a digital camera (except for a few exotica) is interpolated? The skill of the camera maker is surely in choosing the best size
Re: 7000 banding problem
2002-07-31 by antonisphoto
Bill, have you saved the thickness of your PhotoRag as one of the paper pre-sets? Unless it s the thin one, it will be radically heavier than EAM and could be
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Epson 7600/9600 B/W Output Not What I Hoped For.
2002-07-31 by George Hartzell
... My understanding is that this issue isn t profiling the grays per se, but rather that the correction that the printer/inkset/paper requires has more kinks
Re:Luminous Landscape 2200 Review
2002-07-31 by mkravit
I was not going to respond but Doug is missing the point. I don t believe that anyone is putting down Epson or the new printers, only that the initial samples
Re:Luminous Landscape 2200 Review
2002-07-31 by Mitch Alland
To: Editor P.O.V. Image Service ... Now, I don t think much of Leibovitz as a photographer and Mary Ellen Marks is not a favorite of
Re:Luminous Landscape 2200 Review Re:Luminous Landscape 2200 Review Re:Luminous Landscape 2200 Review
2002-07-31 by Mitch Alland
To: Doug I. ... Like Martin Wesley, I also had a frustrating experience wasting a lot of time, ink and paper trying to get a good a
Re: [Digital BW] Storage of digital images
2002-07-31 by Anthony Atkielski
Note that the S2 does not actually produce 12 mp; it produces 6 mp, which it interpolates to 12 mp in order to justify the marketing hype. So you can
Which temp storage is most reliable?
2002-07-31 by Jerry Olson
Hello Group! which of the myriad of storage devices for digital camera images is the most reliable in the field? It wouldn t have to hold more than 5 or 6
Re:Luminous Landscape 2200 Review
2002-07-30 by Doug I.
Keith/Diogenes, I have no argument with the gist of what you re saying. I share your cynicism, only mine is aimed at the knee-jerk anti-Epson reactions, and
Re: [Digital BW] Storage of digital images
2002-07-30 by janishilesh
Along those lines: I recently got a Nikon D100, and spent an afternoon shooting in a graveyard. At the end, I came home with 6 images on a 256 MB compact flash
Re: [Digital BW] Storage of digital images
2002-07-30 by Ricardo Lagos
25 GB -- umm .. lets see.. a DVD-R holds about 4.7 GB -- 25/4.7 = 5.3 .. .. so you can fit your WHOLE vacation shoot on about 6 DVD-R discs.. .. of course you
Re: [Digital BW] Storage of digital images
2002-07-30 by James Klebau
... If I can add a thought: If I shot 500 images on a holiday, I would probably cull out most of them, and would be very pleased if I had more than a dozen
Re:Luminous Landscape 2200 Review
2002-07-30 by pbard2002
... etc. ... saying ... least he ... of some ... the ... printed by ... personal ... Well, Doug, I don t know how long it took you to get a good print from any
[Digital BW] Re: Epson 7600/9600 B/W Output Not What I Hoped For.
2002-07-30 by rubalong
From the profiler RGB term 5. License Restrictions. You may not do any of the following yourself, or through any other person and you may not permit any third
7000 banding problem
2002-07-30 by Bill Giffen
I have tried to find info on banding problems that I am having but have not been successful. I have a 7000 with MIS FS inks and imageprint rip. I just starting
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Converting to B&W Workflow question
2002-07-30 by Martin Wesley
Mike, The Desaturate command simply removes all the color information from all three channels and each channel continues to contribute 1/3 of the info to
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Epson 7600/9600 B/W Output Not What I Hoped For.
2002-07-30 by Tim Spragens
... Really? Isn t that like a programming package that won t allow you to distribute the programs? Time to find a different package. Tim -- Tim Spragens
Re: [Digital BW] Great Tip if you have been experiencingphotoshop crashes.
2002-07-30 by Jerry Olson
Hi Steve, No, but I guess its a Macintosh thing. I ve had the plugin out for 3 weeks and have not had one crash since removing it. It is supposed to have
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Epson 7600/9600 B/W Output Not What I Hoped For.
2002-07-30 by Tony Terlecki
... I think the framework for the format is standard but it can contain proprietary algorithms. Most (or all) profiles are not simple 1 to 1 lookup tables for
Re: Converting to B&W Workflow question
2002-07-30 by michaeladawson_ajax
I read several of the replies and they are all correct but I don t believe they addressed the exact intent of the question. The replies all focused on using
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Epson 7600/9600 B/W Output Not What I Hoped For.
2002-07-30 by Austin Franklin
Hi Jason, I haven t seen those, but typically, with compiled code, more than simply the compiled version of your program goes into the executable...but with a
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Epson 7600/9600 B/W Output Not What I Hoped For.
2002-07-30 by Martin Wesley
... From: Austin Franklin To: Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 12:28 PM Subject: RE:
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Epson 7600/9600 B/W Output Not What I Hoped For.
2002-07-30 by Jason DeFontes
It s just like the learn to program versions of compilers that they bundle in computer books, you can t redistribute what you make with them. There s a much
Reuters' Story on HP Printers
2002-07-30 by Doug Fisher
For what it is worth, Reuters has a story today on new HP printers... http://www.reuters.com/news_article.jhtml?type=technologynews&StoryID=126378 4
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Epson 7600/9600 B/W Output Not What I Hoped For.
2002-07-30 by Austin Franklin
... How can they attempt to legally restrict that? Is the format of these profiles a standard? If so, I simply can t see them attempting the restriction of
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Epson 7600/9600 B/W Output Not What I Hoped For.
2002-07-30 by Lawrence Smith
... I never really thought that was going to be the case. I thought it was aimed at the user who is printing mostly color and needed the occasional good
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Epson 7600/9600 B/W Output Not What I Hoped For.
2002-07-30 by Martin Wesley
... From: George Hartzell To: Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 11:23 AM Subject: Re:
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Epson 7600/9600 B/W Output Not What I Hoped For.
2002-07-30 by Lawrence Smith
... George, Thanks for the info. I was going to have some profiles made but I will wait for Bill s to be completed. According to Bill they will be available
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Epson 7600/9600 B/W Output Not What I Hoped For.
2002-07-30 by George Hartzell
... I was fortunate to get to spend some time with Bill Atkinson last week. He has a 9600 and is working on developing some custom profiles for it. He s
Re: [Digital BW] Great Tip if you have been experiencing photoshop crashes.
2002-07-30 by Stephen Jennings
Jerry, thanks for the tip. Do you know what this plugin is for? STEPHEN JENNINGS P h o t o g r a p h e r Cambridge, MA sgjennin@ix.netcom.com
Re: [Digital BW] New Monitor
2002-07-30 by Anthony Atkielski
... There are several factors to consider. The first is your vision. If you have ideal vision, you can see details about 1 minute of arc in size. That s
Re: [Digital BW] Converting to B&W Workflow question
2002-07-30 by Stan McQueen
... That link doesn t seem to work. Do you have another one? Stan ================================ Photography by Stan McQueen http://www.smcqueen.com
Re: [Digital BW] Re:Luminous Landscape 2200 Review
2002-07-30 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
... Ummm.. he never implied that... Mary Ellen Marks and Annie Leibovitz for example have no frigging clue about actually printing... Doesn t make them
Re: [Digital BW] Converting to B&W Workflow question
2002-07-30 by david_bookbinder@sprynet.com
There are two cheaper alternatives to buying Photoshop to get the channel mixer effect. One is Picture Window Pro (less than $100), which in addition to the
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Epson 7600/9600 B/W Output Not What I HopedFor.
2002-07-30 by Lawrence Smith
... Mike, Thanks for the tip. I m going to begin in earnest in the next few days. I m really excited about this approach. I really view it as the best of
Re: [Digital BW] Converting to B&W Workflow question
2002-07-30 by Jerry Olson
You can bring up any tones you want. You adjust the red, green, and blue tones the way you want them to appear in monochrome. You d use lots of red if you want
[Digital BW] Re: Epson 7600/9600 B/W Output Not What I HopedFor.
2002-07-30 by mkravit
Larry, You will not be disappointed. I have been making digital negatives on my Epson 10k and the results are outstanding. I have been refining the curves and
Re: New Monitor
2002-07-30 by flyfishingusa2002
Helene, I have a 21 inch Electron Blue II and you can run it at whatever the res of your video card in your pc, I run mine at 1152 x 864 32bit color. At these