Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Messages

Browse messages

Page 1893 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched

1280 carts for sale (VM and FS)

2002-05-17 by darinb20855

Hi there, Sorry for the for sale content... Given my recent failure with quadtones (all my fault--many people went way out of their way to try and help) I

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] RE: The Photo Binbook

2002-05-17 by Steadman Uhlich

Greg, I applaud your desire to share info. But I think you went about it in the wrong manner. I did a quick look at your site and was disturbed to see no

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: posterization and cone inks?

2002-05-17 by magerabamb

David, You said you can print the 21 step wedge, but not the photo, then the problem may be with the photo. Although it may look good on your montitor that

Thread view Attachments: 0

The Photo Binbook

2002-05-17 by Thomas Keesling

... Greg, you re STILL not getting it! And you re getting very annoying. Do some research! And make sure my emails and email address don t show up on your

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: posterization and cone inks?

2002-05-17 by jimhayes361

... fine when ... looks ... there is ... Do a search for DSS Density Shift syndrome Hayes Syndrome Greenies , mainly on the piezo list, although some

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] The Photo Binbook

2002-05-16 by Truman Prevatt

Putting a brief statement concerning the purpose of the list and responsibilities of the members is a very good idea and might solve many problems before they

Thread view Attachments: 0

posterization and cone inks?

2002-05-16 by David Myers

okay, I need some help. I have run the 21 step wedge and it looks fine when i print photorag 188 and cone inks. The image I am trying to print looks fine on

Thread view Attachments: 0

Epson 1160 available for sale

2002-05-16 by bluzdoctor

Hi: I already bought a printer, so I m passing this information onto the list. I recieved a voice mail from this person that they have an Epson 1160 available

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] RE: The Photo Binbook

2002-05-16 by Carolyn Frayn

... Neither do I Julian. One of the many things he is failing to realize is that the posts, while in a public archive on yahoo, do not display our email

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] RE: The Photo Binbook

2002-05-16 by greg_pop

Well, let s not discuss this forever. We were excited about what we had achieved and we truely were expecting a very favorable response from this group. We

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] RE: The Photo Binbook

2002-05-16 by Julian Thomas

Greg, I m curious to understand you - so having made my point, I ask this for clarification only... Do you consider it ok to raid photonet of it s photos and

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] RE: The Photo Binbook

2002-05-16 by CDTobie@aol.com

... That is very much a part of the problem. I an an author, editor, developer, and consultant. In those rolls I participate in many lists. On those lists I

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] RE: The Photo Binbook

2002-05-16 by greg_pop

We don t claim other people s knowledge, we indeed credit every post to its author. We try to create a new resource which we think can be very helpful. We work

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] RE: The Photo Binbook

2002-05-16 by Julian Thomas

Don t you see anything even slightly wrong in claiming and using other people s hard-earned knowledge? Would you scan books authored by other people and

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: The Photo Binbook

2002-05-16 by Gregory Popovitch

Hello Martin and Antonis, I don t believe you are correct when you state that we have violated Yahoo s Terms of Service . I also don t believe that you have

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Imageprint/7000/MAC Users???

2002-05-16 by butchhul

Greetings, I have the IP4 software presently. I bought a copy of the MAC version in April but ran into a problem. On my system, I have been unable to get the

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] The Photo Binbook

2002-05-16 by Robert Morrison

Wow...that about says it...thanks guys. Should we put a brief statement to this effect in the joining instructions for the group...just to make sure that new

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: BW Films & Scanning

2002-05-16 by Jon Zax

I recently scanned a large project for a photographer who shot on the chromagenic B&W film, Kodak s, if I recall, and it was very good and easy to scan,

Thread view Attachments: 0

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.