Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Messages

Browse messages

Page 661 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched

Re: Epson 1290 UT2 vs 2400 K3

2006-04-15 by Clayton Jones

Hello David, ... I think the main diference in the prints will be in the general look, because it is made with color inks rather than toned grayscale inks.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Good RIP for the Epson 2200??

2006-04-15 by Johnny Eades

My $.02 worth would suggest getting a package like PrintFix Pro to creae printer profiles, so that if and when you acquire another printer you could do it for

Thread view Attachments: 0

Epson 1290 UT2 vs 2400 K3

2006-04-15 by roaccuk

I currently have a 1290 on a continuous flow system with MIS (UT2 ink) installed and at the moment I am quite happy with it, however I was wondering whether I

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] Anyone Try Neat Image?

2006-04-15 by Daniel Staver

I ve used all three and each has their strong points. I like Neatimage the best for particularly difficult images. I m thinking about grainy film scans and

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] different Epson law suit

2006-04-15 by Editor, P.O.V. Image Service

EPSON is getting what they deserve on this one. If they hadn t done everything in their power to prevent the average comsumer from refilling cartridges, the

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: different Epson law suit

2006-04-14 by lulalake_1999

... the provision in the ... while I haven t read the ... provide specific instructions on ... opt-out is allowed, and ... please consult an attorney and ...

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: different Epson law suit

2006-04-14 by chipcarterdc

Depends on the applicable state rule, which in this case would be the provision in the California Rules of Civil Procedure governing class actions. Also,

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Good RIP for the Epson 2200??

2006-04-14 by Louis Dina

I d agree with Tyler. I own ImagePrint and have tried ColorBurst, StudioPrint and a few others with my 2200. Most RIPs either do not support the 2200, or do

Thread view Attachments: 0

Noise removal, RAW conversion

2006-04-14 by wgh2005

Coming back from several days away - my own experience, after using both Neat Image (NI) and Noise Ninja (NN), and a few other noise removal tool, is that

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Good RIP for the Epson 2200??

2006-04-14 by Tyler Boley

Unless you have some very specific unusual needs, good profiles and Epson driver really do take care of most things with a printer that size. I m afraid I m

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Anyone Try Neat Image?

2006-04-14 by Tyler Boley

... list? And ... In house folks (well, two of them... well, one partner and one freelance...well ok, one and a half). I confess at the time it was with grainy

Thread view Attachments: 0

Good RIP for the Epson 2200??

2006-04-14 by lulalake_1999

Hi Folks, I use QTR regularly for B&W but need to print color from time to time. Can anyone recommend a good RIP for the 2200? I ve been looking at the Wasach

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: glop and fiba gloss

2006-04-14 by Helen Bach

When printing on glossy papers, including the Innova F-type gloss, Silver Rag and Oriental baryta, I use Krystal Topkote in a second pass through the printer,

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Anyone Try Neat Image?

2006-04-14 by Tyler Boley

As posted back then, we downloaded and tested demos of all the major noise/grain plugins about a year ago. Personlly, I thought the Noiseware filter was the

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] Anyone Try Neat Image?

2006-04-14 by Eric Neilsen Photo 2

Tina, When you say plastic, is that to mean in an unreal smooth texture ? Eric Neilsen Photography 4101 Commerce Street, Suite 9 Dallas, TX 75226 214-827-8301

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] R2400 or others?

2006-04-14 by Michael Hung

Agree.. Unless you print at least every week on B/W, it s much better to stick with a K3 printer like 2400. The older Epson like 1280 will clog and it can take

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Anyone Try Neat Image?

2006-04-14 by Gary Udstrand

I have and use five different converters, ACR, Bibble, RSP, C1, and BBPro. All do a very good job and what it comes down to is which tool works best with your

Thread view Attachments: 0

glop and fiba gloss

2006-04-14 by Michael Kitei

I ve tested some of Roark s profiles using UT2 inks and Innova Fiba Gloss and found that the one for EPSG with PK seems to work very well, however, there is

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] R2400 or others?

2006-04-14 by Edward Wiseman

You could try an Epson 1280/90 with MIS UT-2 variable tone inks ..either pre-filled or do-it-yourself in their spongeless carts and BULK 4 oz bottles (six in

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Anyone Try Neat Image?

2006-04-14 by alanrew42

I strongly recommend you try a trial copy of Noise Ninja: http://www.picturecode.com/ I ve used both NI and NN and much prefer the NN user interface. You may

Thread view Attachments: 0

R2400 or others?

2006-04-14 by fabrivale7

It seems that R2400 is the best for B&W print, are there any other printers to consider in order save money if interest in high quality B&W prints? Thank s a

Thread view Attachments: 0

Test Result: Ilford Printasia

2006-04-14 by timeexposure

Iflord Printasia Glossy Paper with UT-R2 on R220. Low cost 255g/m2 glossy paper from Ilford. Paper based, resin coated, microporous. Profile used: Kirkland

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Anyone Try Neat Image?

2006-04-14 by Arthur Fink

... As someone who uses another raw conversion tool (Pixmantec), I m interested in experiences with Bibble, CS@ raw converter, and other tools. Why did you

Thread view Attachments: 0

Epson 1280, UT2, and Elements 3/PS7

2006-04-14 by mbrouphy

I going to be using a nice, new Epson 1280 and UT2 to print out of either Photoshop Elements 3 or Photoshop 7. I m looking for workflow info for using either

Thread view Attachments: 0

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.