Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Messages

Browse messages

Page 767 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched

re: clear sleeves

2005-12-14 by Scott Jones

I used to buy my crystal clear bags from the local art stores, but Light Impressions has FINALLY improved on the design of these bags which for me is a huge

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Clear Sleeves

2005-12-14 by scott_now_coming

Did you try these guys? http://www.pfile.com/index.html Take a look. They may have what you re looking for. Scott In

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Clear Sleeves

2005-12-14 by john dean

Yea, its clear bags dot com. They have every size and are archival and you can store the prints in them and see perfectly through them. John

Thread view Attachments: 0

Clear Sleeves

2005-12-14 by Martin Carrington

I remember some while ago there was a posting referencing a good source of claer sleeves for unmounted and mounted prints. I tried searching the archive with

Thread view Attachments: 0

film for medium format scanning

2005-12-14 by joshscapes

Hello all, I am a b&w landscape photographer who works with a Pentax 67. I have been using Tmax 100 film in 120 size ever since I got into scanning my

Thread view Attachments: 0

Atkinson VFA profile with PK...?

2005-12-14 by scott_now_coming

Looks like Bill is going to make a VFA profile nwith Photo Black. I noticed this on his website in the profile notes : 9800 VFA 1440 PK BA XR1.icc A profile

Thread view Attachments: 0

[Digital BW] Re: paper industry

2005-12-14 by Greg

... two ... same ... paper, ... which ... Just a note: Hahnemuhle sells a lot of paper to different places that then put their house brand name on the box.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Re: paper industry

2005-12-13 by hogarth@snappydsl.net

... But they get coated by vendors x, y, and z. And converted by vendors n, m, o, and p. The thing is that vendors 1 and 2 are using the recipes of vendors A,

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Good Old Epson 3000

2005-12-13 by fotojali

I just got my old 3000 s print head unclogged after it s been sitting still for 2 years :-) I have printed only color before, but am waitig for my first mono

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Digital Vs. Film

2005-12-13 by Peter Marshall

... 120 and sheet film may be Estar as I said, but for 35mm everyone went over to triacetate in the 1950s. 35mm Tri-X, FP4, T-Max etc all triacetate films.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Digital Vs. Film

2005-12-13 by Peter Marshall

Well, Clayton, I too have a certain background in chemistry. Used to earn a living from it once upon a time, long before taking to writing and photography and

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: paper industry

2005-12-13 by kenstrain2000

... OK here is a quiz. Vendors A, B and C have contract manufacturing done by 1 and 2. A (my favourite paper) uses 1, but after a while changes to 2, and my

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] paper industry

2005-12-13 by Steve Kale

In that case I ll stick with the well-known brands that have an established performance, Hahnemuhle for example, until I see a massively demonstrable reason

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] i1 Match 3.4

2005-12-13 by James Irelan

... I heard it. That automator desk looks really cool, though. I had the same idea, only with different mechanics, and a LOT different price. Whenever I

Thread view Attachments: 0

1270 and 2400 vs 2400

2005-12-13 by johnr@valley.net

I am purchasing an Epson 2400 for color work on matte papers (I currently own a 1270). Any recommendations from folks doing both color and BW work whether you

Thread view Attachments: 0

Boston Area Meet-Up !

2005-12-13 by Jeff Magidson

To list members in the Boston area; I have been an avid reader and occasional poster on this list for about 4 years! I would like to see if there is an

Thread view Attachments: 0

paper industry

2005-12-13 by hogarth@snappydsl.net

OK people, you lost me. What is it about the paper industry that people find so scary? If you know the entire chain from trees to the box of paper arriving at

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] i1 Match 3.4

2005-12-13 by Greg

... don t ... prospective ... Sony when ... call a ... I own it, and tried to register it, and with the last email I included the serial number of the spectro!

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] i1 Match 3.4

2005-12-13 by Steve Kale

If you own it and have registered it this is not a problem. If you don t own it then ask a distributor. Support is for owners and not prospective purchasers.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] i1 Match 3.4

2005-12-13 by Tyler Boley

... support ... I hope this doesn t become a habit, and ruin your life. Maybe cold turkey it for the rest of the week. ... between the ... Good, one more thing

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] i1 Match 3.4

2005-12-13 by John Moody

For a cheap thrill, I logged on to GM, and found this in the user support area. :-) “To the best of our knowledge there is no difference in accuracy between

Thread view Attachments: 0

[Digital BW] Re: C84/EZ nicking corners

2005-12-13 by mkirschner

... series? ... design ... Kip, I don t know if the R220 is any tougher than the C8x series, but I doubt it. However, it does have the feature of enabling you

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] i1 Match 3.4

2005-12-13 by Tyler Boley

... wrote: ... finally say ... ... Well John, it s the little things, you know? I have the old i1, did anyone do this revision B or whatever

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] i1 Match 3.4

2005-12-13 by John Moody

Yes, that sounds familiar to the trouble I had, but it was a while ago now. I also got confused with the registrations at i1color.com, and at

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] i1 Match 3.4

2005-12-13 by Steve Kale

You create an account BEFORE you register your product. Go here: http://www.gretagmacbeth.com/ And then Training and Support- Product Registration- Sign Up.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re:Digital Vs. Film

2005-12-13 by Clayton Price

... Hi All, Originally my statement was that I d go digital when a Leica M series equivalent came out. I still feel that way, even though I ve also worked with

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] i1 Match 3.4

2005-12-13 by Greg

... IIRC. That s the really strange part, I m half way registered. Can t explain how but if you persevere you can finally make it take your name and email, but

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Digital Vs. Film

2005-12-13 by Clayton Price

Hi Peter - I read the Kodak Vinegar Syndrome paper on Tri- Acetate film, and they don t emphasize enough, the word WATER. If negatives are stored in a dry

Thread view Attachments: 0

[Digital BW] Re: Phatte Black

2005-12-13 by Louis Dina

Wendell, IP doesn t give you the built in tools for setting ink limits and linearization (like a real full featured RIP does). I ve never had much success

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Phatte Black

2005-12-13 by Carl Schofield

Steve, I gave up on the firmware hack idea and converted the 4000 to piezo inks (dual k7 and carbon sepia) for B&W matte printing using QTR. The 2400 does all

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Phatte Black

2005-12-13 by Wendel White

Sorry if I missed something but I have a question. Are you saying that if you go into the Ink Limit dialogue in IP that it doesn t work or that it refers to

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] QuadToneRIP Problem

2005-12-13 by JoshLi

Roy, I tried to install the older version -- it gave me the same error message. Very weird indeed. I am using the manual paper feed from the back -- I have

Thread view Attachments: 0

[Digital BW] Re: Phatte Black

2005-12-13 by Louis Dina

Total agreement! I d even go further than that. IP uses a one size fits all approach that hard codes ink limits and linearization to the inkset, so you get

Thread view Attachments: 0

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.