Yahoo Groups archive

Doepfer

Index last updated: 2026-04-29 00:15 UTC

Messages

Browse messages

Page 213 of 564 · 28179 messages matched

A-152 Modification: Trigger out on address selection

2008-12-18 by Doug

Hi folks using the A-152 with a cv input immediately gives rise to the need for a trigger on address selection. I'm thinking a socket for this could fit at the bottom of the dig outs section. Has anyone done this? Another thought is a difference or differentiator module that coul

Thread view Attachments: 0

new module idea

2008-12-18 by Monroe Eskew

VCA with built-in slew? To remove the "pop" sound of a gate without the need of an external envelope or slew limiter.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: AW: [Doepfer_a100] Simple Envelope -> was a111-5

2008-12-17 by Florian Anwander

Hi Ernst > I personally think a voltage controlled version is more useful. Ok: I oppose. :-) Already the A143-1 and the A-143-2 are much too complex (where the A143-3 is great; its just "LFOs now!"). I really think of very unexpensive slimmed down bread and butter modules. Aah, a

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: AW: AW: [Doepfer_a100] Simple Envelope -> was a111-5

2008-12-17 by Florian Anwander

Hi Dieter > That's an interesting option and would not take more than a few hours to > develop (noting but a slimmed A-143-1). nope. Its not only an AD envelope like in the 143! It is on one hand an AD (not gate orientated, but triggered only by a positive edge), and on the other

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: AW: [Doepfer_a100] Simple Envelope -> was a111-5

2008-12-17 by achtung_999

I personally think a voltage controlled version is more useful.As it fills a gap in what the Doepfer range has to offer now. Since the only other voltage controlled envelope is the A141.. Next to the A142 of course. I really like voltage controllable envelopes and I own an A141.

Thread view Attachments: 0

AW: AW: [Doepfer_a100] Simple Envelope -> was a111-5

2008-12-17 by yahoo@doepfer.de

> this will be voltage controlled then? no. The A-143-1 is not voltage controlled and consequently a slimmed version as well. The voltage controlled version would be something like the A-142 but with an additional Attack control and CV. Best wishes Dieter Doepfer

Thread view Attachments: 0

AW: AW: [Doepfer_a100] Simple Envelope -> was a111-5

2008-12-17 by yahoo@doepfer.de

> I would definately be interested in what Florian proposes > here..Can you give > a rough estimate what the cost price would be then Dieter? > > greetings, > > Ernst About Euro 60, but that's only a ballpark figure. Best wishes Dieter Doepfer

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: AW: [Doepfer_a100] a111-5

2008-12-17 by Bakis Sirros

yes, and i think that the adsr is really useful for some sounds. i too like AR (or AD) envelopes, but i also like ADSR's... Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist [Doepfer_a100] group owner www. parallel - worlds - music. com www. myspace. com/ parallelwor

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: AW: [Doepfer_a100] a111-5

2008-12-17 by Bakis Sirros

no, i haven't banned you... :-) Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist [Doepfer_a100] group owner www. parallel - worlds - music. com www. myspace. com/ parallelworldsmusic www. myspace. com/ interconnectedmusic www. myspace. com/ memorygeist www. DiN. org

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: AW: [Doepfer_a100] Simple Envelope -> was a111-5

2008-12-17 by achtung_999

this will be voltage controlled then? On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 5:43 PM, achtung_999 wrote: > I would definately be interested in what Florian proposes here..Can you > give a rough estimate what the cost price would be then Dieter? > > greetings, > > Ernst > > > > > > > > > On Wed,

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: AW: [Doepfer_a100] Simple Envelope -> was a111-5

2008-12-17 by achtung_999

I would definately be interested in what Florian proposes here..Can you give a rough estimate what the cost price would be then Dieter? greetings, Ernst On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 5:36 PM, wrote: > > Hi Dieter, > > > > > maybe there will come an "A-111-6". The A-111-5 is too close t

Thread view Attachments: 0

AW: AW: [Doepfer_a100] Simple Envelope -> was a111-5

2008-12-17 by yahoo@doepfer.de

> Hi Dieter, > > > maybe there will come an "A-111-6". The A-111-5 is too close to > production > > to change anything and we have already a lot of pre-orders as it is. > And what about a dual simple-envelope module? A142-2 ? > > Florian That's an interesting option and would not

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: AW: [Doepfer_a100] Simple Envelope -> was a111-5

2008-12-17 by Florian Anwander

Hi Dieter, > maybe there will come an "A-111-6". The A-111-5 is too close to production > to change anything and we have already a lot of pre-orders as it is. And what about a dual simple-envelope module? A142-2 ? Florian

Thread view Attachments: 0

AW: [Doepfer_a100] a111-5

2008-12-17 by yahoo@doepfer.de

> Hi > > Another suggestion: what about two Envelopes in the Moog-Rogue style > instead of one ADSR. For those who don't know the Rogue envelope: > It has two potentiometers, one for risetime (=Attack), one for falltime > (Decay or Release). You have a switch which selects two en

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] a111-5

2008-12-17 by Richard Scott

me too on the ADSR! good point florian - for sure some modules can be made more economical in this way allowing more space for lag generators and therefore more wobbly sounds i love lag generators :) R ----- Original Message ----- From: Denis Gökdag To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.c

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: MAQ16/3 ANALOGUE SEQUENCER AS MASTER CLOCK SOURCE

2008-12-17 by Florian Anwander

Hi Oliver > Thank you very much for you answer, actually i use Pro Tools as clock source nowadays, i set the tempo of my session and send the clock through one midi port to my hardware equipment. The annoying thing here is that, for example: if i program a drum sequence on my dru

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] a111-5

2008-12-17 by Denis Gökdag

I agree, i *rarely* ever use the full ADSR, it's either AD or AR for me most of the time. On Dec 17, 2008, at 2:14 PM, Florian Anwander wrote: > Hi > > Another suggestion: what about two Envelopes in the Moog-Rogue style > instead of one ADSR. For those who don't know the Rogue e

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: MAQ16/3 ANALOGUE SEQUENCER AS MASTER CLOCK SOURCE

2008-12-17 by oliver Miller

Florian: Thank you very much for you answer, actually i use Pro Tools as clock source nowadays, i set the tempo of my session and send the clock through one midi port to my hardware equipment. The annoying thing here is that, for example: if i program a drum sequence on my drum m

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: AW: [Doepfer_a100] a111-5

2008-12-17 by york luethje

This is all great stuff but the really important question has not been adressed: Does it produce a pure and harmonically rich sinewave? [User was banned for this remark] ________________________________ From: "yahoo@doepfer.de" To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, De

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] a111-5

2008-12-17 by Florian Anwander

Hi Another suggestion: what about two Envelopes in the Moog-Rogue style instead of one ADSR. For those who don't know the Rogue envelope: It has two potentiometers, one for risetime (=Attack), one for falltime (Decay or Release). You have a switch which selects two envelope modes

Thread view Attachments: 0

AW: [Doepfer_a100] a111-5

2008-12-17 by yahoo@doepfer.de

> in my book two LFOs is always better than one but in this case I > think I would prefer 1 LFO plus a lag generator, or maybe a single VC LFO > > Richard We built the slew limiter into the A-190-2. One idea was to offer a miniature midi controlled synth assembled into the A-100

Thread view Attachments: 0

AW: [Doepfer_a100] a111-5

2008-12-17 by yahoo@doepfer.de

stu, you find my comments written inline. Best wishes Dieter Doepfer > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com > [mailto:Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com]Im Auftrag von Stu Grimshaw > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 17. Dezember 2008 12:59 > An: Doepfer_a100@yahoogr

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] a111-5

2008-12-17 by Richard Scott

seconded, the a111-5 module is a natural for the beauty case of course. I also really like the sockets at the bottom - in general the eurorack format is basically too small for my moog-sized hands - having patch cables interferring as well takes away a lot of fun. I would like fu

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Some ideas for modules to go with the A-138m Matrix Mixer.

2008-12-17 by sean_process

This looks like a VERY useful module. Looking at the 2 options I would prefer the 4x4 because of the much more intuitive design with the output jacks at the bottom of the columns. That would be much easier to deal with in a live situation! Polarizing switches are a neat idea, as

Thread view Attachments: 0

a111-5

2008-12-17 by Stu Grimshaw

strange, the lack of feedback over the a111-5 synth voice. as a mini-synth i suppose it's pretty run-of-the-mill, although at that price i dare say one or two other manufacturers are uttering the odd expletive. but as a kind of "five things you use in nearly every patch" toolbox,

Thread view Attachments: 0

WTB: Cyndustries Zeroscillator (euro or frac)

2008-12-17 by Bakis Sirros

hello, i want to buy a Cyndustries Zeroscillator in euro or frac format. if its frac format, i want to buy one of the later models that will fit, into a frac rac, really nicely. please, contact me offlist. payment via paypal only, i will cover paypal fees (4%) and shipping costs

Thread view Attachments: 0

AW: [Doepfer_a100] Bus Board connection!

2008-12-17 by yahoo@doepfer.de

> Hello Group! > > Anyone would have a suggestion on how I could expand a Doepfer bus board? > By that I mean add up more connections (as in I'm using many > small modules but miss space > to connect them)... and no worries, the power consumption doesn't > bust the case,s limit!

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] MAQ16/3 ANALOGUE SEQUENCER AS MASTER CLOCK SOURCE

2008-12-17 by Florian Anwander

Hi Oliver > MAQ16/3. But first i need your advice, > should i a better feel out of it? I am not that good in english, so the second half is not a understandable sentence. What do you want to say? > can it work as master clock source on a recording envoirment with > pro tools as s

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Bus Board connection!

2008-12-17 by Laurie Biddulph

Just fit another board in the rack. Just make sure you get its power from the same point the existing board gets it's power (i.e. don't daisy-chain the boards). You may have to make some adjustment to the connections to do that. Best Regards (Mr) Laurie Biddulph Phone: +61 (0)2 4

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Bus Board connection!

2008-12-17 by James Husted

You could add connectors to one end of the ribbon cables and plug them into two adjacent modules or more. The ribbon connectors will get shorter of course but you can at least double the count without much trouble. -James > > > On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 7:04 PM, gabu_004 wrote: > >

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Bus Board connection!

2008-12-17 by Daniel Ornelas

Plan B Model 1 would be a nice fit: http://www.ear-group.net/model_1.html On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 7:04 PM, gabu_004 wrote: > Hello Group! > > Anyone would have a suggestion on how I could expand a Doepfer bus board? > By that I mean add up more connections (as in I'm using many s

Thread view Attachments: 0

Bus Board connection!

2008-12-17 by gabu_004

Hello Group! Anyone would have a suggestion on how I could expand a Doepfer bus board? By that I mean add up more connections (as in I'm using many small modules but miss space to connect them)... and no worries, the power consumption doesn't bust the case,s limit! thanks y'all g

Thread view Attachments: 0

Some ideas for modules to go with the A-138m Matrix Mixer.

2008-12-16 by James Husted

I was thinking of the proposed A-138m Matrix Mixer and thought of some helpful additions and features to add to it. I earlier made the suggestion of adding a ribbon connector header to the input lines so that 2 or more units could be chained/linked to make 4x8, 4x12 etc arrays. I

Thread view Attachments: 0

MAQ16/3 ANALOGUE SEQUENCER AS MASTER CLOCK SOURCE

2008-12-16 by olivermiller2000

Hi There, Im working with Pro Tools on Mac OS Leopard platform, not only using it for recording audio but also for midi sequencing. But i have found that if i use the software clock as master i dont get the tight but groovy feel im used to have if i use my MPC2000 or Drum Machine

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: My web-page about synth programming - Allan Strange

2008-12-16 by Wesley

Hello, I'm currently reading this book and had to chime in. Earlier in the year I attempted to navigate the online service to get at least a .pdf, but was unable to find an ebook. McGraw-Hill may well have added the option since then, which is good. What is great, however, is the

Thread view Attachments: 0

a110 to trade

2008-12-15 by musicagenera

hello I am interested to trade A110 VCO most interested to got wave multipler or Xtreme filter but also other brands are velcome as well please contact me at: rwert@poczta.onet.pl thanks r

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: New announcement

2008-12-15 by Steven Taylor

On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 9:31 AM, wrote: >> Perfect also for my new minicase! The only complaint I have about it >> really is that it only has 4 bus connectors, when this new upsurge of >> 4HP modules means it could have wider possibilities. >> >> S > > I believe that there are on

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Let me hear your bright new ideas for future Doepfer A100 mod

2008-12-15 by bty205236

Would it be possible to get more rows and columns in, or to keep the size down using the type of potentiometer that they use in the Zvex Ooh-Wah and Seek-Wah? I know that smaller knobs are more fiddly, but with 'set and forget' stuff, it could be useful... If not, then I definite

Thread view Attachments: 0

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.