2008-12-18 by Doug
Hi folks using the A-152 with a cv input immediately gives rise to the need for a trigger on address selection. I'm thinking a socket for this could fit at the bottom of the dig outs section. Has anyone done this? Another thought is a difference or differentiator module that coul
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2008-12-18 by Monroe Eskew
VCA with built-in slew? To remove the "pop" sound of a gate without the need of an external envelope or slew limiter.
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2008-12-17 by Florian Anwander
Hi Ernst > I personally think a voltage controlled version is more useful. Ok: I oppose. :-) Already the A143-1 and the A-143-2 are much too complex (where the A143-3 is great; its just "LFOs now!"). I really think of very unexpensive slimmed down bread and butter modules. Aah, a
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2008-12-17 by Florian Anwander
Hi Dieter > That's an interesting option and would not take more than a few hours to > develop (noting but a slimmed A-143-1). nope. Its not only an AD envelope like in the 143! It is on one hand an AD (not gate orientated, but triggered only by a positive edge), and on the other
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2008-12-17 by achtung_999
I personally think a voltage controlled version is more useful.As it fills a gap in what the Doepfer range has to offer now. Since the only other voltage controlled envelope is the A141.. Next to the A142 of course. I really like voltage controllable envelopes and I own an A141.
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2008-12-17 by yahoo@doepfer.de
> this will be voltage controlled then? no. The A-143-1 is not voltage controlled and consequently a slimmed version as well. The voltage controlled version would be something like the A-142 but with an additional Attack control and CV. Best wishes Dieter Doepfer
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2008-12-17 by yahoo@doepfer.de
> I would definately be interested in what Florian proposes > here..Can you give > a rough estimate what the cost price would be then Dieter? > > greetings, > > Ernst About Euro 60, but that's only a ballpark figure. Best wishes Dieter Doepfer
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2008-12-17 by Bakis Sirros
yes, and i think that the adsr is really useful for some sounds. i too like AR (or AD) envelopes, but i also like ADSR's... Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist [Doepfer_a100] group owner www. parallel - worlds - music. com www. myspace. com/ parallelwor
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2008-12-17 by Bakis Sirros
no, i haven't banned you... :-) Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist [Doepfer_a100] group owner www. parallel - worlds - music. com www. myspace. com/ parallelworldsmusic www. myspace. com/ interconnectedmusic www. myspace. com/ memorygeist www. DiN. org
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2008-12-17 by achtung_999
this will be voltage controlled then? On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 5:43 PM, achtung_999 wrote: > I would definately be interested in what Florian proposes here..Can you > give a rough estimate what the cost price would be then Dieter? > > greetings, > > Ernst > > > > > > > > > On Wed,
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2008-12-17 by achtung_999
I would definately be interested in what Florian proposes here..Can you give a rough estimate what the cost price would be then Dieter? greetings, Ernst On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 5:36 PM, wrote: > > Hi Dieter, > > > > > maybe there will come an "A-111-6". The A-111-5 is too close t
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2008-12-17 by yahoo@doepfer.de
> Hi Dieter, > > > maybe there will come an "A-111-6". The A-111-5 is too close to > production > > to change anything and we have already a lot of pre-orders as it is. > And what about a dual simple-envelope module? A142-2 ? > > Florian That's an interesting option and would not
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2008-12-17 by Florian Anwander
Hi Dieter, > maybe there will come an "A-111-6". The A-111-5 is too close to production > to change anything and we have already a lot of pre-orders as it is. And what about a dual simple-envelope module? A142-2 ? Florian
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2008-12-17 by yahoo@doepfer.de
> Hi > > Another suggestion: what about two Envelopes in the Moog-Rogue style > instead of one ADSR. For those who don't know the Rogue envelope: > It has two potentiometers, one for risetime (=Attack), one for falltime > (Decay or Release). You have a switch which selects two en
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2008-12-17 by Richard Scott
me too on the ADSR! good point florian - for sure some modules can be made more economical in this way allowing more space for lag generators and therefore more wobbly sounds i love lag generators :) R ----- Original Message ----- From: Denis Gökdag To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.c
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2008-12-17 by Florian Anwander
Hi Oliver > Thank you very much for you answer, actually i use Pro Tools as clock source nowadays, i set the tempo of my session and send the clock through one midi port to my hardware equipment. The annoying thing here is that, for example: if i program a drum sequence on my dru
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2008-12-17 by Paul Schmidt
That is why I like to use the Garfield Mini Doc, it keeps that swing of the old drum machines. I go from DAW to Mungo Sync2, into the Garfiled Mini Doc and to all other analog clocks. Paul ________________________________ From: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com on behalf of oliver Mil
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2008-12-17 by Denis Gökdag
I agree, i *rarely* ever use the full ADSR, it's either AD or AR for me most of the time. On Dec 17, 2008, at 2:14 PM, Florian Anwander wrote: > Hi > > Another suggestion: what about two Envelopes in the Moog-Rogue style > instead of one ADSR. For those who don't know the Rogue e
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2008-12-17 by oliver Miller
Florian: Thank you very much for you answer, actually i use Pro Tools as clock source nowadays, i set the tempo of my session and send the clock through one midi port to my hardware equipment. The annoying thing here is that, for example: if i program a drum sequence on my drum m
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2008-12-17 by york luethje
This is all great stuff but the really important question has not been adressed: Does it produce a pure and harmonically rich sinewave? [User was banned for this remark] ________________________________ From: "yahoo@doepfer.de" To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, De
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2008-12-17 by Florian Anwander
Hi Another suggestion: what about two Envelopes in the Moog-Rogue style instead of one ADSR. For those who don't know the Rogue envelope: It has two potentiometers, one for risetime (=Attack), one for falltime (Decay or Release). You have a switch which selects two envelope modes
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2008-12-17 by yahoo@doepfer.de
> Is there perhaps a reasonably priced option for using push/pull pots > to switch individual controls between unipolar and bipolar? > > sean Unfortunately the potentiometers used in the A-100 are not available with push/pull switches. And I personally don't like this type of pot
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2008-12-17 by yahoo@doepfer.de
> in my book two LFOs is always better than one but in this case I > think I would prefer 1 LFO plus a lag generator, or maybe a single VC LFO > > Richard We built the slew limiter into the A-190-2. One idea was to offer a miniature midi controlled synth assembled into the A-100
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2008-12-17 by yahoo@doepfer.de
stu, you find my comments written inline. Best wishes Dieter Doepfer > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com > [mailto:Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com]Im Auftrag von Stu Grimshaw > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 17. Dezember 2008 12:59 > An: Doepfer_a100@yahoogr
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2008-12-17 by Richard Scott
seconded, the a111-5 module is a natural for the beauty case of course. I also really like the sockets at the bottom - in general the eurorack format is basically too small for my moog-sized hands - having patch cables interferring as well takes away a lot of fun. I would like fu
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2008-12-17 by sean_process
This looks like a VERY useful module. Looking at the 2 options I would prefer the 4x4 because of the much more intuitive design with the output jacks at the bottom of the columns. That would be much easier to deal with in a live situation! Polarizing switches are a neat idea, as
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2008-12-17 by Stu Grimshaw
strange, the lack of feedback over the a111-5 synth voice. as a mini-synth i suppose it's pretty run-of-the-mill, although at that price i dare say one or two other manufacturers are uttering the odd expletive. but as a kind of "five things you use in nearly every patch" toolbox,
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2008-12-17 by achtung_999
Looks like a nice addition to the Doepfer range!I like the idea of the row and column expandability. On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 10:05 AM, wrote: > > -----Ursprungliche Nachricht----- > > Von: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com > > [mailto:Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com ]Im > Auftrag von Jam
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2008-12-17 by Bakis Sirros
hello, i want to buy a Cyndustries Zeroscillator in euro or frac format. if its frac format, i want to buy one of the later models that will fit, into a frac rac, really nicely. please, contact me offlist. payment via paypal only, i will cover paypal fees (4%) and shipping costs
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2008-12-17 by yahoo@doepfer.de
> Hello Group! > > Anyone would have a suggestion on how I could expand a Doepfer bus board? > By that I mean add up more connections (as in I'm using many > small modules but miss space > to connect them)... and no worries, the power consumption doesn't > bust the case,s limit!
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2008-12-17 by yahoo@doepfer.de
> -----Ursprungliche Nachricht----- > Von: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com > [mailto:Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com]Im Auftrag von James Husted > Gesendet: Dienstag, 16. Dezember 2008 19:22 > An: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com > Betreff: [Doepfer_a100] Some ideas for modules to go with
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2008-12-17 by Florian Anwander
Hi Oliver > MAQ16/3. But first i need your advice, > should i a better feel out of it? I am not that good in english, so the second half is not a understandable sentence. What do you want to say? > can it work as master clock source on a recording envoirment with > pro tools as s
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2008-12-17 by Laurie Biddulph
Just fit another board in the rack. Just make sure you get its power from the same point the existing board gets it's power (i.e. don't daisy-chain the boards). You may have to make some adjustment to the connections to do that. Best Regards (Mr) Laurie Biddulph Phone: +61 (0)2 4
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2008-12-17 by James Husted
You could add connectors to one end of the ribbon cables and plug them into two adjacent modules or more. The ribbon connectors will get shorter of course but you can at least double the count without much trouble. -James > > > On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 7:04 PM, gabu_004 wrote: > >
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2008-12-17 by Daniel Ornelas
Plan B Model 1 would be a nice fit: http://www.ear-group.net/model_1.html On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 7:04 PM, gabu_004 wrote: > Hello Group! > > Anyone would have a suggestion on how I could expand a Doepfer bus board? > By that I mean add up more connections (as in I'm using many s
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2008-12-17 by gabu_004
Hello Group! Anyone would have a suggestion on how I could expand a Doepfer bus board? By that I mean add up more connections (as in I'm using many small modules but miss space to connect them)... and no worries, the power consumption doesn't bust the case,s limit! thanks y'all g
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2008-12-16 by James Husted
I was thinking of the proposed A-138m Matrix Mixer and thought of some helpful additions and features to add to it. I earlier made the suggestion of adding a ribbon connector header to the input lines so that 2 or more units could be chained/linked to make 4x8, 4x12 etc arrays. I
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2008-12-16 by olivermiller2000
Hi There, Im working with Pro Tools on Mac OS Leopard platform, not only using it for recording audio but also for midi sequencing. But i have found that if i use the software clock as master i dont get the tight but groovy feel im used to have if i use my MPC2000 or Drum Machine
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2008-12-16 by Don Kim
How bad is the quality? I have a hardcopy, but wouldn't mind being able to read it anywhere w/o worry. On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 2:47 AM, nicholas_kent wrote: > Here is the pdf for sale link. > > http://ebooks.primisonline.com/cgi/showebook.cgi? > isbn=0390684635&bookType=unselecte
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2008-12-16 by Wesley
Hello, I'm currently reading this book and had to chime in. Earlier in the year I attempted to navigate the online service to get at least a .pdf, but was unable to find an ebook. McGraw-Hill may well have added the option since then, which is good. What is great, however, is the
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2008-12-15 by musicagenera
hello I am interested to trade A110 VCO most interested to got wave multipler or Xtreme filter but also other brands are velcome as well please contact me at: rwert@poczta.onet.pl thanks r
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2008-12-15 by Steven Taylor
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 9:31 AM, wrote: >> Perfect also for my new minicase! The only complaint I have about it >> really is that it only has 4 bus connectors, when this new upsurge of >> 4HP modules means it could have wider possibilities. >> >> S > > I believe that there are on
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2008-12-15 by David Salter
For something like the Matrix mixer, I don't mind smaller knobs. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * David Salter Senior Consultant SSG UKI Thomson Reuters O +44 (0)20 7542 2402X 52402 M 07990562402 david.salter@thomsonreuters.com thomson
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2008-12-15 by yahoo@doepfer.de
> Would it be possible to get more rows and columns in, or to keep the > size down using the type of potentiometer that they use in the Zvex > Ooh-Wah and Seek-Wah? I know that smaller knobs are more fiddly, but > with 'set and forget' stuff, it could be useful... (Nearly) everyt
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2008-12-15 by Bakis Sirros
yes! Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist [Doepfer_a100] group owner www. parallel - worlds - music. com www. myspace. com/ parallelworldsmusic www. myspace. com/ interconnectedmusic www. myspace. com/ memorygeist www. DiN. org. uk www. musicamaximamagne
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2008-12-15 by Bakis Sirros
yes, that would be great! Dieter? Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist [Doepfer_a100] group owner www. parallel - worlds - music. com www. myspace. com/ parallelworldsmusic www. myspace. com/ interconnectedmusic www. myspace. com/ memorygeist www. DiN. o
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2008-12-15 by bty205236
Would it be possible to get more rows and columns in, or to keep the size down using the type of potentiometer that they use in the Zvex Ooh-Wah and Seek-Wah? I know that smaller knobs are more fiddly, but with 'set and forget' stuff, it could be useful... If not, then I definite
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2008-12-15 by yahoo@doepfer.de
> moreover, a normalized dc-voltage of the 1st input would be very handy > (as implemented in the polarizing mixer a138c) for easy baseline shifts... Should be no problem (maybe with a jumper to turn this feature on/off). Best wishes Dieter Doepfer
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2008-12-15 by yahoo@doepfer.de
> Hi Dieter / all > > Is there a single panel AR generator...I like the 143-1 but its way too > big for my system. > > cheers > Ross The lower section of the A-170 does the job. Best wishes Dieter Doepfer
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2008-12-15 by yahoo@doepfer.de
> hello list! > > thanks for this information! i am looking forward a matrix mixer to > integrate it in my modular live setup :) > > imo a 4x4 matrix is for most applications sufficient (eg mixing the > outs of the quad modules or 2 dual modules...). > > hence, it would be more c
Thread view
Attachments: 0