Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Messages

Browse messages

Page 1733 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched

Re: Printing for Editions?

2002-11-18 by Mark Tucker

... More at: http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=003GP Y http://www.jbhphoto.com/cwalbum/cwws3.htm

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Printing for Editions?

2002-11-18 by Clayton Jones

... i just cant yet get my head around the idea of destroying the negative/file after printing and saying that s that ... You have to wait until you re 80,

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Printing for Editions?

2002-11-18 by Clayton Jones

... There is nothing new here. One of the struggles photography went through in getting accepted as a legitimate art form was the fact that a photographer

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Printing for Editions?

2002-11-18 by Mark Tucker

... wrote: - i just cant yet get my head around the ... that s ... goal- ... Frank, Obviously some of my suggestions are on the extreme end of

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Printing for Editions?

2002-11-18 by frankg_photo

... really ... like I ... think ... Changing your mind about a print or edition the next morning is quite different from accepting what you did 15 years ago.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: coatings for handling

2002-11-18 by frankg_photo

sorry, I just re-read your post - my suggestion of sleeves to protect them from handling isn t appropriate as you re binding the prints into a book -apologies.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Printing for Editions?

2002-11-18 by Mark Tucker

... wrote: or, you later learn a new ... light ... corner ... _______ A photographer is always evolving and learning new methods, shortcuts, and

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Printing for Editions?

2002-11-18 by frankg_photo

Mark, I agree entirely with your intentions - it would be wonderful to change these perceptions- however, despite, one s best efforts on any given day, there

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Dec. Issue: B/W Magazine

2002-11-18 by Clayton Jones

... Exactly right. The advertisers know what they are doing. They know that a lot of the readers are doing, or are considering, digital printing, even if the

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Sharpen scan or after?

2002-11-18 by Clayton Jones

... I always sharpen in PS after the scan. Not all pics require the same treatment, and some I only sharpen in certain areas and not others (such as

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Sharpen scan or after?

2002-11-18 by Scott Jolliff

Hi Group, 1st time caller, long time listener here. I m by no means a scanning or digital imaging expert but I did stay at a Holiday Inn last night, Seriously,

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Printing for Editions?

2002-11-17 by Mark Tucker

... can t buy ... Jerry, That s exactly my point -- if you knew that today was the ONLY time you d print a given image, you d make damn sure you didn t print

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Printing for Editions?

2002-11-17 by Cleavis

SNIP ... SNIP ME TOO! ... Mark, Recall the Stieglitz has multiple variations on single images...feeling them out. When F. Sommer was asked for advice about

Thread view Attachments: 0

History of Photo "camps" and Prices

2002-11-17 by Cleavis

Just a few comments. Paul s earlier rational of pricing, i.e., platinum, silver, inkjet, etc. is founded in logic of economics. That has little bearing in

Thread view Attachments: 0

Printing for Editions?

2002-11-17 by Mark Tucker

I ve got to calm down after that last post; my heart is still churning. I want to be level-headed when i write this. I was thinking today about Paul Roark s

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Dec. Issue: B/W Magazine

2002-11-17 by Mark Tucker

... wrote: and although he sees progress for what it ... to ... but ... on a ... Bullshit. If that s the case, and he wants to dedicate his

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Sharpen scan or after?

2002-11-17 by Alan Zinn

... I think it depends on many variables. The scanner and software combination you are using may do a better or worse job than post scanning in PS. It may work

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Dec. Issue: B/W Magazine

2002-11-17 by Tom O'Connell

Hi Mark- Yeah...it s a real pip, isn t it? When BW publisher first made the statement on the policy, I got all crazy and quit my subscription. I have to tell

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Piezo Prints in PhotoEye

2002-11-17 by Tom O'Connell

Mark- I also see Frank Ward s entries...he is often in this forum and has been in several of the monthly print exchanges...he labels his prints as carbon

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Pricing of Prints

2002-11-17 by Julian Thomas

Pretty standard practice. I print editions of 15 with the price raising by 50% in two stages over the edition. Having said that I ve only one 2 prints that

Thread view Attachments: 0

Pricing of Prints

2002-11-17 by Barbara White

... However, there is a photographer out in Utah and Arizona (Michael Fatali) who has a novel approach to pricing his photos. When a print first sells, he

Thread view Attachments: 0

coatings for handling

2002-11-17 by Art Maples

My apologizes if this has already been discussed but I m curious if anyone has experience coating prints simply to protect them from handling. I am printing a

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Dec. Issue: B/W Magazine

2002-11-17 by bellis33624

... very ... Seems to me the problem here, to the extent there is one, is with the advertisers, not the magazine. If sellers of digital products choose to

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] Coating -- 16x20s

2002-11-17 by Shire,Stanley

Sorry: I was responding to Paul s melamime issue and was targeting in that product area. Stan Shire Associate Professor/Department Chair Photographic Imaging

Thread view Attachments: 0

[Digital BW] Dec. Issue: B/W Magazine

2002-11-17 by Paul Roark

Mark, ... I agree. I think it is a good way to get to know the enemy -- the fears and concerns of those who avoid digital prints for irrational reasons. Of

Thread view Attachments: 0

Dec. Issue: B/W Magazine

2002-11-17 by Mark Tucker

It s a continuing source of hearty chuckles to pick up B/W Magazine from time to time. I love to watch the subtle ways that they continue to bash digital

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Sharpen scan or after?

2002-11-17 by Richard Sintchak

Sunday, November 17, 2002, 7:22:15 AM, thronxx wrote: t Hi all, t Anyone have opinions about sharpening during the scan vs. afterward t in Photoshop? I m

Thread view Attachments: 0

Sharpen scan or after?

2002-11-17 by thronxx

Hi all, Anyone have opinions about sharpening during the scan vs. afterward in Photoshop? I m scanning negatives in a Coolscan III with Silverfast. I ve heard

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] 2200 vs 1280

2002-11-17 by Tim Timmermans

... replacement ... I decided to pass on the 2200 for now. I got burned on the 2000P and I know good results can be gotten out of the 1280. Besides the deal at

Thread view Attachments: 0

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.