Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Messages

Browse messages

Page 389 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched

RE: [Digital BW] Scratch Disk

2008-01-31 by Tom Baker

It s easy. I have friends that use it, and are always asking questions. So, I try to be able to answer them. In the end I don t really use much of Elements

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] Scratch Disk

2008-01-31 by Photo Studio

Why us Elements? Am I missing something? ... From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Scratch Disk

2008-01-31 by Tom Baker

Neither Microsoft or Adobe will have anything to do with this problem. Adobe did send one suggestion, but it was useless. Maybe I ll try pulling some memory

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Scratch Disk

2008-01-31 by Bob Frost

Tom, ... Have you read the post today by Goldner_Jeff, who says Elements 4 worked with 2GB RAM but not when he updated to 6GB, but Elements 6 works fine!!

Thread view Attachments: 0

Dithering scheme?

2008-01-31 by hflockwood

Some time ago, someone (Paul R.?) posted a comparison of the dithering schemes available for printing in QTR. I m unable to find where I put that note. Can

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Scratch Disk

2008-01-31 by Bob Frost

... Oh well - I m in total DISagreement here!! I ve used partitions for years without any problems. I don t see how not using them can reduce fragmentation.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Scratch Disk

2008-01-31 by Bob Frost

... And V64 is more stable since it does not allow 3rdparty programs to furkle around in in its innards. Although there are not many 64 bit programs at

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Scratch Disk

2008-01-31 by skefford_1

... and leave ... valid ... partitions ... Brain, I am in total agreement here. If you have your data backed up, then it is no problem. Not using partitions

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Scratch Disk

2008-01-31 by skefford_1

... to build ... of XP and ... 32? Not ... As previously stated, the OS can access more RAM, and PS will use this as a scratch disk. Obvioulsy accessing RAM

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Scratch Disk

2008-01-31 by goldner_jeff

I also made the switch to Vista 64 recently (last week, and running SP1 pre-release). The advantage is largely around memory available to applications. Each

Thread view Attachments: 0

where to obtain refillable cartridges?

2008-01-31 by Paul Whiting

I know there s been a fair amount of discussion of this question, but usually in the context of some other issues, so permit me start on a specific thread on

Thread view Attachments: 0

Calumet Brilliant Museum Papers

2008-01-31 by frankbickelmeyer

I´ve tried Brilliant Museum Silver Gloss white and Brilliant Museum Satin Matte white and natural and i am very happy with these (baryttype) papers. 300g

Thread view Attachments: 0

Magiclee Siena 250L Lustre paper

2008-01-31 by Peter De Smidt

I recently tried Magiclee Siena 250L Lustre paper with my R2400 with MIS K4 inks. Someone on this list pointed to an article where the author though highly of

Thread view Attachments: 0

VFA/K3 Torture Test Report

2008-01-30 by Clayton Jones

Test Description: - Test began on January 4, 2008 - Printer is R2400 with K3 inks - A print on VFA, ABW setting 2,8 - Print placed in direct S. Florida

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Resetting maintenance tank on 3800

2008-01-30 by daverich4

Hi Yves, The 4000, 7600 & 9600 printers were the last ones where you could reset the counters for the various items like the maintenance tank from the front

Thread view Attachments: 0

The Imaging Factory Closing Shop

2008-01-30 by lou4photo

I just found out the owner of the Imaging Factory, maker of the fine Color-to-BW pro plug-in, along with others, is closing his doors due to personal reasons.

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] Scratch Disk

2008-01-30 by Paul Grant

Bob, Appreciate the detailed response on Vista 64. I am getting ready to build my new machine as was struggling with the Memory issue limitations of XP and

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Scratch Disk

2008-01-30 by Bob Frost

Paul, ... Partly curiosity; partly because it seems more secure and more stable now that MS has stopped 3rdparty programs furkling about in its innards; and

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] Scratch Disk

2008-01-30 by Tom Baker

I m not Bob, but lack for drivers is only one issue. There are many pieces of software that won t run under 64. I m also having trouble with Photoshop

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Scratch Disk

2008-01-30 by Steve and Ann Taylor

Yes, it is more appropriate for Win98 and also true of Win2000 which is what I run. I have not upgraded to XP or Vista and do not plan too do so. I am

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] Scratch Disk

2008-01-30 by Paul Grant

Bob, Noted your comment on using Vista 64. Curious as you motive for the 64 bit version. We you able to get all the drivers that you need? Paul From:

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Scratch Disk

2008-01-30 by Tom Baker

I ve also got VIsta64 and 8 gig. As you say, the scratch drive setup doesn t make much difference. But, I was responding to concerns on a more typical setup.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Scratch Disk

2008-01-30 by Bob Frost

Tom, ... Depends on your setup. I have a Raid0 (2x 150 Raptors) as my main system drive, and two other drives of 750GB and 500GB for data. I have shown quite

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] Scratch Disk

2008-01-30 by Paul Grant

Steve, You make a good point on the small C: partition. Unfortunately I have had more drive failures than Windows failures..... But your point is right on.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Scratch Disk

2008-01-30 by Gary Weaver

That s my take. It s easier to rebuild partitions when the crash occurs. Speed isn t as important as the data. *********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Re: [Digital BW] Scratch Disk

2008-01-30 by Thomas@Maugham.org

I thoroughly agree with Steve and will go him one better: Do regular backups of all your critical partition(s) so that if you do suffer a crash you can easily

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Scratch Disk

2008-01-30 by Steve and Ann Taylor

The advantage of having a small C: partition is that when Windows bites the dust and you have to reformat and re-install it, you lose only what was on that

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Scratch Disk

2008-01-30 by Michael King

Keep in mind that small drives generally speaking have relatively low read/write speeds and the best speed is at the start (outside) of the disk. Photoshop

Thread view Attachments: 0

R1900 review

2008-01-30 by Steven Karafyllakis

Well, Someone FINALLY got their hands on one, here s a link: http://www.photo-i.co.uk/Reviews/interactive/Epson%20R1900/page1.html Steve karafyllakis

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Scratch Disk

2008-01-29 by Paul Grant

Richard, I have a lot of drives but that¡¯s not so important..each RAID 0 pair needs at least two drives. So for my current latest configuration I have a

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Scratch Disk

2008-01-29 by Richard Smallfield

So how many physical hard drives does that give you? If you had Raid 0 for everything surely that would be a lot of drives? I m wondering if I could do that

Thread view Attachments: 0

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.