Yahoo Groups archive

Analogue-sequencer

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:15 UTC

Messages

Browse messages

Page 94 of 168 · 8362 messages matched

Multitrack software thatll sync *to* the p3?

2005-08-16 by Julian

With this talk of logic and sync problems earlier... I just want some computer software to multitrack on to. Thats my primary concern. I like the interface of the latter versions of cubase (sx and the like) but most of these type of things will only act as a sync master when usin

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Multitrack software thatll sync *to* the p3?

2005-08-16 by Nick Rothwell

> Yep. MIDI clock is not really stable enough to sync a DAW from. I was going to say that MIDI sequencers (the software multitrack kind) have been syncing to MIDI clock for years - nay, decades - but I forgot that these days they do audio. I don't see why they shouldn't still syn

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Multitrack software thatll sync *to* the p3?

2005-08-16 by Nick Rothwell

> I think Ableton Live will. But remember that it will probably start at > the beginning of the track everytime you hit start on the P3. That reminds me of a question: does the P3 respect Song Pointer? -- N. -- nick rothwell -- composition, systems, performance -- http://www.cass

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [analogue-sequencer] Checksum overview?

2005-08-15 by Colin f

> As a newbie P3 owner I am wondering if there is an overview of > checksums and their corresponding firmware revisions? > Is it possible to see exactly which firware or/and bootloader are > installed? The firmware version is displayed on the second startup screen, on the bottom

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [analogue-sequencer] midi ins

2005-08-15 by Nick Rothwell

> this picture on the website > http://www.p3sequencer.com/gallery/p3-1001-r2.jpg appears to show 6 > midi ports - does that mean there are two ins?? Erm, is your question not answered by http://www.p3sequencer.com/gallery/p3-1001-r1.jpg ? -- nick rothwell -- composition, systems

Thread view Attachments: 0

Checksum overview?

2005-08-15 by willowlacrosse

Hi! As a newbie P3 owner I am wondering if there is an overview of checksums and their corresponding firmware revisions? Is it possible to see exactly which firware or/and bootloader are installed? Martijn

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Another P3 beta

2005-08-15 by Nick Rothwell

> I didn't mention having checked to be sure clock or anything else isn't being > sent as well, since that troubleshooting step (I thought) is obvious. Oh, it is, and I knew you'd have thought of it Amanda, but I thought it worth mentioning anyway... -- N. -- nick rothwell -- com

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Another P3 beta

2005-08-14 by cikira@cikira.com

>The only reason I can think of is if the sequencer is also putting out >beat clock I didn't mention having checked to be sure clock or anything else isn't being sent as well, since that troubleshooting step (I thought) is obvious. In fact, I switch Keyboard Thru off too when pla

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [analogue-sequencer] god bless this machine!

2005-08-14 by Paul Nagle

djparislee wrote: >Now I find myself making awesome music without a software sequencer...Cheers to that! > > Know what you mean man, I grin every day at this very fact. Enjoy! Paul -- --- Paul Nagle / Soft Room Music / Bogus Focus Records / Binar / Headshock / The Joint Intellige

Thread view Attachments: 0

god bless this machine!

2005-08-14 by djparislee

So I had been reticent to to incorporate my Future Retro 777 and my Poly Evolver into my P3 setup b/c I have had such huge problems trying to get them to sync while in Logic... So today I went...alright here goes nuthin...relegated the computer to only triggering my battery 2 dru

Thread view Attachments: 0

midi ins

2005-08-14 by Richard Scott

this picture on the website http://www.p3sequencer.com/gallery/p3-1001-r2.jpg appears to show 6 midi ports - does that mean there are two ins?? If so are they routable, or do they automatically merge? Richard [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [analogue-sequencer] Another P3 beta

2005-08-14 by Colin f

> I'll join in with the "I'd like sysex too" chorus... it > works, it's always > worked (well, except for once), and it's relatively simple. > If something's > not broken I don't want to try to fix it... My main concern with using two file formats is that I have to make sure I up

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [analogue-sequencer] Another P3 beta

2005-08-14 by Colin f

> How many U of rackspace does the production P3 take up? 4U. The rear connector panel is recessed, so you don't lose a U to cables either. Best regards, Colin Fraser Sequentix Music Systems Ltd http://www.sequentix.com

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Another P3 beta

2005-08-14 by Paul Nagle

Colin f wrote: >No need for a sequencer. >In Windows XP, Media Player will play midi files no problem. >You set your default interface for midi playback to the midi output you have >P3 on once (in Control Panel, Sounds and Audio Devices, Audio, Midi Music >Playback), then double-

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [analogue-sequencer] Another P3 beta

2005-08-14 by bleep

On Sat, 13 Aug 2005, Colin f wrote: > So I was thinking of just uploading midi files, unless it causes anyone > problems. I'll join in with the "I'd like sysex too" chorus... it works, it's always worked (well, except for once), and it's relatively simple. If something's not brok

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [analogue-sequencer] Another P3 beta

2005-08-14 by Colin f

> I'd personally prefer sysex as an option: it will save me > having to load > a sequencer jobby on my PC; plus I can reliably update both my P3s at > once with MIDI-Ox with no glitches, no pratting around with > tempo etc. > Just my preference. No need for a sequencer. In Window

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Another P3 beta

2005-08-14 by Paul Nagle

Colin f wrote: > >So I was thinking of just uploading midi files, unless it causes anyone >problems. > > I'd personally prefer sysex as an option: it will save me having to load a sequencer jobby on my PC; plus I can reliably update both my P3s at once with MIDI-Ox with no glitch

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Another P3 beta

2005-08-14 by analog1k

--- In analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com, Paul Nagle wrote: > Colin f wrote: > > > > >So I was thinking of just uploading midi files, unless it causes anyone > >problems. > > > > > I'd personally prefer sysex as an option: it will save me having to load > a sequencer jobby on my

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [analogue-sequencer] Another P3 beta

2005-08-13 by Colin f

> I made an interesting observation about modifying .mid files > of sysex data to > load reliably. > > Using the stalwart sequencer Studio Vision Pro, I have had > better results > than from slowing tempo as the midifile plays, by lengthening > of time between > sysex events (dat

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Another P3 beta

2005-08-13 by cikira@cikira.com

>I've updated a lot of synth OS's over the years and the only ones >I ever had problems with were when they were in mid format. Hear, hear. I made an interesting observation about modifying .mid files of sysex data to load reliably. Using the stalwart sequencer Studio Vision Pro,

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Another P3 beta

2005-08-13 by Nick Rothwell

> Using the stalwart sequencer Studio Vision Pro, I have had better results > than from slowing tempo as the midifile plays, by lengthening of time between > sysex events (data strings). > [...] > I have no idea why this is, The only reason I can think of is if the sequencer is a

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Re: Another P3 beta

2005-08-12 by Paul Nagle

analog1k wrote: >Finally .mid files for OS updates etc. I have midiox, >but prefer using .mid files, it's gonna be easier now. > > Maybe. I've updated a lot of synth OS's over the years and the only ones I ever had problems with were when they were in mid format. In the end I mad

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Another P3 beta

2005-08-12 by analog1k

Finally .mid files for OS updates etc. I have midiox, but prefer using .mid files, it's gonna be easier now. Cheers. --- In analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com, "Colin f" wrote: > > > Colin, would it be possible to also offer the OS (and betas) > > in the more general .mid standar

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Another P3 beta

2005-08-12 by Robert van der Kamp

On Friday 12 August 2005 14:16, Colin f wrote: > But I'll start putting a mid file up if that suits some > people better. I can probably add some code to my hex to > syx file generator so that it creates a mid file at the > same time. Thanks! :) - Robert

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [analogue-sequencer] Another P3 beta

2005-08-12 by Colin f

> Colin, would it be possible to also offer the OS (and betas) > in the more general .mid standard midi file format? None of > my hw sequencers can handle the .syx format, but all of > them read .mid files, and I hate using computers for that. No problem at all. The conversion is

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Another P3 beta

2005-08-12 by Robert van der Kamp

Colin, would it be possible to also offer the OS (and betas) in the more general .mid standard midi file format? None of my hw sequencers can handle the .syx format, but all of them read .mid files, and I hate using computers for that. Is there a specific reason for the .syx form

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Can the P3 share a MIDI bus with other devices?

2005-08-12 by Robert van der Kamp

On Friday 12 August 2005 10:07, Colin f wrote: > > But by the way it looks now, the P3 is in OMNI mode, > > consuming everything that is put on the MIDI bus. So it > > looks like the P3 wants the whole thing, and not just > > one channel I assign it. > > That's true up to the cur

Thread view Attachments: 0

Can the P3 share a MIDI bus with other devices?

2005-08-12 by Robert van der Kamp

Hi all, I've placed the P3 along with other synths on the same MIDI bus. Now when I put the P3 is real-time record mode, I'd only like it to record incoming notes that are addressed to the P3's own MIDI channel, much like I want a synth only to produce a sound when I send it MIDI

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [analogue-sequencer] Regarding Ties

2005-08-11 by Colin f

> My current understanding of the P3 is that Ties can only > occur while the same note is > selected over multiple steps... No, when tie is set on a P3 step, the note on that step will not be released until after the new note on the next step plays. If the next step is a differen

Thread view Attachments: 0

Regarding Ties

2005-08-11 by djparislee

I own a Future Retro 777 in it's sequencer in order to tie notes...you hold down the first and last notes and it ties them...most of the time I'll put it as the same note...but sometimes it's really cool when radically different notes are tied together My current understanding of

Thread view Attachments: 0

Another P3 beta

2005-08-10 by Colin f

Folks, Another P3 beta is in Yahoo files now - v3.1.006b6 Sorry if I'm working too hard ;-) This build follows an upgrade to a new release of the sdcc compiler, which reduces the total code size by a small but useful amount. Compiler updates can sometimes make problems appear in

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [analogue-sequencer] Cool P3 Trick (multiple P3s only :)

2005-08-10 by Mark

You guys are great, I ping a question, go out for a bike ride, come back and theres an answer... Now where did I put my reading glasses ? Cheers mark -----Original Message----- From: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com [mailto:analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of bleep

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [analogue-sequencer] Cool P3 Trick (multiple P3s only :)

2005-08-10 by bleep

On Wed, 10 Aug 2005, Mark wrote: > But maybe someone else can help ? The answer to your riddle lies within the mysteries of playlist mode... Basically, you record the first 16 notes on track 1 in part 1, then the second 16 on track 1 in part 2, then use playlist mode to stitch th

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Cool P3 Trick (multiple P3s only :)

2005-08-10 by Paul Nagle

Mark wrote: >Hi Paul, > >Seeing how you are master of cool tricks - and I've still got to read the >manual, perhaps you can help. > >I'm after some sequences of more than 16 notes, can this be done ? > > Yep! >If not can I use 2 or 3 tracks and alternate between tracks every time

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [analogue-sequencer] Cool P3 Trick (multiple P3s only :)

2005-08-10 by Mark

..oops Meant to sent to Paul only But maybe someone else can help ? mark -----Original Message----- From: Mark [mailto:arpeggi8@btinternet.com] Sent: 10 August 2005 18:33 To: 'analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com' Subject: RE: [analogue-sequencer] Cool P3 Trick (multiple P3s only :

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [analogue-sequencer] Cool P3 Trick (multiple P3s only :)

2005-08-10 by Mark

Hi Paul, Seeing how you are master of cool tricks - and I've still got to read the manual, perhaps you can help. I'm after some sequences of more than 16 notes, can this be done ? If not can I use 2 or 3 tracks and alternate between tracks every time I go around the loop ? i.e. T

Thread view Attachments: 0

Cool P3 Trick (multiple P3s only :)

2005-08-10 by Paul Nagle

Well, it's been a while; and this one is only going to be use to those lucky enough to have access to more than one P3.... Setup each part so that it uses different GBar lengths. My master P3 has all its global bars set at 16 and repeats at 1. When I select multiple parts it ther

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Cool P3 Trick (multiple P3s only :)

2005-08-10 by ch.³l

> Basically, you record the first 16 notes on track 1 in part 1, then > the second 16 on track 1 in part 2, then use playlist mode to stitch > them together... ...or you can halve the timebase of a pattern and use the "REP*2, note + N" event to fill in the gaps between notes. I d

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Problem using my P3 with my Virus Indigo...

2005-08-10 by djparislee

So I disabled the 'midi chans per bank' function and it is now fine switching from bank to bank... but there has to be something else at play here... I've had it go silent while within the same bank...and when it does...the sound won't come back (even when I play the actual Virus

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Re: The Evolver gets CCs!!!

2005-08-10 by Paul Nagle

djparislee wrote: >I would agree in one sense that the large keyboard seems a bit overkill with a polyphony of >only 4...I think the main reason for such a large keyboard was so the Poly could have >enough real estate for the knobs... > > Agreed. That's what he and Dave Bryce sai

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [analogue-sequencer] Re: P3 news

2005-08-10 by Colin f

> Regarding LED feedback of knob positions: I wonder how many P3 users > actually pay attention to the knob positions, given that the knobs are > multi-mode and obviously don't track pattern changes. I use the knob pointers when I'm editing a few steps to the same value - it gets

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [analogue-sequencer] Problem using my P3 with my Virus Indigo...

2005-08-10 by Colin f

> Before I start, I know the problem is clearly coming from the > Virus and not the P3... > > I'm just trying to figure out what type of problem it might be... > > I turn the Virus on, select a patch...but as soon as I press > run on the P3 the virus goes > silent. > > I have to

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Re: P3 news

2005-08-10 by Sascha Matzke

Hi, On 8/10/05, Colin f wrote: > I think the least expensive way to provide encoders with a constant display > of their current position would be a number of extra PLED displays above > them. Good idea... This way it's done on my Yamaha 01X - an even if the encoders do not have a

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [analogue-sequencer] The Evolver gets CCs!!!

2005-08-10 by Colin f

> And in case you didn't know, V3 of the Evolver OS was > announced yesterday. > The main upgrade for non-polyevolver users is that a large number of > parameters have had CC#s assigned to them. Previously, the only way to > remote control an Evo was via sysex, which our P3s can'

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [analogue-sequencer] The Evolver gets CCs!!!

2005-08-10 by Paul Nagle

bleep wrote: >I know this is the P3 group, but I suspect a number of us have Evolvers. >And in case you didn't know, V3 of the Evolver OS was announced yesterday. >The main upgrade for non-polyevolver users is that a large number of >parameters have had CC#s assigned to them. Pre

Thread view Attachments: 0

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.