Yahoo Groups archive
Messages
Page 92 of 168 · 8362 messages matched
2005-09-05 by darkstr1746@comcast.net
Hi Paul : ) well, i wasn't even going to bring it. But if you can pound some of the more subtle nuances into my thick skull, i'll reconsider. My build is 3.98 . . . . that sounds so suggestive. . . erotic even. LMAO!!!! hey dude..... my build is. . . . hahahah see ya next week. k
2005-09-04 by Paul Nagle
darkstr1746@comcast.net wrote: >I think i liked this machine better when it was in it's infancy. It was much more straight forward. I like simple and straightforward. I like to be able to see what's going on and all this masking and unmasking stuff has just left me behind. IT's p
2005-09-04 by darkstr1746@comcast.net
LOL this whole thing is getting very amusing. I'm having a great time watching and listening to Paul wax profound about all the new capabilities he's finding. The hours put in on this one machine alone is very impressive. I got left in the dust with this ongoing conversation long
2005-09-04 by Colin f
> this micron thing is more confusing that I thought. The > problem only happens when I am arp recording with the micron > in its mix mode, its single program mode is fine. When I > press a note on the micron keyboard in mix mode it is > sending the note out on the first 8 midi c
2005-09-04 by richardscott
Hi Colin this micron thing is more confusing that I thought. The problem only happens when I am arp recording with the micron in its mix mode, its single program mode is fine. When I press a note on the micron keyboard in mix mode it is sending the note out on the first 8 midi ch
2005-09-04 by Colin f
> how do I get P3 into sysex recieve mode? For pattern dumping/loading, press FUNC + PAGE in play mode, then PAGE twice. You should see... -- Sysx -- send recv ...above F1 and F2. F1 does a full dump of P3 memory. F2 enters receive mode, to reload a full dump, or to receive dump
2005-09-04 by richardscott
quickie: how do I get P3 into sysex recieve mode?
2005-09-04 by Colin f
> I would like to make a pattern, change the notes with the > lower row and the > midi channel with the upper row. Is this possible?? Yes. You need to assign one of the auxes to the event 'set midi channel'. Enter pattern edit mode, then hold FUNC and press the STEP MODE key. Thi
2005-09-04 by Paul Nagle
lists@ericsmits.nl wrote: >I would like to make a pattern, change the notes with the lower row and the >midi channel with the upper row. Is this possible?? > Yes, set one of the auxilliary events to "Set MIDI Channel" and this will then override the track's MIDI channel for every
2005-09-04 by lists@ericsmits.nl
Hi list, I've probably not read far enough into the manual... I would like to make a pattern, change the notes with the lower row and the midi channel with the upper row. Is this possible?? I know it is a nice technique, it is possible on the ARP sequencer. First make a nice patt
2005-09-04 by Colin f
> Have you ever considered including the midi channel in the playlist > (would the architecture accommodate this?). There's no space in the playlist data structures to store the additional channel data I'm afraid. 12 banks by 8 parts by 8 tracks would need another 768 bytes. Ther
2005-09-04 by richardscott
thanks Colin; the micron was in a mix mode - so was sending the same three notes out on 8 different channels! Everything groovy now. I have a million questions but I think I better get to the end of the manuals before asking them... I can already say, this is great thing you made
2005-09-04 by makedosh
Colin, Have you ever considered including the midi channel in the playlist (would the architecture accommodate this?). Perhaps there could be a 'MChans per Track' added to the User Config to enable this, once enabled it would mean any pattern could be set to any midi channel in t
2005-09-04 by Paul Nagle
colinfraser_com wrote: >You can now manually control part transpose (PXPos) over a 4 octave >range by playing notes on the remote channel. >This is centred around note 60 (middle C), with a +/- 2 octave range. >The transpose is relative to C. It would be easy to make it relative
2005-09-03 by Colin f
> But , following Paul's instructions, in ARP record if I > press the keyboard the left hand display P: n just flicks > between 1 and 9 and doesn't pick up the 3 note chord I'm > playing, same with rong on or off. All the step lights come > on but they just play the same note -du
2005-09-03 by richardscott
Hi Hooray, my new P3 is sitting here and I'm working through both manuals. :) I have a micron keyboard, I think set up properly (local control off) P3 thru on. Everything is working fine - I can record notes from the keyboard, 8 diff patterns playing on 8 diff midi channels, diff
2005-09-03 by colinfraser_com
Folks, Another P3 beta is in Yahoo files now. This one extends the remote control facilities. To enable remote control, remember you need to turn on the 'P3 RemCon RX' user config option, and select a (rem) MIDI channel using the 'Midi Chan' softkey with step key 10. You can now
2005-09-03 by Gary Chang
Although the P3 is a really powerful master, I have used the Synclavier as my master sequencer for the last 20 years. 200 tracks and quite a lot of midi implementation makes it quite capable of controlling the P3 and others at the same time... gary
2005-08-30 by richardscott
hee hee, man that is just the kind of crazy shit my head is doing right now - and its more than just technical ideas but based on something I can sort of hear - its pattern based and conversational but never quite settles or agrees - ever onwards.. maybe autechre helped put this
2005-08-30 by Paul Nagle
ferrograph632 wrote: >mebbes not if you're working mostly on y'r own..... no, even then... >maybe /especially/ then.... paul? waddya reckon? > > I reckon that running even basic sequencers in sync can be utterly chaotic - I used to take quite a while to get my various analogue se
2005-08-30 by Colin f
> This was my feature request to allow me to use the P3 to > control Reason. Because it didn't turn out to be useful in this case is why this feature is not permanent. FUNC + RUN might be re-assigned to something else before it becomes a documented feature, so if it does turn out
2005-08-30 by Oakley Sound
> In the most recent P3 release firmware, if you use FUNC + RUN instead > of just RUN, P3 will send a CONTINUE MIDI message rather than a START. This was my feature request to allow me to use the P3 to control Reason. Thus one should be able to loop Reason's sequencer within its
2005-08-30 by makedosh
I find the 'continue' option most useful. It enables me to use the P3 as a master and record the output to a hardware sequencer (Roland MC-80). I for one would like the facility retained. Thanks Roger --- In analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com, "Colin f" wrote: > > > This was my f
2005-08-30 by Keith
> never had too much problems with bugs in the Cyclone but what i did find was > that when they crashed, they crashed for good. No fixing these babies. I spent a lot of time with my Cyclone, reading and re-reading the manual and committing the mnemonic interface to memory in an e
2005-08-30 by ferrograph632
>>I'm not sure I see a lot of point to wiring two algorithmic note generators in series, especially since they do similar things, and since they both take a few notes in and put lots of notes out. I think it would make more sense to run them in parallel, perhaps upstream from a M
2005-08-30 by Colin f
In the most recent P3 release firmware, if you use FUNC + RUN instead of just RUN, P3 will send a CONTINUE MIDI message rather than a START. It does not actually continue from where it last stopped - it resets to the start as usual, but the sending of a CONTINUE should prevent so
2005-08-30 by bleep
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005, DJ Paris Lee wrote: > The Ability to have my MPC drive the P3 and software sequencer tempo > AND use the MPC's > fast forward and rewind capabilities to move around the computer > track and start the > sequence from any location Well, moving around the sequen
2005-08-30 by Colin f
> The 'R2' resistor on the mainboard should have a 510R. But I couldn't > find one in the standard 0.6W range. Instead I've found this one of > 0.5W (Farnell order code 544-528). I guess that's ok ? That would be fine. Or you could use a slightly different value. 470R should work
2005-08-30 by Nick Rothwell
> Well, moving around the sequence location in Logic sounds like MMC (midi > machine control) to me, which is *totally* different than just syncing to > midi clock. MMC is what controls location and such, it's more like time > code than a clock signal. MMC is a control protocol f
2005-08-30 by DJ Paris Lee
This is a question regarding slaving a software sequencer to both my P3 sequencer and Akai MPC 60 simultaneously... Here's what I want to happen... The Ability to have my MPC drive the P3 and software sequencer tempo AND use the MPC's fast forward and rewind capabilities to move
2005-08-30 by jitterbugbite2003
Hi Colin, The 'R2' resistor on the mainboard should have a 510R. But I couldn't find one in the standard 0.6W range. Instead I've found this one of 0.5W (Farnell order code 544-528). I guess that's ok ? (thx for your time)
2005-08-29 by darkstr1746@comcast.net
never had too much problems with bugs in the Cyclone but what i did find was that when they crashed, they crashed for good. No fixing these babies. That's why i bought up all i could find for awhile. Haven't tried hooking one up with a P3 yet. But they do make good crazed strangn
2005-08-29 by Nick Rothwell
> Nick - are you a cyclone user by chance I had one many, many years ago. Managed to sell it, eventually. It was just too unpredictable, unreliable and just plain cryptic to be of any real use, and I just ended up implementing algorithmic sequencers in MaxMSP. -- nick rothwell --
2005-08-29 by Richard Scott
mmm, good advice guys; split the midi going to the algorhythmic devices and merge it later - and I'm thinking all thyis happens after the P3 -I think thats the right starting point Nick - are you a cyclone user by chance - I have a question about it which is driving me crazy.....
2005-08-29 by Colin f
> in the BOM, in the 'notes'section at the end there was stated that > farnell doesn't stock the exact same kind of pots. While browsing > through their catalogue, I found this one: order code 642-988 > It's 10K, and with a D-shaft. 0.1 W > > It's very pricy, but can I use these
2005-08-29 by sad1robot@aol.com
ooops wishful Uk thinking on my part. .thanks :) john wilmer [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2005-08-29 by Oakley Sound
> US to UK for a Linntronic mod. Rudi's in Wilhermsdorf in Germany. http://www.lintronics.de/lamm.html Tony www.oakleysound.co.uk
2005-08-29 by jitterbugbite2003
Hi Colin, in the BOM, in the 'notes'section at the end there was stated that farnell doesn't stock the exact same kind of pots. While browsing through their catalogue, I found this one: order code 642-988 It's 10K, and with a D-shaft. 0.1 W It's very pricy, but can I use these fo
2005-08-28 by sad1robot@aol.com
my memorymoog has the Dbm mod which is basic. i know the sequencer section was deleted in the software to make room for the midi mod. I really wish i could do that LAMM mod . living in LOs angleles makes it near impossible. Taking a trip to the UK would be grand. . .I cant imagin
2005-08-28 by Paul Nagle
Richard Scott wrote: >Has anyone tried combining the P3 with other pattern generators in such a way - should they be before or after the P3 in the chain? - any tips or info would be most welcome... or maybe I'm just making my life complicated :) > > I have a master P3 controlling
2005-08-28 by Nick Rothwell
> I have a master P3 controlling a slave P3 and two Korg sampling > electribes. I've been wondering about scenarios for recording with a P3 (you know, the one I'm going to buy fairly soon so that I know what I'm talking about) together with a computer sequencer (perhaps I should
2005-08-28 by Gary Chang
--- In analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com, Nick Rothwell wrote: > > and the > > parts that were delayed could be recorded again with an offset to > > compensate, > > Recorded again? I thought the usual trick was to thread the tape > backwards and bounce the track through a delay
2005-08-28 by ferrograph@aol.com
> this week I hooked up one of my p3's to my memorymoog. long story.... but I'd intended to be doing something moog-related, & all sorts of things went wrong. an old groove midi-cv box I use for two prodigies mysteriously packed up early in the session. the midi-jack on one of my
2005-08-28 by Colin f
> It seems that I wasn't holding down the part 1 key long enough > before releasing the part 2 key. Now that I clearly release part 2 > before releasing part 1, it works fine. Hold 1, tap 2, release 1. I'm going to change it so that as soon as you press the second part key, the p
2005-08-28 by Richard Scott
Hi all My P3 is heading towards me in the post as I write so I'm making some plans. I'd like to try using it in a chain with an oberheim cyclone arpeggiator and/or an oberheim drummer pattern sequencer. I want to make a semi algorhythmic system that I can control a sampler and sy
2005-08-28 by jimcombsus
OK, I've confirmed this is operator error on my part, pun intended. It seems that I wasn't holding down the part 1 key long enough before releasing the part 2 key. Now that I clearly release part 2 before releasing part 1, it works fine. Hold 1, tap 2, release 1. I was doing a li
2005-08-27 by Colin f
> Well, what is happening to me is that Part 1 is red and Part 2 is > amber, but once it goes through the cycle once, it stops cycling > and just stays on one Part. I have to manually reset the chain. Weird. > Is there a user config that needs to be set to enable a latch on > the
2005-08-27 by jimcombsus
--- In analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com, "Colin f" wrote: > When you have selected a part chain, part 1 should start red with part 2 > flashing amber. > Then when part 2 plays, it'll be red and part 1 will be flashing amber. > And so it will loop... Well, what is happening to m
2005-08-27 by Colin f
> > The latency on the JP8, including MIDI latency, was between 4 and 10 > > ms, averaging about 6ms. > > This is considerably better than the official SCi midi > interface on the > Prophet 5. This suffers from around 12mS to 15mS and it is > noticeable to > the discerning ear. B
2005-08-27 by Oakley Sound
> The latency on the JP8, including MIDI latency, was between 4 and 10 > ms, averaging about 6ms. This is considerably better than the official SCi midi interface on the Prophet 5. This suffers from around 12mS to 15mS and it is noticeable to the discerning ear. But this again is