RE: [Digital BW] Sizes of Epson PremierArt Matte Scrapbook Photo Paper
2003-11-01 by Paul Roark
Tim, ... I have a beta roll of UltraSmooth on my 7500. I think it s the same paper. It s the one I use now for the archival prints. (EEM is my medium of
Messages
Browse messages
Page 1457 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
RE: [Digital BW] another new Epson
2003-11-01 by Paul D. DeRocco
... I guess we can expect Epson to standardize on eight carts, to avoid wasting so much ink switching between the two blacks. And it s also nice to see the
MIS continuous/cartridges combination
2003-11-01 by Manu Schnetzler
I just received my CFS from MIS with ultratone inks for my 1280. My concern about the whole system when I was getting ready to buy was that I wouldn t be able
RE: [Digital BW] Sizes of Epson PremierArt Matte Scrapbook Photo Paper
2003-11-01 by Tim Atherton
... Agreed - and it s just this side of not too creamy for colour work - it prints great with the Ultrachrome inks. And I love the double sided - half the
RE: [Digital BW] Sizes of Epson PremierArt Matte Scrapbook Photo Paper
2003-11-01 by john eckenrode
i agree my early tests with the 300 weight stuff from inkjetart is really exciting, this will probably become my paper. john e ...
another new Epson
2003-11-01 by Ken Carney
Noticed this today: http://www.creativepro.com/story/news/20394.html?cprose=daily Regards, --Ken Carney www.kencarney.com
Re: [Digital BW] Is there an FAQ?
2003-11-01 by Don
... Thanks so much for your gracious and really informative reply John. Wow. It really is all so simple, isn t it? ;-) Now all I have to do is decide between
RE: [Digital BW] Sizes of Epson PremierArt Matte Scrapbook Photo Paper
2003-11-01 by Tim Atherton
wonderful stuff by the way. very slightly warmer than Photo Rag. Quite a lot cheaper than PR from Photowarehouse - no flaking, no noticeable rubbing great
Re: [Digital BW] Is there an FAQ?
2003-10-31 by Don
... this Some snippage here! ... Thanks so much for your reply! Back now to look for more acronyms! ;-) Don
RE: [Digital BW] Sizes of Epson PremierArt Matte Scrapbook Photo Paper
2003-10-31 by Tim Atherton
http://www.premierimagingproducts.com/pdf/media/Premier_Art_Hot_Press.pdf http://www.photowarehouse.biz/premier.html
Sizes of Epson PremierArt Matte Scrapbook Photo Paper
2003-10-31 by rbecklund11
I was looking at the epson website and see the PremierArt Matte paper only comes in 8.5x11 and that square format stuff, which is kind of interesting for 6x6
RE: [Digital BW] Digital B&W dissing
2003-10-31 by Ken Carney
Whoa -- thank you very much. Praise is always welcome : ) --Ken ... From: Paul D. DeRocco [mailto:pderocco@ix.netcom.com] Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 2:48
RE: [Digital BW] Okay - making the plunge - questions
2003-10-31 by Paul Roark
Allan, ... Probably not. In fact, to ease the transition into the new venture, starting with pre-loaded carts might make sense. ... I m not sure there is a
Re: [Digital BW] Re: QTR, GIMP-PRINT resolution
2003-10-31 by john eckenrode
carl i was using highest quality. then this morning i had I coulda had a V8 moment and realised I had set the paper to the plain setting on all my tests.
Re: [Digital BW] Is there an FAQ?
2003-10-31 by john eckenrode
don there isn t a FAQ that i know of but here is a couple o pointers MIS-one of major players in 3rd party ink development for b&w printing. Piezotone would
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Epson C82 affordable "Carbon on Cotton"
2003-10-31 by Paul Roark
David, The only problem with the C84 is that the chips for the carts are not yet available. MIS thinks they use the same Durabrite inks as the C82 and the
Okay - making the plunge - questions
2003-10-31 by Allan B Chen
All, Okay - so I m finally going to do it - going to order a 1280 and start off with the UT inkset. I therefore have a few questions about exactly what I ll
RE: [Digital BW] Digital B&W dissing
2003-10-31 by Paul Roark
Just to add a little perspective to the carbon print issue, the first carbon-based inks appear to have been used with reeds and brushes in Egypt and China
foamboard in s. florida
2003-10-31 by Boris Wiedenfeld
hi there. anyone know a supplier that sells 32x40 sheets of foamboard for a good price in south florida? (pref. in palm beach or lauderdale) I m tired of
Re: Epson C82 affordable "Carbon on Cotton"
2003-10-31 by dp20031997
I want to especially thank Paul and Clayton (but many others also) for their contributions to this group. This is the first time anyone in the group has heard
Re: [Digital BW] Digital B&W dissing
2003-10-31 by J Vee
... Thanks so much for the kind words. Many of my images are printed both ways and so I also compare. Yes, the output is comparable aesthetically, but subtly
QuadToneRip - Unbelieveable!!!!!!
2003-10-31 by Rich Shelton
I ve tried everything back to the Epson 3000 days and the early quad inksets (then 1200, 1270, 2000p, and now 2200). I recently moved over to a Mac G5 (from
RE: [Digital BW] What is a Roark curve and how does one apply it?
2003-10-31 by John Swain
Don, This is probably the best starting point. http://www.inksupply.com/index.cfm?source=html/workflow_roark.html Paul Roark is on this list and has always
Re: [Digital BW] Re: QTR, GIMP-PRINT resolution
2003-10-31 by Carl Schofield
John, Were you seeing banding at 1440x720 Highest Quality or just at the plain 1440x720 setting? I ve been using the 1440x720 Highest Quality setting with
RE: [Digital BW] Digital B&W dissing
2003-10-31 by Paul D. DeRocco
... I agree with Alex: nice images on your www.kencarney.com site. You have a great ability to see potential pictures where most people wouldn t notice
Re: [Digital BW] Re: QTR, GIMP-PRINT resolution
2003-10-31 by john eckenrode
hi mark the printer is fine, its just using QTR in some configurations has very slight banding. i figured the problem was either a paper thickness issue, ie
Re: [Digital BW] Digital B&W dissing
2003-10-31 by a.lemus
just a quick note. i was just at your web site, you have really strong work. it is my personal oppion that you should be charging more for your work! matted is
Re: 4000 vs. 7600
2003-10-31 by grdglass@aol.com
I saw the 4000 at PhotoPlus. Epson was not printing any B+Ws for distribution with it. When I questioned 3 Epson reps on the metamerism issue regarding the
Re: [Digital BW] Is there an FAQ?
2003-10-31 by Eileen Chun
MIS - The name of 3rd party ink supplier MIS Associates - http://www.inksupply.com/ UT - Ultratone Ink - The b&w inkset people are talking about on this list
What is a Roark curve and how does one apply it?
2003-10-31 by Don
In a previous note, John Swain stated:
Re: [Digital BW] Digital B&W dissing
2003-10-31 by Alan Zinn
... Jvee, I enjoyed your web page - loverly work! Unlike the conventionally sought air-dried, silver print Holy Grail I am on a quest for the fine art print
Re: [Digital BW] New Nikon scanner
2003-10-31 by Steve Kale
Yes but I would never buy one in the UK for example, compare the cost of the 8000 in the UK vs B&H Photo in NY....the price difference buys more than a
Re: [Digital BW] Digital B&W dissing
2003-10-31 by Alan Zinn
... All, Inventing misleading or fanciful names for ink jet printing doesn t help build confidence in the medium. It is rather amusing that art dealers are so
Is there an FAQ?
2003-10-31 by Don
Been enjoying this list for the past few weeks. I own a 2200 and am very interested in improving my B&W printing. I am a little frustrated by some of the
RE: [Digital BW] RE: 2200 inkpositions from Daniel Staver
2003-10-31 by Daniel Staver
... Wouldn t the Ultratones make more sense for IJC? If I m not mistaken it will go much warmer than the Septones bacuse of the added sepia toner, and you can
Re: [Digital BW] New Nikon scanner
2003-10-31 by Richard Corbett
... From: Steve Kale To: Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 2:45 PM Subject: [Digital
Re: [Digital BW] Digital B&W dissing
2003-10-31 by J Vee
Very interesting, and a good point. My own experience over 30 + years as (also) a Carbon printer is that the name is not a good for marketing prints. For many
Re: [Digital BW] Digest Number 1842
2003-10-31 by Carl Schofield
Sanders, I m also using gimp-print 4.2.5 and you might want to wait for Roy to release the version of QTR with the new dot size weighting:
RE: [Digital BW] Re: QTR, GIMP-PRINT resolution
2003-10-31 by Paul D. DeRocco
... Or maybe a manual head cleaning with Windex. It s possible that a nozzle is squirting at an angle. -- Ciao, Paul D. DeRocco Paul
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Levels destruction in adjustment layers?
2003-10-31 by Paul D. DeRocco
... You might try doing the adjustments before converting to 8-bit. This of course precludes the use of adjustment layers (until your copy of PSCS arrives),
RE: 2200 inkpositions from Daniel Staver
2003-10-31 by Jon
Hi Tom, ... Are you on a Mac or a PC? I ve been thinking about trying the Septones using Ink Jet Control (IJC). Would you say you are happier with the D-max
RE: [Digital BW] Digital B&W dissing
2003-10-31 by Paul Roark
In addition to educating people about the relatively archival quality of the best current inkjet pigments, perhaps we should remind the traditionalists that
Re: 4000 vs. 7600
2003-10-31 by outlaw07480
... or ... prints ... This may/may not help answer the question. Yesterday, at the NY Photo Expo., an Epson rep. explained to a bunch of us standing around
Re: 4000 vs. 7600
2003-10-31 by amateriat
While observing and fondling the working prototype of the 4000 at PhotoPlus Expo (didn t win one at the drawing yesterday - maybe better luck today), I
"Calling a Spade a Spade"
2003-10-31 by Colorado Light
... This reminds me of when I was an Amway distributor in the mid-90 s--we didn t call it Amway so as not to scare people away! We called it network
RE: [Digital BW] RE: 2200 inkpositions from Daniel Staver
2003-10-31 by Daniel Staver
... That s interesting. I haven t heard much about the quality of the Septones since their release. Most of what I ve seen so far has been complaints of some
Re: [Digital BW] 4000 vs. 7600
2003-10-31 by Tom Baker
There is no doubt that the Epson drivers/profiles for the 7600/9600 are inferior for photographic use. So, they took Imageprint s lead and improved their
Re: levels destruction in adjustment layers?
2003-10-31 by bruce greene
I think that one might be better off using many adjustment layers instead of many single adjustments (talking 8 bit files here). By using adjustment layers
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Ultra Tones & Dedicated B&W vs ImagePrint & 7-Color
2003-10-31 by Tom Baker
Marketing could be Epson s reason for empasizing different points. Driver design/intent is a controllable aspect of a printer. If they chose to have the
4000 vs. 7600
2003-10-31 by James Sims
Here is an excerpt from the epson site that makes some subtle distinction on the suitibility of these two printers for B & W printing... 4000 Professional