Re: Imageprint for B&W
2003-07-26 by grdglass@aol.com
There is no metamerism with ImagePrint for B+W. ... Metamerism and bronzing are not the same thing. Metamerism is the change of overall color under different
Messages
Browse messages
Page 1530 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
anoth method fo dig BW
2003-07-26 by Julian Thomas
http://www.the-imagepress.de/ This was mentioned on another list. Looks like output onto genuine (Agfa) FB paper. My German is rusty but I guess some folks may
I finally got rid of the roller marks on my 2100... really!
2003-07-26 by Daniel Staver
I know I said I solved this before, but this time it really worked. You basically go in from the front of the printer and stick little pieces of plastic
RE: [Digital BW] Re: QuadToneRIP 2.0
2003-07-26 by Daniel Staver
... Yes, I managed to get QuadToneRIP 2.0 running on Red Hat 8.0. I did the installation a few weeks ago, and there was just a couple of things that didn t
Re: [Digital BW] Re: QuadToneRIP 2.0
2003-07-26 by Ernst Dinkla
... From: Daniel Staver To: Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 1:29 PM Subject: RE: [Digital
Re: QuadtoneRIP installation
2003-07-26 by Roy Harrington
It seems a couple of people are having a problem installing. It s unfortunate that the installer package doesn t give more informative error messages. Since
[Digital BW] Re: Any New 2200 BW for PC's?
2003-07-26 by Roy Harrington
... QuadToneRIP has to run on OS X 10.2.x and you have to print from a OS X native program. So if you want to print directly from PS it has to be PS7.
Re: [Digital BW] QuadtoneRIP installation
2003-07-26 by Phil Rose
... Buried deep down in my OSX system there is something installed called BSD Configuration Files , whatever that is. BTW, I ve discovered that the
[Digital BW] Re: Imageprint for B&W
2003-07-26 by harrisimages
Bronzing and metamerism are not the same. Metamerism is the apparent change of image tone under different light sources, such as incandescant lighting and
Re: [Digital BW] QuadtoneRIP installation
2003-07-26 by Bill Morse
Hi Phil- I m not sure, but I think you have to have installed the BSD sub-system- do you know if you did that when you installed OSX? Bill
Re: [Digital BW] QuadtoneRIP installation
2003-07-26 by mfaphoto@optonline.net
Phil, Just today I tried the same installations as you and had the same problems. I too would like to know what gives? If there is anyone out there that can
[Digital BW] Re: Any New 2200 BW for PC's?
2003-07-26 by Peter Nelson
... platforms). ... It may not be cheaper than the Epson RIP. ($200) The sample prints from the Epson RIP were excellent.
QuadtoneRIP installation
2003-07-25 by Phil Rose
I m having a problem installing QuadtoneRIP 2.0. The installer tells me: There were errors installing the software--Try Installing Again . This message has
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Imageprint for B&W
2003-07-25 by Ken Schuster
I wonder if we re all talking about the same thing. My understanding is that metamerism and bronzing are the same, i.e., a printed image viewed from an angle
[Digital BW] Macs that support OS X (was: Any New 2200 BW for PC's?)
2003-07-25 by Peter
... Here s a URL to check the specs of all current Macintoshes back to the G3 (according to Apple, all G3s can run OS X):
Re: ImagePrint
2003-07-25 by Mitch Alland
For: Steven Schaefer ... You might want to have a look at my Notes on ImagePrint Setup for Beginners on: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ImagePrint/files/
Re: Imageprint for B&W
2003-07-25 by harrisimages
I have been using ImagePrint for some time on a 2200. I see essentially no metamerism when printing B&W. At 50,50 tinting, the image is slightly warm, but
Re: Imageprint for B&W
2003-07-25 by Rick Colson
IMHO, ImagePrint may give you a great B&W print with a 2200 (or 7600/9600 for that matter) but metamerism will rear its ugly head in different lighting
[Digital BW] Re: Any New 2200 BW for PC's?
2003-07-25 by johngeyles
... Bowhaus OPM/IJC runs independently of PhotoShop, so you don t need Photoshop on the cheap Mac. In other words, it s standalone. I m not sure about
Re: Working in OPM/IJC at 8 bits then converting to 16 bits?
2003-07-25 by luisvcool
Ok. If i scan an image at 8 bits and before I print in on OPM I convert it to 16 bits in PS7 and save the file, will the resulting 16 bit image look better
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Any New 2200 BW for PC's?
2003-07-25 by Jack M Kucy
This is a good solution. I am a Pc person (working on both platforms). This print server Mac may not be fast, may not be loaded. All the manipulations you
Re: [Digital BW] Epson Paper names..
2003-07-25 by Robert Morrison
Glossy Paper Photo Weight Robert
Epson Paper names..
2003-07-25 by Tim Atherton
I remember a while back, someone saying that the Professional Glossy Paper which is only available in 13x19 is the exact same paper as one that only comes in
with a 2200??? Re: QuadToneRIP versus OPM/IJC ?
2003-07-25 by luisvcool
I use Carl Schofield s EEM OPM/IJC profile. It works great for me. I wanted to get the profile for the Velvet Fine Art and Watercolor Epson papers pecause
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Image Print / 2200 / highlights
2003-07-25 by Daniel Staver
... so ... some Epson ... Yes, I ve cleaned and refilled empty Epson cartridges with the MIS UltraTones. I ve used them for months now. You can search my older
Re: Any New 2200 BW for PC's?
2003-07-25 by johngeyles
... There IS a 4th approach, that you may not want to hear about, but some people here have actually done: buy a cheap (several hundred dollars, cheaper than
Re: [Digital BW] with a 2200??? Re: QuadToneRIP versus OPM/IJC ?
2003-07-25 by Jo Brunenberg
Hi, I am very happy too with my 2100 (European equivalent for the 2100). For black and white it possibly is not the best choice. (results are quite nice but I
Re: [Digital BW] changing cartridges
2003-07-25 by Richard Vanek
Hello, I like to thank all of you for help, esspecialy to Paul. I succesfully cleaned parking pads today and installed my first MIS UT filled cartridges. I
Any New 2200 BW for PC's?
2003-07-25 by Peter Nelson
About 6 months ago I posted some quetions here about black and white printing for the 2200 on a PC. At that time there were 3 main approaches: 1. Use the
Re: [Digital BW] with a 2200??? Re: QuadToneRIP versus OPM/IJC ?
2003-07-25 by Robert Morrison
Epson Velvet Fine art should work great with the EEM/EAM profiles because it is the same coating. Check the files section of the list for what people have
Re: [Digital BW] with a 2200??? Re: QuadToneRIP versus OPM/IJC ?
2003-07-25 by Carl Schofield
Performance (particularly printing speed), reliability, and ease of switching carts (no need for a dedicated inkset CIS) is much better with the 2200. With
with a 2200??? Re: QuadToneRIP versus OPM/IJC ?
2003-07-25 by Charles Bandes
QTR ships with information on how to make your own paper-specific curve files. It isn t simple, but not too hard either. ... too?)
with a 2200??? Re: QuadToneRIP versus OPM/IJC ?
2003-07-25 by luisvcool
Hi. I am using OPM but I cannot find profile s for Epson s Velvet Fine Art and Watercolor papers. Can anyone tell me where to look? Thanks. By the by, does
with a 2200??? Re: QuadToneRIP versus OPM/IJC ?
2003-07-25 by johngeyles
... You can get the same performance from the 1280 *IF* you load it with 3rd-party inks. And, I already own a 2200. But, even if I were re-thinking the
Re: 1160 -- BW to color
2003-07-25 by Mark Hahn
for the highly saturated poster-like test images that Epson gives you as examples the 1160 does a very nice job... for *real* images it pretty much sucks...
with a 2200??? Re: QuadToneRIP versus OPM/IJC ?
2003-07-25 by Mark Hahn
Now why exactly would you want to use a 2200 with 3rd party inks when you can get the same performance from a 1280 for a fraction of the price???? mark ... ...
Re: QuadToneRIP versus OPM/IJC ?
2003-07-25 by Charles Bandes
One big advantage of QTR is that it s free and supports a huge number of printers. The free version of OPM only supports a few printers, adn the commercial
QuadToneRIP versus OPM/IJC ?
2003-07-25 by johngeyles
I m curious about what the trade-offs are between using QuadToneRIP and OPM/IJC ? Looks like Windows users are out of luck on either one, and for Mac users,
Re: Image Print / 2200 / highlights
2003-07-25 by harrisimages
Antonis, What you say is true....you will see a lot more highlight dots using ImagePrint on a 2200 than when using a 1280 with PiezoTone inks. But, there is a
Re: [Digital BW] Image Print
2003-07-25 by Jean-Pierre Verbeke
I m saying that if you import a file embedded with a Gray Gamma profile (instead of a RGB profile, like Adobe RGB) and print with a gray IP profile blacks are
1160 -- BW to color
2003-07-25 by Chris Hargens
After failing to overcome my CFS problems with the UT inkset, I decided stay with the inkset but go the cart-refill route. I also decided to try some color
Re: [Digital BW] Image Print
2003-07-25 by Phil Bard
With all this talk of which printing solution provides the most neutral, metamerism free monochrome print using color pigs, perhaps it would be worth
Re: [Digital BW] Image Print
2003-07-25 by Roy Harrington
There are now quite a few different solutions to printing B&W with the new 7 ink Ultrachrome printers. Most of the products only run on certain machines (Mac
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Image Print / 2200 / highlights
2003-07-25 by Justin Florentine
... Hash: SHA1 Thanks Antonis, and on that note... Has anyone tried using hextone/quadtone inks from MIS (or anyone else) in the 2200? MIS says they re
Re: [Digital BW] Image Print
2003-07-25 by Steven Schaefer
Are you saying that an imaged printed as a Gray Gamma 2.2 file will have better blacks then if it were printed in RGB?
Re: [Digital BW] Image Print
2003-07-25 by Steven Schaefer
The lack of shadow detail was the only concern I had after looking at the test prints. I am glad to hear the PI 5.6. has address this. The prints I looked at
Re: [Digital BW] Image Print
2003-07-25 by Steven Schaefer
Metamerism is the real issue. I looked at the prints under daylight, tungsten and florescent lighting, and do not remember a notable color shift. But, I will
Re: [Digital BW] Image Print
2003-07-25 by Robert Morrison
Thanks for the tip...in my book that make IP useless for BW for anything other than commercial work...there is no detail between 95 and 100% and very little
Re: [Digital BW] Image Print
2003-07-25 by Jean-Pierre Verbeke
I m using IP 5.6. The shaduw adjusting feature only works with RGB files, not with Gray Gamma 2.2 files which in return gives deeper blacks (same gradation as
Re: Image Print / 2200 / highlights
2003-07-25 by Antonis Ricos
... Justin, the 2200 only has one gray ink. No matter whose driver you use there will be more highlight dots than a full quad machine. For the ideal grayscale