Re: Image Print / 2200 vs 1280 / plug in
2003-07-27 by Shilesh Jani
Hmm, Tyler, I see your point. Reflectance depends only on the the concentration of the pigment per unit area of paper. So, the finer the dither, the less the
Messages
Browse messages
Page 1529 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Myth: was Any New 2200 BW for PC's?
2003-07-27 by Matthew Carlisle
Plus, what s so wonderful about film grain anyway? I happen to love its look, especially on Kodak HIE, but that s personal preference and probably just based
RE: [Digital BW] Myth: was Any New 2200 BW for PC's?
2003-07-27 by Matthew Carlisle
I never said you said you can t see dots. I was just kidding around - I think we need more of that on this forum. :) I tried BO printing myself during the
Re: Image Print / 2200 vs 1280 / plug in
2003-07-27 by harrisimages
Antonis, I certainly agree with your comments. You clearly illustrate the need for both theory and experiment, as Galileo taught us long ago ! And you
Re: Myth: giving BO a fair try
2003-07-27 by André Vallejo
After reading all the posts,no better then giving BO a fair comparison to quad. So I got a good image and printed it side by side using MIS FS Neutral on a
RE: [Digital BW] Printer advice for a new member of the list
2003-07-27 by Nelson Ricciardi
Russ and Antonis, Thanks for the reply. I believe I m familiar with the RIP technology. I used to work for a newspaper and we had Postcript RIPs do drive the
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Coating/protecting matte paper
2003-07-27 by Ed Mathews
Thanks. I ll hit an art supply store and see if I can find one of the things listed. Thanks, Ed http://lightandsilver.com
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Imageprint for B&W
2003-07-27 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
... Nope, bronzing is generally from ink overloading and/or ink remaining on the surface.. What you describe is bronzing, not metamerism.. ... Correct.. ...
Re: [Digital BW] Myth: was Any New 2200 BW for PC's?
2003-07-27 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
... AN important distinction Bernd... A device that allows one dotless imaging gives one more freedom thanone that provides a comparable image in every other
Re: [Digital BW] Myth: was Any New 2200 BW for PC's?
2003-07-27 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
... Bob, you seemingly never fail to take a position supporting an OEM EPSON option... If the elimination of dots visible to the naked eye is relatively
Re: [Digital BW] Printer advice for a new member of the list
2003-07-27 by mfaphoto@optonline.net
Nelson, Since you seem to be a serious person and are computer literate, my suggestion is to buy an Epson 2200. That printer is state of the art, can print up
Re: Imageprint for B&W
2003-07-27 by grdglass@aol.com
Chromaticity is a synonym for hue. Maybe the lab manager used that word to describe the effect (a change in hue), not the phenomenon (metamerism). Helene ...
Re: [Digital BW] Myth: was Any New 2200 BW for PC's?
2003-07-27 by Ruhrfoto/Bernd L.
... Most ... brush strokes. ... paintings. Of ... as you can ... just see the ... unwanted details. ... Very well spoken, Bob, I agree that visible dots are by
Re: [Digital BW] Myth: was Any New 2200 BW for PC's?
2003-07-27 by Bob Frost
Peter, Does it really matter that you can see dots in an inkjet print? Most paintings are made with brushes, and you can usually see the brush strokes. That
Re: Printer advice for a new member of the list
2003-07-27 by Antonis Ricos
Nelson, welcome to the group! When you get some free time , try to look at the archives (i.e. search old messages) here. You may learn a lot about which
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Myth: was Any New 2200 BW for PC's?
2003-07-27 by Loring Palleske
That is at the pixel level only. 1/300 th of an inch is very small. very high quality magazines publish at 175 lpi (which is the realm you are entering into).
Re: Image Print / 2200 vs 1280 / plug in
2003-07-27 by Antonis Ricos
I have some prints, maybe ... Ron, I understand what you say and certainly can t dispute what you observe. All I am adding to the discussion is that in
Printer advice for a new member of the list
2003-07-27 by Nelson Ricciardi
Hi there. I m a new member of this great list. I ve been involved with photography for an year, more or less, as an amateur. It is a serious hobby and I
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Myth: was Any New 2200 BW for PC's?
2003-07-27 by Martin Wesley
... Peter, Contrast is the slope of the tonal curve not the number of tones, so there is no particular reason that BO printing should be more or less contrasty
Re: Myth: was Any New 2200 BW for PC's?
2003-07-27 by Clayton Jones
Hello Peter, ... Sorry, that s just theory. I _know_, from real experience, that I can print both high and low contrast images with the BO technique and get
Re: [Digital BW] Myth: was Any New 2200 BW for PC's?
2003-07-27 by Clayton Jones
Hello Matthew, ... Sorry, I can t say any more. But something is on its way through the pipeline... . ... I never said you can t see dots. I just said that
Re: [Digital BW] Myth: was Any New 2200 BW for PC's?
2003-07-27 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
... That s selective perception akin to the people who call a shortcoming of the car they just purchases a feature. That s psychobabble for saying stuff to
Re: [Digital BW] Myth: was Any New 2200 BW for PC's?
2003-07-27 by Peter Nelson
... Everyone who doesn t have something wrong with their eyesight sees dots. One of the major PROPONENTS of black-only printing, Nicholas Hartmann, happily
Re: Myth: was Any New 2200 BW for PC's?
2003-07-27 by Peter Nelson
... more ... to ... Just do the math. At 2880x1440 DPI (the maximum for the 2200), the printer can produce 4147200 dots/in^2. If you are rendering an image
Re: Coating/protecting matte paper
2003-07-27 by markroth61
Whoops...the message wrap broke up the link...it s message 29541 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/message/295 41 ... looking ...
Re: Image Print / 2200 vs 1280 / plug in
2003-07-27 by Tyler Boley
Well, less ink would mean lighter, which would mean no-longer-accurate. I think the effect the poster meant was the impression that more widely spaced darker
Re: Image Print / 2200 vs 1280 / plug in
2003-07-26 by Shilesh Jani
Ron, Another thought: Apparently the Piezo plug-in dumps a lot of ink on the paper across the entire grayscale spectrum. Perhaps it might be better if
RE: [Digital BW] Myth: was Any New 2200 BW for PC's?
2003-07-26 by Matthew Carlisle
Clayton, What is this important new system for the 2200 ? Who will be making this announcement? Any info you can leak? Nobody s listening - tell all...
Re: Image Print / 2200 vs 1280 / plug in
2003-07-26 by harrisimages
Hi Shilesh, Thanks for your observations and for suggesting alternative methods of printing PiezoTones on the 1280. The old driver is very slow, as you say,
StudioPrint Profiles Link (from Peter B) and First Impressions (x-posted)
2003-07-26 by Ruhrfoto/Bernd L.
ADVERTISEMENT It was Peter Baumbach, who told me, that there has been a disput whether the studioprint demoCD contains generic profiles or not. Well, he found
Re: Image Print / 2200 vs 1280 / plug in
2003-07-26 by Shilesh Jani
..Snip... ... The ... accept ... ICC ... Ron, I agree with you! This special luminous quality is restricted to some images and under specific light condition.
Re: Coating/protecting matte paper
2003-07-26 by markroth61
See this thread...it should answer your question; I was just looking at it and found it very helpful:
Re: Image Print / 2200 vs 1280 / plug in
2003-07-26 by harrisimages
Antonis, I saw the same microbanding on all twelve of the PiezoTone samples that InkjetMall sent me. I don t know what profiles they used, but they were
Coating/protecting matte paper
2003-07-26 by Ed Mathews
Hi, Is there a website someone can suggest that might have basic information on methods of coating and protecting prints? Specifically, I m printing with my
Re: Image Print / 2200 vs 1280 / plug in
2003-07-26 by Antonis Ricos
Ron, I agree with you too... Just want to add a note on an unfair comparison: You are comparing, ImagePrint, an up-to-date software with the original piezo
[Digital BW] Re: QuadtoneRIP installation
2003-07-26 by Roy Harrington
... Ernst, There is no problem with co-existing with any other version of gimp-print. All the programs and all the PPD files for QuadToneRIP have different
Myth: was Any New 2200 BW for PC's?
2003-07-26 by Clayton Jones
Hello Peter, ... Since you continue to perpetuate the myth that BO printing is contrasty, I will continue to debunk it: BO printing is not any more contrasty
Re: [Digital BW] Re: QuadtoneRIP installation
2003-07-26 by Ernst Dinkla
... From: Roy Harrington To: Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2003 7:14 PM Subject: [Digital BW]
Re: Working in OPM/IJC at 8 bits then converting to 16 bits?
2003-07-26 by luisvcool
Thanks Doug. I guess then converting the images in PS& from 8 bits to 16 bits should do the trick. I am saving the images in PS7 also @ 400ppi. ... had ...
Re: [Digital BW] Re: another method fo dig BW
2003-07-26 by Julian Thomas
It was a devere. This stuff is using different lasers to the lambda/dig. I m wading slowly through the dpf. I was contacted about 18 months ago by a guy
[Digital BW] Re: another method fo dig BW
2003-07-26 by sceptre12345
... Thomas ... is ... My mistake, it was not Durst, but De Vere I had in Mind. Maybe this one: http://www.odyssey-sales.co.uk/news/browse.asp?article=6
[Digital BW] Re: another method fo dig BW
2003-07-26 by sceptre12345
... picked up - ... There was talk about an overpriced Durst digital enlarger some while ago. Forgot what the model designation was. Anyway, I ll bet it one of
Re: QuadtoneRIP installation
2003-07-26 by Roy Harrington
... One of the earliest 2.0 beta versions assumed you had 1.1 but all the latest stuff is complete as dowloaded -- i.e. yoiu don t need to download any
Re: Working in OPM/IJC at 8 bits then converting to 16 bits?
2003-07-26 by Doug Nielsen
... A couple of months ago I discovered that OPM prints from 8-Bit files at resolutions under about 450 dpi displayed stair stepped diagonals - at least when
Re: QuadtoneRIP installation
2003-07-26 by Mr_Misty_44
Phil, When I first installed QTR I installed Ghost, Then Gimp-Print then QTR 1.1 and then QTR 2.0. I was under the impression that QTR 2.0 was an update and
[Digital BW] Re: QuadToneRIP 2.0
2003-07-26 by Roy Harrington
... Ernst, I highly recommend just starting at 2.0. It should be much easier to get running because I include all the gimp-print source code that you need.
Re: [Digital BW] Re: another method fo dig BW
2003-07-26 by Julian Thomas
Bernie and Boris - thanks guys. Just to add what my poor German picked up - the prints are airdried and flattened in a press. Selenium toning is available as
Re: anoth method fo dig BW
2003-07-26 by borisw8
Well, since I am German I took a look at it. These guys say they have figured out how to expose traditional paper with their special laser. From there on
Re: another method fo dig BW
2003-07-26 by Bernie Ess
... fluent. Anyone local care to give them a try and report back? Hi Julian, hi all, I allow myself (being german) to step in and translate: What they
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Imageprint for B&W
2003-07-26 by Ken Schuster
Where does chromaticity come in? _____________________________________________ Help end spam and telemarketing... never respond to it. ... From: