Re: [Digital BW] Generic inks
2003-06-12 by Julian Thomas
Hi Tim, good to see you again! Congrats on the sales - get those prices up! As to inks - you ll need new profiles, and you d need to test fade data. I m
Messages
Browse messages
Page 1556 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
Re: [Digital BW] Flatbed Scanners?
2003-06-12 by Martin Wesley
... From: Robert Morrison To: Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 8:43 PM Subject: Re:
Re: [Digital BW] Re: I am lost... (2)
2003-06-12 by Martin Wesley
Aitor, The Image Export BW from bwguys.com (Sundance/R9) supports OS 8.5 through 10.2, Photoshop 5 and up, and the 1290 according to their website.
Re: New 22 megapix Leaf/Creo digital back for large and medium format
2003-06-12 by sanfo2003
The prices on these digital backs are just completely out of line. For example, the Canon 1Ds 11 megapix camera with a 35mm sized sensor costs an outrageous
1280 or 2200 for BW?
2003-06-12 by Jack M Kucy
Hi Group, Sorry this subject was already ON, but not in this decisive form. I am relatively new to the group. I am devouring the info... and I am almost ready
Subject: Re: review of new StudioPrint 10 RI
2003-06-12 by HPA
I am mac user, G4 OSX etc, I would buy a PC in a heartbeat if it would make a quad on 2200. It is much cheaper to go that route than the other way (PC to
Re: [Digital BW] Flatbed Scanners?
2003-06-12 by Robert Morrison
So are intending to do proof sheets on this scanner and then have the keepers drum scanned? Because if you are used to drum scanning anything out of a desktop
Re: [Digital BW] Flatbed Scanners?
2003-06-12 by Allyen Wilson
I always forget something! I scan up to 4x5.
Re: [Digital BW] Flatbed Scanners?
2003-06-12 by Anthony Atkielski
You don t mention the size of the film you are scanning. ... From: Allyen Wilson To:
Re: Tablets was: [Digital BW] levels and grain
2003-06-12 by Anthony Atkielski
... Try signing your name with a ball-point pen. Then try signing it with a trackball. That will give you an idea of the difference between a graphics tablet
Flatbed Scanners?
2003-06-12 by Allyen Wilson
Once again the which scanner is best? question arises for the group. What desktop flatbed scanners are high quality and reasonably priced. I am willing to
Re: Tablets was: [Digital BW] levels and grain
2003-06-12 by Anthony Atkielski
Just about any price you pay for a graphics tablet will be amortized in a few days, just in saved time and increased quality and precision in your work.
Re: [Digital BW] New IJC/OPM Profiles
2003-06-12 by Carl Schofield
Phil, I just put a screen grab of the IJC linearization window up on my filesharing website. This image (IJC.jpg) shows the target and measured density values
Re: New IJC/OPM Profiles
2003-06-12 by Antonis Ricos
... wrote: ........ Even with an uncalibrated densitometer (the_same_ ... Of course!... Antonis
Re: I am lost... (2)
2003-06-12 by Antonis Ricos
... d work too ( Quadtonerip, imageprint ,??? ). And I don´t know if it works w= ith OSX. Aitor, for OSX your main choices - as you say - are ImagePrint
Re: [Digital BW] New IJC/OPM Profiles
2003-06-12 by Phil Rose
... a ... densitometer would be ... essential if you are ... readings between two ... instruments. ... curve, i.e. when ... that should ... missing out (a) ...
Re: [Digital BW] OPM/IJC with 1270
2003-06-12 by Carl Schofield
Brian, Yes, OPM does seem to work with the 1270. I hadn t previously tried my old 1270 with OPM, but I just fired it up and printed some step wedges with it
Lines through my prints
2003-06-11 by Tony Gonda
I m having a problem that is driving me crazy! I m using an Epson 1280 with an MIS CFS and the MIS Ultratone inkset. Initially, I was having some problems with
Re: [Digital BW] New IJC/OPM Profiles
2003-06-11 by Carl Schofield
Antonis, I agree and that is why I m trying to find another densitometer that is better suited for use with IJC. Carl
Re: [Digital BW] New IJC/OPM Profiles
2003-06-11 by Antonis Ricos
Since the densitometer I m currently using ... Carl and Phil, using a densitometer with standard density readings is essential if you are using IJC. In this
Re: [Digital BW] New 22 megapix Leaf/Creo digital back for large and medium format
2003-06-11 by Jack M Kucy
And like it or not many of us - photographers use it. Why exclude our existing systems. I work on both platforms but I just hate these derogatory remarks
OPM/IJC with 1270
2003-06-11 by bu88ahu88a
Hi, Anyone know if OPM works with the 1270? I know Bowhaus lists the 1280 only, but searching the archives, I ve seen hints that maybe OPM will work with the
Re: [Digital BW] New 22 megapix Leaf/Creo digital back for large and medium format
2003-06-11 by qdfb
I agree unfortunate is not the best word. Inexplicable would be a better word. There is a difference between being pro-Mac, and failing to support the world s
Re: [Digital BW] New 22 megapix Leaf/Creo digital back for large and medium format
2003-06-11 by Robert Morrison
On 6/11/03 1:20 PM, Editor P.O.V. Image Service ... And bizarrely it is only OS9 compatible at that...what were they thinking? Is
Re: [Digital BW] New IJC/OPM Profiles
2003-06-11 by Carl Schofield
... Supposedly, but they are still looking at this problem. ... I don t know the answer to that one either. ... If you have IJC, then simply use your
Re: [Digital BW] Generic inks
2003-06-11 by Happy Eyeball
The Photoshop symbol indicates a slice. Your image is one slice by default. You should also see a blue outline around the image. If you re not dividing your
Re: [Digital BW] New 22 megapix Leaf/Creo digital back for large and medium format
2003-06-11 by Mark Savoia
I fail to see the unfortunate that it s a Mac only software. Creo (formally Scitex) has always been pro-Mac, which is not a bad thing in this Window s world.
Generic inks
2003-06-11 by Tim Timmermans
Hi everyone, I ve been away for awhile and it s good to be back. I recently had twelve images hanging in a group show. Priced them at $225 for 16x20 and 20x20
Leaf back
2003-06-11 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
sorry, I forgot to give the URL, it s: http://www.creo.com/leaf -- Keith Just some guy, and caretaker of the Multiverse s largest EPSON printer User
New 22 megapix Leaf/Creo digital back for large and medium format
2003-06-11 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
Since we ve discussed digital backs for large and medium format here... Creo/Leaf has just announced the Leaf Valeo 22, a 22 megapixel back for medium and
Re: [Digital BW] New IJC/OPM Profiles
2003-06-11 by Phil Rose
... shouldn t be ... versions, but ... Carl, Does this mean the same as saying that a particular ijc profile should produce the same result with one version of
RE: Tablets was: [Digital BW] levels and grain
2003-06-11 by Daniel Staver
I agree, the pressure sensitivity together with the natural feeling of holding a pen is the greatest advantage of having a tablet. It can also know which angle
Re: Tablets was: [Digital BW] levels and grain
2003-06-11 by Jack M Kucy
The significant difference is that harder you press the pen to the tablet wider the brush size becomes up to your chosen brush size. But when you press just a
Re: [Digital BW] Re: 2100(2200) The illusive cold B/W print!
2003-06-11 by Robert Morrison
... Its imageprint (www.colorbytesoftware.com) and it costs $495, but you will need to check to make sure that they support the 2100. I regularly run BW
Re: 2100(2200) The illusive cold B/W print!
2003-06-11 by martinshakeshaft
... Unfortunately I am Windows based! What s plan C? Martin
Re: [Digital BW] I am lost...
2003-06-11 by aitor Peña Inclán
Hello, I´m lost too and still don´t have a b/n quadtone printer set up Now I wish to set two printers. I plan to dedicate my Epson 1290 to B/W and purchase a
Re: review of new StudioPrint 10 RIP
2003-06-11 by Roy Harrington
... roberteversole wrote: ... Desktop version that ... pricewise but that will depend ... and 2) ability to license a ... limitations.
Re: 2100(2200) The illusive cold B/W print!
2003-06-11 by johngeyles
... print ... Don t spend your money on any RIPs, at least to solve this problem. (Epson should be ashamed of themselves for charging for a RIP that actually
2100(2200) The illusive cold B/W print!
2003-06-11 by martinshakeshaft
In the days when I didn t know better I bought a Epsom 2100 thinking that I would be able to get a neutral B/W print out of the box....OK I was stupid! After
Re: Printer Poll
2003-06-11 by Clayton Jones
Hello Martin, ... for B&W printing by the members. Only about 350 of the 2900 members have participated so far. If you haven t voted or the printer you are
Re: Tablets was: [Digital BW] levels and grain
2003-06-11 by Edward Wiseman
Kip.. If you had the choice, for example of making a selection in Photoshop with a mouse or now had thenew-found ability of making that same selection with a
Re: review of new StudioPrint 10 RIP
2003-06-11 by roberteversole
... I ll do my best. I figure if I am going to go completely out of my way to look stupid, others are coming along with me! It s a lonely ride otherwise. ...
Re: Tablets was: [Digital BW] levels and grain
2003-06-11 by Kip Babington
At the risk of displaying my ignorance, can someone explain (or point me to an explanation) of the benefits of using a tablet over using a trackball (which is
Re: Tablets was: [Digital BW] levels and grain
2003-06-11 by Mitch Abate
If you do a search on Ebay..someone has them refurbished for $65 and $79..also, the Wacom website has them for $80.00-refurbished.. Stephen Kobrin
Mac Platforms
2003-06-11 by craig
It appears that Apple is moving away from supporting OS-9 (at least bootable systems curently) and based on this I have two questions: 1) By just using OS-9
Re: Tablets was: [Digital BW] levels and grain
2003-06-11 by Stephen Kobrin
Thanks Phil ... (steel ... better
Re: review of new StudioPrint 10 RIP
2003-06-11 by hjswim2@aol.com
Robert:
Re: [Digital BW] Re: review of new StudioPrint 10 RIP
2003-06-11 by Martin Wesley
Robert, Thank you for clarifying the situation. I was told that since Ergosoft had licensed the 2200 screening algorithm from Epson that included a clause not
Re: [Digital BW] New IJC/OPM Profiles
2003-06-11 by Carl Schofield
Robert, Thanks for checking. Charles at Bowhaus thinks that there shouldn t be any problem with profile compatibility between software versions, but he has
Printer Poll
2003-06-11 by Martin Wesley
To all group members, We started a running poll as to which models of printers are in use for B&W printing by the members. Only about 350 of the 2900 members