Re: Neutral Archival QuadTone or HexTone Ink
2002-03-22 by tomoc
Well... There are much more expert opinions here than mine, but if you want to eliminate metamerism you have two choices: stick to dye inks (there are a few
Messages
Browse messages
Page 1957 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
Re: Test target
2002-03-22 by tomoc
There are some pretty good ones on the InkJetArt.com site and the Inksupply.com site. Tom O Connell TomOC@yahoo.com www.thomasoconnell.com ... different
March Print exchange shipping
2002-03-22 by tomoc
Hi Everyone- 2 weeks late, but the March print exchange started shipping tonight and everyone will get their prints next week. It has been suggested and
Neutral Archival QuadTone or HexTone Ink
2002-03-22 by UCCalBear
I have been trying to piece together a good solution to my black and white printing for a neutral non color cast or metamerism print from either an epson 3000
Re: [Digital BW] MIS FS Neutral and Standard Color Comparision
2002-03-22 by Moreno Polloni
... with these two ink sets. It certainly does. Many thanks for posting it!
MIS FS Neutral and Standard Color Comparision
2002-03-22 by Martin Wesley
In the Files section I have posted a jpeg of a scan of two step wedges one printed with the MIS Neutral Full Spectrum (FSN) inks and the other with the
Quadtone FAQ (was Comparison between MIS inks)
2002-03-22 by Peter Marquis-Kyle
Michael Kravit wrote ... I d like to support this suggestion! Mike, are you offering to be the architect for this document? Can it have a modular structure, so
Re: [Digital BW] Re: scan vs. printer resolution (WAS: combingcure)
2002-03-22 by Bill Morse
Austin, I may be fuzzy in my understanding of how PMT scanners work. I am using a Howtek 4500 and have also scanned with Polaroid and Scitex flatbed and film
Great show featuring our own Alan Zinn
2002-03-22 by Don Eby
Tonight I saw an exhibition featuring about a dozen fantastic panoramic images by Alan Zinn. They were on display at Albertus Magnus College in New Haven, CT.
Re: [Digital BW] Re: scan vs. printer resolution (WAS: combingcure)
2002-03-22 by Michael Kravit
Austin/Bill I emailed the files to Martin to upload into the files section. One is called 364.jpg and the other 4000.jpg They are both 300% enlargments of a
Re: [Digital BW] Re: scan vs. printer resolution (WAS: combingcure)
2002-03-22 by Michael Kravit
Austin, The only difference I can see between the two scans is the evidence of visible grain in the 4000dpi scan which makes the image look courser. This tends
Re: [Digital BW] Re: scan vs. printer resolution (WAS: combingcure)
2002-03-22 by Michael Kravit
Sorry guys, but Yahoo does not print your entire email addresses. Please send them to me and I will email the files. Mike ... From: Austin Franklin
Re: [Digital BW] Re: scan vs. printer resolution (WAS: combingcure)
2002-03-22 by Michael Kravit
Austin/Bill I have sent to each of you copies of two scans. Each a 300% enlarged section of a 6x6 negative. One scanned at 4000dpi @100% and the other at
Re: [Digital BW] EAM v EEM
2002-03-22 by Jerry Olson
Mike, Atlex is calling it Enhanced Matte , and I ordered a couple boxes that should be here early next week. The weight is a hair heavier than archival, but
RE: [Digital BW] Re: scan vs. printer resolution (WAS: combingcure)
2002-03-22 by Austin Franklin
Hi Michael, Well, then it sounds to me that no matter what resolution you are using, the scanner is being set to the closest native resolution, right? 24 at
Test target
2002-03-22 by wilfred71118
Where can I download rgb test targets. I would like to see different ones so I could pick one that I think I can make judgements from. Some I have seen are too
Re: [Digital BW] Re: scan vs. printer resolution (WAS: combingcure)
2002-03-22 by Michael Kravit
Austin, Yes, Silverfast calls it Q-Factor. Mike ... From: Austin Franklin To: Sent:
Re: [Digital BW] Re: scan vs. printer resolution (WAS: combingcure)
2002-03-22 by Michael Kravit
Austin, Bill, I don t know whether this is correct or not, so to actually see if there is a difference I just finished scanning a 6x6 Ilford Delta 100 negative
RE: [Digital BW] Re: scan vs. printer resolution (WAS: combingcure)
2002-03-22 by Austin Franklin
... Sorry, I said that wrong...the drum moves only on the Y axis, and the PMT assy moves along the X axis in order to scan the media. Austin
RE: [Digital BW] Re: scan vs. printer resolution (WAS: combingcure)
2002-03-22 by Austin Franklin
Hi Michael, ... Do you mean the I-Factor ? From the Trident manual: I-factor - The I-factor represents the interpolation factor which will be applied to the
RE: [Digital BW] Re: scan vs. printer resolution (WAS: combingcure)
2002-03-22 by Austin Franklin
... Bill, He s talking about a different beast then you are probably used to. I m not saying he s right or wrong, as I don t know his scanner, but PMT
Re: [Digital BW] Re: scan vs. printer resolution (WAS: combingcure)
2002-03-22 by Bill Morse
Mike, I forget, which software version are you scanning with? Anyway, try this; In PS, open a new file, @ 364 DPI, 20x20, GS- file size will be 50.6M @8bit;
Re: [Digital BW] Re: scan vs. printer resolution (WAS: combingcure)
2002-03-22 by Michael Kravit
Bill, I set the scanner resolution to scan at 364dpi, the Q-Factor to 1.0, and I set the output size at 20x20. The file becomes roughly 101mb or there abouts.
Re: [Digital BW] Re: scan vs. printer resolution (WAS: combing cure)
2002-03-22 by Bill Morse
Mike, I m not sure I m following you. Are you scanning the negative @364 DPI or is the 20x20 print @ 364 DPI? If 20x20, then the actual scanner resolution is
Re: [Digital BW] EAM v EEM
2002-03-22 by davidhatton2000
Hey Guys, Many thanks for the almost instantaneous response. As usual this childish list has come up trumps, Cheers, David Hatton
Re: [Digital BW] EAM v EEM
2002-03-22 by Todd Flashner
... Try: Todd
Re: [Digital BW] EAM v EEM
2002-03-22 by Michael Kravit
Todd, Thanks for the link. I was wrong about it being Epson Endurance Matte, it is in fact Epson Enhanced Matte. Thanks, Mike ... From: Todd Flashner
Re: [Digital BW] EAM v EEM
2002-03-22 by Michael Kravit
DH, I believe it is now called Epson Endurance Matte, not Epson Enhanced Matte. The word Archival was changed as many felt it was deceiving and Epson received
EAM v EEM
2002-03-22 by davidhatton2000
Hi, Can anyone say with sure and certain knowledge whether EAM has been renamed EEM (epson ENHANCED Matte)? All the places I ve looked don t seem to want to
Re: [Digital BW] Comparison between MIS inks
2002-03-22 by Michael Kravit
Folks, As this list has grown many of us are now being inundated by emails and requests for information both on and off list. Martin/Antonis would it be
Re: [Digital BW] Remove me from this childish forum!
2002-03-22 by Michael Kravit
Bye, have a nice life. Mike ... From: Mel Sauerbeck To: Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002
Re: [Digital BW] VM inks with ImagePrint?
2002-03-22 by Michael Kravit
Bill, Nit yet but they are working on it. Mike ... From: Bill Morse To: Sent:
Re: [Digital BW] Re: scan vs. printer resolution (WAS: combing cure)
2002-03-22 by Michael Kravit
Austin is 100% right. Run these tests and you will see the results clearly. One other thing that I have found is regarding grain. I find that by scanning at
Re: [Digital BW] Weekly Critiques are back in business....
2002-03-22 by Jerry Olson
Lawrence, Underexposure in the shadows or overexposure in the highlights is the kiss of death for digital. You can do much more with the shadows than the
Re: [Digital BW] Calibrating System?
2002-03-22 by flyfishingusa2002
Martin and others, Many thanks for the very useful information on the above subject. All of the replies contain the kind of information that I was looking for.
RE: [Digital BW] Image Resolution vs. Print Output Resolution
2002-03-21 by Austin Franklin
Hi Keith, ... is ... why... ... Which is what I, and a number of others, have been saying. Thanks for bringing Kennedy s explanation into the fray. Austin
RE: [Digital BW] Re: scan vs. printer resolution (WAS: combing cure)
2002-03-21 by Austin Franklin
... Hi Charles, No problem. Decimation is the opposite of interpolation. Interpolation is adding data between original data points. Decimation is taking
RE: [Digital BW] Combing cure -- change size after the curves are applied
2002-03-21 by Austin Franklin
Hi Bob, ... I am not exactly clear on what it is this is trying to prove...would you mind elaborating? Since I know Kennedy is the source of your post, and I
Re: scan vs. printer resolution (WAS: combing cure)
2002-03-21 by Charles Whitaker
on 3/21/2002 2:36 PM, DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com at ... Another newcomer question: What do you mean by decimation ? Thanks. Charles Whitaker
Re: VM inks with ImagePrint?
2002-03-21 by ruhrfoto
Mike told me, that the Colorbyte people are working to support MIS VM inks in the future. Up to now the system supports Cone inks, MIS FS, MIS FS Neutral and
Re: [Digital BW] Comparison between MIS inks
2002-03-21 by Paul Roark
Bruce, ... The original MIS quads are dilutions of the MIS Archival black ink. That ink is only about 95% as dark as the MIS VM/FS black ink. It also warms
My options w/ a 1270?
2002-03-21 by mlphotos
I would appreciate any advice you all could offer. I ve researched this a lot, and I m only getting more confused the more I read. I have an epson 1270. What
Re: [Digital BW] Image Resolution vs. Print Output Resolution
2002-03-21 by editor@p-o-v-image.com
What follows is as it has been explained to me by an Imaging system scientist/design engineer. He also happens to be a skilled printer and photographer, who
RE: [Digital BW] Calibrating System?
2002-03-21 by Lawrence Smith
... Big huge snip... ... I gotta try this when I get my new dedicated B&W printer... Lawrence
Re: [Digital BW] Re: 1270 Head cleaning
2002-03-21 by Don Rooney
Hi Austin I ll look at the pad position tonight when I get home. And yes the inks are the exact same as the first set I used. I turn the printer off when not
Re: [Digital BW] Comparison between MIS inks
2002-03-21 by Moreno Polloni
... rough ... considered ... Thanks Paul. That gives me a pretty good idea.
Re: [Digital BW] Remove me from this childish forum!
2002-03-21 by Martin Wesley
Mel, I don t see your address in the members list so I assume you managed to unsubscribe yourself. I have to say that you did succeed admirably in your goal to
Re: [Digital BW] Comparison between MIS inks
2002-03-21 by btmcelhaney
Paul, could you tell us that is the difference between the basic MIS inks and the MIS FS inks. All I could glean out of the MIS website is that the FS inks are
Re: [Digital BW] Combing cure -- change size after the curves are applied
2002-03-21 by Bob Frost
Austin & Keith, Posting 2 I have not read the article, but it sounds as if you are reading the article correctly because that is exactly what the Epson driver
Re: [Digital BW] Combing cure -- change size after the curves are applied
2002-03-21 by Bob Frost
Austin & Keith, I have copied two postings from another list on this subject. Since they are fairly detailed I ll put them in separate postings:- Posting 1 I