Re: [Digital BW] Re: Latest QTR profile experiments
2006-12-23 by CorrPro96@aol.com
In a message dated 12/23/2006 3:05:03 PM Eastern Standard Time, jrandall@ch2m.com writes: Richard I use FS Capture. The FS Viewer is also really good. I used
Messages
Browse messages
Page 548 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
RE: [Digital BW] PremierArt Smooth Fine Art (Hot Press) and HPR question (Paul?)
2006-12-23 by Paul Roark
Sarah, ... I have not noticed the difference in recent printing. Actually, overall, I ve thought that HPR s soft surface smoothed out the dots of older
RE: [Digital BW] Anti-static devices
2006-12-23 by John Moody
I am also in agreement with the recommendations for Brillianize. www.brillianize.com I could not find any cautions about using the product on acrylic framing
Re: PremierArt Smooth Fine Art (Hot Press) and HPR question (Paul?)
2006-12-23 by scott_now_coming
... Inkjet is pricier, though ... they were. I m not sure ... are having a wonderful ... Try these guys: http://store.ultrafineonline.com/pr325gmshewe.html
PremierArt Smooth Fine Art (Hot Press) and HPR question (Paul?)
2006-12-23 by sagaface
Hello any and all users of this PremierArt paper (325 gsm). Paul, I have been noting your high recommendations of this paper for some time, and finally decided
[Digital BW] Re: Latest QTR profile experiments
2006-12-23 by Jeff Randall
Paul: As you approach the logical end of your incremental improvement process, I hope you decide to upload what is essentially another Users Guide to the Yahoo
Re: [Digital BW] Re: roller marks with 3800 (was: Re: Epson 3800 for digital ...
2006-12-23 by CorrPro96@aol.com
In a message dated 12/23/2006 2:00:41 PM Eastern Standard Time, gcwagner@sbcglobal.net writes: Richard, The 3800 sounds like a great printer a great price. Why
Epson 4800 BO vs C-86 MIS -EZ
2006-12-23 by scott_now_coming
My 4800 is printing a smoother gradient transition using the BLACK setting (BO) than my C-86 with MIS EZ w/pk is capable of. I used the files that Graham
[Digital BW] Re: Latest QTR profile experiments
2006-12-23 by Jeff Randall
Richard I use FS Capture. The FS Viewer is also really good. I used Irfanview for years, but recently deleted it in favor of FS Viewer. Both are currently
Re: [Digital BW] R220 R340/320
2006-12-23 by CDTobie@aol.com
... Assuming that I m the David in question, the UT3D inkset is the one that can best be used in the 220 or 2200, and profiled via PrintFIX PRO v2.0 for ICC
RE: [Digital BW] Re: roller marks with 3800 (was: Re: Epson 3800 for digital ...
2006-12-23 by gcwagner
Richard, The 3800 sounds like a great printer a great price. Why do you think the 4800 would be better? Thanks, Gary W. ... From:
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Latest QTR profile experiments
2006-12-23 by Paul Roark
Jeff, I m slowly evolving this. Thanks for the feedback as to what would make the procedure more understandable. I m trying to remove as much mystery as
RE: [Digital BW] Need help R220 with UT-R2 inkset
2006-12-23 by Paul Roark
... I assume you re using View Proof Setup Custom ... ... The profile name ending in CC-0 means that the profile was made with the driver set to Color
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Latest QTR profile experiments
2006-12-23 by CorrPro96@aol.com
In a message dated 12/23/2006 12:10:42 PM Eastern Standard Time, jrandall@ch2m.com writes: Thanks Paul -- This fills a few holes in Tom Moore s QTR Users
Re: [Digital BW] Re: roller marks with 3800 (was: Re: Epson 3800 for digital ...
2006-12-23 by CorrPro96@aol.com
In a message dated 12/23/2006 11:54:21 AM Eastern Standard Time, gcwagner@sbcglobal.net writes: Andy, Are you using papers other than Epson and are they also
Re: [Digital BW] Hahnemuhle Fine Art Pearl & Flaking
2006-12-23 by Michael King
Peter you are not going to get a great dmax on this paper. Best one can do is about L*7 vs 2.5 for something like Premium Luster. Its great for images where
Re: [Digital BW] Re: roller marks with 3800 (was: Re: Epson 3800 for digital negative
2006-12-23 by atodzia@cox.net
Gary, I have been only using papers that use the photo black ink. These include Silver Rag, F-Gloss, F-Gloss warm tone, and Epson Premium Luster. They all
Re: Latest QTR profile experiments
2006-12-23 by Jeff Randall
Thanks Paul -- This fills a few holes in Tom Moore s QTR Users Guide. May I suggest adding more detail and 1 or 2 screen shots to show how you set the
RE: [Digital BW] Re: roller marks with 3800 (was: Re: Epson 3800 for digital negative
2006-12-23 by gcwagner
Andy, Are you using papers other than Epson and are they also working good? Are you able to compare the output of the 3800 with other larger Epson printers. I
Re: [Digital BW] Re: roller marks with 3800 (was: Re: Epson 3800 for digital negative
2006-12-23 by atodzia@cox.net
When I said the prints are beautiful, it means 100% perfect, no scratches. On the papers discussed, especially F-Gloss, this can be achieved by doing a quick
Need help R220 with UT-R2 inkset
2006-12-23 by luvrnikons
I just printed out a couple of B&W s on my newly purchased R220 along with the MIS UT-R2 neutral inkset. The nozzle check test patterns are all good. The
RE: [Digital BW] Re: roller marks with 3800 (was: Re: Epson 3800 for digital negative
2006-12-23 by gcwagner
Hello, After reading the two following posts I was still confused if there are roller marks or not. In the first post it says It does print beautifully on the
Re: [Digital BW] Hahnemuhle Fine Art Pearl & Flaking
2006-12-23 by Peter Palmieri
No matter whether I use a custom made profile, Hahnemuhle s profile for FAP or just choosing the 4800 s ICM, the prints I am getting still look muddy . I have
Re: [Digital BW] Re: roller marks with 3800 (was: Re: Epson 3800 for digital negative
2006-12-23 by atodzia@cox.net
On my 3800 using regular F-Gloss increased dry time is mandatory. It seems this is the trade off with vacuum hold down printers (4800, 7800, 9800) and
Re: roller marks with 3800 (was: Re: Epson 3800 for digital negative
2006-12-23 by David Keenan
... time then the ... increased the dry time for these papers to 1 sec. to be safe. At 1 sec I still had marks on the standard F-Gloss. It does ... This is
RE: Spam:********, [Digital BW] u/v protection
2006-12-23 by Jeff Burger
Bob, Thanks for your helpful input. I have seen the Premier Art at the Imaging Products website...I think I will order a case. Jeff Robert Rock
RE: [Digital BW] Hahnemuhle Fine Art Pearl & Flaking
2006-12-23 by Terry Ritz
I found the best balance between DMAX and shadow detail on an Epson 2200 running MIS Pro inks was to use the Premium Glossy setting. Terry.
RE: [Digital BW] Hahnemuhle Fine Art Pearl & Flaking
2006-12-23 by Terry Ritz
Thanks for the feedback Will. I was unsure if it was the ink, paper or (least likely) my cutter. I m going to try the same print using Innova F-Type Gloss with
Re: [Digital BW] R220 R340/320
2006-12-23 by CorrPro96@aol.com
In a message dated 12/22/2006 10:11:33 PM Eastern Standard Time, cj@cjcom.net writes: Hello Kurt, ... PiezoTone inksets can be found here. www.inkjetmall.com
Re: [Digital BW] R220 R340/320
2006-12-23 by Clayton Jones
Hello Kurt, ... I m not David, but nobody seems to be answering your question so I ll jump in here. The MIS grayscale inkset for the 2200 has been UT7 for a
How to make uniform gradients Was RE: [Digital BW] New linearization test image uploaded
2006-12-22 by John Moody
In the photoshop gradient editor, there is a setting for “smoothness”. Set that to 0%, and the gradients are truly linear, it makes equal size steps when
Re: [Digital BW] Hahnemuhle Fine Art Pearl & Flaking
2006-12-22 by Peter Palmieri
Thanks--much appreciated! Peter Peter Hahnemuhle recommend Premium Semi Gloss on their website:
[Digital BW] roller marks with 3800 (was: Re: Epson 3800 for digital negatives? )
2006-12-22 by bwinkjet
Hi, An observation using my 3800. By mistake I loaded an RC paper wrong side up. The ink puddled all over the place, but there were no pizza tracks and even
Re: [Digital BW] roller marks with 3800 (was: Re: Epson 3800 for digital negatives? )
2006-12-22 by atodzia@cox.net
I have done custom paper setups for Silver Rag, F-Gloss, and F-Gloss warm tone, This includes going through the platen gap adj. procedure. What surprised me
RE: [Digital BW] roller marks with 3800 (was: Re: Epson 3800 for digital negatives? )
2006-12-22 by John Moody
This printer does not have vacuum paper transport. Doesn t this make pizza rollers necessary if you want to get the best resolution out of it? And we know
roller marks with 3800 (was: Re: Epson 3800 for digital negatives? )
2006-12-22 by Steven Karafyllakis
David; The paper in question was not FAP, but Premier s Platinum Luster Rag which mau behave very differently-it certainly prints differently, the best Dmax I
RE: [Digital BW] Hahnemuhle Fine Art Pearl & Flaking
2006-12-22 by David Whistance
Peter Hahnemuhle recommend Premium Semi Gloss on their website: http://www.hahnemuehle.com/media/downloads/62/Print_Instruction_Epson.pdf. Regards David
roller marks with 3800 (was: Re: Epson 3800 for digital negatives? )
2006-12-22 by David Keenan
Roller marks with the 3800??!?! Since my preferred paper is Innova F, this recent report is very worrying. I haven t ordered my printer yet -- and maybe I
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Latest QTR profile experiments
2006-12-22 by Paul Roark
Joost, ... Making the toning easier and reducing the need for full Photoshop and a spectro are on the list of things to do. I think (hope) B&W printing with
Re: [Digital BW] Hahnemuhle Fine Art Pearl & Flaking
2006-12-22 by Peter Palmieri
I am not getting good results with FAP. Perhaps it is the media setting that I am using with an Epson 4800? I am using the Premium Luster (250) setting. Which
Re: [Digital BW] Hahnemuhle Fine Art Pearl & Flaking
2006-12-22 by will gibson
Terry, Yes, That happens to me too. I have dry mounted the prints for exhibition and my work around was to leave a very small edge of white around the image to
RE: Spam:********, [Digital BW] u/v protection
2006-12-22 by Robert Rock
Jeff, I ve used Print Guard from Lyson, Inc. (http://www.lyson.com/printguard.html) and also PremierArt from Premier Imaging Products
Re: Latest QTR profile experiments
2006-12-22 by Joost Horsten
... figure out ... notes from ... for what ... Hi Paul, Thanks for your continuing effort to bring B&W printing forward! Looking forward to see where this
Re: Epson 3800 for digital negatives?
2006-12-22 by Steven Karafyllakis
Kees; Sounds like the guy was referring to his 4800, not the 3800. My driver does not have the eject roller option he talks about. I don t know how bad a
Latest QTR profile experiments
2006-12-22 by Paul Roark
I ve been trying various approaches to QTR profiling to try to figure out what gives the best results with the least work. I ve posted my notes from a carbon
Re: [Digital BW] R220 R340/320
2006-12-22 by Kurt Mahan
David, I am new to B/W printing and have been reading the post to ather knowledge. I am using the epson 2200 printer and keep reading about the monochrome
u/v protection
2006-12-22 by trrekrider
I have recently begun to research the various u/v protection sprays that are available. There seems to be a few on the market...PrintShield, Glamour 2,
Hahnemuhle Fine Art Pearl & Flaking
2006-12-22 by Terry Ritz
I ve just finished cutting up my first set of prints made on Hahnemuhle Fine Art Pearl (2200 / MIS Pro). On some prints I had flaking on the edges, which is
Infrared competition reminder, and other things
2006-12-22 by Wayne J. Cosshall
Hi All, Slightly off topic but relevant to some of you at least. Just a quick reminder before the silly seasontakes hold and we are all taken up with family,
Re: [Digital BW] Unbelievable advertising from Epson - EAM/EEM?
2006-12-21 by CorrPro96@aol.com
In a message dated 12/21/2006 8:54:48 AM Eastern Standard Time, cj@cjcom.net writes: I just read the hands on review of the 3800 here