Re: JPEG workflow question
2006-12-21 by Nick H. Nugent
Hello Steve, The most important advantage to a RAW capture is you have the ability develop the frame during editing and change things like ISO, white
Messages
Browse messages
Page 549 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
BO printing with the new canon printers
2006-12-21 by randykglobal
Has anyone tried black only printing with the new Canon printers capable of extremely fine (1 picoliter) droplet size? Shouldn t it be possible to use almost
Re: Photo Rag Pearl
2006-12-21 by Joost Horsten
... Calumet store in San ... I had the same question, but no. After quite some searching at the Hahnemule site I found a press release on the Photo Rag Pearl.
RE: [Digital BW] Re: JPEG workflow question
2006-12-21 by Eric Neilsen Photo
Two things, That sounds just like what Lightroom allows you to do and it is free in beta form to anyone, CS, CS2 or nothing. And two, I d say that simply
Re: JPEG workflow question
2006-12-21 by Mike
I wonder if upscaling from 8 bits to 16 bits will improve your images or not. Your asking PS to make up pixel data, I think?? Alan In a class I took at santa
Re: Photo Rag Pearl
2006-12-21 by William John Smith
... I bought a box of 50 sheets FineArt Pearl two weeks ago from the Calumet store in San Francisco, is that what you are talking about?
Re: [Digital BW] ++++Year end print exchange --- 2 SPACES AVAILABLE+++
2006-12-21 by Michael King
Hi Tom, Two questions; 1) How is the October exchange mail out going? 2) Just wanted to confirm you are waiting for a year end set from me. Haven t had a
Re: Epson 3800 for digital negatives?
2006-12-21 by Kees
Steven, I found this on dpreview, there might be a setting to turn of the eject rollers. Can you try if this works? http://tinyurl.com/y9j58q kees
Re: Epson 3800 for digital negatives?
2006-12-21 by Kees
... Hi Steve, So the dreaded pizzawheels are back in this one? Any chance to lift the upper wheels a little like the 2200 output rollers? kees
Re: [Digital BW] Unbelievable advertising from Epson - EAM/EEM?
2006-12-21 by CDTobie@aol.com
... No, they are simply offering both names for literal matching purposes. They would both trigger the same inking characteristics, but will reduce user
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Epson 3800 for digital negatives?
2006-12-21 by atodzia@cox.net
If the luster rag paper you are using is F-gloss you definitely need to increase the drying time to get rid of the pizza wheel marks. Whatever paper you are
Re: Epson 3800 for digital negatives?
2006-12-21 by Steven Karafyllakis
Hi Kees; I bought one with the hope that the new dither algorithm would finally give me a smooth banding-free digital neg; but even though I ve had it for
Epson 3800 for digital negatives?
2006-12-21 by Kees
Hi, Who has tried the new 3800 for digital negatives? I would like to know how this printer handles the sometimes curly transparant OHP substrates (Agfa
Unbelievable advertising from Epson - EAM/EEM?
2006-12-21 by Clayton Jones
I just read the hands on review of the 3800 here http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/printers/epson-3800.shtml and noticed in the list of paper profiles
RE: [Digital BW] Photo Rag Pearl
2006-12-21 by Jim Doyle
I Saw two Sheets..Not enough to comment.. Still not available Yet.. Heck They Showed The Fine Art Album at PMA and They Just Came In almost a Year Later.. Jim
Re: [Digital BW] Epson V700 Unlock Transparency
2006-12-21 by Steve Gledhill
All I did was follow the instructions which show that at the bottom left corner of the transparency unit (when standing open) there s a switch. Left is
Photo Rag Pearl
2006-12-21 by zonepeter
On another forum, there has been some discussion of a new Hahnemule Photo Rag Pearl. There is a brief page about it on the Hahnemule site. They say it was on
Epson V700 Unlock Transparency
2006-12-21 by Nancy Wilson
Try as I may, I am not able to unlock the transparency unit on my new Epson V700. Does anyone using this scanner have a trick or suggestion on how to do this?
RE: [Digital BW] QTR profile for 2200, 4K+ inkset, and Matte BW paper
2006-12-20 by Paul Roark
... Actually, standard PK has 3 times the carbon of LK. That s the standard dark to light ratio. The K4 PK, however is a bit less dense. The Eboni has more
Re: [Digital BW] JPEG workflow question
2006-12-20 by Clayton Jones
... It definitely helps. First thing I do to a jpeg is convert to 16 bit and save as PSD (smaller than TIF). Try making some adjustments to a copy of a jpeg
RE: [Digital BW] JPEG workflow question
2006-12-20 by Alan Kearney
I agree that working in 16 bit does less damage overall, you can see it in the Histogram. And I guess with my workflow I m up sampling anyway, my D2x shoots in
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Unbelievable advertising from Epson
2006-12-20 by Ernst Dinkla
... I will add something in favor too: the air is cleaner there if the mountains keep quiet. But there are some cons to add as well. Of course that hole in the
Re: [Digital BW] QTR profile for 2200, 4K+ inkset, and Matte BW paper
2006-12-20 by Howard Shaw
Paul, thanks for your reply. ... I understand why you would want to have PK in the printer but not so much why you would want to use it in curves for matt
RE: [Digital BW] JPEG workflow question
2006-12-20 by Eric Neilsen Photo
With the ability that Lightroom offers to develop images, I d advise you to take your JPEG into Lightroom and process it in there. After you make sure the file
Re: [Digital BW] JPEG workflow question
2006-12-20 by Stephen Kobrin
Thanks Guys, Looks like converting to 16 bit won t hurt and may even help. I have the disk space. Steve ... images ... native 16 ... size of ... intuition is
Re: [Digital BW] R220 R340/320
2006-12-20 by Philip Schwartz
David: I haven t done a lot of printing yet, but I have been able to coax Moab Emntrada 190 gsm and Arches Infinity 230 gsm through the printer without too
Re: [Digital BW] Matte B&W print storage question.....
2006-12-20 by Sam McCandless
My limited experience, because I don t print much, Sarah, suggests you are looking in the right places. If you go to enough trouble and buy in large
Re: [Digital BW] JPEG workflow question
2006-12-20 by Patrick Carr
... True and I wonder the same thing, however, there are those who claim a change to 16 bit is better than leaving at 8 bit for large image adjustments. I
Re: Matte B&W print storage question.....
2006-12-20 by Clayton Jones
Hello Sarah, ... I do it as a precaution because the prints can be damaged by scuffing, etc. The back sides of some papers are not very smooth. ... There are
Re: [Digital BW] JPEG workflow question
2006-12-20 by Alan Kearney
Patrick is right, although a TIFF file will usually be quite a lot larger than a Photoshop native PSD file. I wonder if upscaling from 8 bits to 16 bits will
Re: Unbelievable advertising from Epson
2006-12-20 by Nancy Wilson
Actually, NZ time runs faster. It is tomorrow there today. When I visited NZ in 2003, I arrived on the same day, even though the flight was 17 hours long.
Re: [Digital BW] JPEG workflow question
2006-12-20 by Patrick Carr
... Yes, lacking a raw or .tif option you ll want to start with the highest quality jpeg, convert to 16-bit (if you plan on extensive editing, otherwise this
RE: [Digital BW] Unbelievable advertising from Epson
2006-12-20 by Robert Rock
There is almost always small print when a claim like this is made.usually stating that print must be placed under glass, out of direct light, etc.And all they
Matte B&W print storage question.....
2006-12-20 by sagaface
Do you all layer your prints with buffered tissue? I know this is de riguer with traditional darkroom photographs but I wonder what you all use to protect your
RE: [Digital BW] Unbelievable advertising from Epson
2006-12-20 by Paul Roark
We sue companies that make outrageous claims like that. When I was at the U.S. Federal Trade Commission I would have loved to nail Epson on that claim. The
JPEG workflow question
2006-12-20 by Stephen Kobrin
Up to this point my inputs to B&W processing have been limited to scanned film and raw files. However, I have a new camera that does not have a raw option.
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Removing chips from carts
2006-12-20 by Ernst Dinkla
... Mark, There s something more on this subject in the Field Service guide at page 40 but no real answer on your request. Funny those warnings in the SM and
Re: [Digital BW] best place for archival photo boxes/tissue?
2006-12-20 by Stephen Petegorsky
You could try University Products at http://www.archivalsuppliers.com/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [Digital BW] Unbelievable advertising from Epson
2006-12-20 by Ernst Dinkla
... Wasn t that claim used in the past in the US and dropped later on as results showed the paper changed color ? Could be that Epson counts on the fact that
RE: [Digital BW] R220 R340/320
2006-12-20 by David Whistance
Hi Philip I hope you have more sucess with the R800 than I have recently. I use it with the NK7 inkset which is great, however when trying to produce prints
RE: [Digital BW] Re: MIS ink problems...clogs or bubbles?
2006-12-20 by Peter Oksen
I use MIS ink in spongeless refill carts on the 1800. My experience is that it always takes some time to get a perfect nozzle check after a refill. I normally
Unbelievable advertising from Epson
2006-12-20 by Richard Smallfield
I ve just picked up an Epson product catalogue - for Archival Matte Paper as they still call it in New Zealand up to A3+ size, they say: Used Exclusively
Re: MIS ink problems...clogs or bubbles?
2006-12-20 by David Keenan
I m sorry to say that I had nothing but trouble with K4 inks and spongeless cart on my R2400. The Y cart seemed to be worst for me. But I d get clogs out of
best place for archival photo boxes/tissue?
2006-12-20 by sagaface
Where do you all get these materials? Light Impressions is the only place I am familiar with. Anything better/less expensive out there anyone could recommend?
Re: Cooling down UT-R2 inks
2006-12-20 by Clayton Jones
Hello Peter, ... Article #10 at the link below shows how to use a combination of R2 Warm and R2 Neutral inks to create a not so warm set, and it can also be
Re: [Digital BW] R220 R340/320
2006-12-20 by Philip Schwartz
More data points: I also use both a C86 and R200 to print using MIS inks on matte papers. I have three R200s, and while they can make beautiful prints, the
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Cooling down UT-R2 inks
2006-12-20 by Paul Roark
You might find a neutral (cool) in the M & LM (or C & LC) would be effective. Just a single neutral yellow may not be enough. The yellow spot puts less ink
RE: [Digital BW] QTR profile for 2200, 4K+ inkset, and Matte BW paper
2006-12-20 by Paul Roark
Howard, ... Yes. ... With IJC I d agree. However, with QTR s rather automatic method of doing the carbon core cross-overs, it s working fine. One of the main
Re: Cooling down UT-R2 inks
2006-12-20 by Philip Schwartz
I also found the straight UT-R2W too warm. I have just created some color swabs of the UT-R2 neutral and warm yellows. The warm yellow is considerably warmer
RE: [Digital BW] Re:MIS ink problems...clogs or bubbles?
2006-12-20 by Paul Roark
... Have you noticed what I use in the 4K & 5K+ inksets? http://home1.gte.net/res09aij/4K+.pdf ... I have not seen one that did not seal, but I think the ink