Re: [colorvision_group] Print Fix Pro Spectrocolorimeter ?
2007-02-25 by CorrPro96@aol.com
In a message dated 2/25/2007 3:36:49 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, gcwagner@sbcglobal.net writes: Hello, I just purchased Print Fix Pro and am trying to use the
Yahoo Groups archive
Messages
Page 74 of 112 · 5574 messages matched
2007-02-25 by CorrPro96@aol.com
In a message dated 2/25/2007 3:36:49 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, gcwagner@sbcglobal.net writes: Hello, I just purchased Print Fix Pro and am trying to use the
2007-02-25 by garyphoto6
Hello, I just purchased Print Fix Pro and am trying to use the Spectrocolorimeter on the test target but when I push down the top of the unit on the paper
2007-02-25 by David Miller
... I think there s something here that my still not be clear: You do NOT have to remeasure any patches to rebuild a profile. All you need to do is run PFP
2007-02-25 by Tony Hopkinson
Thankyou both Davids ! It s a pity the program doesn t allow this. I ll just have to remember to note the settings I made each time I make a profile in future,
2007-02-24 by CDTobie@aol.com
... You don t mention what product you are profiling a minilab with. If its PrintFIX PRO, then you can print any of the Tiff targets, and build a profile for
2007-02-24 by CDTobie@aol.com
In a message dated 2/24/07 10:17:37 AM, groups@hopkinsont.freeserve.co.uk ... No, PrintFIX PLUS cannot be used to modify existing ICC profiles. It can only be
2007-02-24 by Rick Lee
I should have asked about this before purchasing but here goes.... I bought an Eizo ColorEdge CE240W (for WinXP computer). It comes with the ColorNavigator
2007-02-24 by Eesh Dewan
Hi, I came across dry creek photo s profiles and am too trying to profile a mini lab. Any special process to follow when we profile a mini lab? I saw that on
2007-02-24 by David Miller
... No, you always have to build a new profile; you apply different flavoring to the profile by modifying the adjustment sliders in the PLUS application when
2007-02-24 by Tony Hopkinson
I m using PrintFIX PLUS 1.0. Is it possible to modify an existing profile rsather than starting off from scratch?
2007-02-24 by florent_thouret
Hi all, I want to reinstall my system and I can t find which version I have for my spyder 2 (I want to download the lastest software). I m sure it s not
2007-02-23 by S. Prior
Yes it is PFP, thanks I will give that a try!
2007-02-22 by CDTobie@aol.com
... You don t mention what you are profiling it WITH. I have to assume PrintFIX PRO, which of course isn t designed for transmissive profiling, so the hack is
2007-02-22 by S. Prior
Any suggestions on profiling backlit film? I try and I get very light profiles, I think the light just passes through and does not reflect back. I put several
2007-02-22 by Eesh Dewan
Hi, Actually, I was trying to use printfix pro like in this article written long time ago http://www.digitaldog.net/files/RGBtoCMYKconversons.pdf . I
2007-02-22 by Patrick Philippot
OK. Closing the discussion. Thanks to David s help I could understand what was wrong and how the various versions of the software behave. Everything s fixed
2007-02-22 by CDTobie@aol.com
... This does indeed create the shell of a CMYK profile. Its has only one intent, lacks a lot of data typically built into a profile, and is based on dot gain
2007-02-22 by Eesh Dewan
Hi, I was working with print fix pro and tried my hand at creating color profile for offset. I could follow the below process to get a resonably good profile.
2007-02-22 by CDTobie@aol.com
Here s a table to cover the versions and changes, for anyone who s actually still reading this thread: For all Spyder2 applications (Spyder2, Spdyer2PRO,
2007-02-22 by Patrick Philippot
... Agreed. -- Patrick
2007-02-22 by Patrick Philippot
... Many users *had* this problem as reported on the DReview forum and on some forums here in France. So this is not *my* problem. If there was no problem, why
2007-02-22 by CDTobie@aol.com
... We re working on it. Vista is making all developer s lives crazy at the moment, as you may have experienced yourself... C. David Tobie Product Technology
2007-02-22 by Patrick Philippot
... Yes. Excerpt from their answer: Hi Patrick, As mentioned on the site this version is only for 64bit systems and you should not install it on a 32bit
2007-02-22 by CDTobie@aol.com
... This would indicate that you have figured out that your accusation of incorrect driver bit depth installation is incorrect. Actually, its only one of
2007-02-22 by CDTobie@aol.com
... 2.3.5 has both 32 and 64 bit drivers included. It installs based on what OS version you are using. Clearly you have experimented further already, and as
2007-02-22 by CDTobie@aol.com
... Yes, I ve always found that forum to be the best source of trashtalking and venting on a wide number of topics... Not too good for actual technical
2007-02-22 by CDTobie@aol.com
... Run Spyder2PRO, and read the help related to the Ambient Light screens for details. But put simply: if you are using standard office lighting its way to
2007-02-22 by Patrick Philippot
... Hi John, OK, this is what I already did. But I m just giving information about the problems I encountered with this software. I wish I had this information
2007-02-22 by John Vitollo
... Patrick, This is a User to User group. Colorvision does not own this group. Please contact Colorvision directly to troubleshoot. Thanks, John
2007-02-22 by Patrick Philippot
... Well, it seems that the red dominance problem is also present in version 2.3. Actually, the change with target color temperature appeared in this version:
2007-02-22 by Patrick Philippot
Hi, If by chance you install version 2.3.5 on a 32-bit system, the installation will succeed, the software will work without any error message but the result
2007-02-22 by Patrick Philippot
Hi, I recently purchased Spyder2Express and I must say that is the worst software experience I have made since long. First, I must say that I m not the only
2007-02-22 by Patrick Philippot
... However, I recently purchased Spyder2Express and there s no ProfileChooser utility coming with the software. As far as I know, it comes only with the Pro
2007-02-22 by ve2caz
Please elaborate on this sentence: Make sure your proofing light is in line with your monitor white luminance first. Thanks, Pierre ... your ... do you? With
2007-02-20 by CDTobie@aol.com
... The most common cause of way out of range brightness differences are printing the profiling target through a color managed driver setting. This results
2007-02-20 by darrellmccombs
David, Thanks for the reply. It is appreciated. I must not be conveying correctly the amount of brightness I am seeing in the proof and print. It is far
2007-02-20 by darrellmccombs
John V., Thanks for the suggestion to use Ultrasmooth as the paper type. It sounds like this will yeild a better profile (although I don t think it will fix
2007-02-20 by CDTobie@aol.com
... Right, definately good news. ... This has mostly to do with expectations... ... Thats what its supposed to match. You don t really want us to limit your
2007-02-20 by Bill Hansen
I m a Luddite. I don t do soft-proofing. I print with Qimage, as someone else wrote. My printer profiles, made with PFP, produce perfect matches between
2007-02-20 by David Miller
... There s no guarantee when you build the profile that printing through the profile is going to be an indistinguishably close match to Photoshop s -non soft
2007-02-20 by John Vitollo
... Hi Darrell, You might want to give different Rendering Intents a try...ColorVision recommends Saturation in the Help guide. As much as you don t like to
2007-02-19 by darrellmccombs
John, Actually it is my expectation that they match pretty well. I didn t buy a Profiling product to still do significant tweaks for each type of type of
2007-02-19 by sinar001
WHY? Because each paper is going to have variations and characteristics of it s own. Also, did you do a nozzle check before printing out the targets? Did you
2007-02-19 by PJS
I m the other one! I learned the craft in a darkroom in the 60 s. Digital is getting closer to the real thing every day, but it s not there yet. There s just
2007-02-19 by PJS
That sounds like the same type of problem I had back when I used to try and print from PhotoShop with my 2200. I solved it by using QImage for my prints and
2007-02-19 by Myron Gochnauer
... Indeed. I climbed those learning curves during the 1970 s, and never touched colour until digital cameras entered my life three years ago and Photoshop
2007-02-19 by darrellmccombs
I have made a few profiles now with Frintfix Pro 2.0. Each time, I ensure that the ICM is turned off when making the print targets, and I have been reading in
2007-02-19 by PJS
The longer I think about this problem , the easier it becomes. You said that you could produce the desired results by doing localized adjustments. If you
2007-02-19 by PJS
Read Ansel Adams series on The Camera and Lens; The Negative and The Print. B&W is every bit as subjective and complicated as color, maybe more so.....EVERY
2007-02-19 by PJS
Thank you David for participating on this forum! While I love PrintFix Pro and the Spyder calibration system, both the help files and instructions on using