[Digital BW] Re: 2200 IP5 Grayscale
2003-01-18 by jim hayes <jimhayes@frii.com>
... the ... That s what I m guessing (your last statement re: tonal transitons). The one area where the Epson driver bursts into the ring like a car full of
Messages
Browse messages
Page 1682 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
Re: 2200 IP5 Grayscale
2003-01-18 by jim hayes <jimhayes@frii.com>
... 2880 ... the ... don t ... bitch and ... it is ... about ... Well, okay. On the two prints I did where the 2880 dpi looked marginally better I used an
RE: [Digital BW] MIS Hextone set Question
2003-01-18 by Paul Roark
... From: toliwel@aol.com [mailto:toliwel@aol.com] Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 6:44 AM To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re:
Re: 13X19 boxs
2003-01-18 by Roy Harrington <roy@harrington.com>
... size but 13X19. ... The search engine for the site isn t very useful. The item numbers are 20136, 20137, 20146, 20147 -- use these in the search field. You
Re: [Digital BW] 13X19 boxs
2003-01-18 by Richard Sintchak
Saturday, January 18, 2003, 1:19:16 PM, Marvin Sanders wrote: MS I searched Lightimpressionsdirect.com and they have every size but 13X19. MS The paper
13X19 boxs
2003-01-18 by Marvin Sanders
I searched Lightimpressionsdirect.com and they have every size but 13X19. The paper catalog I have is no help eather. Wher are they?
Re: [Digital BW] Filling virgin carts
2003-01-18 by Jerry Olson
This is new to me, I ve never heard of a rubber ball in anybody s refilling sequence. Jerry
Secret decoder ring
2003-01-18 by Shire,Stanley
I spoke with John at Colorbyte re: Settings for Grayscale prints with IP5. He acknowledges that they have gooten behind in updating the documentation. But,it s
Re: Re: 2200 IP5 Grayscale
2003-01-18 by Andrew Rodney
... Can t speak for others but you and I are on the same island. As for making custom profiles, I m finding that working well now that I know the trick about
Re: building a viewing box (long)
2003-01-18 by Andrew Rodney
... Here s an archive post from Joe Holms from the ColorSync list that you may find useful. Credit to Mr. Holmes! Andrew Rodney ... My favorite viewing light
Re: 2200 IP5 Grayscale
2003-01-18 by Andrew Rodney
... John at ColorByte told me that this is the case with IP and they don t recommend 2880 settings (despite putting it there so users don t bitch and producing
[Digital BW] Re: 2200 IP5 Grayscale
2003-01-18 by eleanor77027 <elliebrown@aol.com>
I agree that the IP prints have a certain smoothness about them. However with that said, why is their dither so course? I am making prints anywhere from 5X7
[Digital BW] Re: 2200 IP5 Grayscale
2003-01-18 by jim hayes <jimhayes@frii.com>
... will ... really ... were ... highlights ... of ... profiles, ... progress ... with ... even ... element ... to ... especially ... I d agree with you Eddie.
Re: [Digital BW] MIS Hextone set Question
2003-01-18 by toliwel@aol.com
Thanks Paul! I assume the 1160 Cyan position ink goes in the Cyan poisition in the 1200, and the Magenta 1160 ink goes in the yellow position in the 1200. Is
Returned mail: User unknown
2003-01-18 by scott@jolliffphoto.com
The original message was received at 2003-01-18 09:01:42 -0500 from postoffice.local. [10.0.0.1] ... ...
RE: [Digital BW] Permanence - Paul Roark
2003-01-18 by Paul Roark
Jerry, I have not seen the PiezoTone cool inks. I think Jon published a fade test of them that was not quite as impressive as the warm-neutral or selenium,
Re: [Digital BW] Filling virgin carts
2003-01-18 by jim hayes <jimhayes@frii.com>
MIS just added the balls because they fit nicely. Tape is fine just make sure you use plastic ELECTRICAL tape. Jim H. ... the ... out ... vacuum ... Polls ...
Re: [Digital BW] Permanence - Paul Roark
2003-01-18 by Paul Roark
Robert, ... No, all the inks have to be RC paper-compatible. The older pigmented quad inksets just don t work well on RC paper. With the new inksets I m
Re: [Digital BW] Filling virgin carts
2003-01-18 by Kevin Gulstene
Thank you Paul. Both for the answer and the good news given my deadline. -- Kevin
Re: [Digital BW] DMCA defendant to stop making chip
2003-01-18 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
... of course, they can make it... The question is will it do them any good..? ... Not a surprise... The Plaintiff has a lot more $$ here and can show a
RE: [Digital BW] Filling virgin carts
2003-01-18 by Paul Roark
Kevin, I always use tape on the hole after a vacuum fill. I don t like the little balls. Paul http://www.PaulRoark.com ... From: Kevin Gulstene
Re: Prepping a surface for inkjet
2003-01-18 by diana jeon
Try a product called Ink Aid. www.inkaid.com You can use it to prep a large variety of surfaces--the people at Digital Atelier have used it for a while and say
Re: Prepping a surface for inkjet
2003-01-18 by Wayne J. Cosshall
You also do not always have to prep the surface. I do some printing with an Encad Croma 24 using Ilford archival dye inks straight onto Arches watercolour
Re: Return of "Is THIS banding?"
2003-01-18 by Charles Bandes <byronbulb@yahoo.com>
Stupid question - Have you fiddled with the 0/+ switch at all? I find that when it s set incorrectly I get banding.
Return of "Is THIS banding?"
2003-01-18 by franklinmiller4 <proxy@photocommando.com>
Hi - Thanks for all of the feedback you ve been giving me. So here s the update: Took off the CFS (which introduced bubbles into the hoses - least of my
Re: [Digital BW] Filling virgin carts
2003-01-18 by Kevin Gulstene
Clamp what tight? I m really hoping I haven t missed a joke here. I have a 1200 that I am trying to fill using the the vacuum pump assembly and sharp needle
Re: [Digital BW] Filling virgin carts
2003-01-18 by Jerry Olson
Little rubber balls? Never heard of them! Don t you just clamp them tight ? Jerry
Re: [Digital BW] Permanence - Paul Roark
2003-01-18 by Jerry Olson
Paul, have you seen any results of the piezotone COOL inks yet? Jerry
Re: [Digital BW] Re: 2200 IP5 Grayscale
2003-01-18 by Carolyn Frayn
Andrew, I compared the 1440 and the 2880 settings on my 2200 - there is a difference to my eyes.. The 2880 appears sharper, has a little more depth, and above
[Digital BW] Re: 2200 IP5 Grayscale (Andrew)
2003-01-18 by jim hayes <jimhayes@frii.com>
Yes Robert. In fact I ve only done one print to try to get it to show up, so I wasn t really trying on the color end. But I didn t see anything there on the
Filling virgin carts
2003-01-18 by Kevin Gulstene
I have been filling virgin carts from MIS with FS-N and have run out of the little rubber balls that are placed in the hole after the vacuum fill procedure.
[Digital BW] Re: 2200 IP5 Grayscale
2003-01-17 by A. Andrew Gonzalez <a_andrew_gonzalez@ya
I m seeing very smooth dithering in the shadows with ImagePrint (os 9 demo) using matte black in the 9600, compared with the Epson driver. But the light areas
Re: [Digital BW] Permanence - Paul Roark
2003-01-17 by Robert Morrison
Paul, Thanks for the thorough post, as usual. So from your experience the black ink is the only problem with the quads on semi-gloss/luster finish papers? If
Re: [Digital BW] Permanence - Paul Roark
2003-01-17 by Paul Roark
James, ... PiezoTone midtones are more lightfast than the FS and FS-N, although the FS are better than the old PiezoBW/Sundance. ... This is not a problem with
Re: [Digital BW] Re: 2200 IP5 Grayscale
2003-01-17 by Eddie Gilbert
On Friday, January 17, 2003, at 05:09 PM, eleanor77027 ... Eleanor, For what it s worth, I m using IP on Mac OS X with a 7600 using UltraChrome inks (Matte
Re: 2200 IP5 Grayscale
2003-01-17 by eleanor77027 <elliebrown@aol.com>
andrew, so far I have been disappointed in image print for the 2200. for $500 bucks I expected a finer dither at 1440 and at least some color controls (the
RE: [Digital BW] Permanence - Paul Roark
2003-01-17 by BOB KRAMER
Can you help out a relative newbie here. What is DSS syndrome? Thanks, Bob Kramer ... From: James Lerager [mailto:JLerager@yahoo.com]
building a viewing box
2003-01-17 by steven0356 <stevenr@mindspring.com>
I would like to build a viewing box. My office is windowless and I keep it fairly dark when I am printing or working in Photoshop. I think I have heard that
Re: [Digital BW] Permanence - Paul Roark
2003-01-17 by James Lerager <JLerager@yahoo.com>
Hi Paul, I am about to switch inks from the original Piezo/Sundance. I am planning on replacing them with either Piezotones, or a blend of MIS FS-N (80%) & FS
Re: [Digital BW] Re: 2200 IP5 Grayscale (Andrew)
2003-01-17 by Robert Morrison
Jim, Just to clarify...the mottling problem that you are having with Eclipse and the 2200 is a problem with gray pigment prints...correct?...because I haven t
Re: [Digital BW] Re: 2200 IP5 Grayscale
2003-01-17 by Robert Morrison
There should be absolutely no difference with the 2200 at 1440 vs. 2880 because of the variable dot capability of the printer. At 1440, when the printer needs
Re: is THIS microbanding
2003-01-17 by jim hayes <jimhayes@frii.com>
I d like to add one small trick to what Gregory has posted below. Indeed it could be misfiring nozzles and I guess you might want to eliminate the possiblities
[Digital BW] Re: 2200 IP5 Grayscale (Andrew)
2003-01-17 by jim hayes <jimhayes@frii.com>
Yes Andrew I had heard on this list, I believe from you about the 2880 vs 1440 variable dot thing, and I assumed it certainly applied to the 1280 and 1160
Re: [Digital BW] MIS Hextone set Question
2003-01-17 by Jerry Olson
I believe you can use the 1160 inks. You just need to get the photo magenta and photo cyan. The Enhanced black (Generations 4) from media street is a deeper
Re: [Digital BW] Re: 2200 IP5 Grayscale
2003-01-17 by Jerry Olson
Hi Andrew. I have made a couple comparison prints between 2880 and 1440 DPI using Hextone inks, and the 2880 was just a hair sharper and smoother. Couldn t
HP755CM for Digital B&W
2003-01-17 by mobile@angrek.com
Has anyone tried working with the Hewlett Packard 755CM? Our lab has one that has been unused for the past year and I am trying to see about doing some
Re: 2200 IP5 Grayscale
2003-01-17 by Andrew Rodney
... You do NOT want to print at 2880. First, with IP or the Epson driver it takes forever but worse, you lose variable dot dither. The 2880 is IMHO more a high
Re: [Digital BW] Prepping a surface for inkjet
2003-01-17 by david_bookbinder@sprynet.com
There is a product called Bubble Jet Set 2000 that people use for printing on fabric. There may be other uses for it, too. I have not personally tried it, as
Re: [Digital BW] Prepping a surface for inkjet
2003-01-17 by Carl Schofield
This doesn t answer your questions on surface prep, but it is an example of another paper alternative for inkjet printing: http://www.imagingalternatives.com/
Prepping a surface for inkjet
2003-01-17 by plnelson2003 <peter@studio-nelson.com>
I m interested in experimenting with inkjet printing on different materials - canvas, linen, metal, panel, plastic, etc. My Epson 2200 has a manual feed slot