Re: [Digital BW] Re: Why print at 2880 DPI
2002-12-05 by Jerry Olson
I use EAM or Eclipse, or Royal Riviera Paper, and the photo paper setting in the media setting dialogue box. That will allow 2880, and The results are
Messages
Browse messages
Page 1717 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
Re: [Digital BW] Chemistry refresher course
2002-12-05 by bgs
Whoops!!! I meant vinegar. ... From: Bruce Kinch To: Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 1:00 PM
Re: [Digital BW] Chemistry refresher course
2002-12-05 by bgs
Good bubbles and noise when added to baking soda. ... From: Bruce Kinch To: Sent: Thursday,
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Convert to B&W plugins
2002-12-05 by Moreno Polloni
... Let say there s a grayscale image of an 18% blue patch, an 18% red patch, and a greyscale strip. With the channel mixer and an RGB image, I can alter the
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Convert to B&W plugins
2002-12-05 by Austin Franklin
... Moreno, It may not be the same thing but you certainly can get the EXACT same results in your final grayscale output. You can do manipulation to the
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Convert to B&W plugins
2002-12-05 by Moreno Polloni
... on ... It s not the same thing. Shoot a Macbeth colour chart in both colour and B&W. When you scan the colour image in colour, and use the channel mixer in
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Chemistry refresher course
2002-12-05 by bgs
Nope. Doesn t make any difference...unless you drink it. A service tech told me that very hot water is better than ammonia and all the other stuff (Windex
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Convert to B&W plugins
2002-12-05 by Austin Franklin
Mark, I still don t understand. Why can t you get the exact same effect in PS on a file that is grayscale? All a filter does is shift/modify the tonality,
[Digital BW] Re: Convert to B&W plugins
2002-12-05 by Mark Hahn
Using the Channel mixer/plugins gives you the flexiblity to choose a filter after shooting (ie. green, yellow, orange etc.), with B&W film you get one chance
Re: [Digital BW] Chemistry refresher course
2002-12-05 by Bruce Kinch
... Mamma said, don t add ammonia to bleach. -- Bruce C. Kinch Associate Professor of Photography The Art Institute of Boston at Lesley University
Re: Chemistry refresher course
2002-12-05 by K2 Chittin
... Thanks for that enlightening info Jeff. I thought it was a case of 1:9 pure ammonia (you know, the highly dangerous stuff with all those warnings on it)
Re: [Digital BW] Epson 1270/1280 vs. Canon S9000
2002-12-05 by Moreno Polloni
... Yes, I know all that. Not everyone wants to bother with a CIS, and for many photographers, short term print quality and print speed are far more important
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Why print at 2880 DPI
2002-12-05 by Andrew Rodney
... That¹s what I was told. Andrew [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Two sided paper options?
2002-12-05 by Jim Panzer
I am going to be making a calendar for my folks and folk-in-laws for Christmas. This will mean I am going to be making a print on one side, and the calendar
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Why print at 2880 DPI
2002-12-05 by Jim Panzer
Can I ask what types of paper people are using to print at 2880? Like someone else mentioned, I used mat paper but had to set the paper setting to something
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Why print at 2880 DPI
2002-12-05 by Jerry Olson
Andrew, In the case of small prints though, the 2280 is most definitely sharper and more detailed. jerry
Re: [Digital BW] Chemistry refresher course
2002-12-05 by Jerry Olson
Doesn t make any difference, but I add the ammonia to the water. Jerry
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Why print at 2880 DPI
2002-12-05 by Jerry Olson
That makes good sense Alessandro. Sounds logical. I was very surprised to see how much sharper the small prints actually were! Jerry
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Why print at 2880 DPI
2002-12-05 by Jerry Olson
Ernst, If the drying time is a factor, you d think the ink would really bleed in a small print at 2880 DPI, as it wouldn t have much time to dry before the
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Why print at 2880 DPI
2002-12-05 by Jerry Olson
Shilesh, For some reason, and I haven t a clue as to why, the bigger prints, (12x18) always seem to look sharper than smaller prints. In fact 4x5 inch prints
Re: Chemistry refresher course
2002-12-05 by Jeff Randall
The houshold ammonia is already a dilute solution of ammonia and water so no big deal. I however add the ammonia solution to the water. 1 part household
End of BO Print Offer
2002-12-05 by Clayton Jones
Hello All, At this time I must end the offer to send sample BO prints for the cost of postage. I have received about a dozen requests and that is about all I
Re: [Digital BW] Epson 1270/1280 vs. Canon S9000
2002-12-05 by Jerry Olson
Eclipse Satine is a great, 100 percent rag, acid free, pH neutral paper, pure white, nicely textured on one side and smooth on the other, printable on either
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Convert to B&W plugins
2002-12-05 by Austin Franklin
... Andy, I don t understand. What control (or anything for that matter) is lacking in scanning B&W films as grayscale if your ultimate goal is grayscale?
Re: [Digital BW] Epson 1270/1280 vs. Canon S9000
2002-12-05 by Jerry Olson
Yes, but you can t get a CIS for a canon printer, and the Canon inks are rated to only 25 years, on CANON paper. I ve seen a few Epson 2200 prints, and they
Color Shift on one image only
2002-12-05 by frankp1_98
I got an Epson 2200 last week and am very pleased with both color images and B/W. However I m having serious color shifts on one particular b/w image. The
Re: [Digital BW] Help!!! Anyone ever use Stylus Photo/Photo Ex/700 for B&W?
2002-12-05 by Jerry Olson
The dots are probably way too coarse to use this printer for photographs. Jerry
C80 and Photo Rag slippage
2002-12-05 by Allyen Wilson
I am printing on 309gsm Photo Rag using my Epson C80. Every sheet slips about a quarter inch which throws off image placement and wastes expensive paper.
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Epson 1270/1280 vs. Canon S9000
2002-12-05 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
... and I use Nikon 35mm LOL ... They still seem slow on computer support for OS X.. The D60 still lacks a RAW format plug-in/browser.. ... I have had no
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Why print at 2880 DPI
2002-12-05 by Bob Frost
Shilesh, 2880 dpi is recommended for printing smaller prints; the detail in the prints is smaller and therefore smaller dots placed more accurately will bring
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Convert to B&W plugins
2002-12-05 by Shire,Stanley
Two points: 1. Shooting color, scanning in RGB and converting to grayscale give tremendous flexibility. The effect is that of shooting BW film with a filter.
Re: [Digital BW] S9000 Printhead (was Epson vs. Canon)
2002-12-05 by Kip Babington
It s weirder than weird. Sometimes when I change a cartridge it isn t that cartridge that fails to fire on all cylinders, but another one. I ve even gone to
Re: [Digital BW] Chemistry refresher course
2002-12-05 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
... Do as you oughta add acid to watta... Of course ammonia is a base.. But, one generally adds a concentrated base or acid slowly to water, not the other
Re: Chemistry refresher course
2002-12-05 by slightlyoutoffocus
I don t recall any rules for ammonia, but there is one for acids. It is, simply, AAA...always add acid. I would guess the same would apply for ammonia.
Re: [Digital BW] Vuescan
2002-12-05 by Julian Thomas
I ll try that Steve, thanks Julian ... From: Steven Chambers To: Sent:
Re: Epson 1270/1280 vs. Canon S9000
2002-12-05 by Doug I.
Keith, Sounds like you are pleased with the Canon overall. Perhaps you can help. Although I love my Canon 35mm equipment, I wrote them off for any/all computer
Re: Convert to B&W plugins
2002-12-05 by Andy Levin
... Stanley: Isn t point is that shooting in digital color and converting using the plug-ins, channel mixer, etc, gives tremendous control over the output and
November print exchange results and thoughts
2002-12-05 by André Vallejo
Just received the november print package. Very instructive... Some of the prints really made hold my breath. David Gabbe,Alan Sanders,Andy Biggs,Gerald
RE: [Digital BW] Vuescan
2002-12-05 by Steven Chambers
Julian, As a fellow 1680 user I would agree. However I have noticed one significant difference when scanning at 1600 v 3200. It relates to post processing the
Re: [Digital BW] S9000 Printhead (was Epson vs. Canon)
2002-12-05 by Dan Honemann
... Service wrote: [re. Inkjetgoodies.com] ... Huh. I just searched the site and find no mention of Canon S9000 printers for sale. Or did you
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Why print at 2880 DPI
2002-12-05 by Shire,Stanley
Andrew: Is this true with all of the 2880 Epson printers? In the case of, lets say, the 2200 (a printer which would be used by the “higher-end,
Re: [Digital BW] S9000 Printhead (was Epson vs. Canon)
2002-12-05 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
... Nope I wiped one out with inks that were incorrectly recommended by a sales person... (Inks that WILL work in a BJ800 and since the S9000 uses the same
Chemistry refresher course
2002-12-05 by K2 Chittin
Can anyone please enlighten me? Add ammonia to water or water to ammonia ? I remember from school days that if you get it wrong ... :) Thanks K2
Re: Why print at 2880 DPI
2002-12-05 by Andrew Rodney
One thing many people don¹t know (and Epson may not make perfectly clear) is that when you print at 2880, you NO LONGER get variable ink droplet delivery! In
RE: [Digital BW] Developing Color Film?
2002-12-05 by Shire,Stanley
A few thoughts: 1. When the college is not open (and I don’t have a commercial c41 machine to run my film) I take it to a local custom lab (120 film $4.00).
Photo / EX / 700/ for B&W?
2002-12-05 by Matthew Born
I did pretty much just that, just to see if I d get some life out of my Photo Ex. I converted it to Lyson Quads. It gives me quite decent prints that by
Re: Why print at 2880 DPI
2002-12-05 by K2 Chittin
Jerry I only tried 2880 dpi once. Since 2880 isn t supported for matt paper, I used the PGPP setting but got prints that were much lighter. Due to the time
[Digital BW] Re: CIS and CFS carts
2002-12-05 by K2 Chittin
Jim ... Or ... port, ... I have no experience with refilling. I just didn t want to go there. However, I can t see why you couldn t fill from the top
Re: [Digital BW] Vuescan
2002-12-05 by Julian Thomas
As Ed explained it - and I m no expert on the math or mechanics - the res of the 1680 is 1600x3200. A full optical resolution is 1600, but you can go to 3200
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Why print at 2880 DPI
2002-12-05 by Alessandro Pardi
Jerry, I think it could simply be because at smaller sizes the fine detail of the image is, well, smaller, so it needs more resolution from the printer, and