Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Messages

Browse messages

Page 609 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched

Re: Monitor Calibration

2006-08-23 by John Vitollo

... It s a LCD but it runs on the VGA analogue signal, not the superior DVI digital signal.

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] Re: Cone v. MIS

2006-08-23 by Paul Roark

That message was not the one I had in mind. There is also at least one UC-based formula out there, I believe. With the advent of the LLK, we can probably make

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: 1280 BO printing looks too light

2006-08-23 by Clayton Jones

Hello Bob, ... That s exactly right, and there s nothing wrong about that approach. You hit upon a combination that works for you. But it might not work for

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Monitor Calibration

2006-08-23 by Craig Roberts

You may find the model number on the back of the monitor. You could then look up the specs on the Dell website s support pages. I also have an older Dell flat

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Firmwere for 9800

2006-08-23 by Mark Savoia

Don t go by the numbers only, check the dates of the firmware releases. Epson for some reason does not have a logical numbering system. You might already have

Thread view Attachments: 0

Firmwere for 9800

2006-08-23 by joaskild

I have a epson 9800 and notised there is a newer firmwere than I have. (i have SWO1761.800) the new one is SWO1965. I have calibrated the printer well and are

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Monitor Calibration

2006-08-23 by brian skipper

I can t speak to the color calibration but if your monitor is more than a 3 or 4 thick it definitely is not an LCD.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: r220 won't print with PhotoRag

2006-08-23 by how786

Yes. I ve had the same problem. I will never use the paper again. It ultimately blocks the feed mechanism on my 220, 2200 and also my 2400. I say ultimately

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: r220 won't print with PhotoRag

2006-08-23 by Chris Ellis

Chris I print on PhotoRag 308 with the r220. You have to help the paper through by resting your hand on its top edge as the printer pulls it from the feeder.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: r220 won't print with PhotoRag

2006-08-23 by Roger

It will feed, but might drive you batty. You need to support it as it goes in, but not push it so hard that it passes through all the way. Sometimes I get it

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Cone v. MIS

2006-08-23 by dlruckus

Daniela. Try Message #23225. It refers to a UC based Quad formula from Paul. Regards Duane

Thread view Attachments: 0

Monitor Calibration

2006-08-23 by coneyislandjim

I have a Dell 17 inch flat panal analog monitor. That is what Dell calls it in my paperwork. Am I correct that this is not LCD? Do I calibrate this with Huey

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: r220 won't print with PhotoRag

2006-08-23 by Clayton Jones

Hello Chris, ... Nudging too hard. Have to find just the right amount. I ve found it helps to bend a small amount of curl in the leading edge. Regards,

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: r220 won't print with PhotoRag

2006-08-23 by mkirschner

... even tried giving it a little ... Chris, I m not sure if this will work on your R220, but here s how I do it on the C86. I bend the paper slightly away

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: 1280 BO printing looks too light

2006-08-22 by Bob Michaels

Clayton, I certainly defer to you. I remember discussing the original concept while you were writing the articles. Based on your thoughts, I hit upon the

Thread view Attachments: 0

r220 won't print with PhotoRag

2006-08-22 by chriskjezp

I got Paul s sample paper pack from inksupply.com, and I m making several prints on different papers. All of them work fine... except for Photo Rag. The

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Paul's ICC profiles & r220

2006-08-22 by chriskjezp

... Today I ve been trying a mixture of Paul and Clayton s method. I m using Paul s ICC profile, but then manipulating the slider to cool or warm the print.

Thread view Attachments: 0

R220 Ink Change / Cleaning?

2006-08-22 by antoinedese

A very green newbie here, with a 220. I ve read the material on the MIS web site regarding ink compatability, but I m still unclear on just what needs to be

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: 1280 BO printing looks too light

2006-08-22 by Kevin

With my Dot Gain 20% image I almost always printed at Dot Gain 15% on the back end to get a better match. Also, make sure to uncheck high speed . I most

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: 1280 BO printing looks too light

2006-08-22 by Clayton Jones

Mo, ... I have never used one of those devices, so I can t comment on that. All I ve ever done is run the Adobe gamma program (and never needed to change

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: 1280 BO printing looks too light

2006-08-22 by mowens

I m starting to think it is the monitor too. If my RBG is 0,0,0 then I know it will be the area that prints absolute black. But the image as a whole may

Thread view Attachments: 0

Paul's ICC profiles & r220

2006-08-22 by chriskjezp

I have found that using Paul s ICC profiles for the r220 produce very pleasing results. Is there any way to alter the toning from neutral to cool or warm using

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Cone v. MIS

2006-08-22 by Tyler Boley

... are...green. That was a troublesome inkset for many. I have about 50 finished matted prints here made from them that, believe it or not, are still just

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] Cone v. MIS

2006-08-22 by Paul Roark

Daniela, It was on this list, but I don t know the message #. I did the exercise fairly early to be sure there was an alternative to MIS pigments in case

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Cone v. MIS

2006-08-22 by dgattarino

... inks. ... of the ... Hello Paul, where did you publish the formulas you mentioned in your post? I am doing several experiments myself and like to compare

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: 1280 BO printing looks too light

2006-08-22 by Clayton Jones

Hello Mo, ... Bob s question got me thinking...wondering if maybe your system is working properly, but perhaps something such as the particular

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: 1280 BO printing looks too light

2006-08-22 by Clayton Jones

Hello Bob, ... Yep, too late at night I guess. Same As Source for the printer (or back end ) profile is the key that makes that workflow so easy. It ensures

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] Cone v. MIS

2006-08-22 by Eric Neilsen

Ken, I was not a person in charge of ink buying at a studio that was invested in Cone Ink and software, but a user. The earlier Cone archival inks did indeed

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: 1280 BO printing looks too light

2006-08-22 by Bob Michaels

Isn t profile - same as source the problem? If working on a file that is DG20%, won t something like DG 10% as a printer profile be needed to match monitor

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] Cone v. MIS

2006-08-22 by Ken Carney

Tyler, This is very interesting. I have some old Cone prints that are...green. I think the idea was that they were to emulate bromide papers but, they were

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: 1280 BO printing looks too light

2006-08-22 by Clayton Jones

Hello Mo, ... Well I was just searching for any clues. Everything sounds fine, no red flags. Does the 1280 driver have an ink density setting of any sort?

Thread view Attachments: 0

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.