MIS VM printing
2003-12-02 by LaCheryl
I recently printed a b& w image using the standard Epson ink to compare with the MIS VM inks. This was my first attempt. The image I chose is of a person with
Messages
Browse messages
Page 1424 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
RE: [Digital BW] A snippet from a day in the life
2003-12-02 by jeffmoore17@comcast.net
Tom Baker wrote:
Re: [Digital BW] Re: New Tri-X: anyone seen?
2003-12-02 by Ken Schuster
I haven t read the article, but most photographers I know who use TX over expose at least a stop, and under develop about 10%. I ve done it that way for
Re: [Digital BW] New Tri-X: anyone seen?
2003-12-02 by Truman Prevatt
With medium format I was a big fan of the old Pan-X. A great film. You could get large format quality with a medium format camera. I think that Kodak put a
Re: [Digital BW] Paper for 8x12
2003-12-02 by awahlster
RAD, I have been talking about doing just this with 13X19 paper on the Photo.net forum for Digital printing I was trying to find out if the Canon i960 or i950
RE: [Digital BW] New Tri-X: anyone seen?
2003-12-02 by Paul Roark
... Never mind that Tri-X s characteristic curve shape was one reason it has remained so popular. The beginning of the end of traditional films has begun. Even
Injetmall and their new ICC's
2003-12-02 by flyfishingusa2002
Has anybody tried the new ICC s available from Injetmall yet? If so have you tried them with any compatible inksets? I currently use a 3000 with MIS FSN inks.
Re: [Digital BW] To all: please limit your postings to necessary lenght
2003-12-02 by flyfishingusa2002
The problem with this forum at the moment is that 80% of the posts have nothing to do with B/W printing. There are a lot of opinions about nothing and a lot of
Re: [Digital BW] Re: New Tri-X: anyone seen?
2003-12-02 by Mark Savoia
We are a photo lab and process hundreds of rolls of the new (almost 1 year old now) Tri-X. Our conclusion is that it is indeed slower, but other then that - it
Re: [Digital BW] UT-2 Preview
2003-12-01 by Mike Sommers
wow. so, what s your ballpark estimate on when the UT-2 inkset will be available for use with the 1280? I was about to purchase the UT-1 set (my 1280 arrived
2200 with MIS UT clog... I guess...
2003-12-01 by jsinger986
I m currently using the MIS UT inks in my 2200. I did a nozzle check today and I was getting gaps in the far right pattern. I made the mistake of thinking
Re: [Digital BW] Re: New Tri-X: anyone seen?
2003-12-01 by Truman Prevatt
I ve got a big stock of Tri-X 4x5 in the frig so was somewhat shocked today when I picked up a copy of View Camera and saw the article about Kodak, fixing
Re: New Tri-X: anyone seen?
2003-12-01 by jsinger986
Kodak already came out with a new Tri-x... at least 6-8 months ago... so I m guessing you are talking about that... at least I hope that s what you re talking
2200 with MIS UT clog... I guess...
2003-12-01 by jsinger986
I m currently using the MIS UT inks in my 2200. I did a nozzle check today and I was getting gaps in the far right pattern. I made the mistake of thinking
New Tri-X: anyone seen?
2003-12-01 by Truman Prevatt
I read today that Kodak as reformulated Tri-X to straighten out the S curve. Has anyone seen it and if so how much speed rating change and development
UT-2 Preview
2003-12-01 by Paul Roark
I think I have the final formula for this inkset, but I ll continue to test all week. On EEM, grayscale files print 0.02 units warm with the driver on the
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Banding on a scanner
2003-12-01 by daschkenas@aol.com
Chuck, the film ws plus X , not Tri x. My friend, whose scitex did the scans, told me it happens occasionally. Scitex gave a few reasons / solutions such as
MODERATOR REQUESTS & REMINDERS
2003-12-01 by Martin Wesley
To All Group Members, I would ask that people please remember that this is a forum dedicated to digital B&W printing. What I see too often are long threads
Re: [Digital BW] To all: please limit your postings to necessary lenght
2003-12-01 by Bob Frost
Ernst, Please don t! I don t read half your postings because I can t be bothered to scroll down through reams of old postings to get to your words of wisdom.
RE: [Digital BW] Re: B&W vs. Color
2003-12-01 by Robbe Gibson
Actually, with a 14n you get appx 60 RAW images on a 1 gig card. Robbe Gibson ... From: Bob Frost [mailto:bobfrost@btopenworld.com] Sent: Saturday, November
MIS Ultra Tone fade data
2003-12-01 by Paul Roark
MIS has put some fade data on its web page that might be of interest. See http://www.inksupply.com/index.cfm?source=html/utfadedata.html The data is
RE: [Digital BW] "Easy B&W"
2003-12-01 by Paul Roark
... When printing from grayscale, it will be close to the print. However, there is no preview of the tones. When curves are used to get the sepia tones or
Re: [Digital BW] CJ's Italian images... (for Paul)
2003-12-01 by Jack M Kucy
Thanks Paul, o grazzie mille per la tua nota. Ciao, Jack _________________________________________________ Jack M Kucy JMK Gallery (www.jmk-gallery.com)
Re: [Digital BW] Paper for 8x12
2003-12-01 by Conrad Weiser
If there were no Legal sized options, cutting down 13x19 was my next idea. I was just hoping for a single sheet solution, but if that s the best way to go
December Exchange FULL
2003-12-01 by Tom OConnell
Hi again- The December Exchange is now full. I will post a notice for January sign up later this week. Thanks for your support. Tom O Connell
Re: [Digital BW] Paper for 8x12
2003-12-01 by Mike Sommers
I buy 50 packs of 13 x 19 sheets and cut the paper down... resulting in two pieces that are 13 x 9.5 ... I center my 8 x 12 prints on that paper and trim
[Digital BW] Re: Anthony G. Atkielski vs CJ
2003-12-01 by px3n120x
... It is the only thing that matters unless one performs a test for the process. ... Usually people take, process and show photos for their estetical
Re: [Digital BW] Moving from Chemical to Digital
2003-12-01 by Tom Baker
There really doesn t seem to be any issues with the Epson printheads and OEM inks. So, your question might be whether the 7960 or 2200 provide better out of
RE: [Digital BW] Paper for 8x12
2003-12-01 by Paul Roark
European size A4 is close at 8 1/4 by 11 5/8. Paul www.PaulRoark.com ... From: Conrad Weiser [mailto:radimus@paonline.com] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003
Re: [Digital BW] Moving from Chemical to Digital
2003-12-01 by Lance Funderburk
You probably are right about these points. I would be ok with HP s papers, and I like the idea of getting a new printhead with every new ink cartridge. That
RE: Re[2]: [Digital BW] Re: Anthony G. Atkielski vs CJ
2003-12-01 by Paul D. DeRocco
... That s indeed what I do. But even in raw mode, there s a hard ceiling on the data, albeit a somewhat higher ceiling. It s surprising how often I encounter
RE: [Digital BW] CJ's Italian images...
2003-12-01 by Paul D. DeRocco
... Very nice stuff in your gallery. I especially like your NYC architectural shots. -- Ciao, Paul D. DeRocco Paul
RE: [Digital BW] PS CS
2003-12-01 by Paul D. DeRocco
... Big win for me. The full 16-bit processing (except for some of the special effect plugins) simplifies my workflow. The new Camera Raw works much better
Re: 1280 Status Monitor - Win XP
2003-12-01 by cschaible94111
Paul: Had the same problem. In addition to the driver, it is also necessary to download a new status monitor from Epson. Chuck ... my new ... driver.
Re: Banding on a scanner
2003-12-01 by cschaible94111
David: I recently (last Monday, I think) posted a message entitled Weird Scanning Artifacts (or something similar) that I would be grateful if you would go
Re: [Digital BW] Re: PS CS
2003-12-01 by john eckenrode
i second everything clayton says 16 bit editing is a joy, much easier than the old workarounds, reason enough to upgrade for me. john e ...
Re: [Digital BW] To all: please limit your postings to necessary lenght
2003-12-01 by Ernst Dinkla
... From: Eileen Chun To: Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 5:54 PM Subject: Re:
Paper for 8x12
2003-12-01 by Conrad Weiser
Can anyone recommend inkjet papers for 8x12 s? I guess the closest standard size would be Legal, but the only choices I know of in that size are Canon Bubble
Re[2]: [Digital BW] Re: Anthony G. Atkielski vs CJ
2003-12-01 by Anthony G. Atkielski
... That s kind of what I was thinking, although pulling shadows out of noise seems like not much more than the lesser of two considerable evils. ... What
RE: [Digital BW] Why so coarse grain?
2003-12-01 by Paul D. DeRocco
... But you re explicitly doing in Photoshop exactly what the Epson driver does anyway. When you pile the Epson dithering on top of the PS dithering, you re
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Anthony G. Atkielski vs CJ
2003-12-01 by Paul D. DeRocco
... The usual reason for such underexposure is that digicams clip highlights hard, but shadows just descend into the noise. Therefore, you can generally fix
Re: PS CS
2003-12-01 by Stephen Kobrin
Thanks to both you and Alan. Now that I have upgraded my computer it sounds like it is time to upgrade PS. Steve ... without ... important ... usable
RE: Re[2]: [Digital BW] Banding on a scanner
2003-12-01 by Alan Zinn
... I don t see the bands - can you describe them? location, frequency, etc? AZ Build a Lookaround! The Lookaround Book, 2nd ed. NOW SHIPPING
RE: Re[2]: [Digital BW] Banding on a scanner
2003-12-01 by Alan Zinn
... Daniel, I ve never seen banding using my 3200 on color and b/w pan negs. Are they are consistent or random bands? Do you hear uneven noise while
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Anthony G. Atkielski vs CJ
2003-12-01 by Anthony G. Atkielski
... I find them aesthetically pleasing overall, and well composed, if that matters. I had not originally offered any comment on that aspect of the photos. I
Re: "Easy B&W"
2003-12-01 by mccarvill
Paul, would you expect that the UT-2 inkset would eliminate the bronzing that s evident with UT-1 and RC / glossy papers? Thanks ... the ... inksets. ... carts
Re: [Digital BW] Moving from Chemical to Digital
2003-12-01 by Alan Zinn
... Lance, The B/W HP prints I saw were OK but no better than Epson. The color was only fair but store samples are not too reliable. I wasn t able to check for
Re: [Digital BW] To all: please limit your postings to necessary lenght
2003-12-01 by Eileen Chun
A good idea to add would be to delete the Yahoo Sponsor Group and below portion of the text as well. It can get a little overwhelming if you have to scroll
To all: please limit your postings to necessary lenght
2003-12-01 by Bernhard Ess
Hello, rules and regulations are certainly not the most important thing in life, but some are quite reasonable: Like the one about quoting. The traffic on this
Re: PS CS
2003-12-01 by Clayton Jones
Hello Steve, ... I m very happy with it. No problems on installation and works without a hitch. Being able to do everything in 16 bit is the most important